Conquer Club

Meh... I was just referring to the way you played in sherwood. I didn't even vote you so no need to get all hairy.

Anyway your over-defensive and in my book over-defensive normally means scum. Keep digging if you want or you can drop it, its up to you .

Hmm. I thought about something earlier, I think scum is likely to submarine day 1 in this kind of games, so checked the inactives list:
Skoffin
kwan
mtg
clive
NES
spurg
minister market
All posted only once.
I'm tempted to do once more a Vote Masket just because it's been a while
We still have some time, but too many inactives certainly don't help getting us leads.

ABWOP Unvote Vote Masket

unvote vote NES

tis tradition and hes submarining

Unvote, vote: RD

To quick to jump, scum.

ga7 wrote:Hmm. I thought about something earlier, I think scum is likely to submarine day 1 in this kind of games, so checked the inactives list:
Skoffin
kwan
mtg
clive
NES
spurg
minister market
All posted only once.
I'm tempted to do once more a Vote Masket just because it's been a while
We still have some time, but too many inactives certainly don't help getting us leads.

Sorry, it's cos there's always so much new posts when I come on.

Well I think that nagerous's tactic is really poor, so unvote vote nagerous

and what is my tactic? All I'm doing is hunting for leads, starting to stifle up some conversation. Would you rather I submarined the whole of the first day like some people are including you sir.. So the person actually posting and trying to get the game moving WHEN we have a deadline is using a poor tactic then your opinions on strategy are obviously well off.

lol, vote nag for trying to find scum/better the game, scummy indeed...

unvote vote clive, I do exactly what nagerous has done, and there are always those who appose me. They usually turn out to be scum.

nagerous wrote:and what is my tactic? All I'm doing is hunting for leads, starting to stifle up some conversation. Would you rather I submarined the whole of the first day like some people are including you sir.. So the person actually posting and trying to get the game moving WHEN we have a deadline is using a poor tactic then your opinions on strategy are obviously well off.

Because you voted shady for being new.

Not for being new no... for being useless in another game and knowing full well he won't be much more than deadweight, though I unvoted when he told me he would put in more effort this time round and will try and learn.

over-defensive = female. not scum + in sherwood i had a difference of opinion on who the good guys vs the bad guys were.

nagerous wrote:Not for being new no... for being useless in another game and knowing full well he won't be much more than deadweight, though I unvoted when he told me he would put in more effort this time round and will try and learn.

I still think it's a bad way to play

Clive wrote:

nagerous wrote:Not for being new no... for being useless in another game and knowing full well he won't be much more than deadweight, though I unvoted when he told me he would put in more effort this time round and will try and learn.

I still think it's a bad way to play

Its better than going throughout the whole game without even bothering to look for leads. At least nagerous is trying. My vote stays.

So master strategist Clive.... you now have the stage.


How would you play day one, with a deadline????

Submarine? Or vote one of the players whos actually posting? Speak now or forever hold your peace.

diddle wrote:

Clive wrote:

nagerous wrote:Not for being new no... for being useless in another game and knowing full well he won't be much more than deadweight, though I unvoted when he told me he would put in more effort this time round and will try and learn.

I still think it's a bad way to play

Its better than going throughout the whole game without even bothering to look for leads. At least nagerous is trying. My vote stays.

That isn't loooking for leads, that is giving a new player no chance becuase they weren't pro-standard in their first game

nagerous wrote:So master strategist Clive.... you now have the stage.


How would you play day one, with a deadline????

Submarine? Or vote one of the players whos actually posting? Speak now or forever hold your peace.

Haha, this'll be interesting.

Clive wrote:

diddle wrote:

Clive wrote:

nagerous wrote:Not for being new no... for being useless in another game and knowing full well he won't be much more than deadweight, though I unvoted when he told me he would put in more effort this time round and will try and learn.

I still think it's a bad way to play

Its better than going throughout the whole game without even bothering to look for leads. At least nagerous is trying. My vote stays.

That isn't loooking for leads, that is giving a new player no chance becuase they weren't pro-standard in their first game

The whole idea of this 'tactic' is to hopefully make a player slip up, or study voting patterns. It just happens to be easier with a new player.

nagerous wrote:So master strategist Clive.... you now have the stage.


How would you play day one, with a deadline????

Submarine? Or vote one of the players whos actually posting? Speak now or forever hold your peace.

I'm not a master strategist, I did not claim so, this is only my 3rd game.

I don't understand what you mean by asking how I'd play day one.

I didn't submarine in the other game (you were in it also, and you did)

It's such a big game and everytime I come on, there's a load of new pages of post, so i've sat back a bit

okay, we should start over and see what we have. i'm keeping my vote because it's a protest vote.

who hasn't said anything at all? i think if someone is being inactive and experienced. then it is pointless to keep them on.

who is playing for the first time? they need a chance at least til the end of next day. let them get used to the game.

i think it sucks when you're new and they blow you away the first time out.

just because some were mafia before doesn't mean that they are mafia now. unless, they are really good at it.

so, any thoughts?

diddle wrote:unvote vote clive, I do exactly what nagerous has done, and there are always those who appose me. They usually turn out to be scum.

firth4eva wrote:unvote vote kalish

little reasoning?

diddle wrote:unvote vote clive, I do exactly what nagerous has done, and there are always those who appose me. They usually turn out to be scum.

\

unvote vote diddle for bad spelling

The Weird One wrote:

diddle wrote:unvote vote clive, I do exactly what nagerous has done, and there are always those who appose me. They usually turn out to be scum.

\

unvote vote diddle for bad spelling

vote two for being a spelling nazi.[/b]