1756206421
1756206421 Conquer Club • View topic - The PS3, the downfall of sony, TRUE?!
Conquer Club

The PS3, the downfall of sony, TRUE?!

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Will this blasted contraption be the end of Sony?!

 
Total votes : 0

Postby Titanic on Sun Aug 26, 2007 2:55 pm

It wont be the downfall of Sony because the company can pay off any debts the PS3 brings. However, its could easily be the beggining of the end for the Sony gaming section because it has been outsold by the 360 and the Wii by 2:1, and has been heavily criticised.
User avatar
Major Titanic
 
Posts: 1558
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 12:58 pm
Location: Northampton, UK

Postby Blastshot on Sun Aug 26, 2007 3:14 pm

Titanic wrote:It wont be the downfall of Sony because the company can pay off any debts the PS3 brings. However, its could easily be the beggining of the end for the Sony gaming section because it has been outsold by the 360 and the Wii by 2:1, and has been heavily criticised.

The guy who said PS3 is in its infancy has a point, the last statistics i heard were that the PS3 is using very little of its complete capacity for games. I HEARD it was under 50%(True?). But by January 08,games on the PS3 will be twice, up to 3 times bigger than Xbox games. Twice as big as the Wii.
If someone described asked me to describe myself in one word, that word would be: Rocker
User avatar
Private Blastshot
 
Posts: 325
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 10:23 am
Location: A little town, in a medium state, from a large country

Postby AndyDufresne on Sun Aug 26, 2007 3:42 pm

PS3 won't be the downfall of sony, as the company, last time I checked, is quite a conglomerate with many other assets and resources. They may stray away from console gaming, but they'll still be making millions and millions, and they'll be laughing all the way to the bank.


--Andy
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class AndyDufresne
 
Posts: 24935
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo

Postby unriggable on Sun Aug 26, 2007 3:56 pm

Really? I hear they have shit products, just the other day my dad bought a CD player from them and it didn't work on the car ride home. Traded it in for a different one, same problem. They need to stop jacking off Blu-Ray and get with the program.
Image
User avatar
Cook unriggable
 
Posts: 8037
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:49 pm

Postby AndyDufresne on Sun Aug 26, 2007 4:09 pm

I didn't say anything about their products being top of the line or good...or bad, etc. I'm simply saying, they'll still make millions and millions just because of the brand name. The company won't take much of a hit at all.


--Andy
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class AndyDufresne
 
Posts: 24935
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo

Postby Strife on Sun Aug 26, 2007 4:22 pm

Utafar wrote:
Coleman wrote:This is stupid, get a Wii, they both suck. The only reason to get 360 is Halo 3, and there is no reason to get a PS3.


lmfao HALO 3 FTW

Theirs so many reasons to get a PS3 Heres my Favorite Killzone 2
Corporal Strife
 
Posts: 2668
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 3:24 pm
Location: Now something has kept me here too long.

Postby static_ice on Sun Aug 26, 2007 5:40 pm

yes it could be the downfall of sony's game division.

It costs sony about $900 to make a PS3.

Blu-ray will not win.

Sony keeps making stupid remarks at press conferences.

Sony sucks at exclusivity. ATM there is one good exclusive game. Sure there are a few exclusive titles in the making right now, but nowhere near enough to pull sony out of the hole. And sony doesn't look to good right now to nab that many exclusives in the future.

Microsoft and Nintendo are both pulling the big guns in this generation.

that is all for now :)
R.I.P. Chef
User avatar
Sergeant static_ice
 
Posts: 9174
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 8:51 am

Postby DirtyDishSoap on Sun Aug 26, 2007 6:27 pm

Strife wrote:
Utafar wrote:
Coleman wrote:This is stupid, get a Wii, they both suck. The only reason to get 360 is Halo 3, and there is no reason to get a PS3.


lmfao HALO 3 FTW

Theirs so many reasons to get a PS3 Heres my Favorite Killzone 2
Killzone was HORRIBLE
Dukasaur wrote:
saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.

Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.

ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class DirtyDishSoap
 
Posts: 9263
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 7:42 pm

Postby DirtyDishSoap on Sun Aug 26, 2007 6:31 pm

Minister Masket wrote:
DirtyDishSoap wrote:well i only had access to what EB downloaded

off the top of my head

Motor Storm
Armored Core 4
Virtual Fighter (5 or 4 i forgot where they left off)
and Genji (which was fucking awesome lol)

Most of em took at least 1-2 minutes to load up the actual demo

for what they had on a 360
Virtual Tennis
Guitar Hero 2
Some gardening game...i have no idea

Virtual Tennis took the same amount of time to load maybe even more
the other two i simply clicked and 30 seconds later its loaded up.


Well ive never played Resistance Fall of Man, although granted i want to, i just dont own a PS3
Played and beaten GoW, awesome game, ran pretty smooth, no complaints.

:roll: You like Genji!? Please don't remind me of the GIANT ENEMY CRAB.
The games you listed are pretty rubbish, which is normal for a launch line-up. The real difference will come next year, when developers actually spread their wings.
Dude how could you have trouble against the giant crab, all you needed to do was bring out that big guy power up your club and in 2 hits the guy is dead, You shame me with your poor gameplay skills!
Dukasaur wrote:
saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.

Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.

ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class DirtyDishSoap
 
Posts: 9263
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 7:42 pm

Postby static_ice on Sun Aug 26, 2007 6:31 pm

DirtyDishSoap wrote:
Strife wrote:
Utafar wrote:
Coleman wrote:This is stupid, get a Wii, they both suck. The only reason to get 360 is Halo 3, and there is no reason to get a PS3.


lmfao HALO 3 FTW

Theirs so many reasons to get a PS3 Heres my Favorite Killzone 2
Killzone was HORRIBLE


yeah it was, but the sonyholics are sacrificing children in ritual of the trailer for the sequel, they have their hopes up for that one.
R.I.P. Chef
User avatar
Sergeant static_ice
 
Posts: 9174
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 8:51 am

Postby Avron on Sun Aug 26, 2007 11:16 pm

Minister Masket wrote:
DirtyDishSoap wrote::lol: , i played both the 360 and the PS3, hell i even compared em at EB games, the motherfucker runs slower then the 360, you can either
A. Believe in paperwork
B. Actually open up your eyes
Ok, just what games were you playing? I compared Resistance on PS3, to Gears of War on 360, and Resistance ran much, much faster. Especially online.


You tard, fucking compare games that are on both consoles. I wont even get into this argument because all end it.
Corporal Avron
 
Posts: 1392
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 5:35 pm
Location: Breaking it Down

Postby Psilocbin on Sun Aug 26, 2007 11:38 pm

Minister Masket wrote:
DirtyDishSoap wrote::lol: , i played both the 360 and the PS3, hell i even compared em at EB games, the motherfucker runs slower then the 360, you can either
A. Believe in paperwork
B. Actually open up your eyes
Ok, just what games were you playing? I compared Resistance on PS3, to Gears of War on 360, and Resistance ran much, much faster. Especially online.


Those aren't the same game.....maybe you should compare the same games.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/fallenepitaph = My photos.
I love my little XT/350D/Kiss N.
draca wrote:Psilocbin, u the stuipedest person on here at the moment....
User avatar
Cadet Psilocbin
 
Posts: 614
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 9:22 pm
Location: CALIFORNIA

Postby sharrakor on Mon Aug 27, 2007 8:49 am

Sony has been losing money ever since the release of the PS2, people just didn't realise it. Now, they're on a crash course with bankruptcy.

PS3's the best. :lol:
User avatar
Corporal sharrakor
 
Posts: 178
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 2:18 pm

Postby qeee1 on Mon Aug 27, 2007 10:57 am

sharrakor wrote:Sony has been losing money ever since the release of the PS2, people just didn't realise it. Now, they're on a crash course with bankruptcy.

PS3's the best. :lol:


I'm pretty sure the PS2 was a profitable venture for Sony overall. They sold at a loss originally I think, but I don't think it remained that way for long.

However even despite Microsoft's seeming success they're still running at a huge loss. I can't see Microsoft sticking out another generation unless they turn profitable before the end of this one. Well maybe one more generation. They've gained a hell of a lot of market share this gen and probably don't want to throw all their efforts away.

PS3 is also currently losing money, but Sony seem to have tighter control on their spending than Microsoft generally so they'll probably turn that around. Nintendo are the only ones in the market making money right now.
Frigidus wrote:but now that it's become relatively popular it's suffered the usual downturn in coolness.
User avatar
Colonel qeee1
 
Posts: 2904
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:43 pm
Location: Ireland

Postby Psilocbin on Mon Aug 27, 2007 10:58 am

They don't have to make profit, they can still afford it.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/fallenepitaph = My photos.
I love my little XT/350D/Kiss N.
draca wrote:Psilocbin, u the stuipedest person on here at the moment....
User avatar
Cadet Psilocbin
 
Posts: 614
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 9:22 pm
Location: CALIFORNIA

Postby static_ice on Mon Aug 27, 2007 1:14 pm

yeah they can afford it but when they realize that they're no point in keeping it because there's no hope for profit in the future they'll have to drop it
R.I.P. Chef
User avatar
Sergeant static_ice
 
Posts: 9174
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 8:51 am

Postby Minister Masket on Mon Aug 27, 2007 1:42 pm

Psilocbin wrote:
Minister Masket wrote:
DirtyDishSoap wrote::lol: , i played both the 360 and the PS3, hell i even compared em at EB games, the motherfucker runs slower then the 360, you can either
A. Believe in paperwork
B. Actually open up your eyes
Ok, just what games were you playing? I compared Resistance on PS3, to Gears of War on 360, and Resistance ran much, much faster. Especially online.


Those aren't the same game.....maybe you should compare the same games.

Alright.
Oblivion is on both consoles. And I've seen it played on both consoles.
It does look better (albeit, slightly) on the PS3.
Victrix Fortuna Sapientia

Image
User avatar
Private Minister Masket
 
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 2:24 pm
Location: On The Brink

Postby firth4eva on Mon Aug 27, 2007 2:25 pm

Minister Masket wrote:
Psilocbin wrote:
Minister Masket wrote:
DirtyDishSoap wrote::lol: , i played both the 360 and the PS3, hell i even compared em at EB games, the motherfucker runs slower then the 360, you can either
A. Believe in paperwork
B. Actually open up your eyes
Ok, just what games were you playing? I compared Resistance on PS3, to Gears of War on 360, and Resistance ran much, much faster. Especially online.


Those aren't the same game.....maybe you should compare the same games.

Alright.
Oblivion is on both consoles. And I've seen it played on both consoles.
It does look better (albeit, slightly) on the PS3.

QFT
User avatar
Captain firth4eva
 
Posts: 6188
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:20 am

Previous

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users