Conquer Club

Juan - does posting those neat little pictures you find send a thrill up your leg?

Juan_Bottom wrote:

Bootlicker

patrickaa317 wrote:Juan - does posting those neat little pictures you find send a thrill up your leg?

1) It's a parody of all the propaganda pictures that have been getting posted over the past year and a half.

2) I've been asked to keep sharing pictures and links, because people are sharing them off of this site. And I think that's pretty cool. Just right click & save the image location or save to your desktop to upload to facebook.

3) If you've got a problem with a particular message that's being slammed across these threads, then feel free to take an issue with it and I'll carpet-bomb whatever points of contention you'd like to raise. I don't know what the point is of making comments that show you don't agree with a message but don't address what you disagree with about the message.

Phatscotty wrote:Bootlicker

Says the guy voting for Mitt Romney even though he doesn't like Mitt Romney. Fall in line, soldier.

thegreekdog wrote:The president wishes for the government to coerce people to exercise their responsibilities. And that is one of the places where we differ.

Like where though? Paying taxes, military service in exchange for college, er where?

Juan_Bottom wrote:

patrickaa317 wrote:Juan - does posting those neat little pictures you find send a thrill up your leg?

1) It's a parody of all the propaganda pictures that have been getting posted over the past year and a half.

2) I've been asked to keep sharing pictures and links, because people are sharing them off of this site. And I think that's pretty cool. Just right click & save the image location or save to your desktop to upload to facebook.

3) If you've got a problem with a particular message that's being slammed across these threads, then feel free to take an issue with it and I'll carpet-bomb whatever points of contention you'd like to raise. I don't know what the point is of making comments that show you don't agree with a message but don't address what you disagree with about the message.

So do you get a thrill up your leg with some of these pictures that you like to share?

Let's just say that it's not as big as the thrill that I'll get when I can finally call you "son."

http://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/20 ... ms_ob.html

Juan_Bottom wrote:

Phatscotty wrote:Bootlicker

Says the guy voting for Mitt Romney even though he doesn't like Mitt Romney. Fall in line, soldier.

thegreekdog wrote:The president wishes for the government to coerce people to exercise their responsibilities. And that is one of the places where we differ.

Like where though? Paying taxes, military service in exchange for college, er where?

What do you mean "like where though?"

thegreekdog wrote:

Juan_Bottom wrote:

Phatscotty wrote:Bootlicker

Says the guy voting for Mitt Romney even though he doesn't like Mitt Romney. Fall in line, soldier.

thegreekdog wrote:The president wishes for the government to coerce people to exercise their responsibilities. And that is one of the places where we differ.

Like where though? Paying taxes, military service in exchange for college, er where?

What do you mean "like where though?"

Somewhere in his social construction of reality which denies the existence of anything contradictory to his worldview?

I might be voting for Romney, but you don't see me licking his boots

thegreekdog wrote:

Juan_Bottom wrote:

Phatscotty wrote:Bootlicker

Says the guy voting for Mitt Romney even though he doesn't like Mitt Romney. Fall in line, soldier.

thegreekdog wrote:The president wishes for the government to coerce people to exercise their responsibilities. And that is one of the places where we differ.

Like where though? Paying taxes, military service in exchange for college, er where?

What do you mean "like where though?"

I mean that you described one of the main jobs of government as the reason that you don't like our president. The government's job is to coerce people to exercise their responsibilities. So you were like, talking about favoring Anarchy or something. So what forced responsibilities don't you like? Taxes or wha?

Phatscotty wrote:I might be voting for Romney, but you don't see me licking his boots

I actually like the guy that I'm voting for. I feel bad for you son.

Juan_Bottom wrote:

thegreekdog wrote:

Juan_Bottom wrote:

Phatscotty wrote:Bootlicker

Says the guy voting for Mitt Romney even though he doesn't like Mitt Romney. Fall in line, soldier.

thegreekdog wrote:The president wishes for the government to coerce people to exercise their responsibilities. And that is one of the places where we differ.

