Conquer Club

Who is better linkin park or ACDC

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

better?

 
Total votes : 0

Postby jnd94 on Wed Dec 12, 2007 7:49 pm

Wow, we really do have a case of WTF?-itis here.
Captain jnd94
 
Posts: 7177
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 4:22 pm

Postby 0ojakeo0 on Wed Dec 12, 2007 7:50 pm

jnd94 wrote:Wow, we really do have a case of WTF?-itis here.
agreed why is AC/DC winning?
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class 0ojakeo0
 
Posts: 6150
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 9:49 am
Location: ON THE ROAD TO SAN ANTONIO!!!!

Re: Who is better linkin park or ACDC

Postby Kaplowitz on Wed Dec 12, 2007 7:52 pm

0ojakeo0 wrote:
Kaplowitz wrote:
0ojakeo0 wrote:linkin park
What ive done and encore are my 2 favorite


Thats my ringtone :D
which one?


what ive done
Image
User avatar
Private 1st Class Kaplowitz
 
Posts: 3088
Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 5:11 pm

Postby jnd94 on Wed Dec 12, 2007 7:52 pm

0ojakeo0 wrote:
jnd94 wrote:Wow, we really do have a case of WTF?-itis here.
agreed why is AC/DC winning?


WTF? Have you lost the necessary oxygen to your brain?
Captain jnd94
 
Posts: 7177
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 4:22 pm

Postby muy_thaiguy on Wed Dec 12, 2007 7:52 pm

0ojakeo0 wrote:
jnd94 wrote:Wow, we really do have a case of WTF?-itis here.
agreed why is AC/DC winning?
I seriously hope that was a lmae attempt at a joke.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
User avatar
Private 1st Class muy_thaiguy
 
Posts: 12746
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
Location: Back in Black

Re: Who is better linkin park or ACDC

Postby 0ojakeo0 on Wed Dec 12, 2007 7:52 pm

Kaplowitz wrote:
0ojakeo0 wrote:
Kaplowitz wrote:
0ojakeo0 wrote:linkin park
What ive done and encore are my 2 favorite


Thats my ringtone :D
which one?


what ive done
I know its a sick song. Its at the end of the transformers movie which is sick too.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class 0ojakeo0
 
Posts: 6150
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 9:49 am
Location: ON THE ROAD TO SAN ANTONIO!!!!

Postby 0ojakeo0 on Wed Dec 12, 2007 7:53 pm

jnd94 wrote:
0ojakeo0 wrote:
jnd94 wrote:Wow, we really do have a case of WTF?-itis here.
agreed why is AC/DC winning?


WTF? Have you lost the necessary oxygen to your brain?
just the unnecessary oxygen
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class 0ojakeo0
 
Posts: 6150
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 9:49 am
Location: ON THE ROAD TO SAN ANTONIO!!!!

Postby soundout9 on Wed Dec 12, 2007 8:12 pm

7-9 :lol:
Private soundout9
 
Posts: 4519
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 12:30 pm
Location: Good ol' MO Clan: Next-Gen Gamers

Postby HayesA on Wed Dec 12, 2007 9:29 pm

dustn64 wrote:The people that voted LP obviously do not understand music. Yes, they are a good band but AC\DC is way better


QFT

LP is for 12 year old emo kids, anyway.
User avatar
Sergeant HayesA
 
Posts: 244
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 2:31 pm
Location: State College, PA

Postby unriggable on Wed Dec 12, 2007 10:01 pm

HayesA wrote:
dustn64 wrote:The people that voted LP obviously do not understand music. Yes, they are a good band but AC\DC is way better


QFT

LP is for 12 year old emo kids, anyway.


