Conquer Club

*fires a gun randomly*

I don't like deadlines

aage wrote:*fires a gun randomly*

Did you fire the gun while inside or outside the matrix? I'm assuming since we are "all plugged in" that it was inside. If inside the matrix with a gun I'm inclined to think agent... That or any other character, because just about every character of note inside the matrix had a gun... often more than one.

Vote Fircoal for senseless bandwagoninit of OMGUS, but hey if he had done the same to Commander I would have done it even sooner.

00icon wrote:

Commander wrote:Again, seriously - where have I stated that I wanted to be voted out?

The smiley was a suggestive motif.

Okay well apparently I'm not gonna hear from violet, and I would like a prod on her. But for now, I want to vote 00icon.

It was obvious Commander was being flippant with the smiley, or you deliberately misinterpreted him.

-Tails

TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Okay well apparently I'm not gonna hear from violet, and I would like a prod on her. But for now, I want to vote 00icon.

It was obvious Commander was being flippant with the smiley, or you deliberately misinterpreted him.

-Tails

well, my bad. i didn't notice it that way. it intrigues me that the smiley was imported rather than using one of the many available.
btw merry Xmas all!

EDIT: It starts snowing

00iCon wrote:

TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Okay well apparently I'm not gonna hear from violet, and I would like a prod on her. But for now, I want to vote 00icon.

It was obvious Commander was being flippant with the smiley, or you deliberately misinterpreted him.

-Tails

well, my bad. i didn't notice it that way. it intrigues me that the smiley was imported rather than using one of the many available.
btw merry Xmas all!

EDIT: It starts snowing

No editting posts. Also its just a smiley...

unvote vote 00icon for editing, also merry xmas ^^

i would've ebwop'ed but my addition was really useless and seconds from posting.

but what else did he cover by editing out?

unvote vote 00icon

vote 00icon editing is a lynchable offense.

Did he edit?

I don't see a "this post was edited" line so I have no reason to assume he did. I suspect he was fastposted.

aage wrote:Did he edit?

I don't see a "this post was edited" line so I have no reason to assume he did. I suspect he was fastposted.

If you edit it within a certain timeframe, about a minute or two, it doesn't show the edit. He openly admitted to editing after he posted.

FOS edocsil and Sax for bandwaggoning someone for adding "It started snowing" to their post.
Let the mod deal with potential rule breaks.

This just seems to me like being desperate to get a bandwaggon going and appearing to contribute.

Haggis_McMutton wrote:FOS edocsil and Sax for bandwaggoning someone for adding "It started snowing" to their post.
Let the mod deal with potential rule breaks.

This just seems to me like being desperate to get a bandwaggon going and appearing to contribute.

I absolutly agree with you there, especially this one...

edocsil wrote:vote 00icon editing is a lynchable offense.

This has triggered my scumdar more than commander did, especially with '' editing is a lynchable offense '' right aftre fircoal voted. While true, it looks much more like hiding behind words than explaining your vote, therefor:

unvote

vote: edoc

freezie wrote:

Haggis_McMutton wrote:FOS edocsil and Sax for bandwaggoning someone for adding "It started snowing" to their post.
Let the mod deal with potential rule breaks.

This just seems to me like being desperate to get a bandwaggon going and appearing to contribute.

I absolutly agree with you there, especially this one...

edocsil wrote:vote 00icon editing is a lynchable offense.

This has triggered my scumdar more than commander did, especially with '' editing is a lynchable offense '' right aftre fircoal voted. While true, it looks much more like hiding behind words than explaining your vote, therefor:

unvote

vote: edoc

You have no way of knowing what else he edited.

Haggis_McMutton wrote:FOS edocsil and Sax for bandwaggoning someone for adding "It started snowing" to their post.
Let the mod deal with potential rule breaks.

This just seems to me like being desperate to get a bandwaggon going and appearing to contribute.

While I definitely agree with you there Haggis, Edoc does bring a good point - 00iCon could have had something slip out of him and he could have edited that along with writing "It's snowing." He was rather too aggressive to find someone lynch before this as well...

FoS 00iCon.

Haggis_McMutton wrote:FOS edocsil and Sax for bandwaggoning someone for adding "It started snowing" to their post.
Let the mod deal with potential rule breaks.

This just seems to me like being desperate to get a bandwaggon going and appearing to contribute.

why are you so quick to believe him? just because he say so? or because you gain something from protecting him? this is the matrix, and we are all plugged, you can trust nothing, i don't believe that this is just a glitch, plus you should know better, there is no snow FOS haggis

FloresDelMal wrote:

Haggis_McMutton wrote:FOS edocsil and Sax for bandwaggoning someone for adding "It started snowing" to their post.
Let the mod deal with potential rule breaks.

This just seems to me like being desperate to get a bandwaggon going and appearing to contribute.

why are you so quick to believe him? just because he say so? or because you gain something from protecting him? this is the matrix, and we are all plugged, you can trust nothing, i don't believe that this is just a glitch, plus you should know better, there is no snow FOS haggis

Hmm, you're supporting the bandwaggon on someone for editing a post?
Why didn't you guys start a similar bandwaggon on VIctor when he edited a post in Briasburg?

Yeah, maybe he accidentally put the names of his scummates in that post, or maybe he's a new player and forgot the rule against editing.
I maintain that you should let the mod deal with potential rule breaks and base voting on actual facts instead of whether the edit of a post was accidental or intentional. Seems very weak to jump on a bandwaggon for that reason.

Haggis_McMutton wrote:Let the mod deal with potential rule breaks.

I was just about to say this.
Now, i'm fairly certain that at least one person on my BW is scum as it was a very easy target. But i have no way of telling exactly who it could be.
Also, will everyone shut up about Briarsburg already!

double vote 00icon for dissing briars.

N.B this is a joke vote. I wouldn't want a bandwagon started on me like dazey in briars...

I've broken my wrist. Is that a good xmas present?

Other than that I would have to agree that voting 00icon for editting is premature. fos flores and sax and more serious fos edoc for being the bandwagoninh vote.

Gah, my first game I was nearly lynched for two things, one the mod sent me the wrong role PM, and two for editing a post. If i remember correctly it was some of the same people who are FoSing me now....

So what do we do from here, everyone going to jump on me for bandwagoning or are we going to look for something else?

edocsil wrote:Gah, my first game I was nearly lynched for two things, one the mod sent me the wrong role PM, and two for editing a post. If i remember correctly it was some of the same people who are FoSing me now....

So what do we do from here, everyone going to jump on me for bandwagoning or are we going to look for something else?

What game was this?

Fircoal wrote:

edocsil wrote:Gah, my first game I was nearly lynched for two things, one the mod sent me the wrong role PM, and two for editing a post. If i remember correctly it was some of the same people who are FoSing me now....

So what do we do from here, everyone going to jump on me for bandwagoning or are we going to look for something else?

What game was this?

viewtopic.php?f=213&t=116199
Think it was this one, first game that I was in to actually finish.

Then there was vodean, we blacklisted him for editing, although there were some other strikes involved there as well, but that was the final straw.

Well I don't personally see it as a lynchable offense. I don't think it should be. I found that the fact you jumped on it where you did struck me as scummy. I will however agree with you that it is impossible to tell what he editted but I do not like building cases on speculative evidence alone. I like to see actual words they said and we can prove they said and I like to see grout between the tiles.