Conquer Club

Greatest General after Alexander the Great of Macedon?

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Who do you think deseves to be next after Al?

 
Total votes : 0

Greatest General after Alexander the Great of Macedon?

Postby muy_thaiguy on Sat Nov 24, 2007 9:59 pm

I know there are some front runners, and I believe that Alexander has the number 1 spot, unless someone disagrees for some reason. But I want to hear from others on their views about this.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
User avatar
Private 1st Class muy_thaiguy
 
Posts: 12746
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
Location: Back in Black

Postby 0ojakeo0 on Sat Nov 24, 2007 10:00 pm

george washington hannibal....
User avatar
Sergeant 0ojakeo0
 
Posts: 6150
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 9:49 am
Location: ON THE ROAD TO SAN ANTONIO!!!!

Postby soundout9 on Sat Nov 24, 2007 10:00 pm

Julius Caeser and Jackson are close but i voted Julius Caeser
Private soundout9
 
Posts: 4519
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 12:30 pm
Location: Good ol' MO Clan: Next-Gen Gamers

Postby Chris7He on Sat Nov 24, 2007 10:01 pm

Alexander was not a great general. If he fought Hannibal or Julius, he would've been fucked. The true best tactician is Hitler or Genghis Khan. Stonewall Jackson was a hotheaded general who got the job done.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Chris7He
 
Posts: 1060
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 8:54 pm
Location: Schplotzing Elin Grindemry

Postby b.k. barunt on Sat Nov 24, 2007 10:02 pm

Stonewall Jackson if he had commanded at Gettysburg, we would have won. Lee was a pussy.


Honibaz
User avatar
Cook b.k. barunt
 
Posts: 1270
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 11:33 pm

Postby soundout9 on Sat Nov 24, 2007 10:03 pm

Chris7He wrote:Alexander was not a great general. If he fought Hannibal or Julius, he would've been fucked. The true best tactician is Hitler or Genghis Khan. Stonewall Jackson was a hotheaded general who got the job done.

And then died :lol: And BK makes a good point too.

But then agian julius died too.
Last edited by soundout9 on Sat Nov 24, 2007 10:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Private soundout9
 
Posts: 4519
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 12:30 pm
Location: Good ol' MO Clan: Next-Gen Gamers

Postby Bigfalcon65 on Sat Nov 24, 2007 10:04 pm

Chris7He wrote:Alexander was not a great general. If he fought Hannibal or Julius, he would've been fucked. The true best tactician is Hitler or Genghis Khan. Stonewall Jackson was a hotheaded general who got the job done.


what about the persian king? he did quite a nice job
Former AP clan member
Former freedom fighter
Now a communist

Image
User avatar
Lieutenant Bigfalcon65
 
Posts: 452
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 12:55 pm
Location: Moscow

Postby Strife on Sat Nov 24, 2007 10:05 pm

What retard put Caesar? And where is the Pompey option?
Corporal Strife
 
Posts: 2668
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 3:24 pm
Location: Now something has kept me here too long.

Postby muy_thaiguy on Sat Nov 24, 2007 10:05 pm

Chris7He wrote:Alexander was not a great general. If he fought Hannibal or Julius, he would've been fucked. The true best tactician is Hitler or Genghis Khan. Stonewall Jackson was a hotheaded general who got the job done.
Hitler? He was military FOOL! It was because of his ineptetude that the Eastern Front backfired so tremendously! The only thing he could do personally was give speeches.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
User avatar
Private 1st Class muy_thaiguy
 
Posts: 12746
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
Location: Back in Black

Postby Chris7He on Sat Nov 24, 2007 10:05 pm

soundout9 wrote:
Chris7He wrote:Alexander was not a great general. If he fought Hannibal or Julius, he would've been fucked. The true best tactician is Hitler or Genghis Khan. Stonewall Jackson was a hotheaded general who got the job done.

