Conquer Club

Who is better linkin park or ACDC

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

better?

 
Total votes : 0

Postby muy_thaiguy on Thu Dec 13, 2007 12:08 am

Neoteny wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:
Neoteny wrote:Congratulations, you are a trendsetter.
Not the first time.

"Nu metal," huh? That's the first I have heard that phrase, and I know some very avid LP fans that like all of this newer rock. Most of which, just plain sucks.

"Your so pleasant." Not sure if that was sarcasm or not.


It's been around for a little while. There is really some debate as to who is included in this, as well as the complete definition of the genre. Some people throw a couple Korn albums in there, some people include Disturbed, Tool is usually considered a large influence of nu metal.

I was being sarcastic, for the record. But not in too malicious of a manner (I suppose that came later). I'm a fan of "rock," in which I include classic, all forms of metal, and "all of this newer rock." Poppier stuff turns me off, but I'm pretty equal opportunity as far as my preferences go. I respect AC/DC for being genre defining, if nothing else. There would be no Linkin Park without them, Sabbath, Zeppelin, etc. I will be the first to admit it. And they are an extremely talented band.
Indeed. When "Dirty Deeds" came out, let's just say that most songs weren't talking about high voltage or getting revenge on someone.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
User avatar
Private 1st Class muy_thaiguy
 
Posts: 12746
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
Location: Back in Black

Postby The Factory on Thu Dec 13, 2007 1:02 am

Wow, where do I begin with this?

Neoteny wrote:Their sound is crisp, and their musicians are talented.


Sound quality is almost exclusively the responsibility of the producer, not the band, and I wouldn't say anything Linkin Park has ever done qualifies as talented, their music is elementary to put it mildly.

Neoteny wrote:It's not our fault you're stuck in the eighties. And of any time period, the eighties is not one I'd want to be stuck in...


AC/DC were actually formed in the early 70's.

Neoteny wrote:If you listen to Hybrid Theory and then Minutes to Midnight, the style varies hugely, and this is even the case for Meteora.


Actually, I'd have to strongly disagree with you on that too. Linkin Park do the same thing every time on all of their albums with slightly different synth/accent noises in the background and slightly different lyrics.

http://www.hometracked.com/2007/05/29/a ... -the-same/

They don't even change song structures, they are stagnant.

Neoteny wrote:Tool is usually considered a large influence of nu metal.


Please don't insult Tool, nu-metal is characterized by a strong hip-hop presence and terrible musicianship, of which Tool doesn't really dabble in either.

Neoteny wrote:I respect AC/DC for being genre defining, if nothing else. There would be no Linkin Park without them, Sabbath, Zeppelin, etc.


Black Sabbath and Led Zeppelin both predate AC/DC seeing as how both were formed in 1968 (although Led Zeppelin didn't release anything until 1969) and AC/DC was formed in 1973 (give or take a bit, of course.)

I'm not trying to change any opinions, I'm only stating the facts, please educate yourself musically before getting in way over your head in a musical argument.
:|
User avatar
Corporal The Factory
 
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: The Great Northwest

Postby Iliad on Thu Dec 13, 2007 1:55 am

AC/DC is only winning by 10 votes. WHAT'S UP WITH YOU?
User avatar
Private 1st Class Iliad
 
Posts: 10394
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:48 am

Postby muy_thaiguy on Thu Dec 13, 2007 10:28 am

Iliad wrote:AC/DC is only winning by 10 votes. WHAT'S UP WITH YOU?
Not to long ago, it was by only 3. Some people these days. :?
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
User avatar
Private 1st Class muy_thaiguy
 
Posts: 12746
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
Location: Back in Black

Postby unriggable on Thu Dec 13, 2007 10:34 am

The Factory wrote:
Neoteny wrote:Tool is usually considered a large influence of nu metal.


Please don't insult Tool, nu-metal is characterized by a strong hip-hop presence and terrible musicianship, of which Tool doesn't really dabble in either.


Actually nu-metal is more korn-like stuff, not death metal, not heavy metal, somewhere in between.

Tool might fit into the category, it's hard to say really as Nu-metal is a fairly new phenomena.
Image
User avatar
Cook unriggable
 
Posts: 8037
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:49 pm

Postby Frigidus on Thu Dec 13, 2007 11:06 am

12-26. All is well.
User avatar
Sergeant Frigidus
 
Posts: 1638
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 1:15 pm
Location: Illinois, USA

Postby The1exile on Thu Dec 13, 2007 11:24 am

RATFE > LP. And AC/DC is better too.
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant The1exile
 
Posts: 7140
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 7:01 pm
Location: Devastation

Postby kwanton on Thu Dec 13, 2007 11:28 am

Kwan is superior to both.
Click the Esoog!
Image
User avatar
Cook kwanton
 
Posts: 3807
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2006 9:33 pm

Postby Neoteny on Thu Dec 13, 2007 12:53 pm

The Factory wrote:Wow, where do I begin with this?

