Moderator: Community Team
Since virtually everyone wanting to play is already in the game, you might have to bend your rule a little if you want a sub. Benga has played on here before, I guess just not in a game you were in alsomandalorian2298 wrote:On the subject of sub: I would really prefer it if all the players were people whom I played with at least once. No offense to bengi.

Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.

Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
Just kidding. Made you look, didn't I?mandalorian2298 wrote:Crapcrapcrapcrap! I accidentely sent Talapus role to Mets!!!

Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
mandalorian2298 wrote: Spamers, beware.
Joking in the thread is fine, but don’t let it get carried away and take over as spam.

Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
After reviewing the play, the ruling on field stands. NO SPAM!WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:mandalorian2298 wrote: Spamers, beware.
Joking in the thread is fine, but don’t let it get carried away and take over as spam.

Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
This here seems (to me at least) even more suspicious than Tim. Assuming anything concrete about factions in a non standard game is scummy at worst and dangerous at best. There's been mentions of pokemon, trainers, and team rocket so far. That's at least 3. I can't help thinking that this is an attempt to gain early town credit for future use.Skittles! wrote: Idk if they are new to mafia or just not sure how to go about discussing who may be the baddie here (obvs Team Rocket and whoever leads them), but it just seems suss.
This is a good question.Skittles! wrote:Also Serb, why did you think you were going to be the aggressive, rage filled player?
He lives like two doors down from you. Just go to his house and play mafia and then let him sub.mandalorian2298 wrote:On the subject of sub: I would really prefer it if all the players were people whom I played with at least once. No offense to bengi.
You and dakky are missing the point. It doesn't matter what "they" think. It matters what you think.new guy1 wrote:My main suspect, if serious votes were to start, would be Tim due to the clash of his emotions compared to when he jumped on dakky (even messed up his name in his haste to jump on him about the mention of Team Rocket) and then as Serbia said, just kind of nonchalantly walked it back as a "pushing his buttons" kind of tactic, which he gave up after dakky made one post. He didn't make any effort to bring it back up to confirm his theory that dakky was dodging the question, not just forgetting to mention it. The two situations seemed conflicting in an odd way. I'm still getting used to dakky, but I came up on this forum in a time when pushing past the joke votes of day 1 to start into serious talk immediately was normally frowned upon, so his pushing past joke voting is something that I take into account, though I'm not sure what to make of it due to not playing enough games with him. It just rubs me wrong, not enough for a vote or fos, because nobody has challenged it as being outside of his meta, but enough to mention for my reference.
Vote Tim due to the above reasoning, and because I'm unsure as to if the joke vote phase has ended or not. It's kind of in that twilight period where half the players are talking seriously and the other half are still clinging to joke voting.

Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.

Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
Sorry Sir, but you are wrong. There were some decent pokemon after Gen 2 (Gogoat!) but it mostly has not been the same. Pretty much all the legendaries after then have been garbage, too. Just accept it.Fircoal wrote:
I know you're lying because Pokemon after Gen 2 is still amazing. Every gen of Pokemon is great even Gen 3. Look at my cute avatar. LOOK AT IT.
I'm not sure I understand your point about Skittles; which part of his comment was an assumption about factions? Could you clarify?BuJaber wrote:This here seems (to me at least) even more suspicious than Tim. Assuming anything concrete about factions in a non standard game is scummy at worst and dangerous at best. There's been mentions of pokemon, trainers, and team rocket so far. That's at least 3. I can't help thinking that this is an attempt to gain early town credit for future use.Skittles! wrote: Idk if they are new to mafia or just not sure how to go about discussing who may be the baddie here (obvs Team Rocket and whoever leads them), but it just seems suss.
Unvote Vote Skittles
This is a good question.Skittles! wrote:Also Serb, why did you think you were going to be the aggressive, rage filled player?


