Conquer Club

safariguy5 wrote:

vodean wrote:Thor is by definition important.

I am the victim here.

if im not making much sense its cuz its very very late here and im sleeping already.

Again, you're not the mod, unless you have solid role PM proof or something like that, it's not a factual statement.

Sure, he could be important, and sure, there's a good probability that he has other night powers, but saying that Thor is important just because he's Thor and therefore has a power role doesn't say much.

Remember, we're all supposed to be GODS, we're ALL important. Comics and DC Universe movies aside, Thor happens to be the most well known of the gods, but not necessarily the most important.

i DO have a role PM. i cant quote it, as per the OP, and i really dont want to reveal more than i have to, but i do have it. im not sure why you are so interested in it...

vodean wrote:

safariguy5 wrote:

vodean wrote:Thor is by definition important.

I am the victim here.

if im not making much sense its cuz its very very late here and im sleeping already.

Again, you're not the mod, unless you have solid role PM proof or something like that, it's not a factual statement.

Sure, he could be important, and sure, there's a good probability that he has other night powers, but saying that Thor is important just because he's Thor and therefore has a power role doesn't say much.

Remember, we're all supposed to be GODS, we're ALL important. Comics and DC Universe movies aside, Thor happens to be the most well known of the gods, but not necessarily the most important.

i DO have a role PM. i cant quote it, as per the OP, and i really dont want to reveal more than i have to, but i do have it. im not sure why you are so interested in it...

i think what he is saying your not the mod or thor therefore you have no real proof that thor is of importance

Some7hingCLEVER wrote:

vodean wrote:

safariguy5 wrote:

vodean wrote:Thor is by definition important.

I am the victim here.

if im not making much sense its cuz its very very late here and im sleeping already.

Again, you're not the mod, unless you have solid role PM proof or something like that, it's not a factual statement.

Sure, he could be important, and sure, there's a good probability that he has other night powers, but saying that Thor is important just because he's Thor and therefore has a power role doesn't say much.

Remember, we're all supposed to be GODS, we're ALL important. Comics and DC Universe movies aside, Thor happens to be the most well known of the gods, but not necessarily the most important.

i DO have a role PM. i cant quote it, as per the OP, and i really dont want to reveal more than i have to, but i do have it. im not sure why you are so interested in it...

i think what he is saying your not the mod or thor therefore you have no real proof that thor is of importance

since i'm masoned to him, i DO!! thats what ive been saying. we got ONE role PM.

vodean wrote:

Some7hingCLEVER wrote:

vodean wrote:

safariguy5 wrote:

vodean wrote:Thor is by definition important.

I am the victim here.

if im not making much sense its cuz its very very late here and im sleeping already.

Again, you're not the mod, unless you have solid role PM proof or something like that, it's not a factual statement.

Sure, he could be important, and sure, there's a good probability that he has other night powers, but saying that Thor is important just because he's Thor and therefore has a power role doesn't say much.

Remember, we're all supposed to be GODS, we're ALL important. Comics and DC Universe movies aside, Thor happens to be the most well known of the gods, but not necessarily the most important.

i DO have a role PM. i cant quote it, as per the OP, and i really dont want to reveal more than i have to, but i do have it. im not sure why you are so interested in it...

i think what he is saying your not the mod or thor therefore you have no real proof that thor is of importance

since i'm masoned to him, i DO!! thats what ive been saying. we got ONE role PM.

oh i didnt know thats how mason role pm works lol

vodean wrote:

Some7hingCLEVER wrote:
i think what he is saying your not the mod or thor therefore you have no real proof that thor is of importance

since i'm masoned to him, i DO!! thats what ive been saying. we got ONE role PM.

I think the problem is, that saf isn't buying your claim.

i claimed mason. without a counter-claim (it would be worth it to expose anyone to kill a mafia), i think theres not much to be said.

vodean wrote:

Some7hingCLEVER wrote:

vodean wrote:

safariguy5 wrote:

vodean wrote:Thor is by definition important.

I am the victim here.

if im not making much sense its cuz its very very late here and im sleeping already.

Again, you're not the mod, unless you have solid role PM proof or something like that, it's not a factual statement.

