Moderator: Community Team
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
To be fair, I didn't think that asking you to be honest would result in some non-union Duck Dynasty moron vid from Youtube.armati wrote:What You Need to Know About Historical Zionism - Video Compilation
https://youtu.be/GqHrbIJI9BQ
Oh dear, Armati, "a Nazi era war crime"? I'm not even sure that your usual propaganda sources are pushing that line. It's almost sad that this bloke you like genuinely has no regard for the use of chemical weapons against civilians. Almost sad, but wearily predictable from you.armati wrote:by Paul Craig Roberts of PaulCraigRoberts.org
Many, including Russia’s President Putin, have asked why the US launched an illegal attack on Syria prior to the chemical weapons inspectors examining the site of the alleged chemical attack.
This popular question completely misses the point. The US attack on Syria is a clear and indisputable war crime against a sovereign country regardless of whether Syria used a chemical weapon in driving the Washington supported terrorists from Douma. No one acted to stop Washington’s war crime. Some of Washington’s vassals, such as Germany and Italy, refused to participate in Washington’s war crime, but no one attempted to block it. The impotent UN Security Council, to which Russia is wasting its time appealing, the EU, NATO, Russia and China themselves did nothing to stop Washington’s Nazi era war crime.
I already posted an video with a boy from the alleged chem attack. One more time for those that didn't saw it.Symmetry wrote:Oh dear, Armati, "a Nazi era war crime"? I'm not even sure that your usual propaganda sources are pushing that line. It's almost sad that this bloke you like genuinely has no regard for the use of chemical weapons against civilians. Almost sad, but wearily predictable from you.armati wrote:by Paul Craig Roberts of PaulCraigRoberts.org
Many, including Russia’s President Putin, have asked why the US launched an illegal attack on Syria prior to the chemical weapons inspectors examining the site of the alleged chemical attack.
This popular question completely misses the point. The US attack on Syria is a clear and indisputable war crime against a sovereign country regardless of whether Syria used a chemical weapon in driving the Washington supported terrorists from Douma. No one acted to stop Washington’s war crime. Some of Washington’s vassals, such as Germany and Italy, refused to participate in Washington’s war crime, but no one attempted to block it. The impotent UN Security Council, to which Russia is wasting its time appealing, the EU, NATO, Russia and China themselves did nothing to stop Washington’s Nazi era war crime.
What you need to know about the Syria strikes
Theresa May described the strikes as the 'right and legal' option, which has been challenged by Labour leader, Jeremy Corbyn
It's kinda like suspecting that firefighters are secretly arsonists. They're always seen around burning buildings, after all.Dukasaur wrote:Maybe because the territory under Assad's control isn't getting gas bombed?The ram wrote:I find it curious that they're only active in rebel held territory.Symmetry wrote:Oh no! Not rescue workers! Maybe they're secretly helping victims of chemical weapon attacks for the CIA? Digging kids out of rubble for the Illuminati? James Bond secretly setting up field hospitals to discredit Assad?The ram wrote: The information the West are reacting on comes from the white helmets!
Those White Helmets... damn them and their actual evidence.
You are probably not good for eating but you can be turned into a good soap, as any other ISIS/Al-Qaeda members or their fans.Symmetry wrote:Are you going to start talking about eating me again, Goran? That was an unpleasant image for literally everyone involved, even people who were just casually observing the threads. Your pathology does seem to start with the weird attempts to call me a terrorist and then progress rapidly to you imagining me in your mouth.
Nobody wants to see you go down that path again. I really don't. It was, frankly, creepy.
So anyway, Goran, I'm still not a fan of Al-Qaeda, or ISiS.
If you guys go through with this, I think I can find a group of people online for whom this would not only be pleasant but might they actually pay just to watch. HMU, my commision is 20%!Symmetry wrote:Are you going to start talking about eating me again, Goran? That was an unpleasant image for literally everyone involved
"might they actually"? You got over eager. The price just doubled.mookiemcgee wrote:If you guys go through with this, I think I can find a group of people online for whom this would not only be pleasant but might they actually pay just to watch. HMU, my commision is 20%!Symmetry wrote:Are you going to start talking about eating me again, Goran? That was an unpleasant image for literally everyone involved
Symmetry is already interested to be eaten, so it doesn't have to be me, we can organize a feast instead. I'm sure many would like to taste a piece of himSymmetry wrote:"might they actually"? You got over eager. The price just doubled.mookiemcgee wrote:If you guys go through with this, I think I can find a group of people online for whom this would not only be pleasant but might they actually pay just to watch. HMU, my commision is 20%!Symmetry wrote:Are you going to start talking about eating me again, Goran? That was an unpleasant image for literally everyone involved
And there he is. Goran wanting to taste my body. You are a strange little man, GoranZ.GoranZ wrote:Symmetry is already interested to be eaten, so it doesn't have to be me, we can organize a feast instead. I'm sure many would like to taste a piece of himSymmetry wrote:"might they actually"? You got over eager. The price just doubled.mookiemcgee wrote:If you guys go through with this, I think I can find a group of people online for whom this would not only be pleasant but might they actually pay just to watch. HMU, my commision is 20%!Symmetry wrote:Are you going to start talking about eating me again, Goran? That was an unpleasant image for literally everyone involved
That will be quite enough of this particular line of "discussion."GoranZ wrote:You are probably not good for eating but you can be turned into a good soap, as any other ISIS/Al-Qaeda members or their fans.Symmetry wrote:Are you going to start talking about eating me again, Goran? That was an unpleasant image for literally everyone involved, even people who were just casually observing the threads. Your pathology does seem to start with the weird attempts to call me a terrorist and then progress rapidly to you imagining me in your mouth.
Nobody wants to see you go down that path again. I really don't. It was, frankly, creepy.
So anyway, Goran, I'm still not a fan of Al-Qaeda, or ISiS.
By 'Nobody' you mean people like you... well you guys will get what you deserve
I'm taking at least partial credit for that, thank you very much.Neoteny wrote:This thread got weeeeeeiiiiird.