Page 7 of 24
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Sat May 13, 2017 12:27 pm
by Samlen
I have to agree with nag here. I've never heard Hooker being used to mention a town roleblocker, but I was willing to give you benefit of the doubt since i didn't know if that was normal here too or not. I'm assuming nag's vote is confirmation that hookers tend to be mafia here as well.
Vote Ga7
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Sat May 13, 2017 12:37 pm
by Ragian
Okay, fine you vote for Ga7, but why on earth would he then proclaim being a hooker if that's usually a non-town role? That doesn't make any sense. To be honest, I've visited a few sites because I seem to remember hooker as a town aligned role, but all the pages I found indicated that it's a scum role.
Still, the question remains: Why would Ga7 claim a scum role? Surely, he wouldn't.
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Sat May 13, 2017 12:37 pm
by Samlen
Because his role was already revealed involuntarily.
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Sat May 13, 2017 4:12 pm
by Pikanchion
Samlen wrote:Because his role was already revealed involuntarily.
Based on this:
ga7 wrote:Fircoal wrote:Well I know that DJ is a good guy, and I'm also wondering if a role called Usurper Hooker is any good considering that's a combination of two bad sounding roles. For that reason I suspect the french one.
Aww that was you in... there... with me and you didn't even talk? And also refused silent sex?
I don't think it's likely but Nag, I am gonna be really pissed at Skittles if your role is scum. And also if it was a vore thing.
I won't say what your role is Chu but it's certainly a town one.
Mine is, as strange as it sounds, also town, because two wrongs feel so very right. I'm a regular blocker but if I lynch the godfather I'll switch sides and take his place as mafia. Role name is Ambitious Old Lady on the Corner
It's a weird role but it's actually better that I claim now because that means there won't be a surprise twist for town. If we happen to lynch the GF and I'm on that lynch you know what to do next. From my cunning modcharming (like snakecharming but with more sex) I also learnt the GF is bulletproof so take that in account.
That also means that if it comes to that, remember no investigation 100% clears someone.
I think the important question then is Fircoal did ga7 tell you they were an Usurper Hooker or were you told that by some other source?
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Sat May 13, 2017 5:03 pm
by ga7
The mod told us each other's role but not who we were and we could only communicate through him. The message I sent to Fircoal that way was... Well actually I can just quote it since it's my own words lol
Hi there, I'm gonna assume you're town by the role description, my sexy roleblocking nag failed because of this so might as well gain some knowledge out of it. Please try to drop a hint during the day, mine should be pretty easy to figure out from day 1. BAI[/b]
It didn't occur to me that Nag knew or would tell who we were right away because since I targeted Nag and was told my roleblocking failed I thought Nag's power occured because I targeted him and not through his own action.
The fact I indicated who I was right away (and you can reread day 1 it was very very obvious, such as this quote:
ga7 wrote:Unvote Vote mitch He already claimed and I'm not buying it. I do wish a doctor would see me for some sexy treatment though.
Makes it obvious I actively tried to identify myself to Fircoal.
So really, saying I'm scum because I have a scummy role name when all my actions have been pro-town just seem very narrow-minded right now.
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Sat May 13, 2017 5:03 pm
by ga7
ga7 wrote:The mod told us each other's role but not who we were and we could only communicate through him. The message I sent to Fircoal that way was... Well actually I can just quote it since it's my own words lol
Hi there, I'm gonna assume you're town by the role description, my sexy roleblocking nag failed because of this so might as well gain some knowledge out of it. Please try to drop a hint during the day, mine should be pretty easy to figure out from day 1. BAI[/b]
It didn't occur to me that Nag knew or would tell who we were right away because since I targeted Nag and was told my roleblocking failed I thought Nag's power occured because I targeted him and not through his own action.
The fact I indicated who I was right away (and you can reread day 1 it was very very obvious, such as this quote:
ga7 wrote:Unvote Vote mitch He already claimed and I'm not buying it. I do wish a doctor would see me for some sexy treatment though.
Makes it obvious I actively tried to identify myself to Fircoal.
So really, saying I'm scum because I have a scummy role name when all my actions have been pro-town just seem very narrow-minded right now.
