World too populated?

[Chris7He]

I think mass murder of those with STDs should be in order, but I (I'm free of STDs) want to sow my seeds.

God....hes back?!

Mass murder is a realistic option when it comes to over-population.

mmmmmmmmm or maybe just deny help to those that aquire a disease.....no need to kill inocent people just because they are stupid...i mean then chris would be gone

Of course, my high IQ, excellent marks in academic fields, and participation in honors classes makes me an idiot.

I simply want to purge the world of STDs. Instead of letting them waste away, offer them euthanasia as an alternative.

[bradleybadly]

Overpopulation my ass. Some areas of the world are in fact underpopulated and will not be able to sustain their social programs for elderly citizens. Yes, the world population is growing but there isn't any overpopulation.

[Chris7He]

Overpopulation my ass. Some areas of the world are in fact underpopulated and will not be able to sustain their social programs for elderly citizens. Yes, the world population is growing but there isn't any overpopulation.

Amen.

[Heimdall]

Overpopulation my ass. Some areas of the world are in fact underpopulated and will not be able to sustain their social programs for elderly citizens. Yes, the world population is growing but there isn't any overpopulation.

1. Do we really need to populate every corner of the globe?

2. Maybe there's too many elderlys to begin with

[Neutrino]

Of course, my high IQ, excellent marks in academic fields, and participation in honors classes makes me an idiot.

I simply want to purge the world of STDs. Instead of letting them waste away, offer them euthanasia as an alternative.

Ummm, you do know that the vast majority of STD's are a) treatable and b) non-lethal? I don't think very many people are willing to die over something that is easily solved by a few weeks of antibiotics

[Chris7He]

Of course, my high IQ, excellent marks in academic fields, and participation in honors classes makes me an idiot.

I simply want to purge the world of STDs. Instead of letting them waste away, offer them euthanasia as an alternative.

Ummm, you do know that the vast majority of STD's are a) treatable and b) non-lethal? I don't think very many people are willing to die over something that is easily solved by a few weeks of antibiotics

We have to eliminate people with non-curable STDs (sorry I was not specific enough).

[Neutrino]

Of course, my high IQ, excellent marks in academic fields, and participation in honors classes makes me an idiot.

I simply want to purge the world of STDs. Instead of letting them waste away, offer them euthanasia as an alternative.

Ummm, you do know that the vast majority of STD's are a) treatable and b) non-lethal? I don't think very many people are willing to die over something that is easily solved by a few weeks of antibiotics

We have to eliminate people with non-curable STDs (sorry I was not specific enough).

I would like to know what this would achieve. It is quite possible to live a pseudo-normal life with the help of antibiotics, even if you have an incurable STD. Should these people be terminated with extreme predjuce? No matter how hard you try, it is exceedingly doubtful that you'll ever absolutely wipe out any disease by assassinating hosts, anyway.
Hell, even if you do eliminate a particular disease, in a few decades another one with just step right in and take it's place.

[Chris7He]

Of course, my high IQ, excellent marks in academic fields, and participation in honors classes makes me an idiot.

I simply want to purge the world of STDs. Instead of letting them waste away, offer them euthanasia as an alternative.

Ummm, you do know that the vast majority of STD's are a) treatable and b) non-lethal? I don't think very many people are willing to die over something that is easily solved by a few weeks of antibiotics

We have to eliminate people with non-curable STDs (sorry I was not specific enough).

I would like to know what this would achieve. It is quite possible to live a pseudo-normal life with the help of antibiotics, even if you have an incurable STD. Should these people be terminated with extreme predjuce? No matter how hard you try, it is exceedingly doubtful that you'll ever absolutely wipe out any disease by assassinating hosts, anyway.
Hell, even if you do eliminate a particular disease, in a few decades another one with just step right in and take it's place.

We can try.

OR

Mandatory testing and we kill those that already have it to stave off the disease.

OR

We examine everyone to see if someone is immune. 3/4 of people with AIDS don't even know they have it!

