Moderator: Community Team
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Yeah. it was only half red, and the "vote" part wasn't colored or anything so I totally missed it.strike wolf wrote: As far as the execution, I used it as soon as F1fth voted and I got the chance to follow up but Edoc initially hadn't noticed Jak's vote in thread so it was delayed.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
I just went back to re-read thatedocsil wrote:Yeah. it was only half red, and the "vote" part wasn't colored or anything so I totally missed it.
Well he said that I was lying when I obviously wasn't, and it just came across as really scummy that he would try to draw attention to me when I thought pcm was more of an issue. I just feel my role really should've been obvious at that point. And since Jak had already voted him, I thought it would be an easy lynch. I had no idea we were in a Lylo situation. I thought their were two mafia amongst us at best- not three. Strike was the one that really had me fooled- I was onto jak and pcm already.jak111 wrote: I was surprised to see Violet vote for Rodion though, I thought we would have all had to be out to get a lynch.


Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Except that you did lie (I still do not understand why you said your saint was alive). It's not even like I was threatening you, as I was holding my vote until I felt 100% certain of the path to take. I reckon you could have gotten out of that situation by simply admitting you screwed up. PCM, on the other hand, had some serious explaining to do on why he'd given Yoshi a cop gift after Yoshi fakeclaimed angel. Unfortunately, CC's bad habit of voting too soon did not allow me to continue my inquiry.VioIet wrote:Well he said that I was lying when I obviously wasn't,jak111 wrote: I was surprised to see Violet vote for Rodion though, I thought we would have all had to be out to get a lynch.
Honestly I think you were being a bit harsh on both of those accounts. There were multiple fake angel claims in the game and they all turned out to be misguided saints and whether Vio's saint was alive or not was a rather trivial detail from my point of view.Rodion wrote:Except that you did lie (I still do not understand why you said your saint was alive). It's not even like I was threatening you, as I was holding my vote until I felt 100% certain of the path to take. I reckon you could have gotten out of that situation by simply admitting you screwed up. PCM, on the other hand, had some serious explaining to do on why he'd given Yoshi a cop gift after Yoshi fakeclaimed angel. Unfortunately, CC's bad habit of voting too soon did not allow me to continue my inquiry.VioIet wrote:Well he said that I was lying when I obviously wasn't,jak111 wrote: I was surprised to see Violet vote for Rodion though, I thought we would have all had to be out to get a lynch.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
You had a double voter and an executioner. You could have forced a lynch if there were 9 people alive. :pstrike wolf wrote:Jak couldnt win with town. Technically only mafia did count against you but it was 3 v 3 and double voter on our side. Me and PCM had made it abundantly clear that we would simply force your lynch as town couldnt force one and edoc decided to end the game early.
DoomYoshi wrote:Sry 4 double:
Yesterday I softclaimed angel. Rodion can investigate me and I can't claim to be human. That will verify me 100%
Fakeclaim shown above.DoomYoshi wrote:Ok, I'm not an angel lmao. I am Brigit of Kildare, a saint.
Wow Rodion, I still don't get you. And no, I didn't screw up when claiming. I think you just thought too hard about it when nothing was there. Here is my role pm:Rodion wrote:Except that you did lie (I still do not understand why you said your saint was alive).VioIet wrote:Well he said that I was lying when I obviously wasn't,jak111 wrote: I was surprised to see Violet vote for Rodion though, I thought we would have all had to be out to get a lynch.
So yes my Saint was still alive as I said. It was you who said/thought/believed my saint to be dead for whatever reason. I remember you bringing up a point about 1512, which didn't even make sense, as it's 2013. All of the characters would be dead, if you think about it like that.edocsil wrote:You are Catherine of Genoa, you are a simple saint trying to live life by your ideals and your faith.
You are a Backup Doc. You will become a full doc if Avitus of Vienne, the Doctor, dies.
To win all the Demons must be dead.
Confirm in the game thread, and PM me if you have any questions.
I don't even know why you brought up a non-issue in the first place. If you were more concerned about pcm at the time, then that is who you should've inquired about.Rodion wrote:It's not even like I was threatening you

