TOP 20 MAP RANKS

Scott-Land · Post by **Scott-Land** » Wed Jul 09, 2008 5:05 pm

Blitzy-- just a suggestion. Perhaps put the winning record up as well, that way all ties can be determined by how many games played. If 2 players had 100% win ratio , I would think that the one who played more games would be in the #1 slot. More work for you though...

Blitzaholic · Post by **Blitzaholic** » Fri Jul 11, 2008 11:46 am

Scott-Land wrote:Blitzy-- just a suggestion. Perhaps put the winning record up as well, that way all ties can be determined by how many games played. If 2 players had 100% win ratio , I would think that the one who played more games would be in the #1 slot. More work for you though...

excellent suggestion scott-land, ty very much

ok all players on the list of top 25 please add your record on the map, if you are 20-0, type that on the specific map, if you are 23-5, type that in please. TY

MOBAJOBG · Post by **MOBAJOBG** » Fri Jul 11, 2008 1:48 pm

1. Mobajobg 20-0 100% Waterloo
2. Mobajobg 33-1 97% Africa
7. Mobajobg 32-2 94% Omaha
15. Mobajobg 26-3 90% ACW
21. Mobajobg 35-5 88% Europe

Kemmler · Post by **Kemmler** » Fri Jul 11, 2008 1:51 pm

Main problem with this is that you couldve lost as noobs on a map and now you'll never get on the scoreboards

Blitzaholic · Post by **Blitzaholic** » Fri Jul 11, 2008 2:16 pm

Kemmler wrote:Main problem with this is that you couldve lost as noobs on a map and now you'll never get on the scoreboards

not true, i highly doubt all noobs play every single map right off, so if they or you are losing a lot on a map, pick another map, there is like 80 maps

Kemmler · Post by **Kemmler** » Sat Jul 12, 2008 9:17 am

My 1v1 record is interesting...

+1796 takes me almost exactly to my points now

and the totals for aor1, doodle and feudal almost exactly add to 1796 (10 points below in fact)... seems all other maps just cancel each other out

Totals Colonel 204pts for Brigadier +1796 Won 827 from 1342(62%)

Age Of Realms 1 Lieutenant 94pts for Captain +706 Won 213 from 320(67%) Won 94 from 132 137

Doodle Earth Sergeant 1st Class 36pts for Lieutenant +564 Won 209 from 378(55%)

Feudal War Sergeant 1st Class 84pts for Lieutenant +516 Won 118 from 167(71%)

DiM · Post by **DiM** » Sat Jul 12, 2008 11:40 am

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:3. JR 95% WWII Jima - not enough games

quick go beat a new recruit :lol:

aspalm · Post by **aspalm** » Sat Jul 12, 2008 5:08 pm

i always enjoy looking at lists such as these, even if they are somewhat subject to manipulation. i think more rankings and more lists are only good for conquer club. having just the one "official" scoreboard seems somewhat silly, given all the different maps/settings etc. Props to you, blitz, for your efforts, but how difficult would it be to start a number of official lists, that auto-calculate? it would give people different goals, different challenges...
if they can figure out a way to auto-calculate info to award medals, surely they could come up with a submenu for the scoreboard, which gave map ranks with different settings. You would have 100s of different titles to shoot for- I think it could be a lot of fun....

Herakilla · Post by **Herakilla** » Sat Jul 12, 2008 5:14 pm

i got 88% on bamboo jack

with like 100ish games finished

lokisgal · Post by **lokisgal** » Sat Jul 12, 2008 6:39 pm

84 % on world 2.1

53 out of 63 as of right now

Blitzaholic · Post by **Blitzaholic** » Sat Jul 12, 2008 8:47 pm

Herakilla wrote:i got 88% on bamboo jack with like 100ish games finished

can i have exact record please

Blitzaholic · Post by **Blitzaholic** » Sat Jul 12, 2008 8:47 pm

aspalm wrote:i always enjoy looking at lists such as these, even if they are somewhat subject to manipulation. i think more rankings and more lists are only good for conquer club. having just the one "official" scoreboard seems somewhat silly, given all the different maps/settings etc. Props to you, blitz, for your efforts, but how difficult would it be to start a number of official lists, that auto-calculate? it would give people different goals, different challenges...
if they can figure out a way to auto-calculate info to award medals, surely they could come up with a submenu for the scoreboard, which gave map ranks with different settings. You would have 100s of different titles to shoot for- I think it could be a lot of fun....

