Conquer Club

WL_southerner wrote:all you need to do is put nasa or bas or nerc in the address bar and you get a whole loads off links to pick from same has i do and you can was yahoo main page some times you get nassa link there

But I don't want to. I want you to do it, and provide a link for me. Somewhere where NASA says the solar system is 120 billion years old. I swear I'll buy you a year's premium membership if you can do it.

i would definetly say we are causing global warming. it actually takes about 20 to forty years to actually make an effect on our ozone though. but the industrial age which happened over 100 years ago was probably when it started and it porbably hasnt gotten any better.

lol a year prem i just giving one away i dont want a prem dont be lazy go and look you might find some other intresting stuff like the 2 comets that are in r sky and can be seen with the naked eye or that saturn and you can see the rings

WL_southerner wrote:lol a year prem i just giving one away i dont want a prem dont be lazy go and look you might find some other intresting stuff like the 2 comets that are in r sky and can be seen with the naked eye or that saturn and you can see the rings

A period, at least one period would be helpful. A period will assist us in understanding where one sentence stops and one begins.

Also, utilizing the spell check functionality recently added to Firefox will go quite far in assisting us in understanding you.

And your reference to "that saturn," are there more than one?

In Britain a period is a full stop, just in case you wondered Southener.

Guiscard wrote:In Britain a period is a full stop, just in case you wondered Southener.

He's British? He misspells and rambles like an American.

Show some pride in your nationality Southerner, spell out your words.

yup pure south coast where they drop h's all the time and talk with out taking breaths

WL_southerner wrote:yup pure south coast where they drop h's all the time and talk with out taking breaths

Ah, hence no periods.

aaaaanyway...

Back on topic.

Can anyone who still feels able to dismiss global warming as a theory/pinko commie conspiracy/overreaction etc etc please state why the conclusions reached by 2,500 international climatologists are wrong.
Please.

heavycola wrote:aaaaanyway...

Back on topic.

Can anyone who still feels able to dismiss global warming as a theory/pinko commie conspiracy/overreaction etc etc please state why the conclusions reached by 2,500 international climatologists are wrong.
Please.

because.

Cynthia wrote:

heavycola wrote:aaaaanyway...

Back on topic.

Can anyone who still feels able to dismiss global warming as a theory/pinko commie conspiracy/overreaction etc etc please state why the conclusions reached by 2,500 international climatologists are wrong.
Please.

because.

genius!!

Cynthia wrote:

heavycola wrote:aaaaanyway...

Back on topic.

Can anyone who still feels able to dismiss global warming as a theory/pinko commie conspiracy/overreaction etc etc please state why the conclusions reached by 2,500 international climatologists are wrong.
Please.

because.

i want an ARGUMENT goddamit! There is not enough arguing around here anymore.

heavycola wrote:aaaaanyway...

Back on topic.

Can anyone who still feels able to dismiss global warming as a theory/pinko commie conspiracy/overreaction etc etc please state why the conclusions reached by 2,500 international climatologists are wrong.
Please.

Because is it an agenda to control the masses. "Conserve energy", "Don't buy SUV's", "Ban hair spray" give me a break. We are not causing global warming. If you choose to buy into it that's your paranoid, pessimistic opinion. Now, Ive gotta hop into my SUV and run to the store to buy a case of hair spray for my wife.... later.

jay_a2j wrote:

heavycola wrote:aaaaanyway...

Back on topic.

Can anyone who still feels able to dismiss global warming as a theory/pinko commie conspiracy/overreaction etc etc please state why the conclusions reached by 2,500 international climatologists are wrong.
Please.

Because is it an agenda to control the masses. "Conserve energy", "Don't buy SUV's", "Ban hair spray" give me a break. We are not causing global warming. If you choose to buy into it that's your paranoid, pessimistic opinion. Now, Ive gotta hop into my SUV and run to the store to buy a case of hair spray for my wife.... later.

Jay uses rush limbaugh's opinion to take on 2,500 qualified scientists from over 30 different countries. My god your head is buried so far in the sand.

Controlling the masses - who? Who wants people to stop buying SUVs and conserve energy? Who does that benefit, if global warming is a fantasy?


(and it seems ironic that a fundamentalist xian condemns global warming as a fantasy meant to control the masses )

Jay_a2j wrote:We are not causing global warming.

2,500 scientists tell you something = it's a conspiracy
A few politicians whose interests lie firmly with oil companies and big industry tell you something = the truth
Really jay? Would you agree with this?

Its already been said but it needs saying again. the earth changes on its own and wil always change of its own free will. look at earthquakes for God's sake! they are caused by the earth and so is everything else in the world. will you paranoid idiots get off your high horses, 'oh we're going to cut down on flying to save the planet.' give me a break.

