Conquer Club

So... we have until Saturday to make a lynch, correct?

-Tails

strike wolf wrote:1. What do you all think of day 1 joke stages?

2. Is there anyone you consider particularly suspicious at this point and why?

1: It sucks.

2: Jonty for his attempt at an easy lynch on Vodean for what I consider not a good reason, even for day 1. Subject to oppinions though.


Heck, thanks strike. You gave me the boost I needed to do something serious on this game.

Unvote

vote: Jonty

Quick scan of the number of posts says soundman has posted the least. Although generally, activity hasn't been a major problem with regards to someone really submarining.

unvote vote soundman

freezie wrote:

strike wolf wrote:1. What do you all think of day 1 joke stages?

2. Is there anyone you consider particularly suspicious at this point and why?

1: It sucks.

2: Jonty for his attempt at an easy lynch on Vodean for what I consider not a good reason, even for day 1. Subject to oppinions though.


Heck, thanks strike. You gave me the boost I needed to do something serious on this game.

Unvote

vote: Jonty

Hell, thats a better case than anyone else has made. He BW FOS'ed me (for a VERY poor reason), and he tried to kill me (vith a slightly better but VERY poor reason)... that all makes him look pretty bad right now... jonty, change my mind about this. [unvote], vote Jonty

freezie wrote:

strike wolf wrote:1. What do you all think of day 1 joke stages?

2. Is there anyone you consider particularly suspicious at this point and why?

1: It sucks.

2: Jonty for his attempt at an easy lynch on Vodean for what I consider not a good reason, even for day 1. Subject to oppinions though.


Heck, thanks strike. You gave me the boost I needed to do something serious on this game.

Unvote

vote: Jonty

I might have joke-voted vodean and one stage but I definitely haven't voted him seriously.

vodean wrote:

freezie wrote:

strike wolf wrote:1. What do you all think of day 1 joke stages?

2. Is there anyone you consider particularly suspicious at this point and why?

1: It sucks.

2: Jonty for his attempt at an easy lynch on Vodean for what I consider not a good reason, even for day 1. Subject to oppinions though.


Heck, thanks strike. You gave me the boost I needed to do something serious on this game.

Unvote

vote: Jonty

Hell, thats a better case than anyone else has made. He BW FOS'ed me (for a VERY poor reason), and he tried to kill me (vith a slightly better but VERY poor reason)... that all makes him look pretty bad right now... jonty, change my mind about this. [unvote], vote Jonty

Erm, please explain where and when this happened.

vodean wrote:

freezie wrote:

strike wolf wrote:1. What do you all think of day 1 joke stages?

2. Is there anyone you consider particularly suspicious at this point and why?

1: It sucks.

2: Jonty for his attempt at an easy lynch on Vodean for what I consider not a good reason, even for day 1. Subject to oppinions though.


Heck, thanks strike. You gave me the boost I needed to do something serious on this game.

Unvote

vote: Jonty

Hell, thats a better case than anyone else has made. He BW FOS'ed me (for a VERY poor reason), and he tried to kill me (vith a slightly better but VERY poor reason)... that all makes him look pretty bad right now... jonty, change my mind about this. [unvote], vote Jonty

If you're referring to the number of votes on you at any given point in this game, I hardly think the second or third vote was "attempting to kill you".

jonty125 wrote:

freezie wrote:

strike wolf wrote:1. What do you all think of day 1 joke stages?

2. Is there anyone you consider particularly suspicious at this point and why?

1: It sucks.

2: Jonty for his attempt at an easy lynch on Vodean for what I consider not a good reason, even for day 1. Subject to oppinions though.


Heck, thanks strike. You gave me the boost I needed to do something serious on this game.

Unvote

vote: Jonty

I might have joke-voted vodean and one stage but I definitely haven't voted him seriously.

vodean wrote:

freezie wrote:

strike wolf wrote:1. What do you all think of day 1 joke stages?

2. Is there anyone you consider particularly suspicious at this point and why?

1: It sucks.

2: Jonty for his attempt at an easy lynch on Vodean for what I consider not a good reason, even for day 1. Subject to oppinions though.


Heck, thanks strike. You gave me the boost I needed to do something serious on this game.

Unvote

vote: Jonty

Hell, thats a better case than anyone else has made. He BW FOS'ed me (for a VERY poor reason), and he tried to kill me (vith a slightly better but VERY poor reason)... that all makes him look pretty bad right now... jonty, change my mind about this. [unvote], vote Jonty

Erm, please explain where and when this happened.

actually, its funny. you quoted the post i was taking that idea from. perhaps you are town, but you are the best case we have.

vodean wrote:actually, its funny. you quoted the post i was taking that idea from. perhaps you are town, but you are the best case we have.

I don't understand. What I'm asking is where the following quote happened.

vodean wrote:and he tried to kill me

jonty125 wrote:

vodean wrote:actually, its funny. you quoted the post i was taking that idea from. perhaps you are town, but you are the best case we have.

I don't understand. What I'm asking is where the following quote happened.

vodean wrote:and he tried to kill me

i didnt have a specific example, but im assuming freezie did. [quote=freezie] his attempt at an easy lynch[/quote]

so dont ask me, ask freezie. you did vote for me in a semi-serious manner in the joke vote phase.

vodean wrote:so dont ask me, ask freezie. you did vote for me in a semi-serious manner in the joke vote phase.

