ron paul = he man

by **suggs** on Tue Nov 06, 2007 5:25 pm

Hang on chaps-you're forgetting just one thing-isnt Ron Paul a right wing bigoted CUNT?

Just in case anyone was taking him seriously.

by **Guiscard** on Tue Nov 06, 2007 5:37 pm

suggs wrote:Hang on chaps-you're forgetting just one thing-isnt Ron Paul a right wing bigoted CUNT?

How can he be? he is FOR the constitution!

by **suggs** on Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:02 pm

Ah, thats ok then! As long as long as he supports stuff that other people have wriiten down, a long time ago, he must be a right on dude!
Forgive me.

by **xtratabasco** on Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:06 pm

suggs wrote:Ah, thats ok then! As long as long as he supports stuff that other people have wriiten down, a long time ago, he must be a right on dude!
Forgive me.

gee I dont know suggs....

have you ever read the damn thing? :lol:

YouTube - Ron Paul's First Action as President
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDM8US25xXg

November 5th - Ron Paul Mass Donation Day
http://www.thisnovember5th.com/

by **unriggable** on Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:33 pm

jay_a2j wrote:
unriggable wrote:Jay, Obama is also good.

but inexperienced

So what - he's practically a prodigy. More experience means more the get beaten down with. I like the fact that he brings a new face to the US.

by **Dancing Mustard** on Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:38 pm

You totally don't understand Unrig, Obama is not FOR THE CONSTITUTION like Ron Paul is. Also he LUSTS for power, not like Ron Paul who just wants to be the President of the United States of America.

Here, check this link: http://www.Iwanttoblowronpaulandwraphiminclingfilm.com

by **unriggable** on Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:38 pm

Redirects to meatspin.

by **Nobunaga** on Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:41 pm

suggs wrote:Ah, thats ok then! As long as long as he supports stuff that other people have wriiten down, a long time ago, he must be a right on dude!
Forgive me.

... That's what it's all about.

...

by **beezer** on Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:49 pm

suggs wrote:Hang on chaps-you're forgetting just one thing-isnt Ron Paul a right wing bigoted CUNT?

Just in case anyone was taking him seriously.

No, he's a libertarian. That's why he's only getting 1 - 3% in the polls. True right wingers recognize him for who he is and he's being rejected by the party.

by **luns101** on Tue Nov 06, 2007 10:11 pm

jay_a2j wrote:I think the data posted is a tad bit misleading to say the least. RP got a 77 liberal rating for foreign policy. Is this because he is anti-Iraq war as the constitution clearly testifies to the illegality of such a war? Such a high number for foreign policy. I agree with getting out of Iraq.... even though most so-called conservatives are pro-Iraq war. Where do these numbers originate from...votes?

Here's their criteria

jay_a2j wrote:I noticed that although RP had a liberal rating of 61(total rating) the two senators in my state (NY) were in the 70's. That includes Hillary.

Why should Schumer or Clinton's high liberal rating be surprising? What should get you thinking is why Paul's is so close to theirs!

jay_a2j wrote:Ron Paul isn't perfect....and I'd be more at ease if those comments concerning race were never made but I also know that other politicians have had similar views yet held high offices in government.

Yeah, you think! You mention other politicians with similar views. Let me just name 2 for you that stand out:

Hugo Black - former Klansman appointed by FDR to Supreme Court
Sen. Robery Byrd - former Klansman still serving in the Senate

Both Democrats! So why should the Republicans engage in that sort of behavior, Jay?

jay_a2j wrote:The alleged statements almost always, if not always, have had no bearing on how they ran the country.

Jay, you should really read some more about our country's history.

jay_a2j wrote:I think your fear of returning to the days of segregation are simply an over-reaction.

Jay, please read what I wrote again. I said he will not enforce current civil rights laws. Of course we won't return to those days because he could never get away with it. He would be impeached immediately for trying to pull that off by the Congress.

by **freezie** on Tue Nov 06, 2007 10:19 pm

xtratabasco wrote:
luns101 wrote:He may not be He-Man, but you would be wise to follow his counsel.

nice

use the force and do not vote for hillary or another neo-con, there traitors.

The force told me to

Vote: Hillary

by **xtratabasco** on Tue Nov 06, 2007 10:19 pm

go ron go

the only one that can beat hillary in 2008

by **MarketAnarchist** on Tue Nov 06, 2007 10:22 pm

Why not just not vote at all?

Voting in itself presents a huge moral conundrum in regards to individual rights, and with the current corrupt system that permeates our society like a festering wound, being supportive of the electoral process that does not involve voluntary interaction would be and is akin to dropping a social hydrogen bomb.

Also, Ron Paul sucks.

Also, cocks.

by **OnlyAmbrose** on Wed Nov 07, 2007 3:54 am

Update on our class mock-election (in which I am Ron Paul).

The primaries were today. Here's what the tally was:

Republicans
Mitt Romney: 9
Rudy Giuliani: 9
Fred Thompson: 4
John McCain: 2
Ron Paul: 25 BABY!!!!

Democrats
Bill Richardson: 4
Barack Obama: 2
John Edwards: 12
Hillary Clionton: 16

by **Iliad** on Wed Nov 07, 2007 4:01 am

jay_a2j wrote:
Snorri1234 wrote:I always laugh when you seem to say that only Ron Paul is against the Iraq war because it's against the constitution. It's so glaringly obvious that you change your views whenever you feel like it. (Or whenever you find a conservative who you think is the greatestss!)

When you move to this country and become legal age to vote, I will consider your opinion.

jay I would sooner consider an opinion of a Mexican baby then you

ron paul = he man

Who is online