Moderator: Community Team


Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Nope. If chap is town, then you and blacky are scum. Not me. It actually makes sense to lynch chap if we're not a LYLO.Skoffin wrote: Well if chap is town then you are scum, because you or me are scum based on chasps claim (unless tobi was the scum result)
But looks like chap may not be coming back per tx's comment. I hope nothing serious has happened to him.
I'll reiterate: If chap is town, blacky is scum. It's a done deal. Don't blame me if we lynch the wrong one. I have not access to anymore information that you guys on those two (except for the FACT that one of them is scum). Moreover, as stated above, if chap is indeed town, he claimed that either Skoffin or I is/am (?) scum.BuJaber wrote:On the other hand chap and ragian have a soft guilty on each other in a roundabout sort of way, means it makes sense to lynch chap first (since ragian is more believable) but to then turn on ragian if chap flips town. Because in that scenario ragian's claim becomes a little suspicious.. like what if he's setting up both of them to die?




Razorvich wrote:High Score: 2569
TeeGee has my PW... Wall him if I get below 1 Hour in CLAN GAMES ONLY !!

Skoffin wrote:I don't know why you are so worried ragoo, chap will almost certainly come up scum. once he does that mostly clears you and me, which validates your report and we lynch blacky. After that it will just be 1 scum which is one of the people who are currently holding off voting chap. Someone among serius, beast, pika or tx.
I don't know. It doesn't state so explicitly. So it's an assumption. I don't know if it's warranted.ZaBeast wrote:Rage, am I correct in assuming your poisoning also prevents the person who targeted you from taking its night action?


I want chapcrap's replacement to fill out this form.Razorvich wrote:PLEASE.... can people compile a list of questions that you want to from Chap.
I'm certain on blacky if chap comes up town. I'm leaning chap over blacky now, but all I know is that one of them is scum.Skoffin wrote: Wait I am confused - ragoo what was youre basis for being certain on blacky? your report says one of them is scum right? Why can't it be chap?
Ask yourself this - which people are voting chap now? Why has it taken so long to get any other votes on him? Do you think all the scum are currently voting chap and it's just townies lingering?

I do not believe this is fair... give whoever comes in a chance to catch up before making demands like this.Pikanchion wrote:I want chapcrap's replacement to fill out this form.Razorvich wrote:PLEASE.... can people compile a list of questions that you want to from Chap.
Role Title:
—
Night Action Role:
Night Action:
Bonus Action:
—
Favourite Food:
Species:
—
N1 Action & Results:
—
N2 Action & Results:
—
N3 Action & Results:
—
N4 Action & Results:
—
Other Information:
—
Nomination for the next player to claim:
So I'm not forgetting myself, then?Sirius Kase wrote:At least you claimed. I don't think everyone has.

Yet you feel it is fair to be voting for this person, and felt the plan had enough support to claim accordingly yourself?blacky365 wrote:I do not believe this is fair... give whoever comes in a chance to catch up before making demands like this.
And also not everyone has agreed with your plan so hold off on it for now
No, I voted Chap before he went MIA, however you are correct in that I should UNVOTE to allow his replacement adequate time to catch up.Pikanchion wrote:Yet you feel it is fair to be voting for this person, and felt the plan had enough support to claim accordingly yourself?blacky365 wrote:I do not believe this is fair... give whoever comes in a chance to catch up before making demands like this.
And also not everyone has agreed with your plan so hold off on it for now
I wanted chapcrap to answer this before we realised that chapcrap was missing and I'm holding the replacement to the same standards. In fact, you voted chapcrap only after this fact was pointed out, and are thereby holding the replacement to a harsher standard.
Have you?Sirius Kase wrote:At least you claimed. I don't think everyone has.
Fully claimed that is?TX AG 90 wrote:Have you?Sirius Kase wrote:At least you claimed. I don't think everyone has.