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Sat May 13, 2017 5:05 pm
by ga7
Lol tried to EBWOP and fucked it up more, third time's the charm:
The mod told us each other's role but not who we were and we could only communicate through him. The message I sent to Fircoal that way was... Well actually I can just quote it since it's my own words lol
Hi there, I'm gonna assume you're town by the role description, my sexy roleblocking nag failed because of this so might as well gain some knowledge out of it. Please try to drop a hint during the day, mine should be pretty easy to figure out from day 1. BAI
It didn't occur to me that Nag knew or would tell who we were right away because since I targeted Nag and was told my roleblocking failed I thought Nag's power occured because I targeted him and not through his own action.
The fact I indicated who I was right away (and you can reread day 1 it was very very obvious, such as this quote:
ga7 wrote:Unvote Vote mitch He already claimed and I'm not buying it. I do wish a doctor would see me for some sexy treatment though.
Makes it obvious I actively tried to identify myself to Fircoal.
So really, saying I'm scum because I have a scummy role name when all my actions have been pro-town just seem very narrow-minded right now.
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Sat May 13, 2017 5:54 pm
by Skoffin
LISTEN TO MEEEEEEEEEEEE you mighty morphin muppets, you gotta take into account who we are dealing with here. We have the flamboyant skittles hosting this and making things as dumb as possible and ruining our lives ia parRT OF HIS AGENDA. If he were to use a roleblocker of any alignment I'm sure he would use the word hooker because ho's be funny yo. We can't base scummyness on the name because that is exactly what skittles woiuld do because he's a miserable bith who wqants to ruin lives. Everyone is a bit too eager to vote on a name and not slow down to consider what up and that is much suspicious!
unvote vote sam
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Sat May 13, 2017 7:12 pm
by Skittles!
Vote count
Ga7 (2) - nagerous, samlen
Samlen (1) - skoffin
With 9 alive it takes 5 to lynch. Things are getting thick and juicy in Clusterfuckville!
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Sat May 13, 2017 8:01 pm
by Fircoal
ga7 wrote:Lol tried to EBWOP and fucked it up more, third time's the charm:
The mod told us each other's role but not who we were and we could only communicate through him. The message I sent to Fircoal that way was... Well actually I can just quote it since it's my own words lol
Hi there, I'm gonna assume you're town by the role description, my sexy roleblocking nag failed because of this so might as well gain some knowledge out of it. Please try to drop a hint during the day, mine should be pretty easy to figure out from day 1. BAI
It didn't occur to me that Nag knew or would tell who we were right away because since I targeted Nag and was told my roleblocking failed I thought Nag's power occured because I targeted him and not through his own action.
The fact I indicated who I was right away (and you can reread day 1 it was very very obvious, such as this quote:
ga7 wrote:Unvote Vote mitch He already claimed and I'm not buying it. I do wish a doctor would see me for some sexy treatment though.
Makes it obvious I actively tried to identify myself to Fircoal.
So really, saying I'm scum because I have a scummy role name when all my actions have been pro-town just seem very narrow-minded right now.
I can confirm that is the message that he sent to me.
I can also confirm that the role was released involuntary.
Reading his message it's clear that he didn't try to hide who he was. (I mean I was pretty sure that it was him just by reading the message.) So I believe what he's saying. It does seem like a Skittles move to put together a role like that.
Also I can confirm from my role name that hooker makes sense with his naming theme -.-
The usuper part was the part that made me more fearful.
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Sun May 14, 2017 5:24 am
by Ragian
lord voldemort wrote:fircoal can you be more clear in why you think dj is a good guy? he was right on the late bandwagon of skoffin yesterday.
also re:frenchie, im not sure I buy it, youre a regular blocker (who failed to block nagerous) and if we lynch the gf you become the gf and switch sides. but your role if usurper hooker? which are two normal scum roles.....
I don't buy that 2 of the people that were FOS'd yesterday have cleared each other and at the same time trying to clear frenchie....
I need to understand how much you're not sure about Ga7.
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Sun May 14, 2017 7:05 am
by lord voldemort
super sceptical. on all 3. im happy to follow the majority re: ga7. just to use 2 fairly common scum role names as a town role name is flat out weird.
fircoal still hasnt answered my question on why he thinks dj is a good guy?
I think we simply just need more information
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Sun May 14, 2017 7:37 am
by ga7
FOS Lovo To me, it sounds like you're fishing to know Chu's action.
If someone had information allowing to catch a scum, we would have had it already.
