Page 5 of 15

Re: [CC5] FALL vs LHDD [6-3]

Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2015 10:22 pm
by rockfist
I never bother with calculations, I just go by gut feel.

Re: [CC5] FALL vs LHDD [6-3]

Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2015 4:40 am
by betiko
loutil wrote:To be clear...70 vs 9,3,3,9,3,70 is NOT less than 1%. It is actually just above 8% meaning it will succeed 1 in 12 attempts. Certainly lucky but not a 1% or 1 in 100. They would have needed to kill an additional stack of 15 to get it below 1%.
yeah I don't have the odds calculator since the site decided to screw all add ons and the firefox version. I just feel screwed when these bellow 10% stuff happen...
rockfist I rarely calculate them anymore, it's more about gut feeling of what the % is more or less.

Re: [CC5] FALL vs LHDD [6-3]

Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2015 10:16 pm
by IcePack
What does LHDD have the games at right now? Just curious to compare numbers ;)

Re: [CC5] FALL vs LHDD [6-3]

Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2015 1:04 am
by Donelladan
Smthg like 10-14 or 9-16 for you guys at our last update.
1st set should finished between 9-11 and 6-14 for you according to me.

But then, what are your numbers?

Re: [CC5] FALL vs LHDD [6-3]

Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2015 2:22 am
by betiko
in other words, we are getting ass raped so far!

Re: [CC5] FALL vs LHDD [6-3]

Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2015 6:59 am
by Momo33
Donelladan wrote:Smthg like 10-14 or 9-16 for you guys at our last update.
1st set should finished between 9-11 and 6-14 for you according to me.

But then, what are your numbers?
We are not all that pessimist in LHDD ;) I don't have the same number as bet lol

Re: [CC5] FALL vs LHDD [6-3]

Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2015 9:06 am
by iAmCaffeine
betiko wrote:in other words, we are getting ass raped so far!
That's the best kind.

Re: [CC5] FALL vs LHDD [6-3]

Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2015 9:39 am
by rockfist
Huge difference between 14-10 and 16-9...huge.

Re: [CC5] FALL vs LHDD [6-3]

Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2015 9:58 am
by betiko
rockfist wrote:Huge difference between 14-10 and 16-9...huge.
pretty much. Still haven't heard about your forecasts ice.

Re: [CC5] FALL vs LHDD [6-3]

Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2015 10:16 am
by IcePack
betiko wrote:
rockfist wrote:Huge difference between 14-10 and 16-9...huge.
pretty much. Still haven't heard about your forecasts ice.
You guys answered while I slept & now I'm at work, don't have my info in front of me. I think I had 16-11 if I included slight leanings, but 13-8 ish realistically. But again, that's from memory I might be off. I can post later w my actual #'s from yesterday

Re: [CC5] FALL vs LHDD [6-3]

Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2015 10:38 am
by Donelladan
rockfist wrote:Huge difference between 14-10 and 16-9...huge.
We have two members making pronostic in LHDD, on is more optimistic than the other :D

Re: [CC5] FALL vs LHDD [6-3]

Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2015 10:39 am
by iAmCaffeine
Donelladan wrote:
rockfist wrote:Huge difference between 14-10 and 16-9...huge.
We have two members making pronostic in LHDD, on is more optimistic than the other :D
Is one of them Momo by any chance? :D

Re: [CC5] FALL vs LHDD [6-3]

Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2015 10:43 am
by betiko
iAmCaffeine wrote:
Donelladan wrote:
rockfist wrote:Huge difference between 14-10 and 16-9...huge.
We have two members making pronostic in LHDD, on is more optimistic than the other :D
Is one of the Momo by any chance? :D
yup... my forecasts vs momo's forecasts lol. We're never on the same page! :lol:
and ice, those include the games leaning one way or the other.

Re: [CC5] FALL vs LHDD [6-3]

Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2015 10:45 am
by iAmCaffeine
betiko wrote:
iAmCaffeine wrote:
Donelladan wrote:
rockfist wrote:Huge difference between 14-10 and 16-9...huge.
We have two members making pronostic in LHDD, on is more optimistic than the other :D
Is one of the Momo by any chance? :D
yup... my forecasts vs momo's forecasts lol. We're never on the same page! :lol:
Well, we all know Momo is ever the optimist, and I have you pegged as a slight pessimist, so therefore we should probably go for a 15-9.5 I reckon.

