I agree with SG7. Ghost and I got an award today, so I have been absent for a while because of that. I also hate joke vote stage, but thats just me . Unvote Vote JG for not getting ice cream!
new guy1 wrote:I agree with SG7. Ghost and I got an award today, so I have been absent for a while because of that. I also hate joke vote stage, but thats just me . Unvote Vote JG for not getting ice cream!
LOL stop skimming on D1 NG1,I said I wasnt selling Ice cream. I have three different kinds in the freezer. Not selling them either.
thechuck51 wrote:unvote (if necessary) vote / because I am lazy and it requires the least amount of typing
Unvote, Vote TheChuck because he's a lazy ass and we need this going somewhere whether it be a claim or something else.
This isn't helping at all, if you need to get it moving somewhere then why not bandwagon someone who is no use to the town, i.e. the inactive case I presented above. Do you think this was seriously gonna generate a wagon on chuck and get him to claim? As far as I see it you were preventing progress for the town and as such you are a better day 1 BW.
unvote vote jak
2009-08-12 03:35:31 - Squirrels Hat: MWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!
2009-08-12 03:44:25 - Mr. Squirrel: Do you think my hat will attack me?
thechuck51 wrote:unvote (if necessary) vote / because I am lazy and it requires the least amount of typing
Unvote, Vote TheChuck because he's a lazy ass and we need this going somewhere whether it be a claim or something else.
This isn't helping at all, if you need to get it moving somewhere then why not bandwagon someone who is no use to the town, i.e. the inactive case I presented above. Do you think this was seriously gonna generate a wagon on chuck and get him to claim? As far as I see it you were preventing progress for the town and as such you are a better day 1 BW.
unvote vote jak
Why would I follow your suggestion? You change your vote because I am not agreeing with it. Am I voting for your scum mate or something? If so, GREAT! You're next if he pops scum. There's others who are not voting how you want them to yet you point out someone who votes for Chuck? Tsk tsk. Poor case against me and poor case against Spartacus. I'd rather get my information from a living person then an inactive at this stage. Inactives can be replaced.
Highest Rank:
Major:2157
"All wars are civil wars, because all men are brothers"
thechuck51 wrote:unvote (if necessary) vote / because I am lazy and it requires the least amount of typing
Unvote, Vote TheChuck because he's a lazy ass and we need this going somewhere whether it be a claim or something else.
This isn't helping at all, if you need to get it moving somewhere then why not bandwagon someone who is no use to the town, i.e. the inactive case I presented above. Do you think this was seriously gonna generate a wagon on chuck and get him to claim? As far as I see it you were preventing progress for the town and as such you are a better day 1 BW.
unvote vote jak
Why would I follow your suggestion? You change your vote because I am not agreeing with it. Am I voting for your scum mate or something? If so, GREAT! You're next if he pops scum. There's others who are not voting how you want them to yet you point out someone who votes for Chuck? Tsk tsk. Poor case against me and poor case against Spartacus. I'd rather get my information from a living person then an inactive at this stage. Inactives can be replaced.
Its the fact you simultaneously complain that no one is creating a lynch chance and vote in a way that will never ever get a BW going. Had you picked anyone who was already been voted, that would have been understandable or at least said why we should bandwagon the person you picked. You want to vote for someone who is active, please tell me how you expect chuck to respond to your vote? You after all, gave no reason for it.
The reason for voting inactives is two fold:
1. They are not helping the town. 2. BWs are more likely to build on them (due to their inability to respond) and its BWs we need.
2009-08-12 03:35:31 - Squirrels Hat: MWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!
2009-08-12 03:44:25 - Mr. Squirrel: Do you think my hat will attack me?
thechuck51 wrote:unvote (if necessary) vote / because I am lazy and it requires the least amount of typing
Unvote, Vote TheChuck because he's a lazy ass and we need this going somewhere whether it be a claim or something else.
This isn't helping at all, if you need to get it moving somewhere then why not bandwagon someone who is no use to the town, i.e. the inactive case I presented above. Do you think this was seriously gonna generate a wagon on chuck and get him to claim? As far as I see it you were preventing progress for the town and as such you are a better day 1 BW.
unvote vote jak
Why would I follow your suggestion? You change your vote because I am not agreeing with it. Am I voting for your scum mate or something? If so, GREAT! You're next if he pops scum. There's others who are not voting how you want them to yet you point out someone who votes for Chuck? Tsk tsk. Poor case against me and poor case against Spartacus. I'd rather get my information from a living person then an inactive at this stage. Inactives can be replaced.
Its the fact you simultaneously complain that no one is creating a lynch chance and vote in a way that will never ever get a BW going. Had you picked anyone who was already been voted, that would have been understandable or at least said why we should bandwagon the person you picked. You want to vote for someone who is active, please tell me how you expect chuck to respond to your vote? You after all, gave no reason for it.
The reason for voting inactives is two fold:
1. They are not helping the town. 2. BWs are more likely to build on them (due to their inability to respond) and its BWs we need.
Well unlike your flawed logic I am looking for information like I always do in games anyone here has played with me in. Even ask them about the Yo Ho game I helped the town get more info than usual on the very first day. I am not looking for a lynch unlike you yet. I am beginning to believe you're digging your own grave even attempting in picking a fight with me bud. Ask anyone here, whether my arguments are good or bad I talk down any one who tries to oppose me .
Here's where I can EASILY make a case against you, you're aiming for a single person when everyone is looking for info with their votes, you wish for a quick and easy bandwagon lynch so we can go into the night stage, why? You do not seem to care for information, just the 'easy' lynches. I'm sure even Chuck can respect me as a player who is trying to find info. Which I cannot say the same for you when you are simply trying to lynch some inactive person that can be replaced by an active player... tsk tsk.
Fastposted once.
Highest Rank:
Major:2157
"All wars are civil wars, because all men are brothers"