JonBenet Ramsey
Moderator: Community Team
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
- stache hag
- Posts: 147
- Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2006 9:51 pm
- Location: Huntin' for Staches' in Philly.
- stache hag
- Posts: 147
- Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2006 9:51 pm
- Location: Huntin' for Staches' in Philly.
stache hag wrote:Yes, but really, I have no idea if you can or cannot sue in this case, Owl would know.
it's tough, i mean i'm all for free speech - i was chatting to a friend the other day and in teh UK we don;t have free speech - i mean you can;t incite racial or religious hatred, i.e. no Klan rallies. I don;t know if that's a good thing, but the media shouldn't be allowed to get away with what they do. They should be accountable for stuff like this.
HighBorn wrote:well defamation of character is a sueable offense
Yes, but the elements of defamation are:
1. Publication of a false and defamatory statement
Publication simply means telling it to people, whether it be a few or on national TV.
2. Publication was not privileged and was done with fault (malice).
Sop, if it is in a court proceeding or other similar circumstance, it is privileged and no one can get in trouble for that, but aside from that, there has to be MALICE. The speaker has to know that the statement is false and injurious, and make the statement anyway. These people believed the statements about the Ramsey's were true, there is nothing to sue over.
3. Injury occurred.
Well, obviously this is true as it was damaging to them.

- stache hag
- Posts: 147
- Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2006 9:51 pm
- Location: Huntin' for Staches' in Philly.
- Caleb the Cruel
- Posts: 1686
- Joined: Sun May 28, 2006 8:36 pm
- Location: Northern Colorado
- Contact:
stache hag wrote:Let me ask you, Caleb, did/do people in CO believe it was the parents? What was the talk there, closer to where it happened?
At first there was widespread panic in this area because there was supposedly a child killer on the loose
but as time passed and the media started talking everyone thought it was the mother, not some crazy child hunter, they thought the mother was jealous of her daughter because JonBenet was in all these pagents and what not
so people became less afraid because the parents moved to georgia
and the mother did know before her death that there was a suspect in the case
and there have already been at least 6 multi-million lawsuits against the media, 5 settled out of court and the other one thrown out by the judge
there are rumored to be at least another 6 multi-million lawsuits on the way
the ramsey's were rich to begin with, have you seen their old house? and real estate is not cheap to begin with in and around boulder
- stache hag
- Posts: 147
- Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2006 9:51 pm
- Location: Huntin' for Staches' in Philly.
- Caleb the Cruel
- Posts: 1686
- Joined: Sun May 28, 2006 8:36 pm
- Location: Northern Colorado
- Contact:
heavycola wrote:The parents got hounded by the press for years, didn't they? Trial by media and all that. Didn't teh governor of Colortado virtually call them guilty as well? Poor bastards. I hope this means they can sue the shit out of someone.
Patsy Ramsey passed away from cancer. But I guess the father could sue.
THE DEBATE IS OVER...
JESUS SAVES!!!
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
JESUS SAVES!!!
- cowshrptrn
- Posts: 838
- Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 1:15 pm
- Location: wouldn't YOU like to know....
- stache hag
- Posts: 147
- Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2006 9:51 pm
- Location: Huntin' for Staches' in Philly.
wicked wrote:just from the little I've read, I am wondering if it's just a sicko's ploy to get attention (hey that guy belongs HERE!). the freak seemed obsessed with her and avoided questions about what caused JB's death.
Agreed, Wicked. Now that more of the story is coming out, things are seeming weird, and he is starting to seem full of shit. If he is lying, that is so fucking sick.
I'm here for the stache-bang.


- Banana Stomper
- Posts: 422
- Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 4:39 pm
- Location: Richmond, Virginia
- Contact:
yea this guy totally didn't do it, he's just a perv who was fixated on the case.
And i wonder what this guy was doing in thailand.................
And i wonder what this guy was doing in thailand.................
Last edited by Banana Stomper on Fri Aug 18, 2006 4:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Caleb the Cruel
- Posts: 1686
- Joined: Sun May 28, 2006 8:36 pm
- Location: Northern Colorado
- Contact:
I dont know i just dont buy it i really believed it was the mother but of course thats kinda how the media wanted it to look i guess... I mean the guy was a school teacher goodness who is a child abuser these days
All trespassers will be shot on sight. All survivors will then be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Have a nice day!!!
- vtmarik
- Posts: 3863
- Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 9:51 am
- Location: Riding on the waves of fear and loathing.
- Contact:
Well, if Carr isn't the doer, then we all know why he was in Thailand.
If he did kill Ramsey, then Mr. Ramsey has a golden opportunity to sue all the tabloids for lots o' money. It may not be right, but it is opportunity.
If he did kill Ramsey, then Mr. Ramsey has a golden opportunity to sue all the tabloids for lots o' money. It may not be right, but it is opportunity.
Initiate discovery! Fire the Machines! Throw the switch Igor! THROW THE F***ING SWITCH!
- stache hag
- Posts: 147
- Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2006 9:51 pm
- Location: Huntin' for Staches' in Philly.
vtmarik wrote:If he did kill Ramsey, then Mr. Ramsey has a golden opportunity to sue all the tabloids for lots o' money. It may not be right, but it is opportunity.
Not really. Read my post earlier on the requirements to win the suit. Basically, one would have to prove that the tabloids knew that Patsy Ramsey and John Ramsey were not involved, and maliciously pubilshed that they were anyway.

- vtmarik
- Posts: 3863
- Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 9:51 am
- Location: Riding on the waves of fear and loathing.
- Contact:
OwlLawyer wrote:Not really. Read my post earlier on the requirements to win the suit. Basically, one would have to prove that the tabloids knew that Patsy Ramsey and John Ramsey were not involved, and maliciously pubilshed that they were anyway.
Yes, those are the legal requirements.
We all know that the law does not apply if you've got a savvy enough lawyer, look at the idiot who won a suit against McDonalds for spilling hot coffee all over herself.
Initiate discovery! Fire the Machines! Throw the switch Igor! THROW THE F***ING SWITCH!