Neoteny wrote:Their sound is crisp, and their musicians are talented.


Sound quality is almost exclusively the responsibility of the producer, not the band, and I wouldn't say anything Linkin Park has ever done qualifies as talented, their music is elementary to put it mildly.

Neoteny wrote:It's not our fault you're stuck in the eighties. And of any time period, the eighties is not one I'd want to be stuck in...


AC/DC were actually formed in the early 70's.

Neoteny wrote:If you listen to Hybrid Theory and then Minutes to Midnight, the style varies hugely, and this is even the case for Meteora.


Actually, I'd have to strongly disagree with you on that too. Linkin Park do the same thing every time on all of their albums with slightly different synth/accent noises in the background and slightly different lyrics.

http://www.hometracked.com/2007/05/29/a ... -the-same/

They don't even change song structures, they are stagnant.

Neoteny wrote:Tool is usually considered a large influence of nu metal.


Please don't insult Tool, nu-metal is characterized by a strong hip-hop presence and terrible musicianship, of which Tool doesn't really dabble in either.

Neoteny wrote:I respect AC/DC for being genre defining, if nothing else. There would be no Linkin Park without them, Sabbath, Zeppelin, etc.


Black Sabbath and Led Zeppelin both predate AC/DC seeing as how both were formed in 1968 (although Led Zeppelin didn't release anything until 1969) and AC/DC was formed in 1973 (give or take a bit, of course.)

I'm not trying to change any opinions, I'm only stating the facts, please educate yourself musically before getting in way over your head in a musical argument.


I'm tired of this so I'll be quick. I'm not talking about sound quality, I'm talking about playing style. AC/DC formed in the 70's, arguably hit their peak in the 80's, and continued into the nineties. Yes, I can use wikipedia like the rest of you. Try listening to the albums. Those songs were representative of their popular music, but not of their albums overall. They didn't do all the songs, they picked six. Even so, following a certain structure doesn't make it bad, nor does it conclude that they all sound the same. I didn't call Tool nu metal, dumbass, I said they are an influence on nu metal. READING IS FUN! I've had this debate with my friends, and I think Sabbath has had the biggest influence on defining metal, though there are plenty who disagree with me. I don't see how mentioning that they predate AC/DC by four years really matters as AC/DC still contributed heavily to defining the genre.

Your facts are ridiculous. Get over yourself, you pompous ass.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
User avatar
Major Neoteny
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:24 pm
Location: Atlanta, Georgia

Postby The Factory on Thu Dec 13, 2007 1:01 pm

unriggable wrote:
The Factory wrote:
Neoteny wrote:Tool is usually considered a large influence of nu metal.


Please don't insult Tool, nu-metal is characterized by a strong hip-hop presence and terrible musicianship, of which Tool doesn't really dabble in either.


Actually nu-metal is more korn-like stuff, not death metal, not heavy metal, somewhere in between.

Tool might fit into the category, it's hard to say really as Nu-metal is a fairly new phenomena.


It's not in between heavy metal and death metal, it's in between rock, rap and pop. Nu metal is just a buzz word created by news stand publications, the correct term is called "rap rock" since nothing about nu metal is metal.
Tool, on the other hand, is progressive rock.
:|
User avatar
Corporal The Factory
 
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: The Great Northwest

Postby firewall20 on Thu Dec 13, 2007 10:19 pm

WTF!!! Linkin Park Doesn't deserve to be classed with AC/DC.
User avatar
Cook firewall20
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 4:59 pm
Location: Nowhere, Kansas ;)

Postby static_ice on Thu Dec 13, 2007 11:04 pm

The Factory wrote:
http://www.hometracked.com/2007/05/29/a ... -the-same/

They don't even change song structures, they are stagnant.



I like that one reply
I need a little fescue seed
JUST ONE STEP CLOSER TO THE HEDGE, AND I'M ABOUT TO RAKE!
They need a little room to be
JUST ONE STEP CLOSER TO THE HEDGE, AND I'M ABOUT TO RAKE!

:lol:


and neoteny, I forget why you're fighting so valiantly, and if its just in defense of lp fans being bashed by classic rockers then I understand, but if you're seriously trying to say that lp has a chance in comparison with a band like AC/DC, then I have to agree with the rest. I used to be an lp fanboy, in fact that was the band that got me into rock, and I haven't listened to much of AC/DC (I know guys, I'll get on it 8-[ ), but even I know the winner is AC/DC hands down.

