Moderator: Community Team
I'm still fairly new myself, but from what I've seen Day 1 lynches are pretty common. Between scumslips, inactives and occasionally due to game rules there's usually someone who gets lynched on D1.Just_essence wrote:Is it a normal thing for Day 1 lynches to happen? Or is the opposite what happens mostly? (First-timer here)
aage wrote: Maybe you're right, but since we receive no handlebars from the mod I think we should get some ourselves.
--When that fizzled, S7C encouraged a lynch of jonty:Some7hingCLEVER wrote:Here he says it seemed he was seriously showing suspicionGustaf Wasa wrote:Hippo hey, no need for sarcasm. Seemed to me too you showed genuine suspicion for Some7hingCLEVER. Usually a joke vote is something like "vote XX for bad taste" etc, not "vote XX for suspect posts".
aage wrote:The true question is: did anyone?Nebuchadnezer wrote:How did anyone take this seriously? I guess the "scared of spiders" and "schimeric friend" are pretty damning. It's like Hippo was riding a bike with no handlebars or something...thehippo8 wrote:I'm here and I sense that clever is being too clever by half - aghast at the original post - bandwagoning - scared of spiders - head up his ... oops in his hands, ain't no excuses my schimeric friend - where are your handlebars now? Hmmm? vote Clever
Anyway, please explain what in this post was "serious"...
As far as I know everyone can at this point claim it was all a ruse from the joke vote phase and nobody could dispute it. I never took Hippo's post seriously; it obviously wasn't... but it was weird and hence my playful response. We don't call them "joke votes" because they're just remarks though. I don't actually want to see him lynched today.
His response to me was,again weird, though. I don't know why he assumed I was being serious. Still don't want to lynch him though.
I could of course be wrong. But as a lynch candidate right now, Some7hingCLEVER looks like a better choice than jonty.Some7hingCLEVER wrote:Ya I usually hate no lynch day one it usually leaves us nowhere for day two
aage wrote: Maybe you're right, but since we receive no handlebars from the mod I think we should get some ourselves.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
That would be so much fun to see in action. (Seems more efficient later in the game though.) Also reminds me of the No Handlebars song rishaed posted; you know, controlling the masses. Seems consistent with the theme.jonty125 wrote:Looks like you guys are going to turn the joke case into a real case.
I am, Edward Jones Town Poet.
I have 1-shot ability to read my poetic masterpiece. This will cause a random number of people (could be 0, could be 10) to be forced to place their vote on a person of my choosing, and not be able to move it until tomorrow.
Yes, but like I said, at least something resembling a case, which I don't see when it comes to jonty. To clarify my post above, S7C seems to be "fanning the flames" in both cases. When it comes to "Ya I usually hate no lynch day one it usually leaves us nowhere for day two" (on page 7), that is when there was talk about whether there would be a lynch. S7C's comment moves the discussion in the direction of having a lynch of just anyone, just to have a lynch on Day 1.pancakemix wrote:Tough to say on jonty. I suppose that's believable, but by its nature it's wholly unverifiable. I also doubt its usefulness.
As for Gustaf's case on Clever, it's a bit tenuous. I think I need more convincing than that to follow that logic.
Who knows, you might not live until tomorrow. It's good bringing up your suspicions.Gustaf Wasa wrote:
IF S7C would turn out to be Mafia, I would say he is a smooth criminal. Not leading the charge, but making sure there is a charge. Maybe I should have waited to bring this up, in order to see if it would happen again.
I do wonder if you're choosing to attack S7C over me because you think you can gain more momentum over S7C... Maybe I'm just seeing things.Gustaf Wasa wrote:I agree there should preferably be a lynch on Day 1, but to lynch jonty "just because"? I don't agree with that. There should at least be something resembling a case. Take a look at S7C for instance:
--S7C was the second to vote for jonty. That was the first start of a wagon. This is horse shit. No way S7C has been planning to lynch Jonty from that vote onwards.
--S7C started the prodding case against me, kind of leading aage in the right direction. "Here he says it seemed he was seriously showing suspicion"The quote after yoursSome7hingCLEVER wrote:Here he says it seemed he was seriously showing suspicionGustaf Wasa wrote:Hippo hey, no need for sarcasm. Seemed to me too you showed genuine suspicion for Some7hingCLEVER. Usually a joke vote is something like "vote XX for bad taste" etc, not "vote XX for suspect posts".
aage wrote:The true question is: did anyone?Nebuchadnezer wrote:How did anyone take this seriously? I guess the "scared of spiders" and "schimeric friend" are pretty damning. It's like Hippo was riding a bike with no handlebars or something...thehippo8 wrote:I'm here and I sense that clever is being too clever by half - aghast at the original post - bandwagoning - scared of spiders - head up his ... oops in his hands, ain't no excuses my schimeric friend - where are your handlebars now? Hmmm? vote Clever
Anyway, please explain what in this post was "serious"...
As far as I know everyone can at this point claim it was all a ruse from the joke vote phase and nobody could dispute it. I never took Hippo's post seriously; it obviously wasn't... but it was weird and hence my playful response. We don't call them "joke votes" because they're just remarks though. I don't actually want to see him lynched today.
His response to me was,again weird, though. I don't know why he assumed I was being serious. Still don't want to lynch him though.
wasn't responded to, which I took to mean "+1". If you think I have been led astray by S7C, please note Jonty wasn't mentioned in this quote at all.