And then died :lol:


Because he was shot by his own troops. Lee was a gentleman who didn't see things the way Jackson did. He could've taken Little Round Top early, but he didn't he also could have struck from the north.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Chris7He
 
Posts: 1060
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 8:54 pm
Location: Schplotzing Elin Grindemry

Postby muy_thaiguy on Sat Nov 24, 2007 10:06 pm

Strife wrote:What retard put Caesar? And where is the Pompey option?
There is the "other" option in case I would forget people like Pompey. I put Caesar up there because he is often counted among the great leaders in military.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
User avatar
Private 1st Class muy_thaiguy
 
Posts: 12746
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
Location: Back in Black

Postby b.k. barunt on Sat Nov 24, 2007 10:07 pm

Chris7He wrote:Alexander was not a great general. If he fought Hannibal or Julius, he would've been fucked. The true best tactician is Hitler or Genghis Khan. Stonewall Jackson was a hotheaded general who got the job done.

This post is simply seething with brilliance. I guess you're right - Alexander was not the greatest general. Damn, and all this time i thought he was. I never realized that Hannibal or Julius would have beat him up - thank you for pointing that out. * * slaps head * * It's a fooking epiphany!


Honibaz
User avatar
Cook b.k. barunt
 
Posts: 1270
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 11:33 pm

Postby soundout9 on Sat Nov 24, 2007 10:07 pm

Chris7He wrote:
soundout9 wrote:
Chris7He wrote:Alexander was not a great general. If he fought Hannibal or Julius, he would've been fucked. The true best tactician is Hitler or Genghis Khan. Stonewall Jackson was a hotheaded general who got the job done.

And then died :lol:


Because he was shot by his own troops. Lee was a gentleman who didn't see things the way Jackson did. He could've taken Little Round Top early, but he didn't he also could have struck from the north.

BK is right though if stonewall had been commmander the south probably would have won the cival war and then 8-[ we might be communist.
Private soundout9
 
Posts: 4519
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 12:30 pm
Location: Good ol' MO Clan: Next-Gen Gamers

Postby Bigfalcon65 on Sat Nov 24, 2007 10:07 pm

muy_thaiguy wrote:
Chris7He wrote:Alexander was not a great general. If he fought Hannibal or Julius, he would've been fucked. The true best tactician is Hitler or Genghis Khan. Stonewall Jackson was a hotheaded general who got the job done.
Hitler? He was military FOOL! It was because of his ineptetude that the Eastern Front backfired so tremendously! The only thing he could do personally was give speeches.


he wasnt a military fool, you are foolish for overlooking a grand detail, something called the holocaust had he not fucked around with jews he wouldve had alot more man power and transportation instead of wasting money and effort of the jewish people.
Former AP clan member
Former freedom fighter
Now a communist

Image
User avatar
Lieutenant Bigfalcon65
 
Posts: 452
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 12:55 pm
Location: Moscow

Postby Strife on Sat Nov 24, 2007 10:08 pm

I meant who voted for him MTG. I voted fer Boneparte :D
Corporal Strife
 
Posts: 2668
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 3:24 pm
Location: Now something has kept me here too long.

Postby Chris7He on Sat Nov 24, 2007 10:08 pm

b.k. barunt wrote:
Chris7He wrote:Alexander was not a great general. If he fought Hannibal or Julius, he would've been fucked. The true best tactician is Hitler or Genghis Khan. Stonewall Jackson was a hotheaded general who got the job done.

This post is simply seething with brilliance. I guess you're right - Alexander was not the greatest general. Damn, and all this time i thought he was. I never realized that Hannibal or Julius would have beat him up - thank you for pointing that out. * * slaps head * * It's a fooking epiphany!


Honibaz


You're not that bad out of flame wars.

Hannibal used superior calvary tactics and Julius used legionnaire formations that easily crushed the phalanx formation.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Chris7He
 
Posts: 1060
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 8:54 pm
Location: Schplotzing Elin Grindemry

Postby muy_thaiguy on Sat Nov 24, 2007 10:09 pm

Bigfalcon65 wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:
Chris7He wrote:Alexander was not a great general. If he fought Hannibal or Julius, he would've been fucked. The true best tactician is Hitler or Genghis Khan. Stonewall Jackson was a hotheaded general who got the job done.
Hitler? He was military FOOL! It was because of his ineptetude that the Eastern Front backfired so tremendously! The only thing he could do personally was give speeches.


he wasnt a military fool, you are foolish for overlooking a grand detail, something called the holocaust had he not fucked around with jews he wouldve had alot more man power and transportation instead of wasting money and effort of the jewish people.
I dearly hope you are being sarcastic.