Like where though? Paying taxes, military service in exchange for college, er where?

What do you mean "like where though?"

I mean that you described one of the main jobs of government as the reason that you don't like our president. The government's job is to coerce people to exercise their responsibilities. So you were like, talking about favoring Anarchy or something. So what forced responsibilities don't you like? Taxes or wha?

I'm still not sure I understand your question. I don't like the federal government doing much of anything except defending the country from invasion and actually regulating interstate commerce to avoid fights between the states. Also enforcing our rights under the Constitution.

thegreekdog wrote:I'm still not sure I understand your question. I don't like the federal government doing much of anything except defending the country from invasion and actually regulating interstate commerce to avoid fights between the states. Also enforcing our rights under the Constitution.

• "The president wishes for the government to coerce people to exercise their responsibilities. And that is one of the places where we differ."
• "Wha... that's the president's actual job...."
• Example - People don't want to pay taxes. So our government gives them the choice of taxes or jail.
  That's coercing people to exercise their responsibilities.

See what I'm saying?

Juan_Bottom wrote:

The 2009 stimulus was supposed to keep unemployment under 8% and to be around 6% at this point. So why are we supposed to believe the claims in these pictures?

Night Strike wrote: The 2009 stimulus was supposed to keep unemployment under 8% and to be around 6% at this point. So why are we supposed to believe the claims in these pictures?

Please stop questioning the propaganda of the Regime or you will find yourself with a ticket to Room 101 of the Ministry of Love.

The general form of a Democratic campaign argument is this.

1. I came up with a plan that won't ever work and will cost us billions for no effect.
2. I make up all kinds of wonderful nonsense about what it will do (or as we say in Nation States "This Resolution Cures Cancer!")
3. I bitterly complain about how the Republicans voted against it (because they knew point 2 was all made up)
4. I argue that Republicans are generally against everything in point 2

Is that about right?

And by the way, I get extreemely upset whenever any Democrat tries to make the "Mitt is Rich" argument. The Democratic Party is the home base of the Rich and Famous. Those Democrats in Congress aren't blue collar. The president and his family take exotic vacations all the time. Their "hard times" occured after their law school days when their incomes, even after being adjusted for their student loans and payments for their lavish dwellings (I went through college at the same time they did ... I know all about how student loan interest rates were at the time) was still well beyond the income of most of the people at that time, or even now. So don't give me this shit. You might disagree that Barry's lifestyle is superior to Mitch's but neither one had to tend bar when they were young or flip burgers at a fast food resturant, and who really cares anyway?

The official Democratic Party platform "strongly and unequivocally supports Roe v. Wade and a woman's right to make decisions regarding her pregnancy, including a safe and legal abortion, regardless of ability to pay."

Reason TV talked with Democratic delegates and supporters at the 2012 Democratic National Convention in Charlotte and found that most were on board with the party's strong pro-choice stance. But when pressed to talk about whether or not they were pro-choice in areas of human activity beyond abortion, delegates and supporters seemed less certain and, at times, outright hostile to the notion of increased choice.

Posing as an anti-business crusader, Peter Schiff found a number of DNC delegates and attendees who support explicitly outlawing profitability. We deliberately avoided speaking with the occupy protestors camping outside in tents to get a more "mainstream" Democratic perspective!

Democratic delegates booed God at the 2012 DNC. AlfonZo Rachel examines the Democratic intolerance of God and faith on this ZoNation.

Phatscotty wrote:Bootlicker

...says the alleged libertarian that supports Romney after he thoroughly shut out Ron Paul's delegates from the Republican National Convention.

Woodruff wrote:

Phatscotty wrote:Bootlicker

...says the alleged libertarian that supports Romney after he thoroughly shut out Ron Paul's delegates from the Republican National Convention.

You will notice Romney was considerate enough to lay down a comfortable Persian silk matt...and Obama would have me licking his boots off the cold floor! I HATE COLD FLOORS!

When it comes to choosing between cold floors or cozy matts, I choose the matt!

Ron Paul 4 Life!