[Neutrino]

Overpopulation my ass. Some areas of the world are in fact underpopulated and will not be able to sustain their social programs for elderly citizens. Yes, the world population is growing but there isn't any overpopulation.

It's not that the world is currently overpopulated, but that it easily has the capacity to be.
With our currect population growth, even the resources (water) of the entire solar system won't be enough in a millenia or two.

[Chris7He]

Overpopulation my ass. Some areas of the world are in fact underpopulated and will not be able to sustain their social programs for elderly citizens. Yes, the world population is growing but there isn't any overpopulation.

It's not that the world is currently overpopulated, but that it easily has the capacity to be.
With our currect population growth, even the resources (water) of the entire solar system won't be enough in a millenia or two.

I can see how that's a problem...

Our answer...

ABORTION!!!

[Neutrino]

We can try.

OR

Mandatory testing and we kill those that already have it to stave off the disease.

OR

We examine everyone to see if someone is immune. 3/4 of people with AIDS don't even know they have it!

But why?
The huge amout of money that would be spent testing the entire population, then ruthlessly hunting down those infected with something that isn't even spectactularly deadly or threatening could be spent on actually finding a cure and not slaughtering large sections of the populace.

[Neutrino]

I can see how that's a problem...

Our answer...

ABORTION!!!

I'm working on the assumption that this is a joke, since it would take every doctor working full time on abortions to make even the slightest difference if population growth.

[Chris7He]

We can try.

OR

Mandatory testing and we kill those that already have it to stave off the disease.

OR

We examine everyone to see if someone is immune. 3/4 of people with AIDS don't even know they have it!

But why?
The huge amout of money that would be spent testing the entire population, then ruthlessly hunting down those infected with something that isn't even spectactularly deadly or threatening could be spent on actually finding a cure and not slaughtering large sections of the populace.

I said we could also look for someone immune, but we could always put the ones to be slaughtered in labor camps to help pay back the government or the Final Solution.

Cure? That money's going to waste. If we did what I suggested, we'd stop overpopulance temporarily and increase income by using forced labor camps or use up the world's chemical weapons and nuclear weapons reserves.

[Chris7He]

I can see how that's a problem...

Our answer...

ABORTION!!!

I'm working on the assumption that this is a joke, since it would take every doctor working full time on abortions to make even the slightest difference if population growth.

I was kind of joking, but abortion could help stop population growth (considering the amount of pregnant teens these days ).

[Neutrino]

I said we could also look for someone immune, but we could always put the ones to be slaughtered in labor camps to help pay back the government or the Final Solution.

Cure? That money's going to waste. If we did what I suggested, we'd stop overpopulance temporarily and increase income by using forced labor camps or use up the world's chemical weapons and nuclear weapons reserves.

Ok, this is getting creepier by the minute.

Labor Camps = Good
Final Solution = Good
Cure = Bad

I'd refrence you some good Neo-Nazi sites, if I knew of any

EDIT
How are these theoretical Labour Camp-ees supposed to "use up" Chemical, Biological and Nuclear weapons? I don't think forcing unskilled and malnourished prisoners to dismantle incredibly dangerous weapons is a good idea. Or does this fit into your "Final Solution"?

[Chris7He]

I said we could also look for someone immune, but we could always put the ones to be slaughtered in labor camps to help pay back the government or the Final Solution.

Cure? That money's going to waste. If we did what I suggested, we'd stop overpopulance temporarily and increase income by using forced labor camps or use up the world's chemical weapons and nuclear weapons reserves.

Ok, this is getting creepier by the minute.

Labor Camps = Good
Final Solution = Good
Cure = Bad

I'd refrence you some good Neo-Nazi sites, if I knew of any

I'm not a Neo-Nazi. I just believe in a Final Solution type way to mass murder people and labor camps to keep them useful (with better conditions).

[Neutrino]

I said we could also look for someone immune, but we could always put the ones to be slaughtered in labor camps to help pay back the government or the Final Solution.

Cure? That money's going to waste. If we did what I suggested, we'd stop overpopulance temporarily and increase income by using forced labor camps or use up the world's chemical weapons and nuclear weapons reserves.

