Conquer Club

White Moose wrote:Noticed a funny thing here.

To be on this list you have to play minimum of 4 games at all times, which means that no freemium can get on this list and no one who play only speed games can either.

(freemiums because when they finish a game they will only have 3 games going, which is below the minimum)

you can, just need to be active, some players may only play a few games for an entire month, that would not be considered active, you would still make the list, but as far as days in a row maintaining #1 may not be.

hope that makes sense now.

Blitzaholic wrote:hope that makes sense now.

It's still a retarded rule.

Since no freemiums and speed gamers can have their days-in-a-row as conqueror posted on this thread.

If you don't understand what i'm saying... then lol.

White Moose wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:hope that makes sense now.

It's still a retarded rule.

Since no freemiums and speed gamers can have their days-in-a-row as conqueror posted on this thread.

If you don't understand what i'm saying... then lol.

they can as long as they stay active. basically why this was added was simply because you could reach conqueror and just sit there, so , you must continue to play games and not milk it.

Clearly you can't understand. I won't bother trying to explain it like i did with creating game-links, that haven't gone through even now so nevermind...

Blitzaholic wrote:

White Moose wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:hope that makes sense now.

It's still a retarded rule.

Since no freemiums and speed gamers can have their days-in-a-row as conqueror posted on this thread.

If you don't understand what i'm saying... then lol.

they can as long as they stay active. basically why this was added was simply because you could reach conqueror and just sit there, so , you must continue to play games and not milk it.

This rule is easy to overcome just like KOG did where you play some no spoils games that you know are going to take forever to end so what is the point of having it if you are going to count that as active?

ljex wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:

White Moose wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:hope that makes sense now.

It's still a retarded rule.

Since no freemiums and speed gamers can have their days-in-a-row as conqueror posted on this thread.

If you don't understand what i'm saying... then lol.

they can as long as they stay active. basically why this was added was simply because you could reach conqueror and just sit there, so , you must continue to play games and not milk it.

This rule is easy to overcome just like KOG did where you play some no spoils games that you know are going to take forever to end so what is the point of having it if you are going to count that as active?

as long as they have several games active always, that is fine. You do make a good point, but, it is better than just sitting there for weeks and playing 1 game, you know what I mean? What would you suggest?

Blitzaholic wrote:

ljex wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:

White Moose wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:hope that makes sense now.

It's still a retarded rule.

Since no freemiums and speed gamers can have their days-in-a-row as conqueror posted on this thread.

If you don't understand what i'm saying... then lol.

they can as long as they stay active. basically why this was added was simply because you could reach conqueror and just sit there, so , you must continue to play games and not milk it.

This rule is easy to overcome just like KOG did where you play some no spoils games that you know are going to take forever to end so what is the point of having it if you are going to count that as active?

as long as they have several games active always, that is fine. You do make a good point, but, it is better than just sitting there for weeks and playing 1 game, you know what I mean? What would you suggest?

To be honest I think it should be the number of concussive days you are listed as #1 on the scoreboard regardless of the amount of games you have active.

Out of curiosity, why is Blitz not listed as a farmer? Can you define farmer?

ljex wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:

ljex wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:

White Moose wrote:It's still a retarded rule.

Since no freemiums and speed gamers can have their days-in-a-row as conqueror posted on this thread.

If you don't understand what i'm saying... then lol.

they can as long as they stay active. basically why this was added was simply because you could reach conqueror and just sit there, so , you must continue to play games and not milk it.

This rule is easy to overcome just like KOG did where you play some no spoils games that you know are going to take forever to end so what is the point of having it if you are going to count that as active?

as long as they have several games active always, that is fine. You do make a good point, but, it is better than just sitting there for weeks and playing 1 game, you know what I mean? What would you suggest?

To be honest I think it should be the number of concussive days you are listed as #1 on the scoreboard regardless of the amount of games you have active.

+1

But then Blitz wouldn't be at the top.

He also avoided my earlier question of him being a farmer. He'll use the "you're on my foe list so I couldn't see it" excuse, but I know you read it Blitz.

How about listing players as having played mostly the same group of people/players.When you have Comic and the likes as mostly by playing 6 player Escalating its completely mis-leading,you make it sound as if he was playing Public Games when every-one knows this is far from the case.If your calling out other players for specializing or noob Farming I would like to see something like played only Private Games where they stood to gain the most points and lose the least.

And still our posts go unanswered, despite being read.

firth4eva wrote:And still our posts go unanswered, despite being read.

Firth, I had to unfoe you and responding to your recent pm. I play the rules of CC, everyone may have their own ideals of what they consider farming, but, I play everyone, public, private games, high ranks, low ranks, medium ranks, all maps, styles, singles and teams, tourney's and clan challenges.

Blitzaholic wrote:

firth4eva wrote:And still our posts go unanswered, despite being read.