And my bad Strife.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
User avatar
Private 1st Class muy_thaiguy
 
Posts: 12746
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
Location: Back in Black

Postby Bigfalcon65 on Sat Nov 24, 2007 10:09 pm

muy_thaiguy wrote:
Bigfalcon65 wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:
Chris7He wrote:Alexander was not a great general. If he fought Hannibal or Julius, he would've been fucked. The true best tactician is Hitler or Genghis Khan. Stonewall Jackson was a hotheaded general who got the job done.
Hitler? He was military FOOL! It was because of his ineptetude that the Eastern Front backfired so tremendously! The only thing he could do personally was give speeches.


he wasnt a military fool, you are foolish for overlooking a grand detail, something called the holocaust had he not fucked around with jews he wouldve had alot more man power and transportation instead of wasting money and effort of the jewish people.
I dearly hope you are being sarcastic.

And my bad Strife.


are you a retard, thats half the reason why they lost, they spent soooo much on shit that wasnt the war
Former AP clan member
Former freedom fighter
Now a communist

Image
User avatar
Lieutenant Bigfalcon65
 
Posts: 452
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 12:55 pm
Location: Moscow

Postby Chris7He on Sat Nov 24, 2007 10:10 pm

muy_thaiguy wrote:
Chris7He wrote:Alexander was not a great general. If he fought Hannibal or Julius, he would've been fucked. The true best tactician is Hitler or Genghis Khan. Stonewall Jackson was a hotheaded general who got the job done.
Hitler? He was military FOOL! It was because of his ineptetude that the Eastern Front backfired so tremendously! The only thing he could do personally was give speeches.


Hitler invented a little thing called the blitzkrieg. No. It wasn't Rommel. It was Hitler who had spent time in the Great War and won an Iron Cross. He simply wasted time killing Jews when he could've spent time fighting.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Chris7He
 
Posts: 1060
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 8:54 pm
Location: Schplotzing Elin Grindemry

Postby got tonkaed on Sat Nov 24, 2007 10:12 pm

Chris7He wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:
Chris7He wrote:Alexander was not a great general. If he fought Hannibal or Julius, he would've been fucked. The true best tactician is Hitler or Genghis Khan. Stonewall Jackson was a hotheaded general who got the job done.
Hitler? He was military FOOL! It was because of his ineptetude that the Eastern Front backfired so tremendously! The only thing he could do personally was give speeches.


Hitler invented a little thing called the blitzkrieg. No. It wasn't Rommel. It was Hitler who had spent time in the Great War and won an Iron Cross. He simply wasted time killing Jews when he could've spent time fighting.


hitler had a pretty big problem in geopolitics. Its pretty hard for anyone to win a war in that situation with those people fighting against you...at the same time, he had not done some of the things in russia he did, he may have had a better chance.
User avatar
Cadet got tonkaed
 
Posts: 5034
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:01 pm
Location: Detroit

Postby Bigfalcon65 on Sat Nov 24, 2007 10:13 pm

got tonkaed wrote:
Chris7He wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:
Chris7He wrote:Alexander was not a great general. If he fought Hannibal or Julius, he would've been fucked. The true best tactician is Hitler or Genghis Khan. Stonewall Jackson was a hotheaded general who got the job done.
Hitler? He was military FOOL! It was because of his ineptetude that the Eastern Front backfired so tremendously! The only thing he could do personally was give speeches.


Hitler invented a little thing called the blitzkrieg. No. It wasn't Rommel. It was Hitler who had spent time in the Great War and won an Iron Cross. He simply wasted time killing Jews when he could've spent time fighting.


hitler had a pretty big problem in geopolitics. Its pretty hard for anyone to win a war in that situation with those people fighting against you...at the same time, he had not done some of the things in russia he did, he may have had a better chance.


that and, japan had to be a douchebag and bomb america so it wasnt all germany's fault that they got fucked over.
Former AP clan member
Former freedom fighter
Now a communist

Image
User avatar
Lieutenant Bigfalcon65
 
Posts: 452
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 12:55 pm
Location: Moscow

