Page 6 of 6

Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 5:04 pm
by JOHNNYROCKET24
Hotdoggie wrote:
Blitzaholic wrote:i just do not know what to think anymore and i am not sure if i should take the scores you got out of the top 5's or not, what do you think jr?


He hasn't been proved to be a cheater so taking any top 5s away is bs.
the problem is, he has been warned, blocked and noted so many times ( all with players from the netherlands ) that its too difficult not to believe that he isnt using multi accounts and secret alliances.

Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 5:35 pm
by suggs
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:
the problem is, Johnny has been warned, blocked and noted so many times ( all with players from the netherlands ) that its too difficult not to believe that he isnt using multi accounts and secret alliances.[/quote]

First sensible thing you've ever said Johnny.

Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 5:51 pm
by Switchfoot
Warsteiner and I haven't even played a game together. how can we either be multi Or Allianced?

Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 5:57 pm
by Hotdoggie
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:
Hotdoggie wrote:
Blitzaholic wrote:i just do not know what to think anymore and i am not sure if i should take the scores you got out of the top 5's or not, what do you think jr?


He hasn't been proved to be a cheater so taking any top 5s away is bs.
the problem is, he has been warned, blocked and noted so many times ( all with players from the netherlands ) that its too difficult not to believe that he isnt using multi accounts and secret alliances.


And it's so hard to believe that they are all friends who play together? It's so hard to believe CCers do actually have RLs? [well some CCers...]

Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 6:10 pm
by Switchfoot
I actually have Ten real life friends that play or played CC.

I am higher than Most of them Though, Haha :]

Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 6:29 pm
by JOHNNYROCKET24
Hotdoggie wrote:
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:
Hotdoggie wrote:
Blitzaholic wrote:i just do not know what to think anymore and i am not sure if i should take the scores you got out of the top 5's or not, what do you think jr?


He hasn't been proved to be a cheater so taking any top 5s away is bs.
the problem is, he has been warned, blocked and noted so many times ( all with players from the netherlands ) that its too difficult not to believe that he isnt using multi accounts and secret alliances.


And it's so hard to believe that they are all friends who play together? It's so hard to believe CCers do actually have RLs? [well some CCers...]
you missed some so I highlighted it for you

Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 6:58 pm
by Hotdoggie
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:
Hotdoggie wrote:
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:
Hotdoggie wrote:
Blitzaholic wrote:i just do not know what to think anymore and i am not sure if i should take the scores you got out of the top 5's or not, what do you think jr?


He hasn't been proved to be a cheater so taking any top 5s away is bs.
the problem is, he has been warned, blocked and noted so many times ( all with players from the netherlands ) that its too difficult not to believe that he isnt using multi accounts and secret alliances.


And it's so hard to believe that they are all friends who play together? It's so hard to believe CCers do actually have RLs? [well some CCers...]
you missed some so I highlighted it for you


Noted yes - if mods cant prove they are guilty, they note stuff, nothing wrong there.

Warned - where? I havn't seen one of these.

Blocked - Lets not get into this discussion again please, you know he agreed to the blocking and it was not done to punish.

Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 2:16 pm
by Blitzaholic
Hotdoggie wrote:
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:
Hotdoggie wrote:
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:
Hotdoggie wrote:
Blitzaholic wrote:i just do not know what to think anymore and i am not sure if i should take the scores you got out of the top 5's or not, what do you think jr?


He hasn't been proved to be a cheater so taking any top 5s away is bs.
the problem is, he has been warned, blocked and noted so many times ( all with players from the netherlands ) that its too difficult not to believe that he isnt using multi accounts and secret alliances.


And it's so hard to believe that they are all friends who play together? It's so hard to believe CCers do actually have RLs? [well some CCers...]
you missed some so I highlighted it for you


Noted yes - if mods cant prove they are guilty, they note stuff, nothing wrong there.

Warned - where? I havn't seen one of these.

Blocked - Lets not get into this discussion again please, you know he agreed to the blocking and it was not done to punish.



just because the mods didnt prove it doesnt mean war did not get away with it, the fact he has been warned several times and blocked indicates he (war) is not totally innocent, correct? or am i wrong?

Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 5:05 pm
by Hotdoggie
Blitzaholic wrote:
Hotdoggie wrote:
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:
Hotdoggie wrote:
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:
Hotdoggie wrote:
Blitzaholic wrote:i just do not know what to think anymore and i am not sure if i should take the scores you got out of the top 5's or not, what do you think jr?


He hasn't been proved to be a cheater so taking any top 5s away is bs.
the problem is, he has been warned, blocked and noted so many times ( all with players from the netherlands ) that its too difficult not to believe that he isnt using multi accounts and secret alliances.