If this thread isn't a bad attempt at a joke from jake, then it is a sick joke by Fate, or God, or The Force, or The Universal Balance, or whatever.
R.I.P. Chef
User avatar
Sergeant static_ice
 
Posts: 9174
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 8:51 am

Postby ignotus on Fri Dec 14, 2007 3:41 am

firewall20 wrote:WTF!!! Linkin Park Doesn't deserve to be classed with AC/DC.


I agree! :P
heavycola wrote:
Snorri1234 wrote:Man, this thread was great. A whopping 230 pages with noone changing their viewpoint.


I actually converted around page 198. Unfortunately, I converted to satanism.
User avatar
Lieutenant ignotus
 
Posts: 2766
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 9:34 am
Location: Hanging on to my old avatar.

Postby autoload on Fri Dec 14, 2007 3:43 am

Neither
User avatar
Major autoload
 
Posts: 3735
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:37 am

Postby The Factory on Fri Dec 14, 2007 5:06 am

Neoteny wrote:
The Factory wrote:Wow, where do I begin with this?

Neoteny wrote:Their sound is crisp, and their musicians are talented.


Sound quality is almost exclusively the responsibility of the producer, not the band, and I wouldn't say anything Linkin Park has ever done qualifies as talented, their music is elementary to put it mildly.

Neoteny wrote:It's not our fault you're stuck in the eighties. And of any time period, the eighties is not one I'd want to be stuck in...


AC/DC were actually formed in the early 70's.

Neoteny wrote:If you listen to Hybrid Theory and then Minutes to Midnight, the style varies hugely, and this is even the case for Meteora.


Actually, I'd have to strongly disagree with you on that too. Linkin Park do the same thing every time on all of their albums with slightly different synth/accent noises in the background and slightly different lyrics.

http://www.hometracked.com/2007/05/29/a ... -the-same/

They don't even change song structures, they are stagnant.

Neoteny wrote:Tool is usually considered a large influence of nu metal.


Please don't insult Tool, nu-metal is characterized by a strong hip-hop presence and terrible musicianship, of which Tool doesn't really dabble in either.

Neoteny wrote:I respect AC/DC for being genre defining, if nothing else. There would be no Linkin Park without them, Sabbath, Zeppelin, etc.


Black Sabbath and Led Zeppelin both predate AC/DC seeing as how both were formed in 1968 (although Led Zeppelin didn't release anything until 1969) and AC/DC was formed in 1973 (give or take a bit, of course.)

I'm not trying to change any opinions, I'm only stating the facts, please educate yourself musically before getting in way over your head in a musical argument.


I'm tired of this so I'll be quick. I'm not talking about sound quality, I'm talking about playing style. AC/DC formed in the 70's, arguably hit their peak in the 80's, and continued into the nineties. Yes, I can use wikipedia like the rest of you. Try listening to the albums. Those songs were representative of their popular music, but not of their albums overall. They didn't do all the songs, they picked six. Even so, following a certain structure doesn't make it bad, nor does it conclude that they all sound the same. I didn't call Tool nu metal, dumbass, I said they are an influence on nu metal. READING IS FUN! I've had this debate with my friends, and I think Sabbath has had the biggest influence on defining metal, though there are plenty who disagree with me. I don't see how mentioning that they predate AC/DC by four years really matters as AC/DC still contributed heavily to defining the genre.

Your facts are ridiculous. Get over yourself, you pompous ass.


Getting a little upset aren't you?

CRAAAAAAWLING IN MY SKIIIIIIN!

Anyway, even in terms of playing style they're sloppier than someone playing guitar with his wrist, most of their songs can literally be played with one finger the way they tune their guitars.


I also find it comforting that you fight internet fights using an open-source encyclopedia that can be edited by anyone at any time.

I never once said that their lack of original song structure was bad, read, I specifically said STAGNANT.

Neoteny wrote:READING IS FUN!


Couldn't agree more, moving on..

I know you didn't call Tool nu-metal, you said they influenced nu-metal, and I never said you said that, I said:

myself]Please don't insult Tool, nu-metal is characterized by a strong hip-hop presence and terrible musicianship, of which Tool doesn't really dabble in either.[/quote]

Meaning that I felt they had no hand in creating the bastard-son of rock and rap.

[quote="Neoteny wrote:
READING IS FUN!


