Page 46 of 275

Re: Football (real)

Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 2:57 pm
by johnboy
Crap game man u up to there old diving tricks again still keeps the top spot alive.
Old firm again tomorrow come on the Gers.

Re: Football (real)

Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 9:36 pm
by borox0
Iliad wrote:*Drum roll* Chelsea vs Man u :lol:


Nooooooo!!!!!!!!!

Re: Football (real)

Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 9:36 pm
by Iliad
borox0 wrote:
Iliad wrote:*Drum roll* Chelsea vs Man u :lol:


Nooooooo!!!!!!!!!
wha?

Re: Football (real)

Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 10:24 pm
by borox0
Man U lost :cry:

Re: Football (real)

Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 12:10 am
by Iliad
borox0 wrote:Man U lost :cry:

What did you expect?
We absolutely owned, completely dominated the game

Also Fergie made soem very bad decisions, you didn't have ronaldo or tevez on and you were playing defensively, you were lucky you even got a goal

Re: Football (real)

Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 5:51 pm
by borox0
We have better goal difference overall. And will win the Premier League any way.

Re: Football (real)

Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 7:04 pm
by Iliad
borox0 wrote:We have better goal difference overall. And will win the Premier League any way.

Really? If you f*ck up agaisnt barcelona, or even if you do beat them, you may be unable to pick up in the premier league
unlike us cause we're going to beat liverpool at home, cause we're undefeatable at home

Re: Football (real)

Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 8:59 pm
by tiberiusaquila
Iliad wrote:Also Fergie made soem very bad decisions, you didn't have ronaldo or tevez on


That's not a bad decision, it's a wise decision. We've got Barça to play in the semis this week.

Re: Football (real)

Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 9:00 pm
by tiberiusaquila
Iliad wrote:we're undefeatable at home


Chelsea's record at home is admirable.

Undefeatable they're not.

Re: Football (real)

Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 9:02 pm
by Iliad
tiberiusaquila wrote:
Iliad wrote:Also Fergie made soem very bad decisions, you didn't have ronaldo or tevez on


That's not a bad decision, it's a wise decision. We've got Barça to play in the semis this week.

Yeah we'll see
After
A) The barca game
b) the two premier league games

Another bad decision is well how defensive you played. I mean you should be glad that you scored a goal and the the score was 2-1 not 3-0

Re: Football (real)

Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 9:03 pm
by Iliad
tiberiusaquila wrote:
Iliad wrote:we're undefeatable at home


Chelsea's record at home is admirable.

Undefeatable they're not.

sure not undefeatable

But it is a very difficult task

Re: Football (real)

Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 9:10 pm
by tiberiusaquila
Iliad wrote:Yeah we'll see
After
A) The barca game
b) the two premier league games

Another bad decision is well how defensive you played. I mean you should be glad that you scored a goal and the the score was 2-1 not 3-0


Carrick had a very dodgy handball call against him. Throw out that penalty and things may have been very different. I don't think the plan was to play defensively, that's not United's style, but without Ronaldo and Tevez it leaves the burden to Rooney who just hasn't been a consistent finisher, although I love his play in general. United has had a number of matches where they can't seem to get untracked. Then, they'll come out next match and be unstoppable. It's a troubling tendency.

Re: Football (real)

Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 9:11 pm
by tiberiusaquila
Iliad wrote:sure not undefeatable

But it is a very difficult task


A difficult task, I'll agree with that.

Re: Football (real)

Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 10:07 pm
by Iliad
tiberiusaquila wrote:
Iliad wrote:Yeah we'll see
After
A) The barca game
b) the two premier league games

Another bad decision is well how defensive you played. I mean you should be glad that you scored a goal and the the score was 2-1 not 3-0


Carrick had a very dodgy handball call against him. Throw out that penalty and things may have been very different. I don't think the plan was to play defensively, that's not United's style, but without Ronaldo and Tevez it leaves the burden to Rooney who just hasn't been a consistent finisher, although I love his play in general. United has had a number of matches where they can't seem to get untracked. Then, they'll come out next match and be unstoppable. It's a troubling tendency.

It wasn't dodgy

Don't complain about penalties, especially when they have been going your way, most of the time

Re: Football (real)

Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 10:44 pm
by tiberiusaquila
Iliad wrote:Don't complain about penalties, especially when they have been going your way, most of the time


I didn't "complain" about the penalty, I pointed out the simple fact that Carrick got called for handball when he couldn't get out of the way. If I'd said "we got hosed" that would be a complaint. I merely said that without the penalty, a dodgy one at best, the outcome may have been different.

Penalties going United's way "most of the time"? Hardly.

Re: Football (real)

Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 11:29 pm
by Iliad
tiberiusaquila wrote:
Iliad wrote:Don't complain about penalties, especially when they have been going your way, most of the time


I didn't "complain" about the penalty, I pointed out the simple fact that Carrick got called for handball when he couldn't get out of the way. If I'd said "we got hosed" that would be a complaint. I merely said that without the penalty, a dodgy one at best, the outcome may have been different.

Penalties going United's way "most of the time"? Hardly.

It wasn't dodgy, it was a legitimate penalty

Re: Football (real)

Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 11:48 am
by cena-rules
Iliad wrote:
tiberiusaquila wrote:
Iliad wrote:Don't complain about penalties, especially when they have been going your way, most of the time


I didn't "complain" about the penalty, I pointed out the simple fact that Carrick got called for handball when he couldn't get out of the way. If I'd said "we got hosed" that would be a complaint. I merely said that without the penalty, a dodgy one at best, the outcome may have been different.

Penalties going United's way "most of the time"? Hardly.

It wasn't dodgy, it was a legitimate penalty

it was a perfectly good penalty. Meanwhile Im gonna need to borrow peoples anils here

Re: Football (real)

Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 7:35 am
by billy07
haha boro, get back to where you belong. the championship.


SAFC FTM

Re: Football (real)

Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 3:52 pm
by tiberiusaquila
Man United on to Moscow!

The Ginger Ninja puts us through. :mrgreen:

Who will join the Reds in the Final?

Re: Football (real)

Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:20 pm
by borox0
Man U bet Barcelona. :D :D :D

Re: Football (real)

Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:23 pm
by Neoteny
borox0 wrote:Man U bet Barcelona. :D :D :D


The game was actually on TV when I was around to watch it! I was so excited! Too bad I missed the second half due to school...

Re: Football (real)

Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:28 pm
by borox0
Final score was 1-0 so you didn't miss any goals.

Re: Football (real)

Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:48 pm
by cena-rules
borox0 wrote:Man U bet Barcelona. :D :D :D

what did the bet on?
how much?

Re: Football (real)

Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 8:40 am
by kingprawn
Heard on the news that Shinawatra is giving Sven the boot at the end of the season. Noel Gallagher has been having a rant about it on 5 live. I think Noel's quite right and that Sven should be given a bit more time to develop the squad. I can see City struggling next year if he goes.

Re: Football (real)

Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 11:33 am
by sam_levi_11
HAHAHAHAHA STORY OF CITY FANS LIVES