No I did not. Saf did.

vodean wrote:

jonty125 wrote:

vodean wrote:actually, its funny. you quoted the post i was taking that idea from. perhaps you are town, but you are the best case we have.

I don't understand. What I'm asking is where the following quote happened.

vodean wrote:and he tried to kill me

i didnt have a specific example, but im assuming freezie did.

freezie wrote:his attempt at an easy lynch

so dont ask me, ask freezie. you did vote for me in a semi-serious manner in the joke vote phase.

sorry

Funny how Vodean quickly jumped against Jonty when he didn't ever vote vodean for that.

I made a mistake. I meant Jonty jumped on Safari for what I consider a poor reason. Not vodean.

But the later is tipping my scum radar some more..

indeed, vodean has gone so far as to say

vodean wrote:Hell, thats a better case than anyone else has made

but is actually unaware what the case was, rather-

vodean wrote:but im assuming freezie did.
[...]
so dont ask me, ask freezie.

-relying on the initial poster to head the case, whilst taking no responsibility as the bandwagon voter.

PS: to answer strike's questions
1.I like joke vote stages, they are usually entertaining, and occasionally lead to something.
2.I am now comfortable leaving my vote as it is.
3. Do you have any answers to your own questions?

ok, hold on, looking back through the thread. i know SOMEONE voted me in a semi-serious manner in the joke votes. sorry. that was safari.

safariguy5 wrote:unvote vote vodean Watch, he's going to claim prematurely anyways, might as well get it over with now rather than at a more inopportune time (See Matrix Mafia).

Also, I'm semi-serious about that.

sorry.unvote

I do have answers to my questions.

1. I like the joke vote stage mostly. I sometimes feel that people can be too eager to get out of it to get to the real votes disregarding the potential for patterns that can come up even during joke stage.

2. I don't have any revolutionary suspicions to add to the game. I Ginsberg little merit to the safari case. I kind of agree with the month case in that I felt he was a bit erratic during the joke vote stage but a bit over sold.

vodean I think is the most interesting. I originally thought he was just being defensive but now he also has shown that he isn't following the actual comments that well and acting as a follower on cases.

It's also odd how defensive vodean got over rather minor pressure. I thought I had said that it was only a semi serious vote, but vodean got rather defensive for one measly vote. Especially since that vote has long been withdrawn by now.

safariguy5 wrote:It's also odd how defensive vodean got over rather minor pressure. I thought I had said that it was only a semi serious vote, but vodean got rather defensive for one measly vote. Especially since that vote has long been withdrawn by now.

I also Ginsberg over what you said earlier, but your statement was pretty pointed. If he reacted the way he did, it was only because what you insinuated wasn't entirely kind.

I am back. Deadline is Saturday night.

Ginsberg?

everywhere116 wrote:Ginsberg?

Strike's post autocorrected. I'm just making fun of him.

pancakemix wrote:

everywhere116 wrote:Ginsberg?

Strike's post autocorrected. I'm just making fun of him.

Ah. I see. Hilary us. Carrie on.

safariguy5 wrote:It's also odd how defensive vodean got over rather minor pressure. I thought I had said that it was only a semi serious vote, but vodean got rather defensive for one measly vote. Especially since that vote has long been withdrawn by now.

i didnt vote you did I? I havent really done anything that defensive. when you accused me of early claiming, i justified it. then i left you alone. now im justifying my recent actions. then unless you keep pressuring, ill leave this alone. one post without an OMGUS is hardly jumpy and defensive. i just left it alone.

vodean wrote:

jonty125 wrote:

safariguy5 wrote:unvote vote vodean Watch, he's going to claim prematurely anyways, might as well get it over with now rather than at a more inopportune time (See Matrix Mafia).

Also, I'm semi-serious about that.

unvote vote safariguy5 that is hardly a reason to semi-seriously vote anyone

hmmm... good point.... vote safguy

Yes you did. And you've been defensive since the first person joke voted you.

Vote Vodean

vodean wrote:

safariguy5 wrote:It's also odd how defensive vodean got over rather minor pressure. I thought I had said that it was only a semi serious vote, but vodean got rather defensive for one measly vote. Especially since that vote has long been withdrawn by now.

i didnt vote you did I? I havent really done anything that defensive. when you accused me of early claiming, i justified it. then i left you alone. now im justifying my recent actions. then unless you keep pressuring, ill leave this alone. one post without an OMGUS is hardly jumpy and defensive. i just left it alone.

im gonna have to agree with this.

question to anyone voting vodean please go back and find a place were she was specifically jumpy and defensive and i may place my vote but i went back and looked and saw nothing. but who knows i might have missed it.

Vodean did have a quick trigger on Jonty with the mistaken thought of them being attacked by Jonty due to a misplaced name by freezie which does tip the scumdar a bit but only enough to get a FOS Vodean. Also the quick rescue by Clever warranted part of the FOS but wont go anywhere past that. Not enough to warrant a vote due to the comeback and proper statement of mistaking jonty for Safari.

At this point Soundman I havent seen either so I will follow that pressure to see what they are at.

Vote Soundman