Conquer Club

billy07 wrote:
didn't you put my old team mate waynemgough on ignore for consistantly beating you when you were conquerer (by dubious means). you can just ignore this if you like

Scott-Land wrote:

billy07 wrote:
didn't you put my old team mate waynemgough on ignore for consistantly beating you when you were conquerer (by dubious means). you can just ignore this if you like

Looky kooky another nobody that is clueless that spews out unfounded garbage and accusations. Of course you can't discuss or debate a topic without trying to insult me but I wouldn't expect anything less. Quite funny actually-- I've had a rather bad day and thanks to you I've got a good chuckle.

Why does it always have to be about me ? Jeesh. For 1, no one and I mean no consistently beats me at any game type nor game setting. Okay maybe there may be someone out there that does-- albeit I don't know who. Wayne is 2-1 against me out of 10 games. Yeah he consistently beats me.

2. I put Wayne on ignore because he spewed a bunch of garbage about me in the forums, much like yourself.

3- Conqueror by dubious means.... hmm suppose winning a large percentage of my freestyle games can appear to someone of your level quite dubious. I just see it as I'm that damn good but you're entitled to your opinion. I'm also regarded as one of the best players to have ever played on this site. They cant can't be right and you beat right as well-- now can they ? So I suppose I'll just leave it at that....

4. Anything else? I mean you could just called me an asshole-- there would've been a hell of a lot more truth in it and I would've agreed !

Fruitcake wrote:Now I am not denigrating this approach, far from it, I have always said openly, this is a way of balancing out the system. What I am seriously saying is that if you preach from a position, then at least have the decency to withdraw that position, in public. Blitz has singularly failed to do this, and even while this thread has continued he has not had the decency to adjust his original position.

Robinette wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:thx all

and thx for all who teamed with me during that time, you are deserve the credit as well, could not of done it without you all, which includes:

*long list of names*

That's it?

THAT'S your big thank you speech?

Blitzaholic wrote:I am preparing my thank you speech for all who helped me, coming soon.

good thing you are better at collecting points than you are at thank you speeches


did you here about my gold medal...
what a shocker, eh?
but no big thank you speech coming from me,
nope, the only people i can thank are lying dead on the battlefield, lol...

Blitzaholic wrote:lol Fc, how old is that quote? over 2 years?

Blitzaholic wrote:funny how you get a new player who is a noob to come a long every few months to team with you and win a ton to jack up your score, then few months later, you recruit another one, so on and so forth.

Blitzaholic wrote:it is quite easy to manipulate that when you have a cook join your team in many of your games fruitcake (like you have done) and you give them direction of plans on what to do every turn, its like you playing both accounts practically but within the rules, but it is a manipulation as you will not lose as many points for losing, and you win more for winning.

Blitzaholic wrote:You fruitcake more than anyone team with cooks to exaggerate you relative rank, which is a little flawed and fruity if you ask me.

Blitzaholic wrote:the fact is you can team with cooks and tell them every move and manipulate your relative rank, and many others will start doing this if your suggestion is implemented.

Blitzaholic wrote:but when one is constantly teaming with new players over and over again [...] with scores of 500 to 1000 and there are many you have done this with, it raises an eyebrow is all.

Blitzaholic wrote:it raises an eyebrow is all.

Timminz wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:it raises an eyebrow is all.

Foxglove wrote:

Timminz wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:it raises an eyebrow is all.

It rubs the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again!

Bones2484 wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:lol Fc, how old is that quote? over 2 years?

Actually it was last February in this thread.

You have a lot of great quotes in there that are hilarious to read in hindsight.

Blitzaholic wrote:funny how you get a new player who is a noob to come a long every few months to team with you and win a ton to jack up your score, then few months later, you recruit another one, so on and so forth.

Blitzaholic wrote:it is quite easy to manipulate that when you have a cook join your team in many of your games fruitcake (like you have done) and you give them direction of plans on what to do every turn, its like you playing both accounts practically but within the rules, but it is a manipulation as you will not lose as many points for losing, and you win more for winning.

