Moderator: Cartographers
Well Oneyed does have a point, and it is gameplay related. Making this change will help players see what can be attacked from where. Looking at the inset of Paris and looking at the map it is hard to tell what is where, so please make the change. You will find that there will be changes that will have to be made all the way through up to the map being quenched. Even then, sometimes changes are made after it's been quenched years later!Mishalex wrote:Sorry Oneyed, we are in the main foundry now, so we won't continu to change the map cartographically speacking, otherwise, we could change this card indefinitely... We have to move forward nowMishalex wrote:Oneyed, thanks for your advice... The enlarged Paris was an advice of koontz1973... So we had get the other territories of Ile de France out of the zoom...
They are notice in the first post no?nolefan5311 wrote:Can you please post the version with starting neutrals?
I don't see it. Just putting a "n3" on the neutral regions is all I need.Mishalex wrote:They are notice in the first post no?nolefan5311 wrote:Can you please post the version with starting neutrals?
Is it good enough?


I disagree. To hold that bonus also requires the additional three regions outside of the neutral starters, and the WC requires one of the regional claims to be held, so it is possible that someone can hold that bonus while not necessarily holding the winning condition. I agree it's not likely that a person will hold that bonus without holding the WC, but there's no reason to remove the bonus completely.koontz1973 wrote:The +8 for the Paris bonus will never be given as it is the winning condition. Remove it from the legend.
I agree with both koontz and jghost here. I like the idea of the foreign claims also being able to attack Paris as that provides a way for someone to defend against their opponent taking the winning condition without necessarily having to break into the Paris area. As is, those regions will never be taken so I think adjacent regions should be able to attack them as well. This would also allow a player to tap down the neutrals on Paris from afar should they have eyes on the winning condition.koontz1973 wrote:I have posted it before and now jghost7 has said it as well. Something needs to be done around the Paris and Foreign/Regional claims. I like his idea for having it reversed. Foreign claims attack/bombard Paris and each other. This is a nice way to open up the board some.
No one is really going to attack the foreign claims now as to do so, you are very close to the WC.
I'm confused...does this equal a +4 in total? If so, it needs to be lowered to a +2 total, possibly even a +1 (I will confirm after running the numbers). This is confusing with all of the Regional Claims too, as jghost pointed out. The repetition of the bonuses needs to be clarified, or maybe remove the bonus from the mini-map and just put the shield there, so that a player will reference the Claim area when trying to distinguish the value of the bonus.koontz1973 wrote:With Corsica, how about dropping both bonuses to a +1. Then you get the +2 for holding it which seems fair and you get to keep both the GP elements for it.
Agreed. This map looks FANTASTIC (though I'm not a graphics guy). Very pretty.koontz1973 wrote:Great work by the way. Really looking forward to this now.
Missed that. You are right. Keep it in.nolefan5311 wrote:I disagree. To hold that bonus also requires the additional three regions outside of the neutral starters, and the WC requires one of the regional claims to be held, so it is possible that someone can hold that bonus while not necessarily holding the winning condition. I agree it's not likely that a person will hold that bonus without holding the WC, but there's no reason to remove the bonus completely.koontz1973 wrote:The +8 for the Paris bonus will never be given as it is the winning condition. Remove it from the legend.

all bonuses or only regional claimsjghost7 wrote:bonuses seem a bit high. One example, BZH seems like it should be a +3
What's that?nolefan5311 wrote:Have you thought about using the new conditional border feature in the map in any way?
You can programme into the game that you can only attack Paris if you hold a certain territory.Mishalex wrote:What's that?nolefan5311 wrote:Have you thought about using the new conditional border feature in the map in any way?

It is a new toy to play with and he wants to see it in play badly.Mishalex wrote:Oh, ok, I'm not sure we need that on this map... Why were you thinking at this, Nole?

And it fits this map in particular because of the winning condition and the Regional/Foreign claim.koontz1973 wrote:It is a new toy to play with and he wants to see it in play badly.Mishalex wrote:Oh, ok, I'm not sure we need that on this map... Why were you thinking at this, Nole?
There are three possibilities to overthrow Paris on the map :nolefan5311 wrote:-Why is "Riots" in there after "Suburbs"? Seems out of place when nothing else on the map makes me think there are any sort of riots going on.
I can't do this modification, I have no free place on legendnolefan5311 wrote:For foreign claims, think about stating (on two separate lines)..
"Can bombard Paris"
"Can be attacked by Paris"
True, that could permit to gain some space on the map...nolefan5311 wrote: -Lower the bonus for Free Bretagne to a +1 as well...this would clear up a lot of legend space if you could word it similar to the Foreign Claim box. That large bonus of +4 also should not be increased by 2 for holding one more additional region.
That was my thinking as well. I still need to run the bonus numbers, but I can guarantee the current bonuses will need to be reduced. I will try to post those numbers tonight or tomorrow night.Mishalex wrote:True, that could permit to gain some space on the map...nolefan5311 wrote: -Lower the bonus for Free Bretagne to a +1 as well...this would clear up a lot of legend space if you could word it similar to the Foreign Claim box. That large bonus of +4 also should not be increased by 2 for holding one more additional region.
Thank you very much. Meanwhile, here are the latest changes.nolefan5311 wrote: I will try to post those numbers tonight or tomorrow night.