And dipshits who broke up with their girlfriends but will never fucking get over it.
Image
User avatar
Cook unriggable
 
Posts: 8037
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:49 pm

Postby soundout9 on Wed Dec 12, 2007 10:24 pm

9-12
Private soundout9
 
Posts: 4519
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 12:30 pm
Location: Good ol' MO Clan: Next-Gen Gamers

Postby Frigidus on Wed Dec 12, 2007 10:26 pm

If Linkin Park won the poll the apocalypse would be upon us.
User avatar
Sergeant Frigidus
 
Posts: 1638
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 1:15 pm
Location: Illinois, USA

Postby Neoteny on Wed Dec 12, 2007 10:28 pm

unriggable wrote:
HayesA wrote:
dustn64 wrote:The people that voted LP obviously do not understand music. Yes, they are a good band but AC\DC is way better


QFT

LP is for 12 year old emo kids, anyway.


And dipshits who broke up with their girlfriends but will never fucking get over it.


As someone who is neither twelve, nor emo (not to mention, that you, in your vast musical knowledge, are just as misguiding as "emo" kids in calling them "emo"), nor [not] getting over a breakup, I have to say I enjoy Linkin Park. Their sound is crisp, and their musicians are talented. I have nothing against AC\DC, but seeing the comments above, all I can think of are a bunch of grumpy old men who can't stand to think that current trends in music are moving away from "the old days." It's not our fault you're stuck in the eighties. And of any time period, the eighties is not one I'd want to be stuck in...
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
User avatar
Major Neoteny
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:24 pm
Location: Atlanta, Georgia

Postby soundout9 on Wed Dec 12, 2007 10:30 pm

10-13
Private soundout9
 
Posts: 4519
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 12:30 pm
Location: Good ol' MO Clan: Next-Gen Gamers

Postby muy_thaiguy on Wed Dec 12, 2007 10:41 pm

Neoteny wrote:
unriggable wrote:
HayesA wrote:
dustn64 wrote:The people that voted LP obviously do not understand music. Yes, they are a good band but AC\DC is way better


QFT

LP is for 12 year old emo kids, anyway.


And dipshits who broke up with their girlfriends but will never fucking get over it.


As someone who is neither twelve, nor emo (not to mention, that you, in your vast musical knowledge, are just as misguiding as "emo" kids in calling them "emo"), nor [not] getting over a breakup, I have to say I enjoy Linkin Park. Their sound is crisp, and their musicians are talented. I have nothing against AC\DC, but seeing the comments above, all I can think of are a bunch of grumpy old men who can't stand to think that current trends in music are moving away from "the old days." It's not our fault you're stuck in the eighties. And of any time period, the eighties is not one I'd want to be stuck in...
This needs to be said.

Linkin Park is an average band that has come out with only a few good songs. AC/DC on the other hand, have been around since the mid 70s and are still playing concerts. They are a band that when you listen to their music, or watch a music video, or see them live, the energy that they radiate will rub off onto you.

Linkin Park, a couple of light head bangers, but no where close to that of AC/DC or any other 80s Hard Rock band.

By the way, I'm 18 and I was born in 1989.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
User avatar
Private 1st Class muy_thaiguy
 
Posts: 12746
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
Location: Back in Black

Postby Frigidus on Wed Dec 12, 2007 10:43 pm

muy_thaiguy wrote:By the way, I'm 18 and I was born in 1989.


Don't worry, we can, at the very least, subtract. 8)

Ditto to the rest btw.
User avatar
Sergeant Frigidus
 
Posts: 1638
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 1:15 pm
Location: Illinois, USA

Postby Neoteny on Wed Dec 12, 2007 10:49 pm

muy_thaiguy wrote:
Neoteny wrote:
unriggable wrote:
HayesA wrote:
dustn64 wrote:The people that voted LP obviously do not understand music. Yes, they are a good band but AC\DC is way better


QFT

LP is for 12 year old emo kids, anyway.


And dipshits who broke up with their girlfriends but will never fucking get over it.