Firth, I had to unfoe you and responding to your recent pm. I play the rules of CC, everyone may have their own ideals of what they consider farming, but, I play everyone, public, private games, high ranks, low ranks, medium ranks, all maps, styles, singles and teams, tourney's and clan challenges.

You're only in team games now! And when you reached your high score, you were a farmer. Your score began to drop when they introduced the "new recruits can't join team games". King Herpes plays anyone now, do you list him as a farmer?

firth4eva wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:

firth4eva wrote:And still our posts go unanswered, despite being read.

Firth, I had to unfoe you and responding to your recent pm. I play the rules of CC, everyone may have their own ideals of what they consider farming, but, I play everyone, public, private games, high ranks, low ranks, medium ranks, all maps, styles, singles and teams, tourney's and clan challenges.

You're only in team games now! And when you reached your high score, you were a farmer. Your score began to drop when they introduced the "new recruits can't join team games". King Herpes plays anyone now, do you list him as a farmer?

Firth, I am done responding to you and your nonsense, I was conqueror or # 1 on the CC site in late 2006 and most of 2007, until late summer time. I reached that status of over 4000 score late in 2006, early 2007 before you were even on the CC site, and I did it mostly by triples as it indicates on page one and all who were around then know of this.

I'm not denying that you did, but you did it by playing new recruits and refuse to list yourself as a farmer.

firth4eva wrote:I'm not denying that you did, but you did it by playing new recruits and refuse to list yourself as a farmer.

You were not even on the site

I did it by playing anyone and everyone and mostly triples games, I did play 6 players singles as well at the time, but my bread and butter was the triples at the time.

Blitzaholic wrote:

firth4eva wrote:I'm not denying that you did, but you did it by playing new recruits and refuse to list yourself as a farmer.

You were not even on the site

I did it by playing anyone and everyone and mostly triples games, I did play 6 players singles as well at the time, but my bread and butter was the triples at the time.

I can quite clearly see the games you played and the people you played. It was new recruits. Your score declined when new recruits could no longer play you.

firth4eva wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:

firth4eva wrote:I'm not denying that you did, but you did it by playing new recruits and refuse to list yourself as a farmer.

You were not even on the site

I did it by playing anyone and everyone and mostly triples games, I did play 6 players singles as well at the time, but my bread and butter was the triples at the time.

I can quite clearly see the games you played and the people you played. It was new recruits. Your score declined when new recruits could no longer play you.

I played over 2,500 triples games and any and all could join those games, some may of been new recruits, some were not, some were high rank, some were low, some medium, etc.

Farming to me is joining team 2 with ? marks constantly and not deviating to you reach that score. The word farming did not even exist back then.

Setting up games in public where all and any ranks can join and playing them as well as private, some tourney's, some 6 playing singles, dubs, trips against a vast majority of players that are diverse at all levels of ranks is much different firth. As far as my score going down, well, I hate to tell you, but I hit over 4000 score like 7 other times after that.
You need to realize 2nd place on the scoreboard had over 1,000 score below me, so I had no choice but to go down , like gravity.

Wait, what?

http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?s ... =D&page=80

Oh yeah. Right.


Also, using your logic, KLOBBER is not a farmer? He just set the games up, anyone could join.

firth4eva wrote:Wait, what?

http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?s ... =D&page=80

Oh yeah. Right.


Also, using your logic, KLOBBER is not a farmer? He just set the games up, anyone could join.

sorry if I farmed you here firth in 2008 Game 2841942.

boys, you are really clueless firth, the link is that of the year 2008, and I was bored, I had accomplished so many things by then, I wanted to practice 1 vs 1, I was not really good at it and it was kind of new to the site. If you want to map rank me 1 vs 1, I probably have a great winning percentage, but my score would be terrible, could even be cook status, because if I lost a game, it was over 90 points, and if I won it was 3 to 5 points. I got crippled in score for practicing 1 vs 1 that way, it really hurt me more than helped me. After learning the hard way, I refrained from playing 1 vs 1 unless it was tourneys or higher ranks.


I told you the 4000 score the 1st time I reached it was late 2006, then went over 4300 score in Feb 2007 and that was mostly triples.

I wanted to practice 1v1. I just wanted to practice with new recruits. On freestyle. Where I would get the first go. Yeah. Sure

Firth, just make your own thread then.

This one, along with JR's "high scores" thread aren't official and include terrible biases and grudges. You are free to make your own list and mark anyone you want as a farmer/cheat as well.

Bones2484 wrote:Firth, just make your own thread then.

This one, along with JR's "high scores" thread aren't official and include terrible biases and grudges. You are free to make your own list and mark anyone you want as a farmer/cheat as well.

Yeah, I don't have the effort for that, but you're right, it's not worth arguing with him as he is so heavily biased and not going to change.