Conquer Club

Molacole wrote:lol yeah I'm sure you do, but I seem to be a patronizing smart ass when I know I'm right and somebody argues with me about it.

deadbeat or no deadbeat it all comes down to current active members. If the top 50 players on the site quit the overall average of the community would take a huge blow to win loss percentage.

I'll agree to disagree only to stop the argueing in the post, but for nothing else.

Well, I can agree with you on this. I know that in Robinette's first post she was referring to the average of all players that have played the game. But an average of current active players would be more reflective of the true average win%.

You want to know the real kicker though? Since most of the people that are affecting the average win% are deadbeats (as shown in all the examples you guys have stated) the current active players should have an average win% OVER their chance of winning (1/6). So having below that number makes your statistics look even worse for that game type.

tahitiwahini wrote:

Molacole wrote:I actually considered replyiing to your response with an explination, but I realized you'll just stop posting when you realize how dumb you look. Go check that other thread because you never answered my question lol get lost little timmy:lol:

Well, you're showing tremendous progress Molacole. You've admitted to being a patronizing smart ass. Now if we can just get you to work on putting more emphasis on the "smart" and less on the "ass" we will be able to tolerate the patronizing better.

Here's the thread Molacole wants everyone to check out:
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=16296

It is a dazzling display of patronizing smart assery, I have to give him props about that.

tahitwit you do realize this is a thread about super elite and your opinions don't mean much here... anyways this following me around crap is kind of creepy so feel free to stop you weirdo

sully800 wrote:

Molacole wrote:lol yeah I'm sure you do, but I seem to be a patronizing smart ass when I know I'm right and somebody argues with me about it.

deadbeat or no deadbeat it all comes down to current active members. If the top 50 players on the site quit the overall average of the community would take a huge blow to win loss percentage.

I'll agree to disagree only to stop the argueing in the post, but for nothing else.

Well, I can agree with you on this. I know that in Robinette's first post she was referring to the average of all players that have played the game. But an average of current active players would be more reflective of the true average win%.

You want to know the real kicker though? Since most of the people that are affecting the average win% are deadbeats (as shown in all the examples you guys have stated) the current active players should have an average win% OVER their chance of winning (1/6). So having below that number makes your statistics look even worse for that game type.

I hated statistics in school and now I'm duscussing them on the internet over a game I like.

wicked wrote:Well let's see I've won ~87.78932716% of games on the Brazil map, so obviously I'm the best Brazil map player here, right? Because sample size doesn't matter!

I was 15-0 on it. I should have tried out before my sample size got big and I started losing.

but still.

I'm one of the highest ranked players on CC. If there were no team games I'd be in the top 5. I've maintained my score for a while now and I only play against the best players CC has to offer. Still no invitation to try out.

Kid_A wrote:I'm one of the highest ranked players on CC. If there were no team games I'd be in the top 5. I've maintained my score for a while now and I only play against the best players CC has to offer. Still no invitation to try out.

Seriously? Then I call major shenanigans on the SE gatekeepers.

Kid_A wrote:I'm one of the highest ranked players on CC. If there were no team games I'd be in the top 5. I've maintained my score for a while now and I only play against the best players CC has to offer. Still no invitation to try out.

It's because you get all your points beating n00bs like me

tahitiwahini wrote:

Molacole wrote:I actually considered replyiing to your response with an explination, but I realized you'll just stop posting when you realize how dumb you look. Go check that other thread because you never answered my question lol get lost little timmy:lol:

Well, you're showing tremendous progress Molacole. You've admitted to being a patronizing smart ass. Now if we can just get you to work on putting more emphasis on the "smart" and less on the "ass" we will be able to tolerate the patronizing better.

Here's the thread Molacole wants everyone to check out:
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=16296

It is a dazzling display of patronizing smart assery, I have to give him props about that.