As someone who is neither twelve, nor emo (not to mention, that you, in your vast musical knowledge, are just as misguiding as "emo" kids in calling them "emo"), nor [not] getting over a breakup, I have to say I enjoy Linkin Park. Their sound is crisp, and their musicians are talented. I have nothing against AC\DC, but seeing the comments above, all I can think of are a bunch of grumpy old men who can't stand to think that current trends in music are moving away from "the old days." It's not our fault you're stuck in the eighties. And of any time period, the eighties is not one I'd want to be stuck in...
This needs to be said.

Linkin Park is an average band that has come out with only a few good songs. AC/DC on the other hand, have been around since the mid 70s and are still playing concerts. They are a band that when you listen to their music, or watch a music video, or see them live, the energy that they radiate will rub off onto you.

Linkin Park, a couple of light head bangers, but no where close to that of AC/DC or any other 80s Hard Rock band.

By the way, I'm 18 and I was born in 1989.


::scoff at light head bangers:: Different genre. We can only compare overall talent, and you aren't being subjective. Any fan will key into the energy at a concert. I've been to a Linkin Park concert, and, as a fan, I was pumped up about it. As a fan of AC/DC (and metal in general), the same would happen to me at an AC\DC concert. Barbara Streisand would be the exact opposite of radiating energy to me, but her fans will tune into it. I don't accuse her of being a terrible musician, I just don't like her music. You're being narrow-minded in saying Linkin Park is less of a band just because their style is not to your taste.

EDIT: And I don't give two shits when you were born, it's just how you sound.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
User avatar
Major Neoteny
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:24 pm
Location: Atlanta, Georgia

Postby muy_thaiguy on Wed Dec 12, 2007 10:59 pm

Neoteny wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:
Neoteny wrote:
unriggable wrote:
HayesA wrote:
dustn64 wrote:The people that voted LP obviously do not understand music. Yes, they are a good band but AC\DC is way better


QFT

LP is for 12 year old emo kids, anyway.


And dipshits who broke up with their girlfriends but will never fucking get over it.


As someone who is neither twelve, nor emo (not to mention, that you, in your vast musical knowledge, are just as misguiding as "emo" kids in calling them "emo"), nor [not] getting over a breakup, I have to say I enjoy Linkin Park. Their sound is crisp, and their musicians are talented. I have nothing against AC\DC, but seeing the comments above, all I can think of are a bunch of grumpy old men who can't stand to think that current trends in music are moving away from "the old days." It's not our fault you're stuck in the eighties. And of any time period, the eighties is not one I'd want to be stuck in...
This needs to be said.

Linkin Park is an average band that has come out with only a few good songs. AC/DC on the other hand, have been around since the mid 70s and are still playing concerts. They are a band that when you listen to their music, or watch a music video, or see them live, the energy that they radiate will rub off onto you.

Linkin Park, a couple of light head bangers, but no where close to that of AC/DC or any other 80s Hard Rock band.

By the way, I'm 18 and I was born in 1989.


::scoff at light head bangers:: Different genre. We can only compare overall talent, and you aren't being subjective. Any fan will key into the energy at a concert. I've been to a Linkin Park concert, and, as a fan, I was pumped up about it. As a fan of AC/DC (and metal in general), the same would happen to me at an AC\DC concert. Barbara Streisand would be the exact opposite of radiating energy to me, but her fans will tune into it. I don't accuse her of being a terrible musician, I just don't like her music. You're being narrow-minded in saying Linkin Park is less of a band just because their style is not to your taste.

EDIT: And I don't give two shits when you were born, it's just how you sound.
Over all talent? In that case, AC/DC hands down. Also, as you seem to have skipped it, I never said I disliked LP, only said that they do not compare with AC/DC. LP is an alright, but not outstanding, band.

And since you insist on calling AC/DC metal, what would you classify LP as? Grunge? Not much difference, even in lyrics.

And if I sound older, then I guess that means you sound like a little 12 year old brat then. Wouldn't be the first time I've seen it either.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
User avatar
Private 1st Class muy_thaiguy
 
Posts: 12746
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
Location: Back in Black

Postby ritz627 on Wed Dec 12, 2007 11:25 pm

static_ice wrote:
unriggable wrote:
jnd94 wrote:Aye, same here. Only people getting air through a resperator could actually think that Linkin Park is even somewhat close to ACDC!!


