Conquer Club

Filosofical Question - Before Life

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Postby Genghis Khant on Wed Nov 07, 2007 10:41 am

Minister Masket wrote:Ok, atoms give you the body, where does soul come from?

Tamla Motown, baby. Ain't that sweet?
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Genghis Khant
 
Posts: 867
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 3:02 am
Location: Cymru

Postby MR. Nate on Wed Nov 07, 2007 3:13 pm

One of questions that I can't answer philosophically, but have some understanding Theologically. Options:

I. Souls are eternally existent, both into the past and the future.

II. Souls are at some point in time created.
. . A. God created souls some time in the distant past, and they are semi-conscious/ asleep until placed into bodies.
. . B. God creates the soul
. . . . 1. At the time of conception
. . . . 2. Shortly after conception

Personally, I adhere to II, B, 2, but I'm not positive about that.
In any case, prior to its creation, a soul would not exist, while most people who believe in souls believe they survive death, so pre-birth does not equal death. (unless you believe in reincarnation)
AAFitz wrote:There will always be cheaters, abusive players, terrible players, and worse. But we have every right to crush them.
MeDeFe wrote:This is a forum on the internet, what do you expect?

End the Flame Wars.
User avatar
Corporal MR. Nate
 
Posts: 951
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 10:59 am
Location: Locked in the warehouse.

Postby Guiscard on Wed Nov 07, 2007 3:35 pm

MR. Nate wrote:One of questions that I can't answer philosophically, but have some understanding Theologically. Options:

I. Souls are eternally existent, both into the past and the future.

II. Souls are at some point in time created.
. . A. God created souls some time in the distant past, and they are semi-conscious/ asleep until placed into bodies.
. . B. God creates the soul
. . . . 1. At the time of conception
. . . . 2. Shortly after conception

Personally, I adhere to II, B, 2, but I'm not positive about that.
In any case, prior to its creation, a soul would not exist, while most people who believe in souls believe they survive death, so pre-birth does not equal death. (unless you believe in reincarnation)


You missed III. Non-existent...
qwert wrote:Can i ask you something?What is porpose for you to open these Political topic in ConquerClub? Why you mix politic with Risk? Why you not open topic like HOT AND SEXY,or something like that.
User avatar
Private 1st Class Guiscard
 
Posts: 4103
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 7:27 pm
Location: In the bar... With my head on the bar

Postby jiminski on Wed Nov 07, 2007 3:45 pm

A light switch is either set to on or off.*

Before the factory made the light-switch...it was set to neither.



*i suppose if you are careful you can select the purgatory setting.. but we'll ignore that for the purposes of the metaphor.
User avatar
Major jiminski
 
Posts: 5422
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 3:30 pm
Location: London

Postby MR. Nate on Wed Nov 07, 2007 5:30 pm

Guiscard wrote:You missed III. Non-existent...


Yeah, I guess if you don't believe in a soul, that would change some things . . . . :lol:
AAFitz wrote:There will always be cheaters, abusive players, terrible players, and worse. But we have every right to crush them.
MeDeFe wrote:This is a forum on the internet, what do you expect?

End the Flame Wars.
User avatar
Corporal MR. Nate
 
Posts: 951
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 10:59 am
Location: Locked in the warehouse.

Re: Filosofical Question - Before Life

Postby Minister Masket on Wed Nov 07, 2007 6:34 pm

EvilPurpleMonkey wrote:You simply did not exist. you were nothing. You were the lack of everything. Then your parents had sex, sperm traveled into the uterus, combined with an egg, the cells then split apart and grew into a larger entity through a process I believe is mitosis. Then you could take 2 approaches. Either you began to exist when you first became conscious, or when the egg and sperm combined. You proceeded to grow in your mothers womb, or a test tube, and grew up into the idiot you are today.

You plonker. If I wanted an answer as tedious and dreary as this, I would have asked my Science teacher. Get an imagination, quick!
Victrix Fortuna Sapientia

Image
User avatar
Private Minister Masket
 
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 2:24 pm
Location: On The Brink

Postby Minister Masket on Wed Nov 07, 2007 6:34 pm

autoload wrote:I'm an idiot.

Good to know, I'll bear that in mind.
Victrix Fortuna Sapientia

Image
User avatar
Private Minister Masket
 
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 2:24 pm
Location: On The Brink

Postby Minister Masket on Wed Nov 07, 2007 6:40 pm

kalishnikov wrote:The word soul is an outdated word. What was recognized as the 'soul' hundreds, if not thousands, of years ago is now recognized as consciousness. It's simpleminded superstition; same as ancient astronomers giving the stars human human attributes to better define what we do not understand.

Just because you're capable of identifying suffering, feeling content, choosing things you like/dislike and bitching about it in terms we understand does not mean you have an 'immortal ghost' that lives inside you.

