Conquer Club

Vote Count

freezie(1)- Tal
Tal(1)- Fir
Com9(2)- Haggis, strike
BG(1)- Sax
Sax(3)- nag, Com9, /
strike(1)- pcm

With 17 alive, it takes 9 to lynch.

Deadline in 4 days.

Ok, I fixed it.

strike wolf wrote:

naxus wrote:I agree with com9 here. He's around, keep the pressure up.

@ Safari, what happens at deadline?

I'm not sure why people are so eager to make the sax wagon look stronger than it is. You weren't voting the inactive who was active elsewhere. If you were you would have voted for fircoal or pancakemix both of whom had been gone for a longer period and both of whom had posted more in the interim.

I will agree that the timing of tails unvote was a bit irregular but the people trying to make this saxlad case stronger than it is are the ones I find more suspicious.

I don't know about how much Saxlad posted in the interim but I know that I didn't post much. :/

strike wolf wrote:Yes you voted an inactive which from my experience tends to be out of character for you. Were you not the one beating up on the victor sullivan wagon in POTC mafia for being against an inactive? You've maintained silence against those on this wagon which is fine it's a perfectly ok wagon overall with traditional pressuring of an inactive. I'm only against those who seem to be trying to point out he is active which isn't really true. Also no I don't think you're trying to use it to get him lynched but I do feel you are trying to create some kind of air of protowniness by asserting that he is active and making it look like it is a bit more than a common inactive hunt. It isn't. I felt the same way about your premature cry to get a discussion going and I will back up my opinion.

This is slightly different than the Sully wagon in POTC. First of all, I was the 1st one to place a serious vote and it was 2nd vote on Saxlad - he had absolutely no pressure and this hadn't moved him anywhere near towards the lynch. The only thing that it did it gave some pressure. Sully's wagon was already established and growing when I said that I won't vote him and that I don't approve that. I don't see how this is out of character for me. At all. Again, with that "protowniness" - that's pretty much your main argument (and quite ineffective too). What I do here is nothing different what I normally do, so I don't understand this. Furthermore, you also know that I always like discussions and get into those (Remember the "painful Lebowski debate") and I'm encouraging them any way that I can.

TheSaxlad wrote:I'm really sorry guys. I have overstretched myself. If you want a claim I can provide that, but I think Safari has done that for me

I will read up and then post a massive post for my views. I'm sorry.

Umm... By any chance you could explain this better? I know you didn't meant Safari, so I'm assuming it's strike and from what I'm reading you two are connected? That could explain Strike's rigorousness...

Commander9 wrote:

TheSaxlad wrote:I'm really sorry guys. I have overstretched myself. If you want a claim I can provide that, but I think Safari has done that for me

I will read up and then post a massive post for my views. I'm sorry.

Umm... By any chance you could explain this better? I know you didn't meant Safari, so I'm assuming it's strike and from what I'm reading you two are connected? That could explain Strike's rigorousness...

I think whoever sax meant should probably elaborate because they probably know what he's talking about. It would at least bring about something productive today.

At the very least sax needs to clarify his statement, and I'm not convinced he'll do that today if he's telling the truth about his being busy.

/ wrote:I think a claim would be the most produtive thing to do at this point since there are only four days left.
in the meantime as promised for the other current votes of note (not counting comm because the vote count doesn't seem to be accurate, or it wasn't counted because it wasn't bolded.)

Haggis_McMutton wrote:Vote Commander for confirming last. classic scum move that.

also FOS Andy for probably being the only one in here that joined CC before me.

Talapus wrote:Vote: freezie. It's just been so long I had to make sure I remembered what it felt like. It felt good

Fircoal wrote:Vote: Talapus Cause he feels better in bed

So, are you guys sticking with this? Would you like us to follow you on these cases?
Or are you just fence sitting until someone else does all the work?
I'll Unvote vote tal, since of the three he's the most active (sort of.)

Honestly looking at my other choices which more or less seem to be the Saxlad wagon which seems like a superfluous wagon made up from thin air I don't really see the problem. My joke vote has as much of an argument as there is against Sax but that doesn't mean tons of people will vote for it.

Besides regarding my play-style I'm not high voter type. There are many games were I was very active in discussion but didn't vote until the end.

Back from vacation...Reading up on the 7 or so pages that happened whilst I was gone.

QOTD:

Glermo: There will be no further questions!
Fry: [Raises his hand] Why?

Vote Count

freezie(1)- Tal
Tal(1)- Fir
Com9(2)- Haggis, strike
BG(1)- Sax
Sax(3)- nag, Com9, /
strike(1)- pcm

With 17 alive, it takes 9 to lynch.

Deadline in 3 days.

Commander9 wrote:

strike wolf wrote:Yes you voted an inactive which from my experience tends to be out of character for you. Were you not the one beating up on the victor sullivan wagon in POTC mafia for being against an inactive? You've maintained silence against those on this wagon which is fine it's a perfectly ok wagon overall with traditional pressuring of an inactive. I'm only against those who seem to be trying to point out he is active which isn't really true. Also no I don't think you're trying to use it to get him lynched but I do feel you are trying to create some kind of air of protowniness by asserting that he is active and making it look like it is a bit more than a common inactive hunt. It isn't. I felt the same way about your premature cry to get a discussion going and I will back up my opinion.

