Conquer Club

ksslemp wrote:

Neutrino wrote:

ksslemp wrote:

Neutrino wrote: but this is true for nearly every religion and political opinion.

You are as small minded as your name implies, open that box you live in and take a deep breath, you need more [b]O
Your comment in red is complete stupidity, please think before you speak!

Wha...?

How is it not true? To the greatest extent of my knowledge, Islam does not have a monopoly over extremist terrorists; it is merely the most active at the present time.

I look forward to the arguments that you can dredge up.

P.S. Its O2. You would think someone who knows what a neutrino is would refrain from making that mistake.

You are Mistaken, It's O, O = Oxygen
I didn't say you need more Air!

O2 isn't the chemical formula for air, you fool... And Oxygen molecule on its own is nearly always a pair - O2. O2 is the formula for pure oxygen.

ksslemp wrote:I'll get back to you later on this, I'm working at the moment.
Just didn't want you to think that I ran away.

Anyway, thought you had no time to post?

Guiscard wrote:

ksslemp wrote:

Neutrino wrote:

ksslemp wrote:

Neutrino wrote: but this is true for nearly every religion and political opinion.

You are as small minded as your name implies, open that box you live in and take a deep breath, you need more [b]O
Your comment in red is complete stupidity, please think before you speak!

Wha...?

How is it not true? To the greatest extent of my knowledge, Islam does not have a monopoly over extremist terrorists; it is merely the most active at the present time.

I look forward to the arguments that you can dredge up.

P.S. Its O2. You would think someone who knows what a neutrino is would refrain from making that mistake.

You are Mistaken, It's O, O = Oxygen
I didn't say you need more Air!

O2 isn't the chemical formula for air, you fool... And Oxygen molecule on its own is nearly always a pair - O2. O2 is the formula for pure oxygen.

Answer this question:

What is the symbol for Oxygen?
That's right, now Shut-Up!

ksslemp wrote:What is the symbol for Oxygen?
That's right, now Shut-Up!

But O3 (ozone) is downright poisonous. We need to know exactly what you're referring to.

Guiscard wrote:

ksslemp wrote:I'll get back to you later on this, I'm working at the moment.
Just didn't want you to think that I ran away.

Anyway, thought you had no time to post?

Just closing up, and had a couple minutes to check online.
won't be back for about 4 hours.

I know, you're all broken up about that.

Stopper wrote:

ksslemp wrote:What is the symbol for Oxygen?
That's right, now Shut-Up!

But O3 (ozone) is downright poisonous. We need to know exactly what you're referring to.

I'm referring to O.

ksslemp wrote:

Stopper wrote:

ksslemp wrote:What is the symbol for Oxygen?
That's right, now Shut-Up!

But O3 (ozone) is downright poisonous. We need to know exactly what you're referring to.

I'm referring to O.

But O doesn't independently exist in nature. It appears in either O2, or O3, or as part of a larger compound. Clarify!

Plus, do you have any serious objections to the Lancet study?

ksslemp wrote:Answer this question:

What is the symbol for Oxygen?
That's right, now Shut-Up!

Answer this question:

How much O(1) will he get by breathing in the air on our planet?

Actually, I'll answer for you:

None.

O2, however, will make up 20.9% of the air he breathes in. So if he needs more O1 he aint gonna get any breathing in, is he!

You're just digging yourself a deeper (and increasingly silly) hole at the moment.

Guiscard wrote:

ksslemp wrote:Answer this question:

What is the symbol for Oxygen?
That's right, now Shut-Up!

Answer this question:

How much O(1) will he get by breathing in the air on our planet?

Actually, I'll answer for you:

None.

O2, however, will make up 20.9% of the air he breathes in. So if he needs more O1 he aint gonna get any breathing in, is he!

You're just digging yourself a deeper (and increasingly silly) hole at the moment.

This is ridiculous! the chemical symbol for Oxygen is O period, done, end of discussion!

vtmarik wrote:

jay_a2j wrote:attacking religious freedom- except Islam of course and tearing apart our

Engel v. Vitale Decision: It is unconstitutional for state officials to compose an official school prayer and require its recitation in public schools, even when it is non-denominational and students may excuse themselves from participation.

Do you know why? Because the government is not allowed to dabble in religion. Even if they celebrate all religions, that still becomes a state religion. It's none of the government's business what private citizens believe in.

Are you saying they should pass laws requiring prayer? What about making church attendance mandatory? If you can do one, you can do the other.

And need I remind you that it's the Supreme Court, not the ACLU, that makes the final call. If you want to blame an organization for the degradation of "religious freedom" then maybe you should argue against the Supreme Court.