Now we're just waiting for tahitiwahini to admit that he's a patronizing smart ass. But that will be the day when pigs fly I guess...

alstergren wrote:

tahitiwahini wrote:

Molacole wrote:I actually considered replyiing to your response with an explination, but I realized you'll just stop posting when you realize how dumb you look. Go check that other thread because you never answered my question lol get lost little timmy:lol:

Well, you're showing tremendous progress Molacole. You've admitted to being a patronizing smart ass. Now if we can just get you to work on putting more emphasis on the "smart" and less on the "ass" we will be able to tolerate the patronizing better.

Here's the thread Molacole wants everyone to check out:
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=16296

It is a dazzling display of patronizing smart assery, I have to give him props about that.

Now we're just waiting for tahitiwahini to admit that he's a patronizing smart ass. But that will be the day when pigs fly I guess...

I was merely taking advantage of a rare opportunity to agree with something Molacole said about himself, that he's a patronizing smart ass. And to offer my congratulations on the progress he demonstrated on his journey of self-awareness. I stand ready to offer the same positive reinforcement to you if and when the opportunity presents itself.

Ditto.

But again… I have no high hopes that such an opportunity will present itself to me anytime soon…

Kid_A wrote:I'm one of the highest ranked players on CC. If there were no team games I'd be in the top 5. I've maintained my score for a while now and I only play against the best players CC has to offer. Still no invitation to try out.

Noob

Kid_A wrote:I'm one of the highest ranked players on CC. If there were no team games I'd be in the top 5. I've maintained my score for a while now and I only play against the best players CC has to offer. Still no invitation to try out.

I never heard of you

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:I never heard of you

It's because he mainly plays singles

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:

Kid_A wrote:I'm one of the highest ranked players on CC. If there were no team games I'd be in the top 5. I've maintained my score for a while now and I only play against the best players CC has to offer. Still no invitation to try out.

I never heard of you

let me clarify.

I only play against the best singles players CC has to offer. You play all team games and I play all singles.

Genghis Khan CA wrote:

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:I never heard of you

It's because he mainly plays singles

oh

well anybody can do that

Kid_A wrote:

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:

Kid_A wrote:I'm one of the highest ranked players on CC. If there were no team games I'd be in the top 5. I've maintained my score for a while now and I only play against the best players CC has to offer. Still no invitation to try out.

I never heard of you

let me clarify.

I only play against the best singles players CC has to offer. You play all team games and I play all singles.

still never heard of you.

I played atleast double the amount of single games than you. In fact, I won more singles than you played in total.

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:

Kid_A wrote:

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:

Kid_A wrote:I'm one of the highest ranked players on CC. If there were no team games I'd be in the top 5. I've maintained my score for a while now and I only play against the best players CC has to offer. Still no invitation to try out.

I never heard of you

let me clarify.

I only play against the best singles players CC has to offer. You play all team games and I play all singles.

still never heard of you.

I played at least double the amount of single games than you. In fact, I won more singles than you played in total.

You're currently in about 800 games. 3 singles the rest team games with almost all low rank opponents. Perhaps I wasn't a member back when you played singles games. 95% of my opponents are on page 1.
I wasn't asking for JOHNNYROCKET24's recognition or rudeness, I was simply expressing an interest in the Super Elite Games.

200 hundred games. My games are open to the public and whoever wants to join. There are plenty of players over 2,500 in those games. I cant control who joins unless I add everyone to my ignore list. I wasnt being rude, I just said I never heard of you.

If the super elite want to add you to there group... congrats.

How do you cope with 183 games JR?? it would kill me I think...

David_Wain wrote:How do you cope with 183 games JR?? it would kill me I think...

clapper passed me for most games played. i want my record back. Next up, I will be setting up 500 doubles games. That will complete the circut for most wins in all 3 catagories. Singles, Doubles, Triples. Within this group of games, I will pass Blitz for the highest wining percentage. I think he said he has a 71% and will claim the number 1 ranking. ....... sorry Jork. And last but not least, I will do this without being part of the super elite.... lol !

Blitz set some goals to accomplish for himself. These are mine.

so you can never join a doubles or triples game?