So I submit to you that this is an inherently flawed conundrum, to which there can possibly be no answer that would satisfy the question. It's all a matter of perspective.

It's quite scary when I realise that I can provoke answers like this from just my random thinking. Wonderfully put here Kalish.
Also, you're trying to mix science and religion here, thus muddying the waters to a point that no possible conclusion can be drawn.

Science and Religion. Why just have one, when you can have them both?
If you have two sides to a story, you put them together to get the truth.
Victrix Fortuna Sapientia

Image
User avatar
Private Minister Masket
 
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 2:24 pm
Location: On The Brink

Postby Minister Masket on Wed Nov 07, 2007 6:42 pm

jiminski wrote:A light switch is either set to on or off.*

Before the factory made the light-switch...it was set to neither.

A balance between life and death? Interesting....
Victrix Fortuna Sapientia

Image
User avatar
Private Minister Masket
 
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 2:24 pm
Location: On The Brink

Postby Snorri1234 on Wed Nov 07, 2007 7:25 pm

MR. Nate wrote:
Guiscard wrote:You missed III. Non-existent...


Yeah, I guess if you don't believe in a soul, that would change some things . . . . :lol:


It would? :-s
User avatar
Private Snorri1234
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.

Postby The Weird One on Thu Nov 08, 2007 12:05 am

autoload wrote:I'm an idiot.

So am I, but you don't here me complaining. :P
sheepofdumb wrote:I'm not scum, just a threat to the town. There's a difference, thank you very much.

ga7 wrote: I'll keep my vote where it should be but just in case Vote Strike Wolf AND f*ck FLAMINGOS f*ck THEM HARD
User avatar
Sergeant The Weird One
 
Posts: 7059
Joined: Fri May 11, 2007 8:21 pm
Location: cursing the spiteful dice gods

Postby Syzygy on Thu Nov 08, 2007 4:39 am

Minister Masket wrote:
Also, you're trying to mix science and religion here, thus muddying the waters to a point that no possible conclusion can be drawn.

Science and Religion. Why just have one, when you can have them both?
If you have two sides to a story, you put them together to get the truth.


Because science and religion disagree with each other...
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Syzygy
 
Posts: 3382
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 1:07 pm
Location: My Acre of Africa

Postby Minister Masket on Thu Nov 08, 2007 6:34 am

Syzygy wrote:
Minister Masket wrote:
Also, you're trying to mix science and religion here, thus muddying the waters to a point that no possible conclusion can be drawn.

Science and Religion. Why just have one, when you can have them both?
If you have two sides to a story, you put them together to get the truth.


Because science and religion disagree with each other...

Not necessarily. See my "Christiovolution" theory.
Victrix Fortuna Sapientia

Image
User avatar
Private Minister Masket
 
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 2:24 pm
Location: On The Brink

Postby Syzygy on Thu Nov 08, 2007 7:01 am

Minister Masket wrote:
Syzygy wrote:
Minister Masket wrote:
Also, you're trying to mix science and religion here, thus muddying the waters to a point that no possible conclusion can be drawn.

Science and Religion. Why just have one, when you can have them both?
If you have two sides to a story, you put them together to get the truth.


Because science and religion disagree with each other...

Not necessarily. See my "Christiovolution" theory.


Link, so I can point out the flaws. :mrgreen: :wink:
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Syzygy
 
Posts: 3382
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 1:07 pm
Location: My Acre of Africa

Postby Minister Masket on Thu Nov 08, 2007 7:11 am

Here you go, took a while to find:

Minister Masket wrote:I would like to take this time to introduce my concept of "Christiovolution" - the combination of Christianity and Evolution.
Just like Judaism combined with Jesus to become Christianity, and Cathlicism combined with Martin-Luthur to become Protestantism.
Who's to say God did not set the Big Bang in motion? And evolution?
I believe in God, not the Bible. Too many people look to the Bible instead of God nowadays. Unfortuantly, the book has been changed and corrupted beyond regognition in history. For example: King James changed it so that most parts said good things about him! Lousy git.
Remember: Christiovolution!

WARNING: the spellings of certain religions in this post are of my own creation. Purely for my own amusment.
Victrix Fortuna Sapientia

Image
User avatar
Private Minister Masket
 
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 2:24 pm
Location: On The Brink

Postby Syzygy on Thu Nov 08, 2007 7:24 am

:lol:

But, you haven't given us evidence that Christiovolution is the way.

(Actually I know one or two christians who do actually believe that evolution was set in motion by god.)
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Syzygy
 
Posts: 3382
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 1:07 pm
Location: My Acre of Africa

Postby b.k. barunt on Thu Nov 08, 2007 7:49 am

kalishnikov wrote:The word soul is an outdated word. What was recognized as the 'soul' hundreds, if not thousands, of years ago is now recognized as consciousness. It's simpleminded superstition; same as ancient astronomers giving the stars human human attributes to better define what we do not understand.