And it's so hard to believe that they are all friends who play together? It's so hard to believe CCers do actually have RLs? [well some CCers...]
you missed some so I highlighted it for you


Noted yes - if mods cant prove they are guilty, they note stuff, nothing wrong there.

Warned - where? I havn't seen one of these.

Blocked - Lets not get into this discussion again please, you know he agreed to the blocking and it was not done to punish.



just because the mods didnt prove it doesnt mean war did not get away with it, the fact he has been warned several times and blocked indicates he (war) is not totally innocent, correct? or am i wrong?


Excuse my french but for f*ck SAKE - he agreed to the blocking, it was not because the mods thought he cheated but simply to stop public 'unrest'

And as for being warned, ermmm no he hasnt...he got NOTED for switchfoot and warsteiner cos there was nothing indicating he was guilty and neither was there anything proving he was innocent[althought there never can be in such instances]

Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 2:17 pm
by Blitzaholic
Hotdoggie wrote:
And as for being warned, ermmm no he hasnt...he got NOTED for switchfoot and warsteiner cos there was nothing indicating he was guilty and neither was there anything proving he was innocent[althought there never can be in such instances]


so he was not guilty and not innocent? or no prove either way? :roll:

Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 5:58 pm
by JOHNNYROCKET24
nobody asks for a block unless they are gulity. he settles for a block because he realized receiving a block was letting him off the hook for his secret alliances. another slap on the wrist for a hacker.

Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 6:10 pm
by KoE_Sirius
What do you mean he agreed to a block...He had a long drawn out conversation with a moderator?
In my experience we get no Judge in Chambers for any punishments.Of course I have only ever been accussed of cheating once...oh yeah it was by warstiener....I was cleared BTW......Reminds me of song....I forget the title.
Anyway why do you guys keep bringing this subject back up..Its boring already

Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 2:00 pm
by Blitzaholic
KoE_Sirius wrote:What do you mean he agreed to a block...He had a long drawn out conversation with a moderator?
In my experience we get no Judge in Chambers for any punishments.Of course I have only ever been accussed of cheating once...oh yeah it was by warstiener....I was cleared BTW......Reminds me of song....I forget the title.


is the song called "guilty conscience"?

Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 2:38 pm
by hwhrhett
Blitzaholic wrote:
KoE_Sirius wrote:What do you mean he agreed to a block...He had a long drawn out conversation with a moderator?
In my experience we get no Judge in Chambers for any punishments.Of course I have only ever been accussed of cheating once...oh yeah it was by warstiener....I was cleared BTW......Reminds me of song....I forget the title.


is the song called "guilty conscience"?


"everybody hurts"?

Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 2:41 pm
by BladiN
Why are there 3 topics about basically the same subject?

Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 4:06 pm
by Snorri1234
BladiN wrote:Why are there 3 topics about basically the same subject?


Because you touch yourself at night.

Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 4:18 pm
by Hotdoggie
KoE_Sirius wrote:What do you mean he agreed to a block...He had a long drawn out conversation with a moderator?
In my experience we get no Judge in Chambers for any punishments.Of course I have only ever been accussed of cheating once...oh yeah it was by warstiener....I was cleared BTW......Reminds me of song....I forget the title.
Anyway why do you guys keep bringing this subject back up..Its boring already


Sully pmed him about it, they had some form of pm conversation I believe, Warsteiner agreed to him and strakkenbillen being blocked.

And idd, this is getting old :P

Re: Warsteiner and strakkebillen [blocked]

Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 7:46 pm
by Blitzaholic
†™ wrote:These are suspected Secret Alliance

Suspect users: Warsteiner and strakkebillen

Game number: http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=1061720

Comments: both from the same county, never attacked eachother, seems they made a pact to wipe blue and I (green) out first. when asked then denied having a pact but the moves they both played clearly indicated they were working together.


†™



did you check the game # to this and read the entire game chat?

Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 12:52 pm
by Blitzaholic
guess not

Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 1:42 pm
by Warsteiner
Blitzaholic wrote:guess not


stop bumping the f*cking topics? are you still mad we didnt play those doubs or what? i promised you we would if i made it to conqueror, unfortunatly i didnt >.<

Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 4:01 pm
by Blitzaholic
no you lied, you said you would, then you said if your teammate agreed later, then you later said if you get conqueror, you changed your story 3x in those pm's, did you not?


i can let it go war, but i need to know, cause i was debating on the 5's thread to take you off or not, but i dont have enough proof, if mods let you off, then they let you off, but dim comes with more info, so i am puzzled on what to do is all.