Blitzaholic wrote:You fruitcake more than anyone team with cooks to exaggerate you relative rank, which is a little flawed and fruity if you ask me.

Blitzaholic wrote:the fact is you can team with cooks and tell them every move and manipulate your relative rank, and many others will start doing this if your suggestion is implemented.

Blitzaholic wrote:but when one is constantly teaming with new players over and over again [...] with scores of 500 to 1000 and there are many you have done this with, it raises an eyebrow is all.

It's amazing that you can't just admit your hypocrisy. The evidence is overflowing!

Bones2484 wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:lol Fc, how old is that quote? over 2 years?

Actually it was last February in this thread.

You have a lot of great quotes in there that are hilarious to read in hindsight.

Blitzaholic wrote:funny how you get a new player who is a noob to come a long every few months to team with you and win a ton to jack up your score, then few months later, you recruit another one, so on and so forth.

Blitzaholic wrote:it is quite easy to manipulate that when you have a cook join your team in many of your games fruitcake (like you have done) and you give them direction of plans on what to do every turn, its like you playing both accounts practically but within the rules, but it is a manipulation as you will not lose as many points for losing, and you win more for winning.

Blitzaholic wrote:You fruitcake more than anyone team with cooks to exaggerate you relative rank, which is a little flawed and fruity if you ask me.

Blitzaholic wrote:the fact is you can team with cooks and tell them every move and manipulate your relative rank, and many others will start doing this if your suggestion is implemented.

Blitzaholic wrote:but when one is constantly teaming with new players over and over again [...] with scores of 500 to 1000 and there are many you have done this with, it raises an eyebrow is all.

It's amazing that you can't just admit your hypocrisy. The evidence is overflowing!

Blitzaholic wrote:

Bones2484 wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:lol Fc, how old is that quote? over 2 years?

Actually it was last February in this thread.

You have a lot of great quotes in there that are hilarious to read in hindsight.

Blitzaholic wrote:funny how you get a new player who is a noob to come a long every few months to team with you and win a ton to jack up your score, then few months later, you recruit another one, so on and so forth.

Blitzaholic wrote:it is quite easy to manipulate that when you have a cook join your team in many of your games fruitcake (like you have done) and you give them direction of plans on what to do every turn, its like you playing both accounts practically but within the rules, but it is a manipulation as you will not lose as many points for losing, and you win more for winning.

Blitzaholic wrote:You fruitcake more than anyone team with cooks to exaggerate you relative rank, which is a little flawed and fruity if you ask me.

Blitzaholic wrote:the fact is you can team with cooks and tell them every move and manipulate your relative rank, and many others will start doing this if your suggestion is implemented.

Blitzaholic wrote:but when one is constantly teaming with new players over and over again [...] with scores of 500 to 1000 and there are many you have done this with, it raises an eyebrow is all.

It's amazing that you can't just admit your hypocrisy. The evidence is overflowing!

Bones, fruitycakes and myself have been at war for years now, I never denied I said it, I was trying to make a point to him was all off him bragging about his relative rank, I honestly don't care what he does, it was more me at war with him and showing him and others how he did it. We have been at war for years with each other, it is nothing new.

It all had to do with his relative rank and him bragging about it over a year ago, I just showed how he got it so good was all, at that time, like I said, it is within the rules. Just funny how he had to revert to that when he had around a 2800 to 3000 score. fruitcakes was trying to fit in and be viewed as a great player and was trying too hard because many did not see him as this at that time, so he was over flating himself. He did not play many high rankers, I have, I also have played and still playing in tournaments, and clan challenges, and clan cups against solid competition, and mod games, etc. This is really stupid to argue over guys.

It had nothing to do with conqueror or being so close to conqueror which is a different animal, when you reach this high in score, like I said it is quite common tactic for players to do, you do not have much of a choice, unless you want to me to try to exploit other ways, which I will not do, because they are more shady. In all the ways to achieve conqueror status, the way I am doing it is the most reasonable, compared to other ways it was or could be achieved. Again, this is my opinion. My point is, trying to maintain around a 3000 score and high relative rank for fruitcake raises an eyebrow and it is not the same as 4500 to 5000 score which is 100x harder and more challenging to achieve, it is an extremely difficult feat to accomplish. Anyone over 3500 score knows how hard it is to maintain that, and 4000 score it becomes so much harder, then 4500 way harder, and 5000 score, just becomes near impossible. So, look at the conqueror's thread and look how they all achieved getting there? I already met conqueror so it does not matter to me if I get it again or not, but was fun trying, it is quite a difficult feat to accomplish.

