Dancing Mustard Tossed From The Tower

[chaosfactor]

Its a laugh a minute!

I am cracking up!!

Mustard You Donkey arsed Ijiot


In the Music Industry we call you a


MUPPET

He Played The Silver Edge, He ran The Gauntlet,

He is obviously getting old isn't he?

Too be caught out by the mods with such a simple one as that??


Play the game Mustard, You are still only 4th phase on the factor scoring system.

[The Fuzzy Pengui]

by volunteer you mean paid right?

No, by volunteer I mean without pay. Isn't that what volunteer normally means?

[Hologram]

Well, I was hoping an admin would read my posts since they were taking the time to lock them, but should I PM them? Do you honestly think it will work even if I presented a courteous, reasonable, and sufficient case (i.e. that he broke no explicit nor implied rules) to revoke the decision?

You could PM them. The people locking your posts have been volunteer moderators, not administrators.

And yes, it could help to PM them, but an e-ticket is normally the way to go. But presenting a clear case, in a professional manner, could reverse a decision.

Hope that helps

Yes lets send an e-ticket and not get a response in weeks! How about we cause havoc and get a response now!

Now now, I'm sure we'll get a response in about a month or so about how we were right and they were wrong...

I honestly can't believe how incredibly ridiculous this is.

A one month ban
for personal info that the owner SAID to post
5 days after he deleted the info because he thought mods could mistake it for something it wasn't
which violates a rule that hasn't been made yet
on forum guildlines that are being updated

That's the kicker, the fact that it's now apparently against the rules in the new rules that they haven't even posted yet, but somehow you still get punished for it. Kind reminds me something that a fascist regime would do, but that's probably just my cynical self seeking justice. Oh well. I'll be gone in about a week, and I may or may not come back. I have better things to do than giving a power hungry asshole the time of day.

[timmytuttut88]

That's the kicker, the fact that it's now apparently against the rules in the new rules that they haven't even posted yet, but somehow you still get punished for it. Kind reminds me something that a fascist regime would do, but that's probably just my cynical self seeking justice. Oh well. I'll be gone in about a week, and I may or may not come back. I have better things to do than giving a power hungry asshole the time of day.

I would leave also, but I prefer expressing how much this place has changed for the worse. Ever since Norse was banned things have just gone downhill.

[Juan_Bottom]

That's the kicker, the fact that it's now apparently against the rules in the new rules that they haven't even posted yet, but somehow you still get punished for it. Kind reminds me something that a fascist regime would do, but that's probably just my cynical self seeking justice. Oh well.

Actually that is literaly part of the reason we fought the Revolutionary War. No lie.
Old King Cole used to write new laws to punish his enemies without the laws being made public.... or he would just say "You had an Orange Sherbert Smoothie on Tuesday? Well today's Thursday buddy and it's against the law! Off with your head!"
Revolutionary War time naow?

I would like to state publically that I do understand the ban. I would have banned DM myself. HOWEVER that would be before finding out that he was asked by the person who owns the number. If I were a mod I would just reinstate him with a firm "never do that again."
Plus, there's no rule about this?

I have better things to do than giving a power hungry asshole the time of day.

I'm never buying prem again.

[timmytuttut88]

That's the kicker, the fact that it's now apparently against the rules in the new rules that they haven't even posted yet, but somehow you still get punished for it. Kind reminds me something that a fascist regime would do, but that's probably just my cynical self seeking justice. Oh well.

Actually that is literaly part of the reason we fought the Revolutionary War. No lie.
Old King Cole used to write new laws to punish his enemies without the laws being made public.... or he would just say "You had an Orange Sherbert Smoothie on Tuesday? Well today's Thursday buddy and it's against the law! Off with your head!"
Revolutionary War time naow?

That's also why it is against the law in the United States and is part of the constitution: not to arrest someone for breaking a law before the law was established. Unfortunately this place is based in Canada and is a private entity so it can do what it pleases.

[Nikolai]

Erm... since currently it's about 50/50... and we all know the first half was all of DM's outraged buddies rushing to the polls... I'd say your assessment is correct, even though you obviously didn't mean it to be.

