Moderator: Community Team
Simonov wrote:i can't believe Bush is leading:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6xsd3qo99M
Napoleon Ier wrote:A fellow man of good taste. rare these days![]()
as for Pinoche,well, I had come up with someoneunder "dictator"cateory, and he was chummy ith JPII and not too badoverall, so...
Norse wrote:Napoleon Ier wrote:A fellow man of good taste. rare these days![]()
as for Pinoche,well, I had come up with someoneunder "dictator"cateory, and he was chummy ith JPII and not too badoverall, so...
Yes, there are not a great deal of people who are able to rise to the challenge, unfortunately.
A sickness within man-kind is the idle-minded.
āMinds, like bodies, will often fall into a pimpled, ill-conditioned state from mere excess of comfort.ā - charles dickens
got tonkaed wrote:admittedly im not as much of a student of dickens as i would assume anyone could be, but given the fact that some of his work seems to suggest writing in a time where people critqued the differences between classes, it seems perhaps more likely that he may have been coming from the perspective that it is excess in the comforts of the wealthy (and by extension conservatism) that makes for the ill conditioned.
got tonkaed wrote:I dont think anyone would suggest that dickens would have advocated a life away from hard work. He certainly worked in most of childhood and lived in a time period of hard work for the majority of people out there. Furthermore he lived in a time period where hard work was expected of people, and it didnt by any means guarantee you anything.
However, you decide to take his quote and apply it to your mindset. Im not saying this is wrong in any sense, but you give up your moral high ground when taking a quote, tying it to your own intellectual point, and then bring it back to its timeperiod when someone points out the potential argument against your stance using the quote.
I dont think anyone on either side argues that people shouldnt work hard and attempt to be competitive as possible. However, one could perhaps argue, that the benefits of being the descendants of those who did work hard, has made you forget the plight of those who did work hard to grant the station which has led to your worldview to create your views.
norse wrote:Now, not that charlie boy has anything to do with my previous post, despite his fantastic quote I used
got tonkaed wrote:norse it does appear to be like you, to take the retreating assertive stance whenever backed into a corner. I unlike you am at least willing to unpack the statements i make, without having to attack you about it.
Norse, i suppose you may miss the point from time to time. Your lineage doesnt need to be rich for it to affect your views. Ive had a fairly middle class upbringing, which has given me the oppertunity to invest in myself to hopefully embetter myself. Through my upbringing i was taught to work hard, and at the same time was capable of seeing the benefits that a good social position would have for me.
You however, given many of your social views, clearly dont seem to recognize the importance of the social position you had. Typically people dont have your libertarian views, without some extra religious attachement, from the working class. You seem to think that everything you did got you where you are, that you were not benefited by the social position that you have been raised in.
Now its not my job to teach you these things norse, and im probably not qualified to do so. But if you want to go on the rest of your life thinking that those people beneath you arent working just as hard as you are, or that youve earned everything that you have ever gotten, then yes you are pretty much right up the alley for a 21st rendition of dickens statement.
Talapus wrote:I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
got tonkaed wrote:Norse the difference between you and I will probably always be, you will look at the world seeking to confirm your worldviews, and i will not be so weak of mind to have to search for that fickle security when im looking at it.
Norse wrote:got tonkaed wrote:Norse the difference between you and I will probably always be, you will look at the world seeking to confirm your worldviews, and i will not be so weak of mind to have to search for that fickle security when im looking at it.
Well, there are leaders, and there are followers.
Norse wrote:got tonkaed wrote:Norse the difference between you and I will probably always be, you will look at the world seeking to confirm your worldviews, and i will not be so weak of mind to have to search for that fickle security when im looking at it.
Well, there are leaders, and there are followers.
Talapus wrote:I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
got tonkaed wrote:Norse wrote:got tonkaed wrote:Norse the difference between you and I will probably always be, you will look at the world seeking to confirm your worldviews, and i will not be so weak of mind to have to search for that fickle security when im looking at it.
Well, there are leaders, and there are followers.
whatever helps you sleep at night sir....
typically leaders display leadership qualities, but i guess we will forget about those in your application.
Norse wrote:Tonky, I could, but quite frankly my visions would be wasted upon you.
got tonkaed wrote:Norse wrote:Tonky, I could, but quite frankly my visions would be wasted upon you.
your garbage for coming back to this thread when we were in the middle of tying things up in the other one, for whats its worth.
Now go find someone to tally up the score for us.
Users browsing this forum: kizkiz