Jay, are you advocating a theocracy? If so, you're stark raving mad. The LAST thing we need is a Church of America (the first reason the New England colonies were set up for was the Church of England).

vtmarik wrote:

jay_a2j wrote:

Policy used by organizations...yet another rip in the flag.

I'm against affirmative action, but I can respect why it was started. It was actually started to prevent race from becoming an issue before it was gutted and turned into this "You have to hire so many minorities" nonsense. It's not a rip in the flag so much as a rip into common sense:
"We're against racism and using race as a barrier against hiring certain people, so you have to hire this many minorities because that's different than what we're against!"

We actually agree on this point Jay, I believe the apocalypse is at hand.

An organization that is utterly useless and my tax dollars fund.

Your tax dollars fund the UN? I thought each individual member funded the UN through dues. Sure, our (The USA) dues come from tax money, but do you know how many other delegations attend the UN?

190

Yep, our tax dollars fund 1/191 of the UN. What a ripoff! Well, we certainly could funnel that money elsewhere.

Actually, the US pays for most of the UN, and supplies most of the peacekeepers. It seems your facts are a bit ascew.

The more toothless the UN becomes the more I believe its a publicity stunt, the fact that Sudan denied them access while slaughtering the people in Darfur makes me question their commitment. While supporting the fact that europe tries to avoid war, when they send peace keepers they better be peace makers.

Kss, your arguement about symbols for elements is irrelevent quit changing the subject.

What the right fails to mention is that their license expired, they knew a long time ago it would not be renewed. The RCTV is accused of supporting the Coup a short time ago. Playing Cartoons and stating that Hugo had stepped out of office when he had been kidnapped by a group with americas support. What the news fails to report is that RCTV is already operational under a new name(TVes) and in the hands of the public.
http://www.handsoffvenezuela.org/

There are still several TV stations in the hands of a few private investors,Along with several mines and factories aswell. Dont worry capitalism isnt dead in Venezuela yet,but soon all of Venezuela will belong to the people.

To be short
I support the bullshit that Chavo is saying
I don't support the bullshit Bush is saying

Guiscard wrote:

ksslemp wrote:I'll get back to you later on this, I'm working at the moment.
Just didn't want you to think that I ran away.

Still waiting on your answer, tetchy!

Guiscard wrote:

Guiscard wrote:

ksslemp wrote:I'll get back to you later on this, I'm working at the moment.
Just didn't want you to think that I ran away.

Still waiting on your answer, tetchy!

I thought i already replied, i'll have to check the thread.
My apology.

ksslemp wrote:

Guiscard wrote:

Guiscard wrote:

ksslemp wrote:I'll get back to you later on this, I'm working at the moment.
Just didn't want you to think that I ran away.

Still waiting on your answer, tetchy!

I thought i already replied, i'll have to check the thread.
My apology.

And... This was quite a while ago... I would have assumed that you would have come up with something in the meantime.

ksslemp wrote:

Guiscard wrote:

ksslemp wrote:I'll get back to you later on this, I'm working at the moment.
Just didn't want you to think that I ran away.

Anyway, thought you had no time to post?

Just closing up, and had a couple minutes to check online.
won't be back for about 4 hours.

I know, you're all broken up about that.

2 days later and still nothing...

Guiscard wrote:

ksslemp wrote:

Guiscard wrote:

ksslemp wrote:
You are as small minded as your name implies, open that box you live in and take a deep breath, you need more O

Your comment in red is complete stupidity, please think before you speak!

Why is it stupidity? Evidence? Argument?

Read what the guy wrote!
If you still have questions, do the following:

1. put gun to head
2. pull trigger

f*ck you. You're the one not presenting any kind of argument here! Why is Islam the only religion with extremist terrorist groups?

Catholicism?
Christianity?
Judaism?

All of those have had extreme terrorist groups at some point!

I Think Catholicism and Christianity should be combined, and the only thing i believe you're referring to is the inquisition? That was an aberrition that happened a long time ago, and it wasn't supported by scripture either. Islam on the other hand directly quotes scripture to support their evil acts. Catholics and Christians exorcised these demons from their ranks a long time ago. (pardon the pun)

I'm not aware of any Jewish terrorist groups. Please enlighten me.

The difference between Islam and the other religions is that islam has been following this "model" since it's inception. They need a reformation! Where is their Martin Luther?, they desperately need one, because that is one screwed up religion.

It's sad because it's a "Blind leading the Blind" situation, the mullahs are blinded by faith and power, and the followers are blinded by faith and ignorance. 1/3 of muslim men and 2/3 of muslim women are illiterate.

