Dictionary.com wrote:1. freedom from arbitrary or despotic government or control.
2. freedom from external or foreign rule; independence.
3. freedom from control, interference, obligation, restriction, hampering conditions, etc.; power or right of doing, thinking, speaking, etc., according to choice.
OK, that sounds all well and good. But does the US (or anywhere) actually ever live up to it? Firstly, and this must be said, the 2nd and 3rd definitions pretty much rule out religious worshippers. They can't actually have liberty if they have God ruling over them, telling them how to live and where to worship and the such.
Also, just the very inherent fact that we have to get up each day and go work a shitty ass job because we pretty much have to. Doesn't sound like much liberty to me. Freedom from obligation? (well we have to go to work) restriction? (well I'm pretty sure only Amsterdam will let me smoke weed without cops busting my balls about it) -
My point, is the word liberty, seems to be just a convienient catch phrase or word. I don't think many people can have true liberty, if going by this definition. It's just kind of annoying to see people using the word so often, when it doesn't actually look like it is a realistic target (to achieve liberty for all)