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Sun May 14, 2017 9:18 am
by Ragian
I just don't see Ga7 play it this way if he was scum. Makes no sense. And also, it's sort of weird to be super sceptical without voting or fossing. I think you're fanning the flames in the hopes that you can look innocent after a mislynch.
vote Lord voldemort
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Sun May 14, 2017 12:27 pm
by nagerous
ga7 wrote:Nag, it's fine if you think it's an elaborate ploy but getting hung up on the hooker title is silly, you should have realized by now that this game is not really themeless. If there's a town roleblocker, of course it's gonna be named hooker.
And the explanation of the usurper part . Who are you usrping ?
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Sun May 14, 2017 1:38 pm
by Samlen
I'm not voting ga purely because hooker/usurper are typically mafia, but because I have other information that makes me very skeptical of the likelihood of ga being townsided.
I'd rather not reveal how I know this information but I can understand if it's needed for you guys to trust me.
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Mon May 15, 2017 12:33 am
by ga7
nagerous wrote:ga7 wrote:Nag, it's fine if you think it's an elaborate ploy but getting hung up on the hooker title is silly, you should have realized by now that this game is not really themeless. If there's a town roleblocker, of course it's gonna be named hooker.
And the explanation of the usurper part . Who are you usrping ?
I don't know. That's why I said it was easier for me to try and stay town, it's not like I can plan my switch unless the GF claims
Samlen, upon my dead body your information will be proven wrong. If you happen to be town, be very careful or that will mean 2 mislynches.
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Mon May 15, 2017 12:40 am
by Skoffin
COME NOW FRIENDS we must root out the villanous villains that are trumping through our town in their terrible shoes and lack of top hats, and we won't get anywhere with the silence of dead fish that is currently exhudinginging from our pores. It's a bit too boooring to go for the obvious ga7 which means it's probably not what it looks like. Chuchuchuuu I choose yu for probably good guy since you seemed to be sticking up for gloriemcglorieface when you didn't have to thus you're probably the bees knees. Nag's power is probably townielike but wtf do I even know.
Raghian also seems like a cool cat so likely scummy scumsters are dj or lord
PIKA PIKA PIKA PIKA PAL pls halp I don't know what I'm doing, what you got to say old bean
unvote vote DJ
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Mon May 15, 2017 2:05 am
by Skittles!
MOD SPEAKING TIME
----
All was annoyingly quiet in Clusterfuckville. Townspeople and breeders alike were scared to disturb the restless slumber of the annual buggering festival. This festival, which has been going on since the dawn of time, or so the townspeople say, was known for the symbolic gesture of posturing oneself on the ground in a position not unlike a dog. In this position, many townsfolk came and noted the spectacle, some even partook. For it was not a symbolic gesture, but one that some members of the town loved doing. It was, in short, an annual hazing festival for those into that kind of thing. And it was no laughing matter. Kinks are never a laughing matter, unless you are a pup. In which case, go in (literally and figuratively).
Anyway, as I enjoy a good laugh, I offer you players an advantage. Whoever makes me laugh the most with either crude literature, a drawing, or just a pun and a joke, then I will give you an advantage through PM that you can choose to use or not. Imbalanced, you argue? No shit Sherlock.
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Mon May 15, 2017 2:12 am
by lord voldemort
whats the difference between peanut butter and jam??
I cant peanut butter my cock in your arse....
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Mon May 15, 2017 3:08 am
by Skoffin
lord voldemort wrote:whats the difference between peanut butter and jam??
I cant peanut butter my cock in your arse....
He said you gotta be funnyunvote vote Lord
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Mon May 15, 2017 3:14 am
by lord voldemort
how do u know he didnt find that funny?
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Mon May 15, 2017 3:19 am
by Skittles!
MOD ANNOUNCEMENT
------
I have changed my mind.
You can either-
1) continue with the jokes/puns/drawings and the best one will get the prize.
OR
2) you can roast Skoffin for 48 hours BUT she will get the prize
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Mon May 15, 2017 5:57 am
by lord voldemort
Skittles! wrote:MOD ANNOUNCEMENT
------
I have changed my mind.
You can either-
1) continue with the jokes/puns/drawings and the best one will get the prize.
OR
2) you can roast Skoffin for 48 hours BUT she will get the prize
por que no los dos?
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 2, whomp whomp
Posted: Mon May 15, 2017 6:16 am
by Ragian
@skoffin, why daddy DJ? He's been cleared by...ahm...fircoal? Someone. So if you like chu, you must also like his train.
(Here's hoping that Skittles! takes pity on ridiculous puns.)