Re: [CC5] FALL vs LHDD [6-3]

Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2015 12:17 pm
by loutil
betiko wrote:
loutil wrote:To be clear...70 vs 9,3,3,9,3,70 is NOT less than 1%. It is actually just above 8% meaning it will succeed 1 in 12 attempts. Certainly lucky but not a 1% or 1 in 100. They would have needed to kill an additional stack of 15 to get it below 1%.
yeah I don't have the odds calculator since the site decided to screw all add ons and the firefox version. I just feel screwed when these bellow 10% stuff happen...
rockfist I rarely calculate them anymore, it's more about gut feeling of what the % is more or less.
All I did was reinstall an older version of Firefox and kept all my tools 8-) .

Re: [CC5] FALL vs LHDD [6-3]

Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2015 12:28 pm
by IcePack
loutil wrote:
betiko wrote:
loutil wrote:To be clear...70 vs 9,3,3,9,3,70 is NOT less than 1%. It is actually just above 8% meaning it will succeed 1 in 12 attempts. Certainly lucky but not a 1% or 1 in 100. They would have needed to kill an additional stack of 15 to get it below 1%.
yeah I don't have the odds calculator since the site decided to screw all add ons and the firefox version. I just feel screwed when these bellow 10% stuff happen...
rockfist I rarely calculate them anymore, it's more about gut feeling of what the % is more or less.
All I did was reinstall an older version of Firefox and kept all my tools 8-) .
Good ol' reliable Firefox 30.0!

Re: [CC5] FALL vs LHDD [6-3]

Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2015 12:44 pm
by Doc_Brown
I know this is off topic (but if everyone can hijack our war thread for a discussion of clan merges, why not start a conversation about site add-ons here? :lol: ), but I have the latest version of Firefox. Bob doesn't work right, but the panel interface works fine, and I have clickies, chat glove, and assault odds working flawlessly (most of the time!). It's actually pretty nice having the assault odds in one of the panels so I can position it where it's most convenient while looking at the map.

Re: [CC5] FALL vs LHDD [6-3]

Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2015 12:59 pm
by Momo33
iAmCaffeine wrote:
betiko wrote:
iAmCaffeine wrote:
Donelladan wrote:
rockfist wrote:Huge difference between 14-10 and 16-9...huge.
We have two members making pronostic in LHDD, on is more optimistic than the other :D
Is one of the Momo by any chance? :D
yup... my forecasts vs momo's forecasts lol. We're never on the same page! :lol:
Well, we all know Momo is ever the optimist, and I have you pegged as a slight pessimist, so therefore we should probably go for a 15-9.5 I reckon.
Sorry guys, but right now I have 14-12 in favor of FALL and not 14-10

So for me this war is still very close, I really don't see FALL getting away from us right now. And I am pretty confident with a lot of games still tied up. This could really go to the 61st game!

Re: [CC5] FALL vs LHDD [6-3]

Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2015 11:41 pm
by IcePack
I have it at:
FALL 15
LHDD 10

As of right now. Out of those, I have 12-7 "locked" (meaning very low chance of moving sides)

Re: [CC5] FALL vs LHDD [6-5]

Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2015 6:06 pm
by IcePack
Spanish Armada has FALLEN! 7-5

Re: [CC5] FALL vs LHDD [6-5]

Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2015 9:57 pm
by betiko
ww2 poland trips to put it back in 1 game! 6-7

Re: [CC5] FALL vs LHDD [7-6]

Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2015 7:44 am
by Momo33
score updated

Re: [CC5] FALL vs LHDD [7-6]

Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2015 8:37 am
by betiko
in decided games I have this at 12-10 fallen right now

Re: [CC5] FALL vs LHDD [7-6]

Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2015 11:37 pm
by jcmagno
nice come back! ;)

Re: [CC5] FALL vs LHDD [7-6]

Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2015 11:24 am
by betiko
austrum in the bag! that's 7-7... first tie since the war started.

but more decided wins coming your way....