This is slightly different than the Sully wagon in POTC. First of all, I was the 1st one to place a serious vote and it was 2nd vote on Saxlad - he had absolutely no pressure and this hadn't moved him anywhere near towards the lynch. The only thing that it did it gave some pressure. Sully's wagon was already established and growing when I said that I won't vote him and that I don't approve that. I don't see how this is out of character for me. At all. Again, with that "protowniness" - that's pretty much your main argument (and quite ineffective too). What I do here is nothing different what I normally do, so I don't understand this. Furthermore, you also know that I always like discussions and get into those (Remember the "painful Lebowski debate") and I'm encouraging them any way that I can.

TheSaxlad wrote:I'm really sorry guys. I have overstretched myself. If you want a claim I can provide that, but I think Safari has done that for me

I will read up and then post a massive post for my views. I'm sorry.

Umm... By any chance you could explain this better? I know you didn't meant Safari, so I'm assuming it's strike and from what I'm reading you two are connected? That could explain Strike's rigorousness...

I'm not connected to saxlad and you know me well enough that I will go aggressively against something that I find stands out whether my decision is popular or not (Defending Jayne in Firefly mafia would be a good example). As far as the vote goes, it's a fair enough point that you jumped on early but it did seem as it had grown bigger you didn't discourage it's growth and if anything made a comment that could have caused it to grow by stating he had been active which doesn't appear to be true especially with the few days leading up to it. He apparently made one post in a private forum between Sunday and your comment and the last you had heard from him otherwise was answering PMs over the weekend? I will say that honestly that weekend from what I've seen of his posts was the most active he's been in a while but he was basically non-existent between Sunday and his post excusing his absence (he even has asked to be replaced in at least one game). Now I want an honest answer to this question. Was he active as the host of the last Official Mafia the last few weeks it was going on? Has he been active in your Unkown mafia? Has he been active in any of his other on going mafias? I know that at least two of those should get a no answer so why would you suggest he is active when he hasn't been in this forum at the very least?

QOTD:

Zapp Brannigan: The alien mothership is in orbit here. If we can hit that bullseye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate.

Vote Count

freezie(1)- Tal
Tal(1)- Fir
Com9(2)- Haggis, strike
BG(1)- Sax
Sax(3)- nag, Com9, /
strike(1)- pcm

With 17 alive, it takes 9 to lynch.

Deadline in 2 days.

safariguy5 wrote:Deadline in 2 days.

Safari, do you have a 'time' when the official deadline is up? Like Midnight? or 6 PM Eastern? or Something?


--Andy

Id like to know too...though at this rate I'm wondering if we'll get anything better than a no lynch.

AndyDufresne wrote:

safariguy5 wrote:Deadline in 2 days.

Safari, do you have a 'time' when the official deadline is up? Like Midnight? or 6 PM Eastern? or Something?


--Andy

Midnight PST.

strike wolf wrote:Id like to know too...though at this rate I'm wondering if we'll get anything better than a no lynch.

Yea... Honestly at this point Sax needs to get in here and claim. Then at least we might be able to get a lynch.

****

Fircoal wrote:

strike wolf wrote:Id like to know too...though at this rate I'm wondering if we'll get anything better than a no lynch.

Yea... Honestly at this point Sax needs to get in here and claim. Then at least we might be able to get a lynch.

+1. He needs to at least name claim.

Tbh, not really holding my breath on him showing up though ...

unvote for now.

QOTD:

Bender: You guys go on without me! I'm going to go... look for more stuff to steal!
Fry: You're going back for the Countess, aren't you?
Bender: Oh, all right, I am. But if anything happens to me, tell them I died robbing some old man.
Fry: I'll tell them you went down prying the wedding ring off his cold, dead finger.
Bender: I love you, buddy!

Vote Count

freezie(1)- Tal
Tal(1)- Fir
Com9(1)- strike
BG(1)- Sax
Sax(4)- nag, Com9, /, BG
strike(1)- pcm

With 17 alive, it takes 9 to lynch.

Deadline in 38 hours.

Well, screw this..I would like to replace him over this, but with a deadline in less than 2 days..

Vote: Sax

QOTD:

[The Planet Express crew has watched an online movie about the solution to the garbage problem in New York.]
Fry: Wow, you got that off the Internet? In my day, the Internet was only used to download pornography.
Professor Farnsworth: Actually, that's still true.
[In the movie.]
Female Scientist: Now that the, uh, garbage ball is in space, Doctor, perhaps you can help me with my sexual inhibitions?
Male Scientist: With gusto. [The two scientists begin disrobing.]

Vote Count

freezie(1)- Tal
Tal(1)- Fir
Com9(1)- strike
BG(1)- Sax
Sax(5)- nag, Com9, /, BG, freezie
strike(1)- pcm

With 17 alive, it takes 9 to lynch.

Deadline in 24 hours.

I think it's a little late in the day for me to be replacing anyone, I'll PM the inactives during the night phase to see if they would like a replacement.

Vote: TheSaxlad

I think we've given him a pretty good chance over the last week, and my other suspicions have even less reasoning behind them.


--Andy

Sigh I really can't believe it's come down to lynching the inactive but at this point it is either that or sit back and watch one of the least productive day ones I've been a part of. unvote vote saxlad

Gilligan wrote:Back from vacation...Reading up on the 7 or so pages that happened whilst I was gone.

It's been 72 hours since this post. Do you have any more to add or are you purposely submarining trying to kill the day?

Safari, by any chance you would be willing to extend the deadline and prod Saxlad?

He's -1. If he hasn't posted by this evening a lynch is probably in order. I think that should also apply if there's no claim given.