Sure, he could be important, and sure, there's a good probability that he has other night powers, but saying that Thor is important just because he's Thor and therefore has a power role doesn't say much.

Remember, we're all supposed to be GODS, we're ALL important. Comics and DC Universe movies aside, Thor happens to be the most well known of the gods, but not necessarily the most important.

i DO have a role PM. i cant quote it, as per the OP, and i really dont want to reveal more than i have to, but i do have it. im not sure why you are so interested in it...

i think what he is saying your not the mod or thor therefore you have no real proof that thor is of importance

since i'm masoned to him, i DO!! thats what ive been saying. we got ONE role PM.

Everytime I have played the mason I have gotten my own role aside from the other one and while we shared actions we each had our own special which is causing me some grief in what you are saying. However there is nothing more to gain out of you since what you have said appears to be everything. So I take it that you are town aligned then?

Djfireside wrote: So I take it that you are town aligned then?

really? you ask this now ? YES!!! i am town.
FOS DJ for skimming

I wasnt skimming, I just wanted to hear you say it. I believe you claim as you leave yourself open to too much to be lying. Plus with how you reacted to various parts to pressure. I can see how you can go over the top but feel you are clear. I also believe that you should not give out more information as you have given all that you can and if you do house both roles which you probabally do leaking out thor would be bad.

As for Saf's claim against you, I can see how it started and continued but OMGUS's the vote back is just keeping it going. Jonty jumped the L-2 pressure push which is fine despite the conversation but keeps dropping one liners to further the situation and draw attention back to the debate while most appear to be letting it rest.

jonty125 wrote:

vodean wrote:

Some7hingCLEVER wrote:
i think what he is saying your not the mod or thor therefore you have no real proof that thor is of importance

since i'm masoned to him, i DO!! thats what ive been saying. we got ONE role PM.

I think the problem is, that saf isn't buying your claim.

I dont see anything on Saf for right now and believe Vod so going with next part I see going on

Vote Jonty

I don't really see it, I've read through the last few pages a few times, can you explain better how jonty's posts incite the situation?

Same as /, I don't see how I said anything against saf, in the posts you have quoted.

jonty125 wrote:Same as /, I don't see how I said anything against saf, in the posts you have quoted.

to me you seem a little iffy, but then again, it seems like i see you as iffy in matrix as well, so maybe your meta pisses me off. given my situation, i cant really complain if thats the case. i do think you might be worth looking into, but lets see if anyone comes up with a better case first.

Yeah I don't see what you are trying to say abotu Jonty at all from that post...honestly at this point I believe you are town. I just haven't decided who makes the next best case. I don't think there's much evidence for a Saf case. I would have to go back and look what was said about jonty earlier and no one else has stood out to me yet.

i dont think that there's a great case against saf, but i DO think that its better than the case against me atm, and people are still pushing me.

As I am reading through the list I may have seen more than I thought but figured I would give some synapsis of at least what I thought I saw.

jonty125 wrote:

strike wolf wrote:

strike wolf wrote:I don't recall when saying you're a power role in a non-vanilla game Gives you a free pass. especially as he's basically said he's not the doc or the cop.

Ebwop in bold.

Well I thought vodean could be bluffing about cop (not doc) but that's just WIFOM unvote vote vodean. L-2, claim time.

Came off a statement of not sure whether to pressure the L-2 as everyone is discussing to pushing it, I agree thats fine made a choice and went with it. Have no quams there.

jonty125 wrote:unvote I have no reason not to believe the claim, thinking out loud, could Sif be an enabler for Thor, and could Thor be a vig or summat?

Here is where I read more into it than I guess I thought was there. Unvotes from the claim which is fine

jonty125 wrote:

vodean wrote:i could tell you that thor has a power-role, but i wont since you wouldn't believe me anyway.

Anyone else think this is contradictory?

But now keeps pushing the attention back on Vodean while taking a side seat with quick one liners bringing everything back up. Already dropped the vote but keeps the pressure on him from the sidelines

jonty125 wrote:

vodean wrote:

Some7hingCLEVER wrote:
i think what he is saying your not the mod or thor therefore you have no real proof that thor is of importance

since i'm masoned to him, i DO!! thats what ive been saying. we got ONE role PM.

