Moderator: Community Team
The Weird One wrote:umm. . .vote firth???
mandalorian2298 wrote:Sierra_Leon wrote:mandalorian2298 wrote:Talapus wrote:Since the gods are battling it out, I think any third party is bad for us.
I disagree. Third parties should be recruitable. Plus, whatever threat they have posed to desits is blunted by the early lynch of 'Neutral Cult' recruiter.
Mandy, how sure are you that both sides can recruit people? The mechanics of this game don't appear to be anything like the Athalalakata game, so I'm not convinced.
It would be unbalanced if only one 'God' had the ability.
Anyways, who am I to doubt th Gods? vote Firth4eva
F1fth wrote:What one needs to realize is that both of the first two messages could have been from the the same god. That second message could also easily (and much less creatively) come from that same god, and probably did.
Vote TWO for his unfounded faith.
kalishnikov wrote: Damn you Koesen. (I know you're reading this)
freezie wrote:The Weird One wrote:umm. . .vote firth???mandalorian2298 wrote:Sierra_Leon wrote:mandalorian2298 wrote:Talapus wrote:Since the gods are battling it out, I think any third party is bad for us.
I disagree. Third parties should be recruitable. Plus, whatever threat they have posed to desits is blunted by the early lynch of 'Neutral Cult' recruiter.
Mandy, how sure are you that both sides can recruit people? The mechanics of this game don't appear to be anything like the Athalalakata game, so I'm not convinced.
It would be unbalanced if only one 'God' had the ability.
Anyways, who am I to doubt th Gods? vote Firth4eva
Going with these, and my last post:
FOS: Mandy, TWO Not sure who to vote right now. Maybe TWO later, because mandy unvoted.
Blindly following 1 of the 2 gods is bad for us. Voting because satan said so is scummy. Right, you 2?
Talapus wrote:I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
firth4eva wrote:Koesen wrote:firth4eva wrote:Coincidently enough my role said neutral(but not that literally)
And you wanted to lynch me for being third party?
But read the bracketed part. I can't reveal all or else it will be quoting my pm.
kalishnikov wrote: Damn you Koesen. (I know you're reading this)
Koesen wrote:firth4eva wrote:Koesen wrote:firth4eva wrote:Coincidently enough my role said neutral(but not that literally)
And you wanted to lynch me for being third party?
But read the bracketed part. I can't reveal all or else it will be quoting my pm.
So you're saying you weren't aware you were neutral until recently?
Sierra_Leon wrote:Tricky question there... Leaving my own alignment out of this completely, I would think that any Godling or Satanling would claim Independent, as to not let the other side know their true alignment. An Independent would always claim his actual role.
Thinking about this made me realize your claim is not guaranteed to be true at all.
Talapus wrote:I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
freezie wrote:gimpyThewonder wrote:hi
not dead
will post more later
And you never do.
Maybe we should lynch YOU
gimpyThewonder wrote:freezie wrote:gimpyThewonder wrote:hi
not dead
will post more later
And you never do.
Maybe we should lynch YOU
somebody is a grouchy pants, jeesh![]()
ok after reading the last couple of pages repeatedly i think i'm starting to wrap my head around how this format works. My take so far is that Mandy is making himself look suspicious. Vote hopping, quickly unvoting. the throw it all against the wall and see what sticks method. it seems scummy to me, but almost blatantly scummy because he should be too smart for that. almost like a jester. TWO also seems a bit off from his vote, but perhaps he's just trying to figure the game out as well, hmm. those are my current thoughts anyway
Talapus wrote:I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users