The TOP 12 Players under 40

by **comic boy** on Fri Aug 17, 2007 9:01 pm

Sugar my win percentage has hit 39%
Must lose more games

by **Robinette** on Tue Aug 21, 2007 10:57 pm

UPDATED --- Top 12 under 40%

5 comic boy 3318 844 (39%) new leader
9 maniacmath17 3166 968 (33%)
27 Point Guard 2698 187 (29%) only 12 games and 302 points from 3000 in under 200 games (gulp)
28 Robinette 2691 316 (35%)
34 ZawBanjito 2637 444 (32%)

47 Matt2006 2565 881 (35%)
51 DP07 2502 256 (37%)
52 cyberdaniel 2500 691 (28%)
53 Craig25 2493 267 (39%)
70 NUKE 2414 518 (26%)

73 kumften 2395 236 (39%)
74 artur1 2391 257 (39%)

by **Robinette** on Sat Sep 01, 2007 12:11 pm

UPDATED --- Top 12 under 40%

4 comic boy 3389 875 337 (39%)
8 maniacmath17 3216 978 318 (33%)
21 ZawBanjito 2825 450 146 (32%) Moving up
27 Point Guard 2724 192 56 (29%) only 7 games and 276 points from 3000 in under 200 games (gulp)
39 Robinette 2606 321 110 (34%)

47 DP07 2538 263 97 (37%)
51 wacicha 2505 2894 986 (34%)
53 Matt2006 2487 904 311 (34%)
62 RL_Orange 2439 1712 478 (28%)
66 cyberdaniel 2416 696 192 (28%)

70 MikeZoo 2403 690 223 (32%)
73 Freebyrd1977 2376 464 123 (27%)

by **JOHNNYROCKET24** on Sat Sep 01, 2007 1:05 pm

1 more % and comic boy comes off

all those team games lately has moved you into the number 1 spot as your percentage grew up to 39%. just curious to see how you respond to staying on this chart. do you continue playing the same team games and come off or do you start back in with just singles ? or do you keep it balanced? play half and half. Lose the singles but win the team games which will maintain the 39% for you.

good luck with your decission !

by **comic boy** on Sat Sep 01, 2007 1:35 pm

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:1 more % and comic boy comes off all those team games lately has moved you into the number 1 spot as your percentage grew up to 39%. just curious to see how you respond to staying on this chart. do you continue playing the same team games and come off or do you start back in with just singles ? or do you keep it balanced? play half and half. Lose the singles but win the team games which will maintain the 39% for you.

good luck with your decission !

Believe it or not I dont actually consider the percentages, I play approx 75% singles and 25% team because basically I prefer singles,doubt that has changed much in the last couple of months. If I played more teams then I would no doubt fall of this list but overall probably gain more points so its a double edged sword really. Having said that I have cut down my games recently so the team games will probably rise to about 40% but I will still have the all time top singles score and that wont be easy to beat. You know yourself how difficult it is to maintain a score over 3000 so if I can stay around that and still play the type Of games I enjoy then I will be content.

by **Robinette** on Thu Sep 06, 2007 9:10 pm

UPDATED --- Top 12 under 40%

4 comic boy 3316 884 340 (38%)
6 maniacmath17 3216 978 318 (33%)
23 ZawBanjito 2770 453 147 (32%)
28 Point Guard 2724 192 56 (29%) yikes 7 games and 276 points from 3000 in under 200 games
33 RL_Orange 2671 1728 484 (28%)

40 Robinette 2606 321 110 (34%)
45 DP07 2566 265 98 (37%)
55 Matt2006 2487 904 311 (34%)
60 rabbiton 2447 317 97 (31%)
72 cyberdaniel 2416 696 192 (28%)

73 hwhrhett 2412 1858 725 (39%)
75 Freebyrd1977 2409 471 126 (27%)

and 4 more, waiting to bump somebody
77 Uberwald 2406 561 218 (39%)
78 MikeZoo 2403 690 223 (32%)
80 papapanther 2395 366 135 (37%)
84 kumften 2366 247 96 (39%)

by **DiM** on Thu Sep 06, 2007 9:45 pm

Robinette wrote:UPDATED --- Top 12 under 40%

4 comic boy 3316 884 340 (38%)
6 maniacmath17 3216 978 318 (33%)
23 ZawBanjito 2770 453 147 (32%)
28 Point Guard 2724 192 56 (29%) yikes 8 games and 276 points from 3000 in under 200 games
33 RL_Orange 2671 1728 484 (28%)

