Page 8 of 78

Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 2:23 pm
by wicked
Everytime i've played with someone witha post restriction, they haven't been scum.

Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 2:27 pm
by The1exile
I'm getting scummy vibes from reb, and to a lesser extent nark.

reb appears not to want to actually push the game along and is making placeholder posts of little or no value, despite random votes (if you're going to drop random votes when the random reason is refuted, what hope do you have of actually learning anything from the reaction?)

Nark seems to be taking offence as the best form of defence and accusing the so-called bandwagonners of being scum despite knowing full well that a two or three man bandwagon on the first day of a 17-to-lynch game means next to nothing. seems to me like he's trying top act like super-townie to cover his arse later on.... not entirely sure though.

firth swears in every post but he's also giving us the most info so I'm inclined to want him around longer since I'm unconvinced of his guilt.

In summary:

FOS nark and vote rebelman

Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 2:31 pm
by icedagger
So are there any townies who don't have the family mentioned in their PM? If there aren't that's gonna be pretty incriminating for firth

Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 2:35 pm
by wicked
From nag's first post, he made it sound like PMs would be varied. I woudn't read anything into it.

Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 2:37 pm
by gimpyThewonder
i'm gonna echo those who thought the post restriction wasn't likely to produce scum. I think it would just be a huge bullseye to paint on someone. that is unless Nag just wanted to give us an easy Day 1 lynch :shock:

Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 2:58 pm
by nagerous
Wicked is right about PMs being variance... and I would also like to say that I don't like talk about PMs and words that may or may not be in them in general. Thankyou...

Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 3:04 pm
by mandalorian2298
wicked wrote:We should combine and have the Godfathers in the Asylum game. :lol:


In an "Analyse that" Mafia? :lol:

wicked wrote:Everytime i've played with someone witha post restriction, they haven't been scum.


You forgot LSU, the infected SK in Re-Inquisition.

BTW vote Fircoal, just so that he doesn't feel left out. :)

On the more serious side, Crab and Riggable are probably scum (you know that the rest of you guys a) don't want to know my reasoning and b) aren't going to believe my logic, so let's not go there this time. :wink: ).
unvote vote Riggable

Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 3:09 pm
by MountainLion
gimpyThewonder wrote:i'm gonna echo those who thought the post restriction wasn't likely to produce scum. I think it would just be a huge bullseye to paint on someone. that is unless Nag just wanted to give us an easy Day 1 lynch :shock:


Well if you consider that we're already down 2 with SL and Jnd gone, perhaps he could...just a thought.

Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 3:12 pm
by LSU Tiger Josh
mandalorian2298 wrote:
wicked wrote:We should combine and have the Godfathers in the Asylum game. :lol:


In an "Analyse that" Mafia? :lol:

wicked wrote:Everytime i've played with someone witha post restriction, they haven't been scum.


You forgot LSU, the infected SK in Re-Inquisition.

BTW vote Fircoal, just so that he doesn't feel left out. :)

On the more serious side, Crab and Riggable are probably scum (you know that the rest of you guys a) don't want to know my reasoning and b) aren't going to believe my logic, so let's not go there this time. :wink: ).
unvote vote Riggable


Mandy I didn't actually have to "cough" each post. To be effective in giving out my disease I had to. I made up the post restriction to try to hide my killing but was screwed by some bad luck when it came to aimless giving the dice a roll on if the infected people lived or died.

Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 3:16 pm
by wicked
Adn making up that post restriction put a huge target on yoru back!

Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 3:17 pm
by mandalorian2298
LSU Tiger Josh wrote:
mandalorian2298 wrote:
wicked wrote:We should combine and have the Godfathers in the Asylum game. :lol:


In an "Analyse that" Mafia? :lol:

wicked wrote:Everytime i've played with someone witha post restriction, they haven't been scum.


You forgot LSU, the infected SK in Re-Inquisition.

BTW vote Fircoal, just so that he doesn't feel left out. :)

On the more serious side, Crab and Riggable are probably scum (you know that the rest of you guys a) don't want to know my reasoning and b) aren't going to believe my logic, so let's not go there this time. :wink: ).
unvote vote Riggable


Mandy I didn't actually have to "cough" each post. To be effective in giving out my disease I had to. I made up the post restriction to try to hide my killing but was screwed by some bad luck when it came to aimless giving the dice a roll on if the infected people lived or died.