ty aspalm

Kemmler · Post by **Kemmler** » Sun Jul 13, 2008 8:48 am

aspalm wrote:i always enjoy looking at lists such as these, even if they are somewhat subject to manipulation. i think more rankings and more lists are only good for conquer club. having just the one "official" scoreboard seems somewhat silly, given all the different maps/settings etc. Props to you, blitz, for your efforts, but how difficult would it be to start a number of official lists, that auto-calculate? it would give people different goals, different challenges...
if they can figure out a way to auto-calculate info to award medals, surely they could come up with a submenu for the scoreboard, which gave map ranks with different settings. You would have 100s of different titles to shoot for- I think it could be a lot of fun....

now that was a good post... and thats what medals were the beginning of I think

aspalm · Post by **aspalm** » Sun Jul 13, 2008 11:27 am

well thanks kemmler! i'm not sure what the point system would be however. in other words, lets say there is a 20 game minimum to get ranked on a board. how do you prevent someone from beating up on noobs and going 20-0 and then just sitting there? you might run into a similar problem if it was just total wins. i guess you could do it by points earned-points lost on a certain board? not sure how much more difficult this would make it to auto-calculate. undoubtedly this would take up a lot more room on the server, but i'm glad at least someone else out there thinks it warrants discussion.

Kemmler · Post by **Kemmler** » Sun Jul 13, 2008 11:41 am

aspalm wrote:well thanks kemmler! i'm not sure what the point system would be however. in other words, lets say there is a 20 game minimum to get ranked on a board. how do you prevent someone from beating up on noobs and going 20-0 and then just sitting there? you might run into a similar problem if it was just total wins. i guess you could do it by points earned-points lost on a certain board? not sure how much more difficult this would make it to auto-calculate. undoubtedly this would take up a lot more room on the server, but i'm glad at least someone else out there thinks it warrants discussion.

hence MOBAJOBG's 100% record on Waterloo, a few quad games with top ranked players and a few beaten up noobs...

Blitzaholic · Post by **Blitzaholic** » Sun Jul 13, 2008 12:00 pm

Blitzaholic wrote:
Herakilla wrote:i got 88% on bamboo jack with like 100ish games finished

can i have exact record please

i guess i will search for it later

is the map rank down?

Herakilla · Post by **Herakilla** » Sun Jul 13, 2008 12:22 pm

Blitzaholic wrote:
Herakilla wrote:i got 88% on bamboo jack with like 100ish games finished

can i have exact record please

Won 89 from 101(88%)

Blitzaholic · Post by **Blitzaholic** » Sun Jul 13, 2008 3:26 pm

AAFitz wrote:WWII Australia Corporal 1st Class 17pts for Sergeant +283 Won 13 from 13(100%) Won 1 from 1 38

im gonna have to work on this one... : )

7 more str8 wins fitzy and u tied for #1

Blitzaholic · Post by **Blitzaholic** » Mon Jul 14, 2008 12:01 pm

Blitzaholic wrote:ok, lets hear it, who has the best records or winning percentages of any map on CC with a minimum of 20 games on 1 map, may add this to 1st 5 and Top 5 list if there is enough interest. I am open to tweaking it as well if some deem it necessary.

This is a list compiled of the Top 25 CC players with best winning %'s per map (minimum 20 games played per map but will soon go to minimum of 30 games, then 50 games).

1. Mobajobg 100% Waterloo (20-0)
2. Mobajobg 97% Africa (30-1)
3. JR 95% WWII Jima
4. JR 95% US Apocalypse
5. Poo-maker 94% Bamboo (106-7)
6. Warsteiner 94% Bamboo (216-14)
7. Mobajobg 94% Omaha (31-2)
8. JR 94% Seige (33-2)
9. SkyT 93% Aussie (26-2)
10. JR 92% 8 Thoughts
11. JR 91% Checkers
12. JR Extreme 91% (21-2)
13. Blitz Checkers 90% (18-2)
14. Torcav2 90% Classic (427-47)
15. Mobajobg 90% ACW (26-3)
15. Blitz 90% Pacman (18-2)
16. JR New World 90%
17. Blitz 89% Hong Kong (26-4)
18. Herakilla 88% Bamboo (89-12)
18. Big Whiskey 88% Africa (56-9)
19. Paddy the Cat 88% Actium (126-17)
19. JR 88% World 2.0 (52-6)
21. Mobjobg 88% Europe (35-5)
22. SkyT 88% USA
22. JR 88% KOM (90-12)
23. Blitz 87% World 2.0 (100-15)
24. GoVegan 87% Ardennes (20-3)
25. JR 87% Great Lakes (23-5)