40 Robinette 2606 321 110 (34%)
45 DP07 2566 265 98 (37%)
55 Matt2006 2487 904 311 (34%)
69 Freebyrd1977 2431 470 126 (27%)
72 cyberdaniel 2416 696 192 (28%)

73 hwhrhett 2412 1858 725 (39%)
76 Uberwald 2406 561 218 (39%)

by **rabbiton** on Thu Sep 06, 2007 10:11 pm

ahem.

perhaps you missed me:

60 rabbiton 2447 317 97 (31%)

never played a teams game.

by **Robinette** on Thu Sep 06, 2007 10:21 pm

rabbiton wrote:ahem.

perhaps you missed me:

60 rabbiton 2447 317 97 (31%)

never played a teams game.

Did I miss it? or did you just win a few?
In any case, Well Done!
And you've been added!

by **Robinette** on Thu Sep 06, 2007 10:31 pm

DiM wrote:
Robinette wrote:...
28 Point Guard 2724 192 56 (29%) yikes ??? games and 276 points from 3000 in under 200 games
...

Robinette math
192 + 7 = 199 = UNDER 200 games = CORRECT

Dim math
192 + 8 = 200 ... which is not UNDER 200 games = ERROR

by **DiM** on Fri Sep 07, 2007 8:31 am

Robinette wrote:
DiM wrote:
Robinette wrote:...
28 Point Guard 2724 192 56 (29%) yikes ??? games and 276 points from 3000 in under 200 games
...

Robinette math
192 + 7 = 199 = UNDER 200 games = CORRECT

Dim math
192 + 8 = 200 ... which is not UNDER 200 games = ERROR

DiM's posting hour 05:45 AM. :roll:

05:45 AM = brain dead :lol:

by **Robinette** on Sat Sep 22, 2007 8:50 pm

UPDATED --- Top 12 under 40%

3 comic boy 3555 930 361 (39%)
9 maniacmath17 3167 980 318 (32%)
21 Point Guard 2818 193 57 (30%) 6 games and 181 points from 3000 in under 200 games
23 RL_Orange 2774 1817 510 (28%)
36 ZawBanjito 2655 465 150 (32%)

44 rabbiton 2599 327 102 (31%)
52 papapanther 2530 402 152 (38%)
53 subprime 2526 127 47 (37%) 72 games and 474 points from 3000 in under 200 games
54 Uberwald 2519 562 219 (39%)
56 austex 2507 416 147 (35%)

59 Matt2006 2500 909 312 (34%)
61 Robinette 2497 327 110 (34%)

and 6 more, waiting to bump somebody

64 DP07 2483 269 99 (37%)
66 Freebyrd1977 2455 493 131 (27%)
78 cyberdaniel 2398 717 196 (27%)
79 KLOBBER 2394 429 133 (31%)
83 Naato 2381 269 98 (36%)
87 Lector 2372 136 43 (32%)

by **DiM** on Sat Sep 22, 2007 9:23 pm

one quick question. why was the 40% or below win rate a criteria?
is that to show those are singles only players? or that they get more points per win?

because for example i have over 80% singles and yet i have a win of 48% plus i will never play team games ever.

the point is there might be better singles players than those listed by you. players with better percentages. not me of course cause i have a lower score but maybe others.

by **Robinette** on Sat Sep 22, 2007 10:50 pm

DiM wrote:one quick question. why was the 40% or below win rate a criteria?
is that to show those are singles only players? or that they get more points per win?

because for example i have over 80% singles and yet i have a win of 48% plus i will never play team games ever.

the point is there might be better singles players than those listed by you. players with better percentages. not me of course cause i have a lower score but maybe others.

Fair question...
Top 10 Highest Singles Players Scores (without team points)
can be found here:
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... sc&start=0

It was simply too much bother to keep that updated...
and the under 40% produces a "similar" result with no effort.
Yes... it's flawed, but just maybe the Easter update of 2012 will include two scoreboards, one for singles and one for team scores.

by **hulmey** on Sun Sep 23, 2007 4:18 am

why does th elist keep getting longer and longer. First it started with 12 and then 12 + 2 and 12 + 4 and now 12 + 6......Is this so you dont fall over the list?

by **DiM** on Sun Sep 23, 2007 9:30 am

Robinette wrote:
DiM wrote:one quick question. why was the 40% or below win rate a criteria?
is that to show those are singles only players? or that they get more points per win?

because for example i have over 80% singles and yet i have a win of 48% plus i will never play team games ever.

the point is there might be better singles players than those listed by you. players with better percentages. not me of course cause i have a lower score but maybe others.