--When that fizzled, S7C encouraged a lynch of jonty:
Well, it is true. Even you would rather lynch S7C over these mostly baseless accusations than pass up the opportunity for a kill. Strange world, isn't it?Some7hingCLEVER wrote:Ya I usually hate no lynch day one it usually leaves us nowhere for day two
I could of course be wrong. But as a lynch candidate right now, Some7hingCLEVER looks like a better choice than jonty.
unvote
vote Some7hingCLEVER
so basically your voting me cause i voted for someone second and if thats the case why dont we vote for the guy who voted first? you're also voting for me because i brought something up on you which is true i did but it is not scummy at all and because of this i think you are fishing for things and making this a bigger deal than it is. and your third reason was that i like to lynch someone rather than a no lynch. if you misunderstood what i said about the no lynch then i understand but otherwise im confused.Gustaf Wasa wrote:I agree there should preferably be a lynch on Day 1, but to lynch jonty "just because"? I don't agree with that. There should at least be something resembling a case. Take a look at S7C for instance:
--S7C was the second to vote for jonty. That was the first start of a wagon.
ya. this is a bad reason. i voted second! there is no way i could realize he would get this close because of that!!
--S7C started the prodding case against me, kind of leading aage in the right direction. "Here he says it seemed he was seriously showing suspicion" OMGUS? i pointed something out that i thought was suspicious and if this is a crime everyone would be guitly.
--When that fizzled, S7C encouraged a lynch of jonty: i did not say i was gonna try and lynch jonty i said i dont like no lynches. was that unclear?Some7hingCLEVER wrote:Here he says it seemed he was seriously showing suspicionGustaf Wasa wrote:Hippo hey, no need for sarcasm. Seemed to me too you showed genuine suspicion for Some7hingCLEVER. Usually a joke vote is something like "vote XX for bad taste" etc, not "vote XX for suspect posts".
aage wrote:The true question is: did anyone?Nebuchadnezer wrote:How did anyone take this seriously? I guess the "scared of spiders" and "schimeric friend" are pretty damning. It's like Hippo was riding a bike with no handlebars or something...thehippo8 wrote:I'm here and I sense that clever is being too clever by half - aghast at the original post - bandwagoning - scared of spiders - head up his ... oops in his hands, ain't no excuses my schimeric friend - where are your handlebars now? Hmmm? vote Clever
Anyway, please explain what in this post was "serious"...
As far as I know everyone can at this point claim it was all a ruse from the joke vote phase and nobody could dispute it. I never took Hippo's post seriously; it obviously wasn't... but it was weird and hence my playful response. We don't call them "joke votes" because they're just remarks though. I don't actually want to see him lynched today.
His response to me was,again weird, though. I don't know why he assumed I was being serious. Still don't want to lynch him though.
I could of course be wrong. But as a lynch candidate right now, Some7hingCLEVER looks like a better choice than jonty.Some7hingCLEVER wrote:Ya I usually hate no lynch day one it usually leaves us nowhere for day two
unvote
vote Some7hingCLEVER
aage wrote: Maybe you're right, but since we receive no handlebars from the mod I think we should get some ourselves.
Are you suggesting that we oblige him in his wish? Surely he's not a jester!Little Witt wrote:Well, we are running out of options and idk but Clever might have just been looking for a lynch of any kind, but he certainly wanted a lynch. And so do I, otherwise I feel like this day might not yet as much info as it could if we vote NL
I just want a lynch or if we pressure clever enough we can find out if he was scummy so we have more to go off of tomorrow.thehippo8 wrote:Are you suggesting that we oblige him in his wish? Surely he's not a jester!Little Witt wrote:Well, we are running out of options and idk but Clever might have just been looking for a lynch of any kind, but he certainly wanted a lynch. And so do I, otherwise I feel like this day might not yet as much info as it could if we vote NL
Guh...I'm in the camp of "meh, pretty useless role". It's basically a 1-shot daykill, which isn't bad, but could be really bad if it were a mafia role...or if Jonty got mad at someone and just wanted him gone. I tend to think he wouldn't do that, and given that he complied with the claim, I will unvote.jonty125 wrote:Looks like you guys are going to turn the joke case into a real case.
I am, Edward Jones Town Poet.
I have 1-shot ability to read my poetic masterpiece. This will cause a random number of people (could be 0, could be 10) to be forced to place their vote on a person of my choosing, and not be able to move it until tomorrow.
How am I fanning the cases? I voted on jonty on...well basically nothing! And when I realized he got close I backed offGustaf Wasa wrote: Yes, but like I said, at least something resembling a case, which I don't see when it comes to jonty. To clarify my post above, S7C seems to be "fanning the flames" in both cases. When it comes to "Ya I usually hate no lynch day one it usually leaves us nowhere for day two" (on page 7), that is when there was talk about whether there would be a lynch. S7C's comment moves the discussion in the direction of having a lynch of just anyone, just to have a lynch on Day 1.
IF S7C would turn out to be Mafia, I would say he is a smooth criminal. Not leading the charge, but making sure there is a charge. Maybe I should have waited to bring this up, in order to see if it would happen again.
I voted for Jonty because him and aage made some silly mistake that me and nedreal picked on. I didn't say it was actually scummy(I do say it is but it was a joke . I figure that was obvious as it was on the 4th page) I didn't expect a bandwagon in him.Some7hingCLEVER wrote:This is my post to the opening scene blah blah blah man with hood blah blah blah maybe there is a bouncer in a club or bar not sure blah blah blah
Fast posted
Ohhhhh I like small details that make people look scummy
vote jonty