Yes, but except from me being wrong, I am right and you know it!. 8-[

Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 3:20 pm
by LSU Tiger Josh
wicked wrote:Adn making up that post restriction put a huge target on yoru back!


I was going to die neway. My best bet would've been to have as many people infected that I could and hope they spread it around and "live on" through their infection.

Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 3:22 pm
by wicked
So my point, no one would willingly do that b/c it draws unnecessary attention, unless they had to. Wow that's my first lucid thought all day. :shock: Best wuit while ahead.

Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 3:23 pm
by gimpyThewonder
nagerous wrote:Wicked is right about PMs being variance... and I would also like to say that I don't like talk about PMs and words that may or may not be in them in general. Thankyou...


I'm in total agreement, which is why i made the Deadwood descriptions as alike as possible. especially after JND's apocalypse game, us scum in that game got hosed on role descriptions alone

Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 4:22 pm
by Anarkistsdream
The1exile wrote:I'm getting scummy vibes from reb, and to a lesser extent nark.

reb appears not to want to actually push the game along and is making placeholder posts of little or no value, despite random votes (if you're going to drop random votes when the random reason is refuted, what hope do you have of actually learning anything from the reaction?)

Nark seems to be taking offence as the best form of defence and accusing the so-called bandwagonners of being scum despite knowing full well that a two or three man bandwagon on the first day of a 17-to-lynch game means next to nothing. seems to me like he's trying top act like super-townie to cover his arse later on.... not entirely sure though.

firth swears in every post but he's also giving us the most info so I'm inclined to want him around longer since I'm unconvinced of his guilt.

In summary:

FOS nark and vote rebelman


Or I just believe that there are more scum in this game than townies, due to the different factions, and I don't want all townies to die just to let the scum duke it out in the end.

Secondly, I FOSed the bandwagon. I asked for an actual reason to vote him. No one could give me one. It was bandwagonning him for his fucking AVY, exile. You think that was a good reason?

Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 5:18 pm
by rebelman
wicked wrote:/me ducks

WTFH? Stop the madness!! :shock:


fos wiki
for such a swift reaction to the day kills - almost trying too hard to sound like she knows nothing about them

Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 5:26 pm
by /
Unvote
Vote Talapus Since he was the last to confirm just before the killings, then disappeared for several pages immediately afterward.

Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 5:34 pm
by Talapus
/ wrote:Unvote
Vote Talapus Since he was the last to confirm just before the killings, then disappeared for several pages immediately afterward.


:? I confirmed in the original signup thread but didn't see a star next to my name. How does that prove anything? Also the fact that I'm a baby who probably does no more then sleeps, poops, and eats when I'm not using my 1/2 a vote should clue you in that I'm not that powerful. So, I find your logic very flawed...

Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 5:36 pm
by /
Talapus wrote:
/ wrote:Unvote
Vote Talapus Since he was the last to confirm just before the killings, then disappeared for several pages immediately afterward.


:? I confirmed in the original signup thread but didn't see a star next to my name. How does that prove anything? Also the fact that I'm a baby who probably does no more then sleeps, poops, and eats when I'm not using my 1/2 a vote should clue you in that I'm not that powerful. So, I find your logic very flawed...
oh I suppose I must subconsciously have a grudge against you then :P
Unvote

Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 5:38 pm
by Talapus
/ wrote:oh I suppose I must subconsciously have a grudge against you then :P


:lol: I tend to leave an impression...

Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 7:07 pm
by Serbia
icedagger wrote:
firth4eva wrote:
icedagger wrote:The question was- are they mentioned in yours? :P
My rhetorical question kinda answered that.


fucktard


Im guna assume that fucktard was cos of your post restriction :shock:

Yes they're mentioned in mine but maybe that's just me. Can any townies confirm either way?


FOS icedagger

Not because he's saying his pm mentioned the family, but because he's asking for townies to confirm this. I'm thinking that's not totally smart right now.

Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 7:08 pm
by wicked
rebelman wrote:
wicked wrote:/me ducks

WTFH? Stop the madness!! :shock:


fos wiki
for such a swift reaction to the day kills - almost trying too hard to sound like she knows nothing about them


talk about reaching. :lol: I'll see your FOS and raise you a SHOVE IT. :twisted:

Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 8:57 pm
by nagerous
No-one saw nothing.

Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 9:00 pm
by wicked
HYE! when did I wite your sig???

Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 9:07 pm
by nagerous
Iliad's thread, page 5 or around that area.