[timmytuttut88]

Erm... since currently it's about 50/50... and we all know the first half was all of DM's outraged buddies rushing to the polls... I'd say your assessment is correct, even though you obviously didn't mean it to be.

Wow i'm surprised. The mod squad must be pretty active today.

[richardgarr]

why??? , you ask.
Well to quote most people who do things for reasons I didn't immediately understand, "BECAUSE I SAID SO ! ".

[clapper011]

if you are posting a picture of yourself it is not. It is only if you are posting someone elses.... and it should be posted in here :
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=10159

what if someone tells you to post there picture? Apparently that warrants a 1 month ban.

actually, I would tell them to post it themselves...

[jonesthecurl]

Well, yes.

But would not doing so be as bad as all that?

I know you're taking flak you don't deserve personally on this, but I do feel your defence is weak because um, there is no defence.

Oh, and we have a new variant on the "if you don't like it sod off" line from NS - "We have your money now, If you go we won't miss you".

Customer Relaltions 101 is recommeded.

[Night Strike]

Oh, and we have a new variant on the "if you don't like it sod off" line from NS - "We have your money now, If you go we won't miss you".

You really shouldn't misquote me. Some people stick around on the site despite their complaints because they have already paid money to the site. Freemiums have not tied themselves to the site using money, so why should they stick around if they don't like it here?

[F1fth]

The thing is we do like it here, and we especially like the people here. So when we lose those people and it becomes less enjoyable we get upset.

[clapper011]

no, because if they posted a picture in the post a pic thread, thats their own info to give. As for the other threads started about emails etc, they were only to cause trouble or a "revolution" so to speak. In saying to post themselves , i merely meant im not going to give it out for you.
I have not much defence on this subject, as I am not the one who banned him, and as far as I know, he got banned for posting a persons rl phone number. Regardless of the person saying he could or not. It has been said many times about posting personal information in the forums, especially after the whole wicked/twill troubles, where twills picture and personal information was posted. So you all cannot tell me that you had absolutely NO idea that it is or could be against any rules? Just because a guideline isnt posted does not me there isnt proper etiquette that most should follow out of respect for others privacy. As someone already said.... about an old saying, well heres another for ya:
If I tell you to go jump off a bridge, would you?

[StiffMittens]

If I tell you to go jump off a bridge, would you?

Probably not. But then again, it depends on the bridge. Are there any clearly posted signs that say "Danger: alligators below?"

[timmytuttut88]

no, because if they posted a picture in the post a pic thread, thats their own info to give. As for the other threads started about emails etc, they were only to cause trouble or a "revolution" so to speak. In saying to post themselves , i merely meant im not going to give it out for you.
I have not much defence on this subject, as I am not the one who banned him, and as far as I know, he got banned for posting a persons rl phone number. Regardless of the person saying he could or not. It has been said many times about posting personal information in the forums, especially after the whole wicked/twill troubles, where twills picture and personal information was posted. So you all cannot tell me that you had absolutely NO idea that it is or could be against any rules? Just because a guideline isnt posted does not me there isnt proper etiquette that most should follow out of respect for others privacy. As someone already said.... about an old saying, well heres another for ya:
If I tell you to go jump off a bridge, would you?

Are you mods so stupid that you honestly think that

1.posting info without the persons consent
2.posting info with the persons consent

are the exact same thing? You honestly think there is no difference between the two and that the twill/wicked and mustard/semigall things are exactly the same? HE SAID TO POST IT! Mustard just did what a normal guy would do and posted it without arguing with the guy. Now you still have to show me where you told him that posting with the persons consent would warrant a one month ban.

[wcaclimbing]

I usually try to stay out of these discussions, but:

So you all cannot tell me that you had absolutely NO idea that it is or could be against any rules?

I honestly had no idea that posting someone's phone number with permission would be against the rules. Seeing as a person would be allowed to post their own info, I would have just assumed that someone else could post it for them if they had permission from the person the info (phone number) was about.

If I tell you to go jump off a bridge, would you?