I think the problem is, that saf isn't buying your claim.

I took this much like the last one but this may just be more informational which as I was reading took it as such. I guess their one line responses normally catch me off since appears to be sliding along each time but may not be the intention.

thats pretty much where im at too

vodean wrote:i dont think that there's a great case against saf, but i DO think that its better than the case against me atm, and people are still pushing me.

Where? Where are people still pushing you? If you're going to get insulted and play the victim every time you're forced to claim, how do you expect to finish any mafia game? Honestly, you're coming off as being unhappy about being forced to claim and blaming me for it.

Djfireside wrote:I took this much like the last one but this may just be more informational which as I was reading took it as such. I guess their one line responses normally catch me off since appears to be sliding along each time but may not be the intention.

Sorry, if my one liners are setting off scumdars but my thoughts often revolve around 1 or 2 sentences. Short and sweet.

jonty125 wrote:

Djfireside wrote:I took this much like the last one but this may just be more informational which as I was reading took it as such. I guess their one line responses normally catch me off since appears to be sliding along each time but may not be the intention.

Sorry, if my one liners are setting off scumdars but my thoughts often revolve around 1 or 2 sentences. Short and sweet.

ya after playig a few games with him i have to agree he does post short ones with long ones from time to tie. just his play style.

safariguy5 wrote:

vodean wrote:i dont think that there's a great case against saf, but i DO think that its better than the case against me atm, and people are still pushing me.

Where? Where are people still pushing you? If you're going to get insulted and play the victim every time you're forced to claim, how do you expect to finish any mafia game? Honestly, you're coming off as being unhappy about being forced to claim and blaming me for it.

This is true, there's not as much pressure on vodean as there was, but that doesn't mean that the pressure was warranted in the first place. I'd be pretty pissed if I had to claim D1 just because of someone's presuppositions about me.

I'm not saying it wasn't entirely his fault. The initial pressure certainly wasn't.

pancakemix wrote:

safariguy5 wrote:

vodean wrote:i dont think that there's a great case against saf, but i DO think that its better than the case against me atm, and people are still pushing me.

Where? Where are people still pushing you? If you're going to get insulted and play the victim every time you're forced to claim, how do you expect to finish any mafia game? Honestly, you're coming off as being unhappy about being forced to claim and blaming me for it.

This is true, there's not as much pressure on vodean as there was, but that doesn't mean that the pressure was warranted in the first place. I'd be pretty pissed if I had to claim D1 just because of someone's presuppositions about me.

I'm not saying it wasn't entirely his fault. The initial pressure certainly wasn't.

He could've defended himself better. It's not like Saf's case was all that great.

-Tails

TA1LGUNN3R wrote:

pancakemix wrote:

safariguy5 wrote:

vodean wrote:i dont think that there's a great case against saf, but i DO think that its better than the case against me atm, and people are still pushing me.

Where? Where are people still pushing you? If you're going to get insulted and play the victim every time you're forced to claim, how do you expect to finish any mafia game? Honestly, you're coming off as being unhappy about being forced to claim and blaming me for it.

This is true, there's not as much pressure on vodean as there was, but that doesn't mean that the pressure was warranted in the first place. I'd be pretty pissed if I had to claim D1 just because of someone's presuppositions about me.

I'm not saying it wasn't entirely his fault. The initial pressure certainly wasn't.

He could've defended himself better. It's not like Saf's case was all that great.

-Tails

slap in the face?

im still getting readjusted to the strange ways logic works on this forum. a defense that would work most places fails epically here. i think im starting to get the hang of you guys though.

vodean wrote:im still getting readjusted to the strange ways logic works on this forum. a defense that would work most places fails epically here. i think im starting to get the hang of you guys though.

Could be we're smarter around here.

safariguy5 wrote:

vodean wrote:im still getting readjusted to the strange ways logic works on this forum. a defense that would work most places fails epically here. i think im starting to get the hang of you guys though.

Could be we're smarter around here.

could be youre dumber