Conquer Club

Iron Butterfly wrote:
So in other words your relying on probabilities and luck rather then an actual bonified case?

All cases do is increase the perceived chance of them being one of the ones to be mafia. This is Day 1 and by his comments and the case against him so far, I am just more willing to lynch him than anyone else at the current moment.

jonty125 wrote:

Nebuchadnezer wrote: It looks as though Jonty is gone, so we could always go with the ever popular "lynch the inactive"...that always works.

Is that long ago since I last posted??? Didn't realise.

vote charm for sheeping mtam.

This is all you got to say?

Really?

ITS BEEN THAT LONG ILL JUST VOTE ON SOMEONE AND LEAVE WITH A SMALL EXPLANATION

HotShot53 wrote:As annoying as tails has been, he actually does have a point that it's pretty rare to get a lynch on day 1 when you need a full majority instead of just a plurality. Of course that's not much of an excuse to not even try to do anything, because otherwise you're almost as bad off on day 2. Since he is now more actively posting, I'll hold off on joining the bandwagon yet... will see how things develop

Heres another point, he is probably scum and we should lynch him.

Nebuchadnezer wrote:

TA1LGUNN3R wrote: So you suspect anyone who has been promoting activity and trying to get everyone to participate? Please explain how you move the day further along without participation? Or are you referring to if it were day two, then it's an issue for you? To just fos everyone who has been talking is bad form in my mind.

Sorry, missed this earlier. I meant that yes, it's kinda silly to screech out for a lynch based on day one inactivity when many posters usually post the bare minimum on that day, and that to keep driving away at it is just reaching.

-Tails

So you think I wanted a lynch and not just more activity? My posts and vote were aimed at getting the inactive too talk. It felt like only the of us were posting for a few days. I wouldn't lynch on inactivity, but I will pressure to get participation.[/quote]

If I go inactive for the majority of the game do you promise not to lynch me?

mtamburini wrote:

Nebuchadnezer wrote:

TA1LGUNN3R wrote: So you suspect anyone who has been promoting activity and trying to get everyone to participate? Please explain how you move the day further along without participation? Or are you referring to if it were day two, then it's an issue for you? To just fos everyone who has been talking is bad form in my mind.

Sorry, missed this earlier. I meant that yes, it's kinda silly to screech out for a lynch based on day one inactivity when many posters usually post the bare minimum on that day, and that to keep driving away at it is just reaching.

-Tails

So you think I wanted a lynch and not just more activity? My posts and vote were aimed at getting the inactive too talk. It felt like only the of us were posting for a few days. I wouldn't lynch on inactivity, but I will pressure to get participation.

If I go inactive for the majority of the game do you promise not to lynch me?

spiesr wrote:If you aren't willing to do the former then the later is basically an empty threat.

Im willing to bet spiesr is town from this comment alone.

[/quote]


EBWOP

mtamburini wrote:

mtamburini wrote:

Nebuchadnezer wrote:

TA1LGUNN3R wrote:

Nebuchadnezer wrote: So you suspect anyone who has been promoting activity and trying to get everyone to participate? Please explain how you move the day further along without participation? Or are you referring to if it were day two, then it's an issue for you? To just fos everyone who has been talking is bad form in my mind.

Sorry, missed this earlier. I meant that yes, it's kinda silly to screech out for a lynch based on day one inactivity when many posters usually post the bare minimum on that day, and that to keep driving away at it is just reaching.

-Tails

So you think I wanted a lynch and not just more activity? My posts and vote were aimed at getting the inactive too talk. It felt like only the of us were posting for a few days. I wouldn't lynch on inactivity, but I will pressure to get participation.

If I go inactive for the majority of the game do you promise not to lynch me?

spiesr wrote:If you aren't willing to do the former then the later is basically an empty threat.

Im willing to bet spiesr is town from this comment alone.

EBWOP

EBWOP to fix proper quotation

jonty125 wrote:

Nebuchadnezer wrote: It looks as though Jonty is gone, so we could always go with the ever popular "lynch the inactive"...that always works.

Is that long ago since I last posted??? Didn't realise.

vote charm for sheeping mtam.

You're just jealous Jonty!!

You all have very good points. I've only had one game which was GoT that ended in a nL I think there is always value in trying to sniff out scum at all times even day 1. I think tail is scum - he is vague and pointless

Wow. Stunning display of wit and debate from the wonder twins. Where's that can of whoop ass?

-Tails

TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Wow. Stunning display of wit and debate from the wonder twins. Where's that can of whoop ass?

-Tails

Stunning display of condescending tone, AGAIN.

Can I vote twice please?

VC (Probably not correct, just counted votes SINCE my vote on Tails)

Tails ~ Jak, Mtam, Charm, (L4)
HotShot ~ spiesr,
Charm ~ PCM, Jonty, (L5)

So, if we want another claim we either need 2 more votes on Tails or 3 more on Charm. Which one do we really want a claim from today?

Eh. Nothing about Tails' play is abnormal, at least not for him. D1 apathy tends to be general sentiment 'round these parts (which is not to say it's a good thing).

