Actually, though believing there was a conspiracy, and no plane at this point is reckless, not considering the possibility that the buildings were dropped with controlled demolition is just as reckless.
Building 7 was. Theres a quote by the owner in and interview where he says he specifically said "pull it" reffering to building 7. He could have meant pull the firefighters, but they evacuated the building, set up a safe perimiter and watched it drop on que.
This isnt mentioned in the 911 report anywhere. The reason it woudnt be mentioned if there was a cover-up, is because controlled demolitions take weeks of careful setting up to prepare. If building 7 was demolished, it would have had to have been done ahead of time. If it was done ahead of time, it is possible the other towers were done too.
The twin towers were a huge target of terrorists...if they managed to get them to fall sideways the damage and loss of life could have been many times greater than what did happen. Its not a stretch to think that in the interest of saving tens of thousands of New Yorkers from a falling 1000 ft building that was a target of terrorists in the past and present, that they rigged it to fall safely in upon itself just in case.
Now, it is possible that this was not a massive plot, planned from day one, and that it just happened, and the contingency plan was to drop the building if it looked as though it was going to fall over.
I watched the inside job video. I yelled at the announcer absolutely pissed off about what she was saying. I couldnt believe anyone would even dare mention anything as crazy and disrespectful...but after 45 minutes of watching detail after detail that just seemed suspicious, I became very nervous, because though theres no way they proved it was an inside job by any stretch, they certainly proved, it might warrant further investigation.
I dont question the fact that a jumbo jet at 400 miles per hour with full fuel tanks could demolish a building exactly as it happened. Certainly planes can be hijacked as those were, and as many have been in the past. However, firemen were saying the fire was almost out, they then heard what they called many secondary explosions...many... and the explosion before the building collapsed was documented by videos as far away as a few miles. The fact that the collapses perfectly resemble controlled demolition does warrant some further investigation.
To simply trust that no one would be crazy enough to kill that many people goes against all human history. I have no idea what happened, and it is at least just as likely that it happened just as we were told it did. But Im not about to discount the possibility that more didnt happen, just because it seems crazy to think anyone could be that evil.
I think xtra is a bit high strung, and has the argumentative ability of a 5th grader usually, but I dont believe he is doing this for fun. I think he genuinely believes the whole thing was planned, and feels compelled to share it. I think hes jumped to a bunch of conclusions far too early, but his pointing out that it could use a little more looking into is certainly justified, if for no other reason, than because of the ramifications if its true. In any case, if someone believes they were planned, and is trying to convince someone of it, they would be doing the people who died there a service. Ignoring the possibility because its easier to do so is actually an injustice to those who died, I think.
Personally, I think its perfectly plausible, that a plane made of aluminum which does vaporize at the impact speeds it was going probably hit the pentagon. Even if the entire event was orchestrated, it seems like it would have been easier to just crash the plane into it, then get rid of a plane, and set up a missile strike....hell, if it was a missile strike, that was planned in advance, I think they would have actually planted some fragments of plane to make sure no one would ever suspect a missile...
As far as the buildings, knowing that building 7 was almost certainly demolished, and did not fall because of the fire means that I cannot fully discount the possibility that the towers were rigged too. Whether for safety, or profit... or whatever other reason. To ignore its possible is just somewhat naive. There have been too many instances in history, where societies have been fooled by their leaders, so to discount it summarily without researching it is just unwise. The government has done many evil things in the interest of preserving our nation and way of life.
Im not suggesting anyone believes any of the conspiracy theories in the state they are now. There's no real evidence, and realistically the most probable explanation is that they are just coincidences that unfortunately have made a horrible event even harder for some to handle. However, I would suggest that keeping an open mind in this kind of situation is vital to the health of a country. To simply trust leaders because you cant imagine theyd ever do anything crazy, is just crazy in and of itself. Its always worth investigating something like this from every angle. To not do so is just asking for trouble.
xtra may very well be crazy, and is more likely completely off base than right, however, I think he believes it, and his actual goal isnt just to get attention for the sake of it, but to make sure justice is done. Though his conclusions are by far premature, some of the facts that hes pointing out, really are suspicious. I wouldnt recommend putting too much time into researching them, because it would be fruitless, and people with means and resources will never stop investigating it till they die, regardless of what happened at this point. However, discounting the possibility that something is covered up here, without ever looking at the other side of it, is dangerous business.
are registered trademarks of Backglass Heavy Industries.
