Dancing Mustard wrote:what you're trying to do at the moment is the equivalent of trying to learn advanced quantum physics before you've taken your science GCSE.
This is wrong?
Psh... Schroedinger has nothing on me...
And I've got his kitty in my boxers.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Dancing Mustard wrote:what you're trying to do at the moment is the equivalent of trying to learn advanced quantum physics before you've taken your science GCSE.
My point exactly. How is your ordinary citizen expected to get to grips with what he can and can't do legally without taking this course in "advanced quantum physics"? How is the State supposedto legitimately embody justice when it has such an esoteric and unnecessarily complex system for pronouncing it?
Dancing Mustard wrote:what you're trying to do at the moment is the equivalent of trying to learn advanced quantum physics before you've taken your science GCSE.
My point exactly. How is your ordinary citizen expected to get to grips with what he can and can't do legally without taking this course in "advanced quantum physics"? How is the State supposedto legitimately embody justice when it has such an esoteric and unnecessarily complex system for pronouncing it?
For what it's worth, I suppose there might be more than a touch of validity in this statement, but I'm too unfamiliar with the system to comment much farther.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.