perhaps the extra line of text can be added at the same time as the +2 autodeploy is removed from canada in the small and large images.
ian.
Moderator: Cartographers
Oops. Our bad. Sorry.iancanton wrote:the 2011 women's world cup map says specifically that each team in the group stage may replay any team in their qualifier group. however, this sentence is missing from the 2015 women's world cup map and, without it, there is no logical reason for anyone to suspect that it applies.
perhaps the extra line of text can be added at the same time as the +2 autodeploy is removed from canada in the small and large images.
ian.
LOL this made me laugh, gj on the wineddie2 wrote:I hope this map will be added to farming list.
Just had a game in a tourney where a high ranker got canada first. I went on to win it because he had no clue what he was doing.
benga wrote:LOL this made me laugh, gj on the wineddie2 wrote:I hope this map will be added to farming list.
Just had a game in a tourney where a high ranker got canada first. I went on to win it because he had no clue what he was doing.
Wrong topic - this topic is for 2015.hjelp wrote:Regarding The 2011 Womens World Cup
Perhaps try reading the last page of comments.Falkomagno wrote:I'm playing it right now, and notice that Canada, in the group A it has a huge advantage, because the autodeploy and the ability to bombard. It should have more neutrals or be a bit difficult to take than the other regular territories.

TL,DRiAmCaffeine wrote:Perhaps try reading the last page of comments.Falkomagno wrote:I'm playing it right now, and notice that Canada, in the group A it has a huge advantage, because the autodeploy and the ability to bombard. It should have more neutrals or be a bit difficult to take than the other regular territories.


sempaispellcheck wrote:New XML posted, removing autodeploy.
Sorry it took me so long, guys.
sempai
Why, Don why?Donelladan wrote:the other way around would be better.
We are waiting for MrBenn to upload corrected images before applying the new XML.Donelladan wrote:The current version of the map says "canada gains +2 auto deploy".
But sempai said, 18th august
sempaispellcheck wrote:New XML posted, removing autodeploy.
Sorry it took me so long, guys.
sempai
Is the auto deploy still there ? If not please correct the image asap, you cannot be asking people to go to the beta thread to know rules of the map.
To raise awarenessiAmCaffeine wrote:Then why should anyone bother with your comment? It's been addressed and a solution has been agreed upon. Bye now.
By adding a comment that's already been discussed for over a page?Falkomagno wrote:To raise awarenessiAmCaffeine wrote:Then why should anyone bother with your comment? It's been addressed and a solution has been agreed upon. Bye now.


I find its these type of comments that made me stay away from the foundry and kept me from participating, more then comments like his which are trying to be helpful and maybe dont have the time to read the whole thread.iAmCaffeine wrote:By adding a comment that's already been discussed for over a page?Falkomagno wrote:To raise awarenessiAmCaffeine wrote:Then why should anyone bother with your comment? It's been addressed and a solution has been agreed upon. Bye now.

Ok, good, thanks for the info.sempaispellcheck wrote:We are waiting for MrBenn to upload corrected images before applying the new XML.Donelladan wrote:The current version of the map says "canada gains +2 auto deploy".
But sempai said, 18th august
sempaispellcheck wrote:New XML posted, removing autodeploy.
Sorry it took me so long, guys.
sempai
Is the auto deploy still there ? If not please correct the image asap, you cannot be asking people to go to the beta thread to know rules of the map.
In the meantime, the autodeploy remains and the map remains in Beta.
sempai
Canada is very powerful because you can break everyone's bonus. So if you ever hold canada, you can prevent anyone to have a bonus, and you can have a bonus yourself. If it's a 1vs1, 2vs2, 3vs3 or 4vs4,it's basically game over if you have a bonus and can break other's people bonus by bombarding them. ( bombarding is better than conquering when you want to make lot of damage).WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Why, Don why?Donelladan wrote:the other way around would be better.
It wasn't helpful.IcePack wrote:I find its these type of comments that made me stay away from the foundry and kept me from participating, more then comments like his which are trying to be helpful and maybe dont have the time to read the whole thread.iAmCaffeine wrote:By adding a comment that's already been discussed for over a page?Falkomagno wrote:To raise awarenessiAmCaffeine wrote:Then why should anyone bother with your comment? It's been addressed and a solution has been agreed upon. Bye now.