Okay, that's just bullshit. You threw the town off balance by your claim. Want to know why?VioIet wrote:Wow Rodion, I still don't get you. And no, I didn't screw up when claiming. I think you just thought too hard about it when nothing was there. Here is my role pm:
So yes my Saint was still alive as I said. It was you who said/thought/believed my saint to be dead for whatever reason. I remember you bringing up a point about 1512, which didn't even make sense, as it's 2013. All of the characters would be dead, if you think about it like that.edocsil wrote:You are Catherine of Genoa, you are a simple saint trying to live life by your ideals and your faith.
You are a Backup Doc. You will become a full doc if Avitus of Vienne, the Doctor, dies.
To win all the Demons must be dead.
Confirm in the game thread, and PM me if you have any questions.
This was a game. It is not real. It's not real life! It's a game! Edoc has the right to bring up characters from all different time periods and put them all in the same universe/world/game if he chooses. You can't let details like that throw you off from the flow of the game.
Obviously all the characters are dead, only dead people are canonized. One of the prerequisites of becoming a saint is performing miracles after you died. This meta junk you're defending yourself a posteriori with now is highly confusing and irrelevant. According to you, we shouldn't even care if the mod confirms someone is God, because who cares about flavour?Wikipedia wrote:Saint Catherine of Genoa (Caterina Fieschi Adorno, 1447 – 15 September 1510) is an Italian Roman Catholic saint and mystic, admired for her work among the sick and the poor.
Hmm. In that case, weird prhasing, but more logical from Violet's point of view.jak111 wrote:I think what she means is Sam was still alive, that's what I gather from it.
Once again you are trying to compare real information with a game. That was from Wiki talking about the real Saint Catherine of Genoa. I was a character in a game. It's not real!aage wrote: Okay, that's just bullshit. You threw the town off balance by your claim. Want to know why?Wikipedia wrote:Saint Catherine of Genoa (Caterina Fieschi Adorno, 1447 – 15 September 1510) is an Italian Roman Catholic saint and mystic, admired for her work among the sick and the poor.
My role pm gave no information about my character's personality or miracles performed, etc. All it said was that I was a simple saint living my life by my faith and ideals. Meaning in the game- I was a saint and I was living. Nothing more and nothing less. I am not using any meta whatsoever. I am simple stating what was in my role pm. In fact, you are the one trying to bring in information from wiki and other sources, when that has absolutely nothing to do with the game.aage wrote:Obviously all the characters are dead, only dead people are canonized.
Umm, it's a game, not real life. You are thinking too hard. Being canonized in real life had nothing to do with the saints in this game. Once again, you can't compare real life to a game. In the context of this game, the saints were all living, and town aligned. One of the prerequisites of becoming a saint is performing miracles after you died. This meta junk you're defending yourself a posteriori with now is highly confusing and irrelevant.
Where and when did I even say anything like that? I don't even know what you are talking about here, or the relevance of it to anything that I'm trying to say.aage wrote:According to you, we shouldn't even care if the mod confirms someone is God, because who cares about flavour?

1) I was scum, so obviously I could have been lyingIn fact, you are the one trying to bring in information from wiki and other sources, when that has absolutely nothing to do with the game.
Yes. "You are trying to life your live....." means my character is still alive. When I say still alive, I'm not talking about real life, or wiki or anything like that. I didn't do any outside research on my character. I was just talking about my role pm and the context of the game. And yes, of course I was not died yet in the game. But this whole issue of being alive or not came up early on in the game to distinguish the humans from the angels. The angels were town aligned and some humans were town aligned. Early in the game I claimed to be a human who was a saint, which confused some people.aage wrote:You're focussing on the "you're trying to live life..."-part, I take it. I was under the impression you were saying that your character, Catherine, was not dead yet in the context of the flavour (like Pope Benedict). Obviously you had not died yet in the game.
aage wrote:1) I was scum, so obviously I could have been lyingIn fact, you are the one trying to bring in information from wiki and other sources, when that has absolutely nothing to do with the game.
2) I wasn't lying because it does, it can help you catch a fake claim. Everyone who had claimed saint had claimed someone who has been dead for quite some time. You claimed Catherine was alive. Catherine isn't. You are. This is probably where the miscommunication happened.