Ok, this is getting creepier by the minute.

Labor Camps = Good
Final Solution = Good
Cure = Bad

I'd refrence you some good Neo-Nazi sites, if I knew of any

I'm not a Neo-Nazi. I just believe in a Final Solution type way to mass murder people and labor camps to keep them useful (with better conditions).

Please explain how Mass Murder for something that was never really very dangerous to the majority of the population is a good thing.

You may not classify yourself as Neo-Nazi, but you must certainly idolise Hitler. He invented and perfected the Final Solution long before you were even born. He's what you aspire to be

[bradleybadly]

Maybe there's too many elderlys to begin with

Yes nice reply there, Stalin.

[Chris7He]

I said we could also look for someone immune, but we could always put the ones to be slaughtered in labor camps to help pay back the government or the Final Solution.

Cure? That money's going to waste. If we did what I suggested, we'd stop overpopulance temporarily and increase income by using forced labor camps or use up the world's chemical weapons and nuclear weapons reserves.

Ok, this is getting creepier by the minute.

Labor Camps = Good
Final Solution = Good
Cure = Bad

I'd refrence you some good Neo-Nazi sites, if I knew of any

I'm not a Neo-Nazi. I just believe in a Final Solution type way to mass murder people and labor camps to keep them useful (with better conditions).

Please explain how Mass Murder for something that was never really very dangerous to the majority of the population is a good thing.

You may not classify yourself as Neo-Nazi, but you must certainly idolise Hitler. He invented and perfected the Final Solution long before you were even born. He's what you aspire to be

Hitler had a hard time distinguishing reality from fantasy. His only childhood friend August Kubizek described him as living in his own dreamworld. He managed to talk Kubizek into pooling their money to buy a lottery ticket. When Hitler failed to win the lottery he reacted violently, blaming the "entire social order".

I support Lenin more than Hitler. It was not just created by Hitler, but more by an assembly at Nuremberg. STDs are dangerous if left untreated and I think there should be mandatory testing and I'll improvise from there.

[Neutrino]

Hitler had a hard time distinguishing reality from fantasy. His only childhood friend August Kubizek described him as living in his own dreamworld. He managed to talk Kubizek into pooling their money to buy a lottery ticket. When Hitler failed to win the lottery he reacted violently, blaming the "entire social order".

I support Lenin more than Hitler. It was not just created by Hitler, but more by an assembly at Nuremberg. STDs are dangerous if left untreated and I think there should be mandatory testing and I'll improvise from there.

And you don't? You're advocating wholesale mass murder of something that is, in reality only ever a minor problem! War criminals deserve to die. Serial killers do. People with STD's do not.

[Chris7He]

Hitler had a hard time distinguishing reality from fantasy. His only childhood friend August Kubizek described him as living in his own dreamworld. He managed to talk Kubizek into pooling their money to buy a lottery ticket. When Hitler failed to win the lottery he reacted violently, blaming the "entire social order".

I support Lenin more than Hitler. It was not just created by Hitler, but more by an assembly at Nuremberg. STDs are dangerous if left untreated and I think there should be mandatory testing and I'll improvise from there.

And you don't? You're advocating wholesale mass murder of something that is, in reality only ever a minor problem! War criminals deserve to die. Serial killers do. People with STD's do not.

Why not? I was thinking of a very peaceful end instead of the twisted wretched end they will face. Many people with AIDS cannot afford treatment (the majority live in Southern Africa). I say cull their numbers.

[Neutrino]

Hitler had a hard time distinguishing reality from fantasy. His only childhood friend August Kubizek described him as living in his own dreamworld. He managed to talk Kubizek into pooling their money to buy a lottery ticket. When Hitler failed to win the lottery he reacted violently, blaming the "entire social order".

I support Lenin more than Hitler. It was not just created by Hitler, but more by an assembly at Nuremberg. STDs are dangerous if left untreated and I think there should be mandatory testing and I'll improvise from there.