I dislike how Charm is playing tambo's cheerleader, adding nothing but sheeping his points. It does nothing to change my opinion on her. Vote stands.

pancakemix wrote:Eh. Nothing about Tails' play is abnormal, at least not for him. D1 apathy tends to be general sentiment 'round these parts (which is not to say it's a good thing).

I dislike how Charm is playing tambo's cheerleader, adding nothing but sheeping his points. It does nothing to change my opinion on her. Vote stands.

I agree on a 2nd claim (then a lynch) but what do you think YOU will gain from getting a claim from charm rather than Tails?

mtamburini wrote:

pancakemix wrote:Eh. Nothing about Tails' play is abnormal, at least not for him. D1 apathy tends to be general sentiment 'round these parts (which is not to say it's a good thing).

I dislike how Charm is playing tambo's cheerleader, adding nothing but sheeping his points. It does nothing to change my opinion on her. Vote stands.

I agree on a 2nd claim (then a lynch) but what do you think YOU will gain from getting a claim from charm rather than Tails?

I never sheep anything!

I will claim that I was a cheerleader in 7th grade!
Give me a T
Give me an A
Give me an I
Give me a L
Let's wag the Tail!!

I crack myself up!!

Now TAILS, you gun slinging bad boy, what kind of jobs have you had?

mtamburini wrote:

pancakemix wrote:Eh. Nothing about Tails' play is abnormal, at least not for him. D1 apathy tends to be general sentiment 'round these parts (which is not to say it's a good thing).

I dislike how Charm is playing tambo's cheerleader, adding nothing but sheeping his points. It does nothing to change my opinion on her. Vote stands.

I agree on a 2nd claim (then a lynch) but what do you think YOU will gain from getting a claim from charm rather than Tails?

Don't believe I said anything regarding claims there. Where are you getting that from?

On the whole, I think there is more to be gained from pursuing charm because she's exhibiting actively scummy, whereas Tails' is in line with his meta and not scummy in general, in my estimation.

FP'd by charm: I'd appreciate if you'd back up that claim (the one about not sheeping, I'll trust that you were a cheerleader ). You'd help your case by posting something of substance.

mtamburini wrote:

TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Wow. Stunning display of wit and debate from the wonder twins. Where's that can of whoop ass?

-Tails

Stunning display of condescending tone, AGAIN.

Can I vote twice please?

I promise I'll stop being condescending if you'll answer the question.

Do have any point or argument that sells me as scum, other than my attitude? I don't treat any of the vets that way, only the sillehs who refuse to see the error of their ways.

-Tails

mtamburini wrote:

jonty125 wrote:

Nebuchadnezer wrote: It looks as though Jonty is gone, so we could always go with the ever popular "lynch the inactive"...that always works.

Is that long ago since I last posted??? Didn't realise.

vote charm for sheeping mtam.

This is all you got to say?

Really?

ITS BEEN THAT LONG ILL JUST VOTE ON SOMEONE AND LEAVE WITH A SMALL EXPLANATION

Yeah, you may want to reread some of Neb's posts, because somewhere he mentions he got me and jmac mixed up.


My vote stays on charm denies sheeping, yet didn't provide her own reason for her vote on Tails

pancakemix wrote:

mtamburini wrote:

pancakemix wrote:Eh. Nothing about Tails' play is abnormal, at least not for him. D1 apathy tends to be general sentiment 'round these parts (which is not to say it's a good thing).

I dislike how Charm is playing tambo's cheerleader, adding nothing but sheeping his points. It does nothing to change my opinion on her. Vote stands.

I agree on a 2nd claim (then a lynch) but what do you think YOU will gain from getting a claim from charm rather than Tails?

Don't believe I said anything regarding claims there. Where are you getting that from?

On the whole, I think there is more to be gained from pursuing charm because she's exhibiting actively scummy, whereas Tails' is in line with his meta and not scummy in general, in my estimation.

FP'd by charm: I'd appreciate if you'd back up that claim (the one about not sheeping, I'll trust that you were a cheerleader ). You'd help your case by posting something of substance.

If you dont want a claim from her why does your vote stay on her? What does your vote on her accomplish if you dont want a claim?

charm wrote:

jonty125 wrote:

Nebuchadnezer wrote: It looks as though Jonty is gone, so we could always go with the ever popular "lynch the inactive"...that always works.

Is that long ago since I last posted??? Didn't realise.

vote charm for sheeping mtam.

You're just jealous Jonty!!

You all have very good points. I've only had one game which was GoT that ended in a nL I think there is always value in trying to sniff out scum at all times even day 1. I think tail is scum - he is vague and pointless

A lot of the game creators here have realized that it is very hard to get majority lynches, which is why most games have plurality lynches... that's why most games have day 1 lynches. I can't recall any majority lynches day 1 since I've been playing here the last few months. Between tails and charm, I'd agree with jonty's and PCM's reasoning and vote Charm

mtamburini wrote:If you dont want a claim from her why does your vote stay on her? What does your vote on her accomplish if you dont want a claim?

