NEW GAME TYPE: 2 on 1 games CHALLENGE: ANY FLAWS?

[Koronna]

Suggestion: a game type when 2 people can challenge one player to a match

Specifics
Territories:
20% neutral
20% team player A
20% Team player B
40% The ONE

Turns:
1 Team Player A
The ONE
Team Player B
(repeat)
OR
2. The ONE
Team Player A
Team Player B
(repeat)
OR
3. Team PLayer B
THe ONE
Team Player A
(repeat)
OR
4. The ONE
Team Player B
Team PLayer A

Points:
The ONE wins: (Team PLayer A points +Team PLayer B points) / The ONE points * 20
The ONE loses:(Team PLayer A points +Team PLayer B points) / The ONE points * 20 DIVIDED BY 2 to each player

Creating a Game
The creator of the game will be the ONE, and two empty slots will be for the Team PLayers.

[Coleman]

I think the turn order for 2v1 would need to be.

Team Member A
The One
Team Member B
The One
[repeat]

or

The One
Team Member A
The One
Team Member B
[repeat]

[Koronna]

i agree, the turns will be treated as if in a teams game.

[Rocketry]

a similar idea to this came up a little while ago - sounds good.

[misterman10]

a similar idea to this came up a little while ago - sounds good.

that was my 3v1 idea, which was a bit different. However from that thread I doubt this new game option will be implemented

[Rocketry]

a similar idea to this came up a little while ago - sounds good.

that was my 3v1 idea, which was a bit different. However from that thread I doubt this new game option will be implemented

lol thats right - i supported your idea as well.

i played a triples game the other day when a guy on my team deadbeated. We were in a bad way but made a wonderful comback. Its not often you get the chance to do this and these games would give you the opporunity.

Rocketry

[misterman10]

Heres the link to my old idea

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=22515

[Koronna]

Heres the link to my old idea

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=22515

hm...I think this suggestion will work, because it solves many problems with your original 3v1 idea: balance. 2v1 will be much more balanced than 3v1, solving many of the cards, turns, bonus problems etc

[dominationnation]

i susgested this a while ago. I hope that it is implemented

[Koronna]

I have come up with a set of rules for this new game type (learning from misterman10 ), hope you can help me find any flaws in the plan or support!

[MR. Nate]

You should have whoever started the game be the 1, otherwise, cooks are going to team up & trap newbies.

[Keredrex]

I think the turn order for 2v1 would need to be.

Team Member A
The One
Team Member B
The One
[repeat]

or

The One
Team Member A
The One
Team Member B
[repeat]

I agree Order should be based on team..
Essentially Team 1 (The one ) then Team 2 - 1 player Repeat

On a side note and it probably will never happen but i would like to see... 9 players... 3 teams of 3 or better 12 4 teams of 3 or 3 teams of 4

[Koronna]

On a side note and it probably will never happen but i would like to see... 9 players... 3 teams of 3 or better 12 4 teams of 3 or 3 teams of 4

I believe this would give the ONE too much advantage, this was discussed in misterman10's original plan....

Lackattack is currently working on 4 v 4 games, but haven't heard of 3 v3 v3 ....sounds good

And personally I see no reason why this type shouldn't be implented, unless there's a fatal problem, which hasn't been brought up yet.

[Optimus Prime]

I think that it might also be worthwhile to have a block in place to prevent New Recruits from creating these games, otherwise they will more than likely get taken advantage of in the end.

[AndyDufresne]

For right now, 9 player games won't be on the radar. We first have to find the right colors to display the additional two players if 8 player games are ever added.


--Andy