Fair question...
Top 10 Highest Singles Players Scores (without team points)
can be found here:
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... sc&start=0

It was simply too much bother to keep that updated...
and the under 40% produces a "similar" result with no effort.
Yes... it's flawed, but just maybe the Easter update of 2012 will include two scoreboards, one for singles and one for team scores.

considering the points i'd have to be on that list in your link.
i have exactly 2184 points without team games

but considering the win% i shouldn't be :roll:

by **Scott-Land** on Sun Sep 23, 2007 7:05 pm

ive been over 2600 at one point and was at 2550+ last week -- Robin. not exactly a great score but nonetheless

by **negoeien** on Sun Sep 23, 2007 7:13 pm

Hey robinette, that's a hot list mate.
Although:
A: I'm a true single player kinda guy, but have an occasional doubles(like 5-10% of my games)
and B: I don't play a lot of elitists are whatever, I just enjoy playing against a wide range of players. Therefore my win ratio is above 40%.
Am I excluded now?

Not that I'm in the top 12 for now, but I was like 5 days ago.

by **Robinette** on Mon Sep 24, 2007 1:11 am

DiM, Scott land, Neogien....

I hear what you are saying...
and to get this right there would need to be 2 scoreboards, one for our team scores and one for our singles scores.

This latest "under 40%" list made it easy, but I have to agree that it has just too many shortcomings... and the 1st method was simply no good due to the effort required and the restrictions as to who was eligible.

Sooooo.... here's what I've come up with...
A Top 10 List that doesn't exclude anybody no matter how many team games they choose to play, and gives a reasonable representation of their standings in the singles world...

It works like this... Simply deduct 3 points from your current score for every team game you have ever played. And there is your "Singles Score"... SIMPLE and FAIR, in a lame sort of way...

Pretty lame that we have to do it this way... hopefully technology will be applied to CC scoring BEFORE we become the laughing stock of internet gaming sites...

by **Robinette** on Mon Sep 24, 2007 1:17 am

This is a copy of the New Top 10 Highest Scores (without Team points) which can be found here: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=15958

Sept 23, 2007

A NEW way to list the
Top 10 Highest Singles Players Scores
(without team points*)

*What has changed is that ALL players are eligible...
Any WIN %, Any SINGLES %, Any TEAM %...
Just take your current score and deduct 3 points for every team game...
If you still have over 2000 then post it here with the details...

Here is what I've got so far:

....................... current score ...... current ....... highest ..... current.......
.......................... adjusted ............ score........... score ....... overall......
...................... for team games .......................... ever ........ ranking.....

1. maniacmath. . . . 2873. . . . . . . . 3167. . . . . . .3514 . . . . . #9 . . . . 980/98/294
2. Point Guard . . . . 2809 . . . . . . . .2818 . . . . . . 2818 . . . . . #19 . . . 193/3/9
3. Lazaruslong . . . .2796 . . . . . . . .2943 . . . . . . 3267 . . . . . #14 . . . .536/49/147
4. comic boy . . . . . 2636 . . . . . . . .3626 . . . . . . 3626 . . . . . #3 . . . . 933/330/990
5. ZawBanjito. . . . . 2514 . . . . . . . .2640. . . . . . .2930 . . . . . #37 . . . 466/42/126

6. Kid_A . . . . . . . . . 2445 . . . . . . . .2625 . . . . . . 2625 . . . . . #39 . . . .778/60/180
7. Robinette. . . . . . 2410 . . . . . . . . 2497 . . . . . . 3021 . . . . . #59 . . . 327/29/87
8. RL_Orange . . . . 2404 . . . . . . . . 2551 . . . . . . ???? . . . . . #49 . . . 1825/49/147
9. Cyberdaniel . . . .2323 . . . . . . . . 2446 . . . . . . 3145 . . . . . #70 . . . 720/41/123
10. sully800 . . . . . 2218 . . . . . . . . 2236 . . . . . . 2650 . . . . . #141 . . 260/6/18

Last 3 numbers on the right = Total games / Team games / Point adjustment

These players fell short, but we will keep their info ready to use later:

DiM . . . . . . . . . .2104 . . . . . . . .2239 . . . . . . ???? . . . . . #138 . . . 227/45/135
artur1 . . . . . . . 2052. . . . . . . . .2184 . . . . . . 2713 . . . . . #172 . . 285/44/132
Scott-Land . . . . . 2018 . . . . . . . .2246 . . . . . . 2551 . . . . #132 . . . 941/76/228
Nuke. . . . . . . . . .1916 . . . . . . . .1949 . . . . . . 3160 . . . . . #383 . . . 546/11/33
negoeien . . . . . . 1914 . . . . . . . .2058 . . . . . . ???? . . . . . #254 . . . 489/48/144
steve monkey . . .1910 . . . . . . . .1985 . . . . . . 2820 . . . . . #341 . . . 1173/25/75

by **DiM** on Mon Sep 24, 2007 6:06 am

Robinette wrote:Just take your current score and deduct 3 points for every team game...

why deduct 3 points for every team game?

here are my scores:

points with team games in all finished games: 2208
points with team games including active terminator games (where i made some kills): 2239
points without team games in all finished games: 2184
points without team games including active terminator games (where i made some kills): 2215
highest with team games: 2297
highest without team games: 2273

the funny thing is that i have lost 90 points in doubs and gained 114 in trips so overall my team games only got me 24 points. yeah i'm lousy at team games :lol:

so basically in your chart i should be:

Code: Select all: DiM . . . . . . . . . .2215 . . . . . . . .2239 . . . . . . 2297 . . . . . #138 . . . ???/???/???

just 3 points short of #10 :lol:

by **Robinette** on Mon Sep 24, 2007 9:32 am

DiM wrote:
Robinette wrote:Just take your current score and deduct 3 points for every team game...

why deduct 3 points for every team game?

here are my scores:

points with team games in all finished games: 2208
points with team games including active terminator games (where i made some kills): 2239
points without team games in all finished games: 2184
points without team games including active terminator games (where i made some kills): 2215
highest with team games: 2297
highest without team games: 2273

the funny thing is that i have lost 90 points in doubs and gained 114 in trips so overall my team games only got me 24 points. yeah i'm lousy at team games

so basically in your chart i should be:

Code: Select all
DiM . . . . . . . . . .2215 . . . . . . . .2239 . . . . . . 2297 . . . . . #138 . . . ???/???/???

just 3 points short of #10

Sorry DiM... my bad, this should posted in the Top 10 Singles Scores without Team Points...
This thread should remain for the under 40% crowd...

Robinette wrote:UPDATED --- Top 12 under 40%

3 comic boy 3555 930 361 (39%)
9 maniacmath17 3167 980 318 (32%)
21 Point Guard 2818 193 57 (30%) 6 games and 181 points from 3000 in under 200 games
23 RL_Orange 2774 1817 510 (28%)
36 ZawBanjito 2655 465 150 (32%)

44 rabbiton 2599 327 102 (31%)
52 papapanther 2530 402 152 (38%)
53 subprime 2526 127 47 (37%) 72 games and 474 points from 3000 in under 200 games
54 Uberwald 2519 562 219 (39%)
56 austex 2507 416 147 (35%)

59 Matt2006 2500 909 312 (34%)
61 Robinette 2497 327 110 (34%)

by **Robinette** on Sat Oct 06, 2007 12:10 pm

UPDATED 10/6

UPDATED --- Top 12 under 40%

2 comic boy 3586 940 365 (39%)
3 maniacmath17 3394 992 323 (33%)
20 Point Guard 2818 193 57 (30%) 6 games and 182 points from 3000 in under 200 games
26 Naato 2728 295 110 (37%)
40 ZawBanjito 2604 472 151 (32%)

45 rabbiton 2577 334 104 (31%)
48 Scott-Land 2545 999 300 (30%)
51 austex 2535 425 149 (35%)
52 RL_Orange 2533 1885 526 (28%)
55 Robinette 2515 330 111 (34%)

66 Matt2006 2478 910 312 (34%)
67 Uberwald 2470 564 219 (39%)

(ps... this thread is looking for a sponsor to keep it updated)

by **Robinette** on Wed Nov 07, 2007 9:23 pm

UPDATED 11/7/07

UPDATED --- Top 12 under 40%

2 comic boy 3532 942 365 (39%)
5 maniacmath17 3267 1013 330 (33%)
14 austex 3043 460 163 (35%)
21 Scott-Land 2830 1116 356 (32%)
22 hermanitor 2819 467 181 (39%)

26 Point Guard 2775 200 58 (29%)
48 Naato 2619 370 130 (35%)
51 Robinette 2600 339 113 (33%)
52 NUKE 2588 619 162 (26%)
57 DP07 2564 296 111 (38%)

70 ZawBanjito 2493 485 152 (31%)
73 subprime 2470 229 86 (38%)

by **Uberwald** on Thu Nov 15, 2007 2:19 am

Aawww no updates lately?

The TOP 12 Players under 40

Who is online