You might be unfamiliar with some of my work in the main forums - I am an occasionally aggressive, rage filled poster. This comment therefore actually had little to do with mafia, and everything to do with my recent posting habits here on CC.Skittles! wrote:Also Serb, why did you think you were going to be the aggressive, rage filled player?
TimWoodbury wrote:Reason i gave up so to say on dakky is because he ignored the question so no reason right now to keep hounding on a simple thing. Like i said in my last one im currwntly giving dakk a pass because he currently claims keyword here is claims to be looking for and hunting rockets
That being said, look at the underlined, and the bold in particular. We have been told claims of any kind will be suicidal. And interestingly, Tim tries to get dakky to claim in the earliest hours of Day 1. This could be purely coincidental, and reckless, or could be a genius scum tactic - Tim, being Rocket himself, has identified a target for himself and his scum buddies.TimWoodbury wrote:Awww thank you hotshot how nice to give benafit of tje doubt. Funny how the 1 game i try to get lynched i failed to secure it but every game i trynot to i manage to get lynched so maybe i need to start trying to be lynched to be kept alive idk
dakky21 wrote:And btw Serb, you are allowed to voted mandy, but that would be scummy just as is DY's voting Confirm. Actually, even mentioning you'd vote Mandy is scummy. If you don't care who will you vote, then you must be Team Rocket. I'll keep my vote on DY's joke confirm but you're the serious candidate now for something more real.
So in reality, it was DAKKY who automatically accused me of being Rocket. Tim followed it up with a question, which once ignored he let lie. My opinion? With Tim, I think it more likely he was legitimately asking the question, then moving on. With dakky, I'm not as confident. Maybe HE'S the Scum Genius immediately looking for a claim, since he's the one who actually brought it up. He's also the one who revenge voted me (scummy) and is throwing suspicions around like party favors, which also feels reckless and scummy. For now, my vote stands.TimWoodbury wrote:Doom why mention team rocket who says they even in the game are you team rocket??
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE

Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.

Posting about spam without posting anything else is real great if you want to look like you are participating without actually doing anything. Do more than leave a quote. And don't be a rules Nazi...WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:mandalorian2298 wrote: Spamers, beware.
Joking in the thread is fine, but don’t let it get carried away and take over as spam.
So you are a trainer? Well golly gee. Let's put a big ol' target on you... Or maybe not. Maybe we are all trainers. But what you just said guarantees you are 1) lying to get info or 2) admiting your role... I don't like either choice.Minister Masket wrote:
Where was Pokemon roles mentioned? I assumed it would all be trainers. Then again my memory of the Indigo series is very fuzzy. I know there've been loads of trainers introduced over the years but perhaps there weren't that many way back then.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
So Minister Masket assumes it would be all trainers, and then you say maybe we are all trainers... and accuse Minister of addmiting his role while you do the same thing?Anarkistsdream wrote:So you are a trainer? Well golly gee. Let's put a big ol' target on you... Or maybe not. Maybe we are all trainers. But what you just said guarantees you are 1) lying to get info or 2) admiting your role... I don't like either choice.Minister Masket wrote:
Where was Pokemon roles mentioned? I assumed it would all be trainers. Then again my memory of the Indigo series is very fuzzy. I know there've been loads of trainers introduced over the years but perhaps there weren't that many way back then.
Minister Masket wrote:[Bugcatcher Kwanton wants to battle!]
[Send out Pikachu?]
[Yes]
Go Pikachu! Use Thunderbolt on Kwanton!
[It's super eff-]
Oh uhh...ahem...excuse me...
Vote Kwanton because he voted himself and that's always suspicious.
Where was Pokemon roles mentioned? I assumed it would all be trainers. Then again my memory of the Indigo series is very fuzzy. I know there've been loads of trainers introduced over the years but perhaps there weren't that many way back then.


Are you joking? Or serious?Anarkistsdream wrote:Posting about spam without posting anything else is real great if you want to look like you are participating without actually doing anything. Do more than leave a quote. And don't be a rules Nazi...WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:mandalorian2298 wrote: Spamers, beware.
Joking in the thread is fine, but don’t let it get carried away and take over as spam.