But even then it takes a single digit IQ and some PCP to even consider LP as an option.


or maybe an uncultured child :-k


Agree on all three statements. I mean, I don't mind AC/DC, I really like a few of their songs... i'll listen to them, but they're not my favorite. Linkin Park is just crap. Pure and simple...The Who

And no I'm not old, I'm 17.
User avatar
Private 1st Class ritz627
 
Posts: 458
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 7:17 pm

Postby Neoteny on Wed Dec 12, 2007 11:38 pm

muy_thaiguy wrote:
Neoteny wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:
Neoteny wrote:
unriggable wrote:
HayesA wrote:
dustn64 wrote:The people that voted LP obviously do not understand music. Yes, they are a good band but AC\DC is way better


QFT

LP is for 12 year old emo kids, anyway.


And dipshits who broke up with their girlfriends but will never fucking get over it.


As someone who is neither twelve, nor emo (not to mention, that you, in your vast musical knowledge, are just as misguiding as "emo" kids in calling them "emo"), nor [not] getting over a breakup, I have to say I enjoy Linkin Park. Their sound is crisp, and their musicians are talented. I have nothing against AC\DC, but seeing the comments above, all I can think of are a bunch of grumpy old men who can't stand to think that current trends in music are moving away from "the old days." It's not our fault you're stuck in the eighties. And of any time period, the eighties is not one I'd want to be stuck in...
This needs to be said.

Linkin Park is an average band that has come out with only a few good songs. AC/DC on the other hand, have been around since the mid 70s and are still playing concerts. They are a band that when you listen to their music, or watch a music video, or see them live, the energy that they radiate will rub off onto you.

Linkin Park, a couple of light head bangers, but no where close to that of AC/DC or any other 80s Hard Rock band.

By the way, I'm 18 and I was born in 1989.


::scoff at light head bangers:: Different genre. We can only compare overall talent, and you aren't being subjective. Any fan will key into the energy at a concert. I've been to a Linkin Park concert, and, as a fan, I was pumped up about it. As a fan of AC/DC (and metal in general), the same would happen to me at an AC\DC concert. Barbara Streisand would be the exact opposite of radiating energy to me, but her fans will tune into it. I don't accuse her of being a terrible musician, I just don't like her music. You're being narrow-minded in saying Linkin Park is less of a band just because their style is not to your taste.

EDIT: And I don't give two shits when you were born, it's just how you sound.
Over all talent? In that case, AC/DC hands down. Also, as you seem to have skipped it, I never said I disliked LP, only said that they do not compare with AC/DC. LP is an alright, but not outstanding, band.

And since you insist on calling AC/DC metal, what would you classify LP as? Grunge? Not much difference, even in lyrics.

And if I sound older, then I guess that means you sound like a little 12 year old brat then. Wouldn't be the first time I've seen it either.


You're so pleasant. The current classification of Linkin Park is nu metal. But whatever. The remark at them being a bad band was directed to the people insulting LP fans, so it might not be directed particularly at you, though this is wonderful.

muy_thaiguy wrote:The people that voted LP obviously do not understand music.


I might be whining like a brat, but at least I'm not a pretentious asshole. I'm glad you think that AC/DC is a better band based on overall talent. It's the first constructive contribution you've (as well as any other AC/DC fans, though admittedly LP fans haven't done any better) made to defending their stance on this thread. Congratulations, you are a trendsetter.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
User avatar
Major Neoteny
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:24 pm
Location: Atlanta, Georgia

Postby Strife on Wed Dec 12, 2007 11:46 pm

AC / DC Linkin park sucks.
Corporal Strife
 
Posts: 2668
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 3:24 pm
Location: Now something has kept me here too long.