Just because you're capable of identifying suffering, feeling content, choosing things you like/dislike and bitching about it in terms we understand does not mean you have an 'immortal ghost' that lives inside you.

So I submit to you that this is an inherently flawed conundrum, to which there can possibly be no answer that would satisfy the question. It's all a matter of perspective.

Also, you're trying to mix science and religion here, thus muddying the waters to a point that no possible conclusion can be drawn.

I beg to differ. Freud explained the soul with science in the same way the disciples of Christ explained it with their faith over 2 thousand years ago. Freud called it the "ego", which is the self, your identity, and the New Testament uses the greek word "psuche" (self) for soul. Actually the immortal ghost is the spirit, or "super ego". So though you may have a different viewpoint yourself, it would not be accurate to call the concept of the spirit and soul outdated, or unscientific.
User avatar
Cook b.k. barunt
 
Posts: 1270
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 11:33 pm

Postby MeDeFe on Thu Nov 08, 2007 7:53 am

Except that Freud did a lot of guesswork and very little science.
User avatar
Major MeDeFe
 
Posts: 7831
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:48 am
Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.

Postby autoload on Thu Nov 08, 2007 11:18 am

The Weird One wrote:
autoload wrote:I'm an idiot.

So am I, but you don't here me complaining. :P

I'm glad I'm not the only one.
User avatar
Major autoload
 
Posts: 3735
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:37 am

Postby Snorri1234 on Thu Nov 08, 2007 12:13 pm

Minister Masket wrote:Here you go, took a while to find:

Minister Masket wrote:I would like to take this time to introduce my concept of "Christiovolution" - the combination of Christianity and Evolution.
Just like Judaism combined with Jesus to become Christianity, and Cathlicism combined with Martin-Luthur to become Protestantism.
Who's to say God did not set the Big Bang in motion? And evolution?
I believe in God, not the Bible. Too many people look to the Bible instead of God nowadays. Unfortuantly, the book has been changed and corrupted beyond regognition in history. For example: King James changed it so that most parts said good things about him! Lousy git.
Remember: Christiovolution!

WARNING: the spellings of certain religions in this post are of my own creation. Purely for my own amusment.


Dude that isn't a new concept. Theistic evolution is a widely accepted view by many people.
User avatar
Private Snorri1234
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.

Postby muy_thaiguy on Thu Nov 08, 2007 12:17 pm

Snorri1234 wrote:
Minister Masket wrote:Here you go, took a while to find:

Minister Masket wrote:I would like to take this time to introduce my concept of "Christiovolution" - the combination of Christianity and Evolution.
Just like Judaism combined with Jesus to become Christianity, and Cathlicism combined with Martin-Luthur to become Protestantism.
Who's to say God did not set the Big Bang in motion? And evolution?
I believe in God, not the Bible. Too many people look to the Bible instead of God nowadays. Unfortuantly, the book has been changed and corrupted beyond regognition in history. For example: King James changed it so that most parts said good things about him! Lousy git.
Remember: Christiovolution!

WARNING: the spellings of certain religions in this post are of my own creation. Purely for my own amusment.


Dude that isn't a new concept. Theistic evolution is a widely accepted view by many people.
Like OnlyAmbrose.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
User avatar
Private 1st Class muy_thaiguy
 
Posts: 12746
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
Location: Back in Black

Postby b.k. barunt on Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:30 pm

Reminds me of the time that i took 5 hits of Orange Sunshine, and thought that i had invented the railroad.


Honibaz
User avatar
Cook b.k. barunt
 
Posts: 1270
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 11:33 pm

Postby Minister Masket on Thu Nov 08, 2007 5:10 pm

Syzygy wrote::lol:

But, you haven't given us evidence that Christiovolution is the way.

(Actually I know one or two christians who do actually believe that evolution was set in motion by god.)

Did they call it "Christiovolution"?
I think NOT!

And whether it is "the way" or not is a matter for you to decide.
As for me, I will continue to search for immortality!

BTW: Do watch "The Fountain" sometime, t'is a good film.
Victrix Fortuna Sapientia

Image
User avatar
Private Minister Masket
 
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 2:24 pm
Location: On The Brink

Postby Minister Masket on Thu Nov 08, 2007 5:11 pm

b.k. barunt wrote:Reminds me of the time that i took 5 hits of Orange Sunshine, and thought that i had invented the railroad.


Honibaz

Knowing how old you are, you probably did.
Victrix Fortuna Sapientia

Image
User avatar
Private Minister Masket
 
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 2:24 pm
Location: On The Brink

Previous

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Dukasaur