Conquer Club

JamesKer1 wrote:I'm here, thanks for understanding Flores. Please make the attempt to look at others who haven't posted instead of those who tell you they won't. I try to he courteous in that respect instead of disappearing for no reason. I'm feeling a LOT of biased from you, please look at my improvements from game 1 instead of my past. Happy Holidays.

Anarkistsdream wrote:

JamesKer1 wrote:I'm here, thanks for understanding Flores. Please make the attempt to look at others who haven't posted instead of those who tell you they won't. I try to he courteous in that respect instead of disappearing for no reason. I'm feeling a LOT of biased from you, please look at my improvements from game 1 instead of my past. Happy Holidays.

That brought a tear to my drunkoffturkey eye.... haha

And Happy Thanksgiving to all those Stateside

The Weird One wrote:

Anarkistsdream wrote:

JamesKer1 wrote:I'm here, thanks for understanding Flores. Please make the attempt to look at others who haven't posted instead of those who tell you they won't. I try to he courteous in that respect instead of disappearing for no reason. I'm feeling a LOT of biased from you, please look at my improvements from game 1 instead of my past. Happy Holidays.

That brought a tear to my drunkoffturkey eye.... haha

And Happy Thanksgiving to all those Stateside

Happy Smallpox Awareness Day to you as well, sir.

jonty125 wrote:No Thanksgiving in the UK.

As the game stalls.

nagerous wrote:

jonty125 wrote:No Thanksgiving in the UK.

As the game stalls.

Surely isn't the idea of holidays to get a day off work, hide from the family and piss about on the internet?

Anarkistsdream wrote:

edocsil wrote:Hell, half of America won't post between now and Sunday.

Exactly... It is a national holiday here, and it isn't as if Flores was ignorant of that fact....

Vote: Flores

edocsil wrote:

Anarkistsdream wrote:

edocsil wrote:Hell, half of America won't post between now and Sunday.

Exactly... It is a national holiday here, and it isn't as if Flores was ignorant of that fact....

Vote: Flores

unvote Vote anark

Few reasons.

1. He is voting in red, red doesn't count, ergo either his vote is not serious, or he is not paying attention, or he doesn't intend to actually lynch flores.

Nothing was ever said about red not counting... Not BOLDING it doesn't count. At least, that's what it says in the instructions... So either the instructions should be more clear, or you are wrong...

2. I don't understand why he would vote for her in the first place, her wanting a replacement was unrealistic, not scummy.

Because I was replying to a ridiculous request with a ridiculous vote... Hell, my reasoning for voting her is better than any other reason I have seen so far in this thread.

In short, Anarks vote didn't make sense, so I'm voting for him.

You just think I'm cute.

edocsil wrote:

Anarkistsdream wrote:

edocsil wrote:Hell, half of America won't post between now and Sunday.

Exactly... It is a national holiday here, and it isn't as if Flores was ignorant of that fact....

Vote: Flores

unvote Vote anark

Few reasons.

1. He is voting in red, red doesn't count, ergo either his vote is not serious, or he is not paying attention, or he doesn't intend to actually lynch flores.

2. I don't understand why he would vote for her in the first place, her wanting a replacement was unrealistic, not scummy.

In short, Anarks vote didn't make sense, so I'm voting for him.

HotShot53 wrote:So far, it seems we're still pretty much in the joke vote stage... I know at least for me I haven't seen anything I would consider a definite scum sign. Have I missed anything?

Minister Masket wrote: Yes, red votes do count, as long as they are in bold.

Anarkistsdream wrote:

Minister Masket wrote: Yes, red votes do count, as long as they are in bold.

Suck it, Edocsil!

edocsil wrote: @Jonty.
No, i was perfectly serious. If I need to use smaller words to explain it I will. I thought Anarks vote was not in jest, and that it was poor logic, which I felt that he needed to explain. That's what my vote provoked, and that was it's intent.

JamesKer1 wrote:I thought it only went down by 1 per day? Dang...

rishaed wrote:Okay, we have real issues to talk about now. Mod for the last few days can you make it drop by one and not two? My reasoning here is that it is too easy to raise someone to L-2 for a claim and have the poor sucker lynched the next day without even a chance to claim/ for people to unvote. Also, unvote until i find someone to seriously put my vote on.

ga7 wrote:Damn, time sure flies fast, since less than half the players are needed for a lynch I reckon it's time for thoughts.
I don't know what's weirder between Nark's pissing about as usual, Edoc getting his panties in a bunch or James & Jonty to the rescue of all things serious, but at least something is going on. As the votes needed for a lynch get lower, I expect some people to lay veeery low.
Rish, putting someone at L-2 is definitely risky for this setup but it's better than to have someone lynched with 3 votes and no real suspicion. So while I agree we need to be careful with our votes, I see it as an incentive to pressure people more. That said I'd like to see some more posts before putting my vote down tomorrow. Unvote