Page 6 of 25

Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 11:30 am
by wicked
how about the person with the most annoying avatar (omg risk)? :lol:

Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 11:40 am
by Master Bush
How about a vote count. If we have a tie at the moment, my vote goes to Andy

Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 11:42 am
by wicked
I believe omg & I both have 2, with a bunch of others at 1. But I'm not the flavor you would want. :wink:

Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 11:49 am
by Master Bush
Na, I'm pretty sure I would enjoy that flavor.

Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 11:51 am
by wicked
I thought you preferred chocolate?

Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 12:00 pm
by Master Bush
wicked wrote:I thought you preferred chocolate?


What? Where did that come from?

Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 1:41 pm
by qeee1
Some mod *cough* wicked *cough* is editing posts, (s)he unbolded my post when I voted for wicked (her).

Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 1:46 pm
by wicked
qeee, you're not playing this game, move on. :roll:

Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 1:51 pm
by qeee1
wicked wrote:qeee, you're not playing this game, move on. :roll:


does that make me any less entitled to post? What makes playing a mafia game any more of a noble cause than having fun at the expense of those playing a mafia game?

Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 1:56 pm
by supercram
qeee1 wrote:
wicked wrote:qeee, you're not playing this game, move on. :roll:


does that make me any less entitled to post? What makes playing a mafia game any more of a noble cause than having fun at the expense of those playing a mafia game?


seriously, get out of the thread.

Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 1:57 pm
by wicked
I'll let Auto decide, it's his game. If you want attention, the kiddie pool is thatta way >>>>

Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 1:57 pm
by supercram
Master Bush wrote:
wicked wrote:I thought you preferred chocolate?


What? Where did that come from?


she is trying to say she's VANILLA. as in VANILLA TOWNIE. a broom-ism.

Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 2:03 pm
by wicked
OMG Cram, must you point out EVERYTHING noob?? :roll: the more you point out, the more you help the mafia. first you gave out the win condition, now this. thanks a lot bud.

Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 2:05 pm
by supercram
wicked wrote:OMG Cram, must you point out EVERYTHING noob?? :roll: the more you point out, the more you help the mafia. first you gave out the win condition, now this. thanks a lot bud.


WTF?? like it means anything for you to say "townie" in code? :roll:

it doesn't mean you aren't lying about it. i'd rather expose what you're doing.

Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 2:08 pm
by qeee1
Hey, the thread doesn't belong solely to the owner, anyway I don't really care. The kids over at the pool think I'm cool so I don't need your approval. Still I feel slighted that you used your modly powers for something like that, I wasn't intending on posting again until I saw that.

Bla Bla Bla... etc.

*leaves thread*

Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 2:09 pm
by wicked
cram, go look up breadcrumbing. :roll:

Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 2:14 pm
by supercram
wicked wrote:cram, go look up breadcrumbing. :roll:


i can't win with you. i help out, i get nada. i explain stats, i get flamed. i try to explain to MB, i get called a noob.

fuhgeddaboutit.

Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 2:14 pm
by autoload
Master Bush wrote:I unvote rev

and vote for whoever is closest to being lynched.


I'm in the middle of tallying vote counts and when you posted this the Rev was closest to the lynch. However, I can not put a vote back on someone unless specifi named. Therefore I will count this post as an unvote.

Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 2:17 pm
by autoload
Vote Count:

2 reverend_kyle (Incandenza, Senfive)
2 omg_risk (UCAbears, wicked)
1 wicked (supercram)
1 Master Bush (Machiavelli)
1 UCAbears (dcowboys055)
1 supercram (Fircoal)
1 Senfive (reverend_kyle)
1 No Lynch (omg_risk)

2 Not Voting (HoussamTheGreat, Master Bush)



With 12 alive it takes 7 to lynch!

Edited. Thanks for pointing that out cram. Although the votes were correct, this way makes it much easier to follow.

Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 2:24 pm
by supercram
autoload wrote:Vote Count:

1 wicked (supercram)
1 omg_risk (UCAbears)
1 Master Bush (Machiavelli)
1 UCAbears (dcowboys055)
1 supercram (Fircoal)
2 reverend_kyle (Incandenza, Senfive)
1 Senfive (reverend_kyle)
1 omg_risk (wicked)
1 No Lynch (omg_risk)

2 Not Voting (HoussamTheGreat, Master Bush)

omg_risk is twice.



With 12 alive it takes 7 to lynch!

Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 2:28 pm
by wicked
cram, you crack me up, well at least you're talking!!

Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:10 pm
by HoussamTheGreat
OK - back to what cram was saying earlier.. unless we change something, this is a no lynch. a no lynch is bad since we literally acquired zero information today, so tomorrow is going to be exactly the same situation, except with one less townie. Or are we collectively agreeing on a no lynch. Cause all those one off votes are exactly that.

Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:43 pm
by Incandenza
But the whole point is that there's no way for us to make a smart decision. All we can do is make a shot-in-the-dark decision and hope it pans out.

That being said, I'm coming around to the no-lynch-is-bad concept. It seems like in this game it's almost impossible to make smart decisions in the first few rounds no matter what, so you may as well take a stab at a lynch and hope you don't take out one of the power townie types...

So I'm going to make a decision based on stupid things like 'he was the last one to post' and 'jesus, I totally won't be able to deal with seeing that avvy for the next two weeks'... basically the same reason others are voting for the potential lynch victim in question.

Unvote RK

Vote omg_risk

Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:47 pm
by wicked
Houssam, lynch or no lynch, we've acquired no information today.

Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:48 pm
by dcowboys055
i agree with incandenza, so

unvote ucabears (which wasnt a serious vote anyways)

vote omg_risk