I'll forget about the F*ck you remark, i know it was said in a moment of passion.

ksslemp wrote:

Guiscard wrote:

ksslemp wrote:Answer this question:

What is the symbol for Oxygen?
That's right, now Shut-Up!

Answer this question:

How much O(1) will he get by breathing in the air on our planet?

Actually, I'll answer for you:

None.

O2, however, will make up 20.9% of the air he breathes in. So if he needs more O1 he aint gonna get any breathing in, is he!

You're just digging yourself a deeper (and increasingly silly) hole at the moment.

This is ridiculous! the chemical symbol for Oxygen is O period, done, end of discussion!

sorry just got it on school, its O2
and O3 is for the atmosphere (^sp)

Wisse wrote:

ksslemp wrote:

Guiscard wrote:

ksslemp wrote:Answer this question:

What is the symbol for Oxygen?
That's right, now Shut-Up!

Answer this question:

How much O(1) will he get by breathing in the air on our planet?

Actually, I'll answer for you:

None.

O2, however, will make up 20.9% of the air he breathes in. So if he needs more O1 he aint gonna get any breathing in, is he!

You're just digging yourself a deeper (and increasingly silly) hole at the moment.

This is ridiculous! the chemical symbol for Oxygen is O period, done, end of discussion!

sorry just got it on school, its O2
and O3 is for the atmosphere (^sp)

I'd like to make a material donation to your school, A Periodic Table! (ever heard of it?)

ksslemp wrote:

Guiscard wrote:

ksslemp wrote:

Guiscard wrote:

ksslemp wrote:
You are as small minded as your name implies, open that box you live in and take a deep breath, you need more O

Your comment in red is complete stupidity, please think before you speak!

Why is it stupidity? Evidence? Argument?

Read what the guy wrote!
If you still have questions, do the following:

1. put gun to head
2. pull trigger

f*ck you. You're the one not presenting any kind of argument here! Why is Islam the only religion with extremist terrorist groups?

Catholicism?
Christianity?
Judaism?

All of those have had extreme terrorist groups at some point!

I Think Catholicism and Christianity should be combined, and the only thing i believe you're referring to is the inquisition? That was an aberrition that happened a long time ago, and it wasn't supported by scripture either. Islam on the other hand directly quotes scripture to support their evil acts. Catholics and Christians exorcised these demons from their ranks a long time ago. (pardon the pun)

I'm not aware of any Jewish terrorist groups. Please enlighten me.

The difference between Islam and the other religions is that islam has been following this "model" since it's inception. They need a reformation! Where is their Martin Luther?, they desperately need one, because that is one screwed up religion.

It's sad because it's a "Blind leading the Blind" situation, the mullahs are blinded by faith and power, and the followers are blinded by faith and ignorance. 1/3 of muslim men and 2/3 of muslim women are illiterate.

I'll forget about the F*ck you remark, i know it was said in a moment of passion.

Whether Islam is a naturally violent religion has already been debated, and is completly pointless anyway.

Neutrino wrote: but this is true for nearly every religion and political opinion.

That was what I said that made you upset. You barely mentioned it at all, with most of your post devoted to slagging off Islam.

I was saying that nearly everyone has had terrorists at some point or another. How can you prove that this is not true?

Christianity:
IRA
Army of God
Nagaland Rebels

Judaism:
Jewish Defence League
Gush Emunim Underground
Jewish Defense Organization


Islam does not have a monopoly on terrorism, it is merely the most active at the present.

They exist. Deal with it.

ksslemp wrote:In relation to the topic of this thread i'd like to send out my support to the clear minded people of Venezuela, who are at this moment are in the streets of Venezuela in protest of what their Tyrant leader has done previously and recently to silence any opposing viewpoints and dimish the peoples freedoms.

If there is a God, I hope he gives all of you the passion, strength and courage to fight this Ego-Maniacal Want to be Castro Dictator.

I am with you in solidarity!

Are you by any chance Karl Rove's semi-retarded half-brother? You sure do lean to the extreme right. "I am with you in solidarity." What kind of of neoconservative propaganda doublespeak is this? It's utter bullshit. Get a spine, think for yourself, and stop using bold and colors.

First the evil dictator(Chavo) takes away freedom of speech, now the government of brazil(US friendly) is protecting it in their own way...

Brazil: Federal Police invade occupied factory CIPLA
By In Defence of Marxism
Thursday, 31 May 2007
The workers of the occupied factory CIPLA were surprised this morning by 150 men, heavily armed, from the Federal Police, who invaded the factory in order to arrest the members of the factory committee.