And you don't? You're advocating wholesale mass murder of something that is, in reality only ever a minor problem! War criminals deserve to die. Serial killers do. People with STD's do not.

Why not? I was thinking of a very peaceful end instead of the twisted wretched end they will face. Many people with AIDS cannot afford treatment (the majority live in Southern Africa). I say cull their numbers.

Again, rather than terminating them with extreme predjuce, why not put a little money towards a cure?

[Mr_Adams]

truth is, the world population is actually close to 7 billion now, that just seems a bit too high. THink about it, if there were less people, there would be less poverty, less hunger, and global warming would not be an issue if there were less people to use fossil fuels. Also, for the US immigration issue, if there were less people in Mexico, there would probably be less of a need for them to come here.

so, I say the population should be less, but I won't give up my life for it

Global warming?!? are you kidding?!? The Earth goes through heating & cooling cycles... let me tell you a story called daisy world (really a clever analigy as to why global warming is bs)

Imagine a planet with the same atmosphere as Earth...ok? the only diffrence is that the only things that lives on daisyworld are daisies.
The daisies are all one species w/ 2 possible colors, a very dark purple and white. Now we have our setting.

when the planet is warm, the purple daisies die out because thy absorb the heat, and are unable to survive. The white daises prosper, and spread across the planet. Because of the white daisies, the heat escapes more easily, causing the planet to cool back down. After several years of almost all white daisies, the planet starts to cool down and nothing changes except the general temperature of the planet.

A few years later it starts getting to cold, and the purple daisies, which absorb heat, start to flourish, and the white ones freeze in winter. The purple daisies spread across the world, until the planet starts to warm up again, just to repeat the cycle.

The moral is, the planet is bigger than you, it can take care of itself!!!!

[Chris7He]

Hitler had a hard time distinguishing reality from fantasy. His only childhood friend August Kubizek described him as living in his own dreamworld. He managed to talk Kubizek into pooling their money to buy a lottery ticket. When Hitler failed to win the lottery he reacted violently, blaming the "entire social order".

I support Lenin more than Hitler. It was not just created by Hitler, but more by an assembly at Nuremberg. STDs are dangerous if left untreated and I think there should be mandatory testing and I'll improvise from there.

And you don't? You're advocating wholesale mass murder of something that is, in reality only ever a minor problem! War criminals deserve to die. Serial killers do. People with STD's do not.

Why not? I was thinking of a very peaceful end instead of the twisted wretched end they will face. Many people with AIDS cannot afford treatment (the majority live in Southern Africa). I say cull their numbers.

Again, rather than terminating them with extreme predjuce, why not put a little money towards a cure?

Cures take too much time and it's hard to administer, but this was a thread about OVERPOPULATION. I'm offering mass murder here...

Besides... with the way that the US healthcare system is so screwed up, we might as well build some internment camps for STD patients.

[Frigidus]

Hitler had a hard time distinguishing reality from fantasy. His only childhood friend August Kubizek described him as living in his own dreamworld. He managed to talk Kubizek into pooling their money to buy a lottery ticket. When Hitler failed to win the lottery he reacted violently, blaming the "entire social order".

I support Lenin more than Hitler. It was not just created by Hitler, but more by an assembly at Nuremberg. STDs are dangerous if left untreated and I think there should be mandatory testing and I'll improvise from there.

And you don't? You're advocating wholesale mass murder of something that is, in reality only ever a minor problem! War criminals deserve to die. Serial killers do. People with STD's do not.

Why not? I was thinking of a very peaceful end instead of the twisted wretched end they will face. Many people with AIDS cannot afford treatment (the majority live in Southern Africa). I say cull their numbers.

Again, rather than terminating them with extreme predjuce, why not put a little money towards a cure?

Cures take too much time and it's hard to administer, but this was a thread about OVERPOPULATION. I'm offering mass murder here...

Besides... with the way that the US healthcare system is so screwed up, we might as well build some internment camps for STD patients.

I think we're dancing around the issue too much. Overpopulation isn't the fault of disease...disease kills people! That helps! We all know who the real culprits are. That's right, the Jews!