Aw, boy, this is confusing.VioIet wrote:Me= Alive
Me= Catherine
Catherine= Alive
Or is my reasoning faulty here? Is the above a valid argument, or a fallacy?
Role PM wrote:You're Jack, town vigilante. You've watched the world succumb in chaos until you could no longer stand it. Now you decided to take it upon yourself to cleanse humanity of all evil.
Every night you can target someone to kill him.
You win when all threats to town are eliminated.

No offense but now you're just being spiteful.VioIet wrote:Hmm, Rodion, I know you aren't a native speaker of English, so perhaps that's where the confusion lies.
Since, to my knowledge, everyone was confused by your claim, you also seem to be suggesting that all the players in this game must be non native speakers, or just suck at their mother tongue, while all that happened was that you just focussed on trivial details in your role pm that had nothing to do with the game. You ignore meta but do choose to go into the flavour of your pm? That is simply hypocritical. But I am also on the verge of being spiteful so I will stop this battle of having the last word now.Rodion wrote:You're Jack, town vigilante. You watch the world succumb in chaos and you can no longer stand it. You decided to take it upon yourself to cleanse humanity of all evil.
That's just the thing. I wasn't taking flavor whatsoever. I don't even think there was enough in the role pm to be flavor. It was quite bare bones, imo. I just read word for word what the role pm said, no more, no less. I didn't mislead anyone- I was 100% honest about my claim.Rodion wrote:You missed the point. The issue is not verbal tenses, but taking an useless flavour piece from your role PM and misleading everyone.
Well that was definitely the wrong expectation- I don't know how you even deduce that. As I've said many many times before- it's a game not real life. Who cares about sainthood, Catholicism, the Pope or how whatever works in real life. I'm simply talking about the game and nothing beyond. I don't care about the real life definition of a saint. I only care about the definition of a saint within the context of the game.Rodion wrote: It should be obvious that the "trying to live life" bit of your PM was just for flavour, but you managed to make the point that your saint was alive when all catholic saints are, by definition, dead. The expectation was that you were either the Pope or some other really good-hearted contemporary human being, not some lady who died more than 500 years ago.
What contradiction did you notice? As yes, quite funny that my claim was "fishy" as it was pretty much as word-for-word as could be possible without directly quoting. I still don't get why something so trivial as me being alive is so important to you. Or why you feel that elements in the game need to be the exact way as they are in real life. I thought the whole point of creating a game was so that you could have your characters do whatever they wanted in that alternate universe you created for the context of the game. It doesn't have to go by real life rules.Rodion wrote:After you fully claimed and I went back to reading every post of yours to see whether the claim was compatible to the way you had been playing (something I always do as it may help see through a fakeclaim), I noticed the contradiction. Sucks that you had to feel threatened and vote me, but I'm not going to let something as fishy as your claim fly just because I had someone else higher in my suspicion list (do notice that nothing kept me from asking multiple questions to multiple people simulteaneously - the fact I asked you a question did not stop me from also interrogating PCM, which I did).
No, I definitely do not understand your line of view, as you don't understand mind. From my perspective you are taking all these non-game elements and using them to analyze the game and you're looking for stuff that's not there. I think that just results in making things complicated and confusing when they shouldn't be. We are just thinking completely differently about it. So at this point, we'll just agree to disagree.Rodion wrote:Not sure if you'll understand, so I'll agree with the recommendation that you bury it.
None taken. But I guess just equally as spiteful as someone telling me that I would think "had watched," equals "Watcher."aage wrote:No offense but now you're just being spiteful.VioIet wrote:Hmm, Rodion, I know you aren't a native speaker of English, so perhaps that's where the confusion lies.
Well those are your words, not mine. But yes, that would be unfortunate if so. I've always been big on wording, and normally seem to think others are likewise. But I guess not.aage wrote: Since, to my knowledge, everyone was confused by your claim, you also seem to be suggesting that all the players in this game must be non native speakers, or just suck at their mother tongue
With all due respect, I honestly don't think I was the one who focused on such a trivial detail. Not to begin with, that is. It was after I claimed, that someone else seemed to focus too much on me saying that I was alive. Something like that would've never bothered me in the first place, honestly.aage wrote:While all that happened was that you just focussed on trivial details in your role pm that had nothing to do with the game. You ignore meta but do choose to go into the flavour of your pm? That is simply hypocritical.
aage wrote:But I am also on the verge of being spiteful so I will stop this battle of having the last word now.

