Conquer Club

kylegraves1 wrote:

AndyDufresne wrote:Due to FredVIII's numerous benefits of the doubt during past issues with his account(s), in addition to previous Warnings and Vacations, taking into account the recent game chats, the culmination of all this has lead us to issue a Permanent Website Vacation for FredVIII---no buy backs or coming back.
--Andy

thank you andy
go to hell fredd anton jeff whatever the hell your name is

lanyards wrote:Swearing isn't even breaking any rules... Wow.

Renegades wrote:After losing his Jeff Hardy account, this loyal CC player created another account and bought ANOTHER premium just to keep playing this game!
We should cherish players like this not dump them. He has not gotten an official warning about swearing and we can ALL understand that CC can be frustrating sometimes.. We should just guide and/or coach this player, not ban him! This is probably the worst advertisement there is for a game: "We ban all dedicated players who get frustrated sometimes."
Hows that for a slogan?

lancehoch wrote:Guys, clearly this ruling has stirred up a lot of emotion. There was a lot of discussion up and back on this and this was the final outcome as decided by the administrators of CC. Some of you have claimed that Fred has never been warned before. That could not be farther from the truth. Fred (only on the new account) has already had 2 PM warnings from moderators, 2 official warnings, a permanent forum vacation, a temporary chat vacation, and a permanent chat vacation. Under the Jeff account he received 9 PM warnings, 1 official warning, a temporary chat vacation, a temporary website vacation, and a permanent website vacation. Clearly this user was not angelic. The punishment for this action may seem over the top, but the action must also be taken in context of the previous actions. This user was not allowed access to the forums because he could not stay within the guidelines of the forums. He was not allowed into chat because he continued to not follow the guidelines of chat. Now he could not stop harassing other members of the community in the last vestige of interaction he still had accessible to him. Therefore, he was sent on his way. Arguing is not going to get him back.

a.sub wrote:then what will get him back? or are we expected to just sit around while unfair ruling are put forth?
dont say etickets because selucind empire and rabid bunnies have been sending out etickets for their situation since day one, what have they gotten? BULL SHIT.
are we expected to let the same thing happen here?

a.sub wrote:then what will get him back?

A firm belief in Hinduism.
If we all cross our fingers at the same time and make a wish!
Pray to the sila that Fred's anirniq may be liberated.
Write your state senator.
Sing the blues.
Start some more threads; hope some sh!t sticks.
Whistle a lonesome, but graceful tune; let the wind carry your notes to all who may listen.
Call in the assistance of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
Complain some more.

AndyDufresne wrote:We took into account FredVIII's past history, as usual. He was on a Permanent Live Chat Vacation, a hold over Permanent Forum Vacation, and had received numerous Warnings and Vacations as well.


--Andy

Hoagy wrote:Nice work Beckytheblondie.

There is some justice after all.

I had my own run-in with this arrogant piece of work in Game 4896721.

Well done.

Mr Changsha wrote:I always found him agreeable enough in the forums and I can't personally remember anything he wrote that was so terrible or flagrant. Lot's of little things sure, but overall he was an active member of the community. One must also take into account that max and fred are both very young and so therefore also very foolish. Setting guidelines for kids is usually much preferable to just kicking them out, or expelling them if you will.

CC would have been better to enforce all the previous restrictions, but let him continue to play and, yes, let him write crap in gamechat. It really isn't that important if someone swears in gamechat and should never be 'the straw that breaks the camel's back'.

Very poor decision IMO.

Bruceswar wrote:

Hoagy wrote:Nice work Beckytheblondie.

There is some justice after all.

I had my own run-in with this arrogant piece of work in Game 4896721.

Well done.

From the looks of that game you played terrible. With that said anybody would be pissed after playing with you.

Hoagy wrote:

Bruceswar wrote:

Hoagy wrote:Nice work Beckytheblondie.

There is some justice after all.

I had my own run-in with this arrogant piece of work in Game 4896721.

Well done.

From the looks of that game you played terrible. With that said anybody would be pissed after playing with you.

I probably did play terrible. So what? I was pretty new to that map at the time anyway.

The problem with some people is that they just have neither respect, manners nor common decency, and wouldn't even know what they were if they smacked them in face with them; never mind getting sore about the way people play.

caymanmew wrote:what dose Permanent Website Vacation mean can he buy his acconts back?

lancehoch wrote:Guys, clearly this ruling has stirred up a lot of emotion. There was a lot of discussion up and back on this and this was the final outcome as decided by the administrators of CC. Some of you have claimed that Fred has never been warned before. That could not be farther from the truth. Fred (only on the new account) has already had 2 PM warnings from moderators, 2 official warnings, a permanent forum vacation, a temporary chat vacation, and a permanent chat vacation. Under the Jeff account he received 9 PM warnings, 1 official warning, a temporary chat vacation, a temporary website vacation, and a permanent website vacation. Clearly this user was not angelic. The punishment for this action may seem over the top, but the action must also be taken in context of the previous actions. This user was not allowed access to the forums because he could not stay within the guidelines of the forums. He was not allowed into chat because he continued to not follow the guidelines of chat. Now he could not stop harassing other members of the community in the last vestige of interaction he still had accessible to him. Therefore, he was sent on his way. Arguing is not going to get him back.

lancehoch wrote:Now he could not stop harassing other members of the community in the last vestige of interaction he still had accessible to him. Therefore, he was sent on his way.

• Banter and some trash talking IS allowed in the Game Chats, so don't waste time complaining about that.
• You may not be used to hearing or reading those "four-letter words", but some people do and will use them. This isn't a reason to open a complaint about the player; just kindly ask them to stop or ignore them.

This isn't a reason to open a complaint about the player; just kindly ask them to stop or ignore them.

the.killing.44 wrote:[/b] I can't care to see how a society where doing something against the law means a perfectly legal action with no reason for punishment turns into one leading to the harshest and FINAL punishment.[/i]

.44