That question doesn't seem to apply to this situation really easily. DM wasn't asked to do something that was against the rules. At least, I think most people would have assumed that it would be perfectly all right.
The question would probably be better worded as "If I tell you to go jump onto a pile of pillows, would you?"
Because most people would assume the pillows were safe and would go ahead and jump.

Just a question I was thinking about, about the new "personal info" rules.
If I posted a picture of myself, and in that picture was another member of CC, would it be fair to say "The guy wearing the red shirt is me, the username of the guy standing next to me is _________." Or would that be counted as personal info also?
Because if so, you guys will find quite a few people to bust in the 500+ pages of the "Post a Picture of Yourself" thread.
Or personal info (just a picture and the name) of me and someone NOT on CC, which would also apply to many of the posts in the "picture of yourself" thread. Just curious...

[Frigidus]

If I posted a picture of myself, and in that picture was another member of CC, would it be fair to say "The guy wearing the red shirt is me, the username of the guy standing next to me is _________." Or would that be counted as personal info also?
Because if so, you guys will find quite a few people to bust in the 500+ pages of the "Post a Picture of Yourself" thread.
Or personal info (just a picture and the name) of someone NOT on CC, which would also apply to the "picture of yourself" thread. Just curious...

The same thing happened when they banned the four users for posting on other accounts earlier (including DM). This had been done before under very similar circumstances, yet no action was taken. However, once DM did it shit went down. It must be hard for DM, honestly. There's no way to tell when his actions break the rules. Just as with last time, I guarantee there will never again be a ban over this sort of thing. For instance, my sister's phone number is (630)-386-2820.

<waits>

[whitestazn88]

If I posted a picture of myself, and in that picture was another member of CC, would it be fair to say "The guy wearing the red shirt is me, the username of the guy standing next to me is _________." Or would that be counted as personal info also?
Because if so, you guys will find quite a few people to bust in the 500+ pages of the "Post a Picture of Yourself" thread.
Or personal info (just a picture and the name) of someone NOT on CC, which would also apply to the "picture of yourself" thread. Just curious...

The same thing happened when they banned the four users for posting on other accounts earlier (including DM). This had been done before under very similar circumstances, yet no action was taken. However, once DM did it shit went down. It must be hard for DM, honestly. There's no way to tell when his actions break the rules. Just as with last time, I guarantee there will never again be a ban over this sort of thing. For instance, my sister's phone number is (630)-386-2820.

<waits>

yo, post her picture too... so i know whether i wanna call her or not

[atheistheretic]

I'll bet the one dude who voted "no he broke no rules but I don't like him" was the guy who did it.

[MeDeFe]

I have found the phone number of a C D Dawkins, resident of Oxford, by using an online telephone catalogue. Want me to post it?

[MeDeFe]

Well, there's no explicit rule against posting personal information if the person the information is about gave you permission.

In fact, outisde Flamewars there's no rule against posting personal information at all.

[static_ice]

© University of Wisconsin-Parkside • 900 Wood Road • P.O. Box 2000
Kenosha, WI 53141-2000 • 262-595-2345 • Questions or comments?
Contact UW-Parkside!

I am posting the address and phone number of a public establishment, however there will be a singular being opening a package sent to that address or answering your telephone calls. And they clearly state that they want you to contact them.

[MeDeFe]

If I posted a picture of myself, and in that picture was another member of CC, would it be fair to say "The guy wearing the red shirt is me, the username of the guy standing next to me is _________." Or would that be counted as personal info also?
Because if so, you guys will find quite a few people to bust in the 500+ pages of the "Post a Picture of Yourself" thread.
Or personal info (just a picture and the name) of someone NOT on CC, which would also apply to the "picture of yourself" thread. Just curious...

The same thing happened when they banned the four users for posting on other accounts earlier (including DM). This had been done before under very similar circumstances, yet no action was taken. However, once DM did it shit went down. It must be hard for DM, honestly. There's no way to tell when his actions break the rules. Just as with last time, I guarantee there will never again be a ban over this sort of thing. For instance, my sister's phone number is (630)-386-2820.

<waits>

Is she hot?

[static_ice]

Wait so Lack keeps the $25 DM forked over to come back while no one uses that play's worth?