I'm sorry, I was under the impression that the purpose of voting was to lynch, and that claiming is purely the realm of one who has votes, not the one casting them. I vote the scummiest player because they're the scummiest and I want to eliminate scummy players because I think they're more likely to be mafia. That's the whole idea, y'know.

pancakemix wrote:

mtamburini wrote:

pancakemix wrote:Eh. Nothing about Tails' play is abnormal, at least not for him. D1 apathy tends to be general sentiment 'round these parts (which is not to say it's a good thing).

I dislike how Charm is playing tambo's cheerleader, adding nothing but sheeping his points. It does nothing to change my opinion on her. Vote stands.

I agree on a 2nd claim (then a lynch) but what do you think YOU will gain from getting a claim from charm rather than Tails?

Don't believe I said anything regarding claims there. Where are you getting that from?

On the whole, I think there is more to be gained from pursuing charm because she's exhibiting actively scummy, whereas Tails' is in line with his meta and not scummy in general, in my estimation.

FP'd by charm: I'd appreciate if you'd back up that claim (the one about not sheeping, I'll trust that you were a cheerleader ). You'd help your case by posting something of substance.

I had to go look up the term Sheeping since you keep insisting on this! Here is what the urban dictionary states...
Sheeping
"Sheeping" is another way of saying "A Wolf In Sheep's Clothing".
On the internet, this is referring to a person that instant messages, emails, chats or calls pretending to be someone else or a different gender than they really are.
They can be found in internet chat rooms or forums.
They will try to "disguise" themselves by using a female screen name and a color or font that implies "female".
A person that is sheeping will also email or post “fake” pics and claim they are their own.
Sheeping is also when a person wants others to think he/she is "new" to their chat room/forum.
Syntax and diction can/are specific to each person’s manner and personality therefore sheepers can be easily exposed.
"He is sheeping."
"What?"
"He is not female he is pretending to be a female"
"That is Cynthia. She is sheeping. You can change your SN but you cant change the way you type. "
"She is sheeping. Those are'nt her pics. Those pics are on 11 websites. Unless of course she is a model."
"He is male not female. That insult is used more by men and scarcely by women. He is sheeping."

So, Mr. Pancake, I thought it was because you thought I was following MTam which of course I'm not. Now I understand it is because you think I'm a guy with a hot avatar picture. I assure you I am female how should I prove this to you? You can ask any one in my clan, Gladiators of Noxious - I'm sure they would say there is no doubt that I am the fabulous Gladiatrix. Now, you on the other hand, do have a girl as your avatar and I did call you a girl in the other mafia game. So, if I offended you I'm so sorry - but you're the one that's being sheepy! You keep on pursuing me and you will prove to the town that you are Tail's mafia brother or being totally lame. From what I have seen, you're a pretty good player - but you never played with me before and you have no idea how wacky I am!!

pancakemix wrote:

mtamburini wrote:If you dont want a claim from her why does your vote stay on her? What does your vote on her accomplish if you dont want a claim?

I'm sorry, I was under the impression that the purpose of voting was to lynch, and that claiming is purely the realm of one who has votes, not the one casting them. I vote the scummiest player because they're the scummiest and I want to eliminate scummy players because I think they're more likely to be mafia. That's the whole idea, y'know.

So you are in favor of a lynch of charm regardless of claim?

FPD by sexy charm

Sheeping is following another person like a sheep follows a shepherd.

FP by mtam

jonty125 wrote:

mtamburini wrote:

jonty125 wrote:

Nebuchadnezer wrote: It looks as though Jonty is gone, so we could always go with the ever popular "lynch the inactive"...that always works.

Is that long ago since I last posted??? Didn't realise.

vote charm for sheeping mtam.

This is all you got to say?

Really?

ITS BEEN THAT LONG ILL JUST VOTE ON SOMEONE AND LEAVE WITH A SMALL EXPLANATION

Yeah, you may want to reread some of Neb's posts, because somewhere he mentions he got me and jmac mixed up.


My vote stays on charm denies sheeping, yet didn't provide her own reason for her vote on Tails

This is what you said

jonty125 wrote:Is that long ago since I last posted??? Didn't realise.

How does that have anything to do with nebs post?

Mtam. This what I'm referring to.

Nebuchadnezer wrote:

jonty125 wrote:

Nebuchadnezer wrote: It looks as though Jonty is gone, so we could always go with the ever popular "lynch the inactive"...that always works.

Is that long ago since I last posted??? Didn't realise.

vote charm for sheeping mtam.

Doh! Sorry...get you and Jmac confused. You're still here then...

jonty125 wrote:Mtam. This what I'm referring to.

Nebuchadnezer wrote:

jonty125 wrote:

Nebuchadnezer wrote: It looks as though Jonty is gone, so we could always go with the ever popular "lynch the inactive"...that always works.

Is that long ago since I last posted??? Didn't realise.

vote charm for sheeping mtam.

Doh! Sorry...get you and Jmac confused. You're still here then...

And I'm referring to not giving a shit about what neb said it's what you said.