Postby HayesA on Wed Dec 12, 2007 11:47 pm

When I say that LP is a crappy band, I mean that they are sell outs to the music industry. They are not artists; they are following a very normal template. This template dictates how they should act, how they should perform music, how they can make money, how they can release albums, and how they're suppose appear to the general public.

All of their music generally sounds the same, and does not entertain me in the least.

For the record, I am not "old", nor am I a grumpy person. I listen to metal, pop, alternative, experimental, and occasionally jazz just to name a few types of genres.

LP are slaves to the general public, and their label like most American bands.I have long since been in protest of such labels, and have refused to buy from them until they update their business model to meet the demands of not only my self, but the new generation of music fans.

Linkin Park is a fad, and are definitely not artists.
User avatar
Sergeant HayesA
 
Posts: 244
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 2:31 pm
Location: State College, PA

Postby muy_thaiguy on Wed Dec 12, 2007 11:51 pm

Neoteny wrote:Congratulations, you are a trendsetter.
Not the first time.

"Nu metal," huh? That's the first I have heard that phrase, and I know some very avid LP fans that like all of this newer rock. Most of which, just plain sucks.

"Your so pleasant." Not sure if that was sarcasm or not.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
User avatar
Private 1st Class muy_thaiguy
 
Posts: 12746
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
Location: Back in Black

Postby Neoteny on Wed Dec 12, 2007 11:58 pm

HayesA wrote:When I say that LP is a crappy band, I mean that they are sell outs to the music industry. They are not artists; they are following a very normal template. This template dictates how they should act, how they should perform music, how they can make money, how they can release albums, and how they're suppose appear to the general public.

All of their music generally sounds the same, and does not entertain me in the least.

For the record, I am not "old", nor am I a grumpy person. I listen to metal, pop, alternative, experimental, and occasionally jazz just to name a few types of genres.

LP are slaves to the general public, and their label like most American bands.I have long since been in protest of such labels, and have refused to buy from them until they update their business model to meet the demands of not only my self, but the new generation of music fans.

Linkin Park is a fad, and are definitely not artists.


Hey! Another real contribution! Though I disagree with a lot of it, I will commend you for it. Shinoda talks a good bit in some of their songs about going against what the record label wanted and doing their own thing. Of course, that could just be a cover... either way, sure, they are "slaves" to the public, their success is based on the public opinion of them. But I would not say that their sound has stagnated by any means. If you listen to Hybrid Theory and then Minutes to Midnight, the style varies hugely, and this is even the case for Meteora. To each his own. I think they wrote all of their songs, but I wasn't there so I suppose I can't back that up. I'll take their word for it, just like I'll take AC/DC's word for it that they wrote their songs.

I'm not old either, but I can be pretty grumpy.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
User avatar
Major Neoteny
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:24 pm
Location: Atlanta, Georgia

Postby Neoteny on Thu Dec 13, 2007 12:05 am

muy_thaiguy wrote:
Neoteny wrote:Congratulations, you are a trendsetter.
Not the first time.

"Nu metal," huh? That's the first I have heard that phrase, and I know some very avid LP fans that like all of this newer rock. Most of which, just plain sucks.

"Your so pleasant." Not sure if that was sarcasm or not.


It's been around for a little while. There is really some debate as to who is included in this, as well as the complete definition of the genre. Some people throw a couple Korn albums in there, some people include Disturbed, Tool is usually considered a large influence of nu metal.

I was being sarcastic, for the record. But not in too malicious of a manner (I suppose that came later). I'm a fan of "rock," in which I include classic, all forms of metal, and "all of this newer rock." Poppier stuff turns me off, but I'm pretty equal opportunity as far as my preferences go. I respect AC/DC for being genre defining, if nothing else. There would be no Linkin Park without them, Sabbath, Zeppelin, etc. I will be the first to admit it. And they are an extremely talented band.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
User avatar
Major Neoteny
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:24 pm
Location: Atlanta, Georgia

PreviousNext

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users