the new TOP 25, again a minimum of 20 games on 1 MAP, will increase to minimum of 30 games on 1 MAP soon, then will again increase to 50 games minimum in a couple months. This is due the feedback of some of the CC players on here and I think it is fair, so this list will keep changing, when we started 25th place was 77% and now its jumped to 87%, yikes.

updated with the win/loss records added, still missing some if any or all could add in here, thx

JOHNNYROCKET24 · Post by **JOHNNYROCKET24** » Mon Jul 14, 2008 12:16 pm

8 Thoughts 33-3
Chinese Checkers 31-3
New World 19-2
WWII Iwo Jima 18-1
Siege 36-2
USA Apocalypse 38-2
D Day 29-2

Classic 3,667-1,049 (compared to Robins 100 wins on this map

)

firth4eva · Post by **firth4eva** » Mon Jul 14, 2008 12:26 pm

Poomaker and warsteiner are in the wrong positions for 5th and 6th.

Blitzaholic · Post by **Blitzaholic** » Mon Jul 14, 2008 3:51 pm

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:8 Thoughts 33-3
Chinese Checkers 31-3
New World 19-2
WWII Iwo Jima 18-1
Siege 36-2
USA Apocalypse 38-2
D Day 29-2

Classic 3,667-1,049 (compared to Robins 100 wins on this map )

can i also have %'s jr please?

and are you trying to rub it in on robinette? :lol:

Blitzaholic · Post by **Blitzaholic** » Mon Jul 14, 2008 3:52 pm

firth4eva wrote:Poomaker and warsteiner are in the wrong positions for 5th and 6th.

why? this one here is for 20 games minimum, top 25, will soon be going to 30 games

for the 1st & TOP 5's, I did minimum of 100 games, but this is a top 25 list of minimum 20 games.

JOHNNYROCKET24 · Post by **JOHNNYROCKET24** » Mon Jul 14, 2008 4:08 pm

Blitzaholic wrote:
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:8 Thoughts 33-3
Chinese Checkers 31-3
New World 19-2
WWII Iwo Jima 18-1
Siege 36-2
USA Apocalypse 38-2
D Day 29-2

Classic 3,667-1,049 (compared to Robins 100 wins on this map )

can i also have %'s jr please?

and are you trying to rub it in on robinette?

you already have the percentages up above

Blitzaholic · Post by **Blitzaholic** » Mon Jul 14, 2008 4:30 pm

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:
Blitzaholic wrote:
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:8 Thoughts 33-3
Chinese Checkers 31-3
New World 19-2
WWII Iwo Jima 18-1
Siege 36-2
USA Apocalypse 38-2
D Day 29-2

Classic 3,667-1,049 (compared to Robins 100 wins on this map )

can i also have %'s jr please?

and are you trying to rub it in on robinette?

you already have the percentages up above

no, i have the win/loss records, is 33-3 about 92% and so on? i dont want to dig out the calculator

TOP 20 MAP RANKS

Re: TOP 25 MAP RANKS

Re: TOP 25 MAP RANKS

Re: TOP 25 MAP RANKS

Re: TOP 25 MAP RANKS

Re: TOP 25 MAP RANKS

Re: TOP 25 MAP RANKS

Re: TOP 25 MAP RANKS

Re: TOP 25 MAP RANKS

Re: TOP 25 MAP RANKS

Re: TOP 25 MAP RANKS

Re: TOP 25 MAP RANKS

Re: TOP 25 MAP RANKS

Re: TOP 25 MAP RANKS

Re: TOP 25 MAP RANKS

Re: TOP 25 MAP RANKS

Re: TOP 25 MAP RANKS

Re: TOP 25 MAP RANKS

Re: RANKS of MAP

Re: TOP 25 MAP RANKS

Re: TOP 25 MAP RANKS

Re: TOP 25 MAP RANKS

Re: TOP 25 MAP RANKS

Re: TOP 25 MAP RANKS

Re: TOP 25 MAP RANKS

Re: TOP 25 MAP RANKS