Conquer Club

Jdsizzleslice wrote: Conquerors hate Dice.

God hates Dice.

bad dice = trash can

riskllama wrote:bad dice = trash can

I still think a sub-forum for number crunching and strategy would have been a good idea. Fun as it is to take the piss out of people on a streak of bad luck, that's not really a great way to retain members.

This is my thread now.

17 vs 3 ended 2 vs 1.

iAmCaffeine wrote:17 vs 3 ended 2 vs 1.

That's just karma. Think about all those little puppies you tortured in middle school and you'll get it.

I love puppers.

The dice on Epic Fuedal is fucking brutal, no matter what you're attacking how much you're attacking with. I feel like that map is specifically designed to completely rail one players asshole over the other.

DirtyDishSoap wrote:The dice on Epic Fuedal is fucking brutal, no matter what you're attacking how much you're attacking with. I feel like that map is specifically designed to completely rail one players asshole over the other.

ok it's getting worrisome DDS. post after post after post, it's all about anuses for you.

nietzsche wrote:

DirtyDishSoap wrote:The dice on Epic Fuedal is fucking brutal, no matter what you're attacking how much you're attacking with. I feel like that map is specifically designed to completely rail one players asshole over the other.

ok it's getting worrisome DDS. post after post after post, it's all about anuses for you.

Maybe I like butt stuff?

DirtyDishSoap wrote:

nietzsche wrote:

DirtyDishSoap wrote:The dice on Epic Fuedal is fucking brutal, no matter what you're attacking how much you're attacking with. I feel like that map is specifically designed to completely rail one players asshole over the other.

ok it's getting worrisome DDS. post after post after post, it's all about anuses for you.

Maybe I like butt stuff?

but.. it's a sin..

So are tattoos. Guess I'm fast tracking to hell

DirtyDishSoap wrote:So are tattoos. Guess I'm fast tracking to hell

Blanket statement, not completely accurate. Also Hebrew law. Same as don't eat shrimp. Good idea in certain circumstances, an important rule to keep a particular group of people, a few thousand yeas ago pure for..

Never mind, tattoos are whatever you heard.

Now the dice algorithm, that! Is a sin.

The dice on Conquer Club can't be statistically correct. If real dice were actually rolled, there's no way you would get the results seen on this site.

Stan 1951 wrote:The dice on Conquer Club can't be statistically correct. If real dice were actually rolled, there's no way you would get the results seen on this site.

No way? That's quite a claim. Has someone been rolling fractions and irrational numbers again? Or have you observed one of the mods rolling 7's again? They can be sneaky like that, with their d8s.

Watch out though, if you catch someone rolling a 6.66... recurring, it's the end of the world, or possibly you win a pot of gold. I forget which, but you should probably post screen shots of the impossible rolls you've seen next time.

You don't even play the game so don't comment on it.

iAmCaffeine wrote:You don't even play the game so don't comment on it.

I'm gonna have to roll the dice on that one:

Symmetry rolled a pair of π, and one imaginary number i.

Caffeine rolled a Planck's constant and a 3.

Unlucky this time, iAC.

How unfortunate.

iAmCaffeine wrote:How unfortunate.

I know,right! You couldn't make it up!

Since this is the tread where we grumble about dice, this is my most recent escapade:
Rolling 17v1 I managed to lose 11 rolls in a row.. best I've managed so far, not counting anomalies with the auto roll button which are hard to follow sometimes when you have the large stack mopping up at the end of a game.
If I need a lot of ones to win the lotto, I should probably buy a ticket.

Overall, the dice are fine, Like all gaming dice ,one won't always get the number he wants.

Still...
Could the dice be made less 'streaky'? Perhaps.
Should the dice be made less 'streaky'? Perhaps.

Thorthoth wrote:Overall, the dice are fine, Like all gaming dice ,one won't always get the number he wants.

Still...
Could the dice be made less 'streaky'? Perhaps.
Should the dice be made less 'streaky'? Perhaps.

I think what Thorth is trying to say here, using the Queen's English, is that if you think of using "one" as a pronoun you need to be a female head of state to get what you want. A king, emperor, or "he", as Thorth puts it, will not always get the number "he wants".

It's an interesting proposition, and I'm a little sceptical, but perhaps a basic pledge of allegiance to the British monarchy would help avoid streaky dice. As Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth's subject, you would be subject to her will.

There are other perks too-

Less streaky bacon, for example

Took almost too long to unpack what the Sym was saying...

But in the singular hypothetical, a she is a a 'he', even a feminine, heteronormative, cissexual she is a 'he'.

That's the King's English for you, though the new political-correct term is the President's American.