Stopper wrote:

WL_southerner wrote:all you need to do is put nasa or bas or nerc in the address bar and you get a whole loads off links to pick from same has i do and you can was yahoo main page some times you get nassa link there

But I don't want to. I want you to do it, and provide a link for me. Somewhere where NASA says the solar system is 120 billion years old. I swear I'll buy you a year's premium membership if you can do it.

I read in a steven hawking book that the universe was 12-15 billion years old. not to mention all my physics textbooks, they also found that the expansion of the universe was accelerating so if anything that should revise its age to younger.

you called me pe 24
ah what wonders the local english is south cant under stand the north the north cant under stand the welsh and no body can under stand them in/or from glasgow
thats are cyn a genius in the making
back to global warming its a cycle that the earth have all though it history but man has added to the ploblem ever since he first lit a fire just that in the last 200 odd years we got better at it
why prof cox would not add his name to that paper with the other 2000 odd tects is because there are to many verables
one verable is very time there been global warming the land masses was in diffrent places and they all ended with an ice age
even if you take from now to the last ice age the land masses are in a diffrent place ie america has been moving away from europe at a rate 2cm a year and britain is moving away from the main land at 1mm a year
what could be intesting is people idea in what going to happen

jay_a2j wrote:Because is it an agenda to control the masses. "Conserve energy", "Don't buy SUV's", "Ban hair spray" give me a break. We are not causing global warming. If you choose to buy into it that's your paranoid, pessimistic opinion.

BWAAAHAHAHA! This from one of the most "controlled" people I have ever seen. If you looking for "an agenda to control the masses" and people "buying into paranoia", just look around the room next Sunday. Those are your lemmings.

jay_a2j wrote:Now, Ive gotta hop into my SUV and run to the store to buy a case of hair spray for my wife....

It's sad that your wife needs so much hairspray. Please remind her this is 2007.

Backglass wrote:

jay_a2j wrote:Because is it an agenda to control the masses. "Conserve energy", "Don't buy SUV's", "Ban hair spray" give me a break. We are not causing global warming. If you choose to buy into it that's your paranoid, pessimistic opinion.

BWAAAHAHAHA! This from one of the most "controlled" people I have ever seen. If you looking for "an agenda to control the masses" and people "buying into paranoia", just look around the room next Sunday. Those are your lemmings.

jay_a2j wrote:Now, Ive gotta hop into my SUV and run to the store to buy a case of hair spray for my wife....

It's sad that your wife needs so much hairspray. Please remind her this is 2007.

Backglass you hacking into my computer stealing pics of my wife again! ROFL.

steven hawking publish that 15-20 years ago even he had a change of heart over how old the solar system is
the expaning universe is still being work on we dont know how far the universe has expaned, we cant see the edge of the universe yet so we dont know how big it is. but they have and idea what is out on the edge that is dead planets,stars and galaxys then they need to see to the other side off that and with them 3 points thay can work out where the centre was or is that give them a rough idea how old the universe is, but theres another problem all the galaxys are traveling in diffrent directions like the galaxy that heading towards are mikyway. thats way the last idea on the big bang was not just one but more how many who knows
about 120 billion years go are solar system was a mass of swirling gas that was the start of things

WL_southerner wrote:steven hawking publish that 15-20 years ago even he had a change of heart over how old the solar system is
the expaning universe is still being work on we dont know how far the universe has expaned, we cant see the edge of the universe yet so we dont know how big it is. but they have and idea what is out on the edge that is dead planets,stars and galaxys then they need to see to the other side off that and with them 3 points thay can work out where the centre was or is that give them a rough idea how old the universe is, but theres another problem all the galaxys are traveling in diffrent directions like the galaxy that heading towards are mikyway. thats way the last idea on the big bang was not just one but more how many who knows
about 120 billion years go are solar system was a mass of swirling gas that was the start of things

I think you're confusing the term "Solar system" with "Universe."

all the galaxys are traveling in diffrent directions

The universe is a hypersphere - a 4-dimensional sphere - and this is exactly what its expansion SHOULD look like. Do not try to visualise a hypersphere, it can cause madness.

we dont know what shape it is untill we see the outter edges it could be shape like a galaxy for all we know, if we know what shape the big bang exlosion was then have an idea what shape the universe is
are solar system is a lot younger than the universe , are solar system is prob just a blink on an eye to the age off the universe

heavycola wrote:

all the galaxys are traveling in diffrent directions

The universe is a hypersphere - a 4-dimensional sphere - and this is exactly what its expansion SHOULD look like. Do not try to visualise a hypersphere, it can cause madness.

I've never considered that possibility before, that certainly would make the open system theory a whole helluva lot easier to visualize.

jay_a2j wrote:Backglass you hacking into my computer stealing pics of my wife again! ROFL.

I hate to admit it, but yes.

I also found this one of you and the family. It seems your whole family needs that hairspray...and your daughter looks just like you!