Anyway, you sure do seem to be defensive, there's no real sense in getting so desperately upset over musical opinions because no matter what you like there is someone, somewhere that hates it and hates you for liking it. One day when you truly realize that you'll stop asking/caring about your friend's/random stranger's specific musical opinions and start listening to music for the right reason; for enjoyment, and if that enjoyment comes from rap rock, jazz, technical Ethiopian blues or whatever genre you could name so be it.
Now calm down and learn to act like an adult when conflicting opinions arise, calling people names like an easily-defeated child won't convey your point more effectively, I assure you.
:|
User avatar
Corporal The Factory
 
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: The Great Northwest

Postby Stymie on Fri Dec 14, 2007 6:59 am

AC/DC all the way.
"Back in Black"

BTW... I am not a guy, and I don't consider myself old. I am definitely not a grumpy person. :wink:
User avatar
Corporal Stymie
 
Posts: 288
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:19 am
Location: New Mexico

Postby unriggable on Fri Dec 14, 2007 7:36 am

Stymie wrote:I am definitely not a grumpy person. :grunt:


That's not a smiley, FYI.
Image
User avatar
Cook unriggable
 
Posts: 8037
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:49 pm

Postby heavycola on Fri Dec 14, 2007 8:23 am

ACDC. No question. It's like asking, who's better? Keane or Led Zeppelin?
Image
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class heavycola
 
Posts: 2925
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 10:22 am
Location: Maailmanvalloittajat

Postby Stymie on Fri Dec 14, 2007 8:31 am

unriggable wrote:
Stymie wrote:I am definitely not a grumpy person. :grunt:


That's not a smiley, FYI.


That is a smiley winking at you. :wink:
User avatar
Corporal Stymie
 
Posts: 288
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:19 am
Location: New Mexico

Postby Neoteny on Fri Dec 14, 2007 8:34 am

It started out in response to LP fan-bashing. It became defense of the band. Which I won't do anymore.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
User avatar
Major Neoteny
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:24 pm
Location: Atlanta, Georgia

Postby edwinissweet on Fri Dec 14, 2007 8:41 am

i like the sound of liknig park more but saying that they are better than ACDC would be heresy
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant edwinissweet
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 7:59 pm
Location: cozumel

Postby Snorri1234 on Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:37 am

The Factory wrote:
unriggable wrote:
The Factory wrote:
Neoteny wrote:Tool is usually considered a large influence of nu metal.


Please don't insult Tool, nu-metal is characterized by a strong hip-hop presence and terrible musicianship, of which Tool doesn't really dabble in either.


Actually nu-metal is more korn-like stuff, not death metal, not heavy metal, somewhere in between.

Tool might fit into the category, it's hard to say really as Nu-metal is a fairly new phenomena.


It's not in between heavy metal and death metal, it's in between rock, rap and pop. Nu metal is just a buzz word created by news stand publications, the correct term is called "rap rock" since nothing about nu metal is metal.
Tool, on the other hand, is progressive rock.


Limp Bizkit is nu-metal?
"Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice skate uphill."

Duane: You know what they say about love and war.
Tim: Yes, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's war.
User avatar
Private Snorri1234
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.

Postby bloknayrb on Fri Dec 14, 2007 11:38 am

AC/DC, hands down... I consider their music to be Rock in it's purest form actually. Not my favorite band, but they're up there.
I'm waiting for someone to post a Britney Spears/Led Zeppelin comparison thread now...
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class bloknayrb
 
Posts: 219
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 12:00 pm

Postby edwinissweet on Fri Dec 14, 2007 12:41 pm

Snorri1234 wrote:
The Factory wrote:
unriggable wrote:
The Factory wrote:
Neoteny wrote:Tool is usually considered a large influence of nu metal.


Please don't insult Tool, nu-metal is characterized by a strong hip-hop presence and terrible musicianship, of which Tool doesn't really dabble in either.


Actually nu-metal is more korn-like stuff, not death metal, not heavy metal, somewhere in between.

Tool might fit into the category, it's hard to say really as Nu-metal is a fairly new phenomena.


It's not in between heavy metal and death metal, it's in between rock, rap and pop. Nu metal is just a buzz word created by news stand publications, the correct term is called "rap rock" since nothing about nu metal is metal.
Tool, on the other hand, is progressive rock.


Limp Bizkit is nu-metal?


hell no they arent.
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant edwinissweet
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 7:59 pm
Location: cozumel

Re: Who is better linkin park or ACDC

Postby whitelighting on Fri Dec 14, 2007 7:15 pm

0ojakeo0 wrote:linkin park
What ive done and encore are my 2 favorite



what the F*ck are u stupid linkin park sucks


AC/DC is way better
User avatar
Private 1st Class whitelighting
 
Posts: 154
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 4:50 pm
Location: Missouri,USA

PreviousNext

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ConfederateSS