Conquer Club

pimpdave wrote:mod edit

EvilPurpleMonkey wrote:I was intrigued by the title, thinking this thread would be some little joke. I just skimmed over the thread, and I have a few comments, and one question.

Some of the artwork here is of surprising quality to me, which makes me think that these people take this stuff seriously, and it is my opinion that anything that a group as large as "yiffers" takes seriously should be considered a respected opinion, and should be treated as such. If some people enjoy looking at these pics, let them. Who is harmed by this niche in the furry subculture?

If an opinion is worth respecting, it is deserving of a well reasoned counter-argument, not a bunch of pictures of projectile vomiting, and a few dozen slurs being thrown around.

And, how many people here, excluding yiffers, actually find the projectile vomiting more offensive than the "yiffy" pics? I do.

sheepofdumb wrote:
This is just the soft stuff. There is much more disturbing things in the fandom. But there's a lot of quality to that stuff. Just go in knowing that furries aren't just sex starved perverts who get off to animals. There's a lot of respectable furs. Lawyers, doctors, you name it. They also make a lot of creative, clean, quality art. Lucari got sort of a counter-argument in me chewing him out for giving furs a bad light. So I think we are good there.

EvilPurpleMonkey wrote:WHERE ARE THE MODS!
Really, that obviously violates forum rules.

...Maybe all the mods are too afraid to come in here...

MeDeFe wrote:

EvilPurpleMonkey wrote:WHERE ARE THE MODS!
Really, that obviously violates forum rules.

...Maybe all the mods are too afraid to come in here...

Well, it's not "real" the way a photography or photoship is so it might not really violate the rules, but someone will probably be banned anyway.

EvilPurpleMonkey wrote:

MeDeFe wrote:

EvilPurpleMonkey wrote:WHERE ARE THE MODS!
Really, that obviously violates forum rules.

...Maybe all the mods are too afraid to come in here...

Well, it's not "real" the way a photography or photoshop is so it might not really violate the rules, but someone will probably be banned anyway.

...Really? Is that a loophole?

Nudity and sexual material are not allowed.


Any images or textual descriptions of sexual activity or nudity - nipples, areola, genitals, anuses etc - whether intended as artistic, erotic, pornographic or otherwise are not allowed.
This includes content posted here and links to other sites. Posting NSFW - "Not Suitable For Work" - does not make it ok for posting.
If it is ambiguous, we'll ask you to remove it anyway, so "It's a guy's nipple" isn't going to fly. You're just trying to be annoying at that point.
Posting a painting from the 13th century with exposed nipples to claim that we're evil dictators when we ask you to remove it is also just being annoying, and you're probably just being a troll at that point.

Serbia wrote:Saw it.

john9blue wrote:

Serbia wrote:Saw it.

Saved it. Kidding.

john9blue wrote:

Serbia wrote:Saw it.

Saved it. Kidding.

hecter wrote:

john9blue wrote:

Serbia wrote:Saw it.

Saved it. Kidding.

Really? I would have... Just so I could freak the shit out of other people. I have a lot of images for that purpose.

Lucarilover240 wrote:

hecter wrote:

john9blue wrote:

Serbia wrote:Saw it.

Saved it. Kidding.

Really? I would have... Just so I could freak the shit out of other people. I have a lot of images for that purpose.

(strengthens thread defenses)