I think only 20 players have ever made conqueror out of around 400,000 or half million players that have came through and played on the cc site, so, this is what you should compare conqueror's to, other conquerors, not a colonel or brig's with high relative rank, they are simply not the same. Compare field marshalls with field marshall and conqueror's with conquerors, this is a more fair comparison. There is only few and far between.

RiskTycoon wrote:holy shenanigans, look at you go ! nice work bud

rbelgrod wrote:well of all the people who deserve it, its blitz, he is among the elite where he should be......maybe he can have natasha now , ill pat for the plane ticket haha

Blitzaholic wrote:

RiskTycoon wrote:holy shenanigans, look at you go ! nice work bud

thx RT

rbelgrod wrote:well of all the people who deserve it, its blitz, he is among the elite where he should be......maybe he can have natasha now , ill pat for the plane ticket haha

thank you rbel, I hope natascha dont see you post, lol that is funny though. she would luv me if I was any rank.

Blitzaholic wrote:
I got the gold medal in singles a long time ago, as many others did, it is not that big of a deal nette, getting gold in all areas is extremely challenging, especially trying to maintain high score.

Blitzaholic wrote:the comparisons you and a few others are trying to make are not even in the same universe, they are galaxies away.

Robinette wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:thx all

and thx for all who teamed with me during that time, you are deserve the credit as well, could not of done it without you all, which includes:

*long list of names*

That's it?

THAT'S your big thank you speech?

Blitzaholic wrote:I am preparing my thank you speech for all who helped me, coming soon.

good thing you are better at collecting points than you are at thank you speeches

Blitzaholic wrote:lol Fc, all I was trying to do to is show back then over a year ago was how you fruitcake teamed with cooks to get colonel and brig status and high relative rank where many on cc never had to revert to that to reach those scores!

When you get close to conqueror, well, that is a whole different animal all together, the comparisons you and a few others are trying to make are not even in the same universe, they are galaxies away.

This is evidenced by the number of players that have hit those ranks throughout history. The higher you go up the more scarce it becomes, so when a player reaches that high of a score and your goal is conqueror, you have no choice but to try to level the playing field some in score to make it fair, it is only common sense.

Bones2484 wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:lol Fc, how old is that quote? over 2 years?

Actually it was last February in this thread.

You have a lot of great quotes in there that are hilarious to read in hindsight.

Blitzaholic wrote:funny how you get a new player who is a noob to come a long every few months to team with you and win a ton to jack up your score, then few months later, you recruit another one, so on and so forth.

Blitzaholic wrote:it is quite easy to manipulate that when you have a cook join your team in many of your games fruitcake (like you have done) and you give them direction of plans on what to do every turn, its like you playing both accounts practically but within the rules, but it is a manipulation as you will not lose as many points for losing, and you win more for winning.

Blitzaholic wrote:You fruitcake more than anyone team with cooks to exaggerate you relative rank, which is a little flawed and fruity if you ask me.

Blitzaholic wrote:the fact is you can team with cooks and tell them every move and manipulate your relative rank, and many others will start doing this if your suggestion is implemented.

Blitzaholic wrote:but when one is constantly teaming with new players over and over again [...] with scores of 500 to 1000 and there are many you have done this with, it raises an eyebrow is all.

It's amazing that you can't just admit your hypocrisy. The evidence is overflowing!

Blitzaholic wrote:

RiskTycoon wrote:holy shenanigans, look at you go ! nice work bud

thx RT

rbelgrod wrote:well of all the people who deserve it, its blitz, he is among the elite where he should be......maybe he can have natasha now , ill pat for the plane ticket haha

thank you rbel, I hope natascha dont see you post, lol that is funny though. she would luv me if I was any rank.