Postby muy_thaiguy on Sat Nov 24, 2007 10:13 pm

Bigfalcon65 wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:
Bigfalcon65 wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:
Chris7He wrote:Alexander was not a great general. If he fought Hannibal or Julius, he would've been fucked. The true best tactician is Hitler or Genghis Khan. Stonewall Jackson was a hotheaded general who got the job done.
Hitler? He was military FOOL! It was because of his ineptetude that the Eastern Front backfired so tremendously! The only thing he could do personally was give speeches.


he wasnt a military fool, you are foolish for overlooking a grand detail, something called the holocaust had he not fucked around with jews he wouldve had alot more man power and transportation instead of wasting money and effort of the jewish people.
I dearly hope you are being sarcastic.

And my bad Strife.


are you a retard, thats half the reason why they lost, they spent soooo much on shit that wasnt the war
Hence another reason why he was a fool. He concentrated manpower on death camps and concentration camps instead of the front lines.

And Chris, Alexander used superior cavalry, employed war elephants (great for rendering cavalry useless), and used a different form of the phalanx the what later people would use, one that was more flexible and effective.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
User avatar
Private 1st Class muy_thaiguy
 
Posts: 12746
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
Location: Back in Black

Postby Bigfalcon65 on Sat Nov 24, 2007 10:14 pm

muy_thaiguy wrote:
Bigfalcon65 wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:
Bigfalcon65 wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:
Chris7He wrote:Alexander was not a great general. If he fought Hannibal or Julius, he would've been fucked. The true best tactician is Hitler or Genghis Khan. Stonewall Jackson was a hotheaded general who got the job done.
Hitler? He was military FOOL! It was because of his ineptetude that the Eastern Front backfired so tremendously! The only thing he could do personally was give speeches.


he wasnt a military fool, you are foolish for overlooking a grand detail, something called the holocaust had he not fucked around with jews he wouldve had alot more man power and transportation instead of wasting money and effort of the jewish people.
I dearly hope you are being sarcastic.

And my bad Strife.


are you a retard, thats half the reason why they lost, they spent soooo much on shit that wasnt the war
Hence another reason why he was a fool. He concentrated manpower on death camps and concentration camps instead of the front lines.

And Chris, Alexander used superior cavalry, employed war elephants (great for rendering cavalry useless), and used a different form of the phalanx the what later people would use, one that was more flexible and effective.


he let his hatred consume him, doesnt mean he was a bad genral, means he was a bad leader.
Former AP clan member
Former freedom fighter
Now a communist

Image
User avatar
Lieutenant Bigfalcon65
 
Posts: 452
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 12:55 pm
Location: Moscow

Postby Chris7He on Sat Nov 24, 2007 10:14 pm

muy_thaiguy wrote:
Bigfalcon65 wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:
Chris7He wrote:Alexander was not a great general. If he fought Hannibal or Julius, he would've been fucked. The true best tactician is Hitler or Genghis Khan. Stonewall Jackson was a hotheaded general who got the job done.
Hitler? He was military FOOL! It was because of his ineptetude that the Eastern Front backfired so tremendously! The only thing he could do personally was give speeches.


he wasnt a military fool, you are foolish for overlooking a grand detail, something called the holocaust had he not fucked around with jews he wouldve had alot more man power and transportation instead of wasting money and effort of the jewish people.
I dearly hope you are being sarcastic.

And my bad Strife.


His brilliance was prevalent up until he started taking various medications so that he looked like a TRUE 'aryan superman'. He then deterred from research into nuclear weapons, tanks, missiles, and jets.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Chris7He
 
Posts: 1060
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 8:54 pm
Location: Schplotzing Elin Grindemry

Postby Norse on Sat Nov 24, 2007 10:17 pm

Where's the "ron paul" option?....

terrible, I actually like ron paul.
b.k. barunt wrote:Snorri's like one of those fufu dogs who get all excited and dance around pissing on themself.

suggs wrote:scared off by all the pervs and wankers already? No? Then let me introduce myself, I'm Mr Pervy Wank.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Norse
 
Posts: 4227
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 4:14 pm
Location: Cradled in the arms of Freya.

Next

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users