Moderator: Community Team
That depends on whether Chap's investigation was affect by Aage and his godfather role. The initial report came up with 4 and if Aage's role came into play there would be 5.jak111 wrote:Only two of the 4 original were found on that list, leaving two baddies up, yes?
I don't think so. With Soundman, Aage, and Vodean as scum, that means there are 1 or 2 scum left on the list.So realistically, all 3 of them could be mafia.

In other words, no one is confirmed now, random players are evil.His neck snapped and his power broke free of his shackles. Baal jerked in the throes of death and his power slammed into the men watching his death. Some it passed through, some it turned. Some had spoken for hanging the demon some had not, the power did not discriminate.
Darkness came, and the forces of Yahweh knew fear. They had killed their enemy, but more had been spawned in their midst. This night would hold new terrors for them all.
Partially; also because aage defended your request to have a mass night prodRodion wrote: Is the Jak lead because Edoc replaced him rather than modkill?
This would make sense if the final member(s) were habitual inactives (droz/illiad).aage wrote:But Mafia doesn't. If this game were democratic in any way, there would be no point in playing it.VioIet wrote:Well that choice is up to Edoc, but I personally don't think that he should have to do that. It is everyone's responsibility to follow the game. I think reminding people to submit an action outside of the game thread can be loosely influencing the game.
If Mafia miss their action- oh well. I would think that Town would want them to miss anyhow.
Technically id rather give blake the boot, been gone longer. I suppose kicking them both outmod killingboth isnt out of the question. I just hate modkillsedocsil wrote:Jak replaces Iliad. I'm also posting in the replacements to see if I can find one for droz.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Fair enough, I had no idea who was inactive, I'm not really keeping track day to day, I simply noted the last page iliad posted on; page 70 was wayyyyyy back in December, while 20 days ago is a mere 4 pages back.jak111 wrote:
But speaking of inactives / wants an inactive dead yet doesn't worry about the above two? Call me a conspiracy theorist but I smell something fishy going on. But once DRoZ flips then I can better assess where /'s loyalties lie.
This seems to be a confession. I am actually in favor of Droz being modkilled so that we will be able to vote Doom off.DoomYoshi wrote:I would post, but I have quite literally, nothing to say.

Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
As in we know Doom's anti-town since last month.Rodion wrote:Doom was caught back in january.

Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
VioIet wrote:Why was "Droz ~ Augustine of Canterbury Saint ~ Watcher," listed in Red? I thought Red was the mafia's color, and Blue was the Town's color.
That's actually a really good point. Leaving Yoshi alive is basically a ticket to Saf getting blocked. Hard to argue with that logic, despite the case against you.Normally I'd probably agree with Rodion about lynching Doom (If for no other reason to prevent Safari from being interfered with) but I'm not sure that's an option. Frankly we don't have to kill the subverted to win and if we lynch Doom we're probably only slowing mafia down which I'm not sure we can afford right now.
I'll admit, I've had a hard time following this one since it started. That said, I feel the case on strike is based more in reality than in meta, solely because there was an actual action involved rather than the guesswork of "the list". It's also been easier to point out due to its simplicity. Is it possible that it was purely coincidence? Sure. I just find that too convenient. So as much as I'm flattered by you thinking I'm trying to be your buddy, that is not the case. It's just something I feel I can get behind, something I've been hard-pressed to find all game.Of the rest of your list, I would most highly suspect pancakemix. He's been playing "yes man" to my accusations against you (even when I was somewhat unsure about them) and it seems as if he's trying to bandwagon with me to create an association between us, which is a common scum tactic. It let's him get by with contributing very little and avoiding much attention.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.