After almost five years of struggle to save their jobs and protect their rights, and for the federal government to nationalise the factories as proposed by the BNDES (National Social and Economic Development Bank) the workers now find themselves threatened by the federal police and with losing their jobs.

At this moment the workers are organising and mobilising in order to hold assembly meetings in Flaskô, in Sumaré, and in Cipla.

At the same time the workers of Flaskô, in Sumaré (São Paulo) are mobilising in support of the comrades at Cipla and to organise resistance against any threat in Sumaré.

The workers ask that letters and resolutions are immediately sent, that phone calls are made, and that everyone head down to the headquarters of the companies in support of the struggle of the workers against any threat of the federal government, the justice system or of the old bosses.

Capitalist hypocrite!
http://www.marxist.com/brazil-police-in ... 310507.htm

Anarchist wrote:Capitalist hypocrite!

Who do you think is a capitalist hypocrite? Lula?

Maybe he is... but he's proud of it. He's the epitome of the ever-elusive neoliberal socialist.

ksslemp wrote:

Guiscard wrote:

ksslemp wrote:

Guiscard wrote:

ksslemp wrote:
You are as small minded as your name implies, open that box you live in and take a deep breath, you need more O

Your comment in red is complete stupidity, please think before you speak!

Why is it stupidity? Evidence? Argument?

Read what the guy wrote!
If you still have questions, do the following:

1. put gun to head
2. pull trigger

f*ck you. You're the one not presenting any kind of argument here! Why is Islam the only religion with extremist terrorist groups?

Catholicism?
Christianity?
Judaism?

All of those have had extreme terrorist groups at some point!

I Think Catholicism and Christianity should be combined, and the only thing i believe you're referring to is the inquisition? That was an aberrition that happened a long time ago, and it wasn't supported by scripture either. Islam on the other hand directly quotes scripture to support their evil acts. Catholics and Christians exorcised these demons from their ranks a long time ago. (pardon the pun)

I'm not aware of any Jewish terrorist groups. Please enlighten me.

The difference between Islam and the other religions is that islam has been following this "model" since it's inception. They need a reformation! Where is their Martin Luther?, they desperately need one, because that is one screwed up religion.

It's sad because it's a "Blind leading the Blind" situation, the mullahs are blinded by faith and power, and the followers are blinded by faith and ignorance. 1/3 of muslim men and 2/3 of muslim women are illiterate.

I'll forget about the F*ck you remark, i know it was said in a moment of passion.

Although this has been dealt with already, no I'm not referring to the Inquisition. That was nothing like a terrorist group...

For Christianity, we have groups like the KKK, the IRA... They may not be on the same international scale as some of the Islamic extremists but it is still taking the lives of innocents. Jewish groups carried out terrorist actvities in Palestine before the mandate... What I'm saying it that terrorism has less to do with actual religious teaching and more to do with the geo-political climate of the present day. Anyone can use scripture to justify terrorism. The KKK have used it to justify the lynching of black people in just the same way as some extreme Muslims have used it to justify a twisted idea of Jihad. You cannot write off Islam as a violent religion. There are millions of moderate peaceful Muslims throughout the world. What 'model' are you referring to? If we reversed the polarities, and the Christian world was focussed on the middle east and the Muslim west acted as we are acting now, and we had all the same post-colonial political and economic issues, I strongly doubt we'd be any different whatsoever.

Indeed, you can look to Ireland as an example of where a group who feel they are being repressed use religion as a uniting factor to excuse terrorism. It makes no comment on the religion itself, but only the people who use it in a corrupt way. The current extremists are acting no differently to the leaders of the Crusades! They had corrupt motives which inspired the death of thousands of innocent people, but the actual soldiers who marched to the Holy Land were often just subject to human nature. we can all commit atrocities when we are gullible or brainwashed enough, and religion is the best way to do that if we use it wrongly.

Furthermore, the illiteracy thing is not applicable to religion whatsoever! i'm sure the literacy rate in some areas of Africa is tragically low, but that doesn't mean Black people can't read does it! Try and make sensible arguments in the future if you're gonna say anything at all, and stop with all the bold and coloured bullshit while you're at it.


And I'm not gonna retract telling you to f*ck off because in your post you'd told me to shoot myself in the head. Wanker.

reverend_kyle wrote:

P Gizzle wrote:i know, im jk. but, the UN freaks no matter what we do.

Incorrect once again, The US is constantly thinking we are better than the UN's laws and feel we have the obligation to step on their toes.

i don't hate venezala, of however u spell it, but, the UN SUCKS!!! it's useless! it's about as useful as the leauge of nations! screw the $@%$@!# UN!
oh, and GOD BLESS AMERICA!