1756198867
1756198868 Conquer Club • View topic - Restrict Flame Wars to New Posters
Conquer Club

Restrict Flame Wars to New Posters

Suggestions that have been archived.

Moderator: Community Team

Restrict Flame Wars to New Posters

Postby misterman10 on Mon Aug 06, 2007 8:34 pm

* Suggestion Idea: I think we should hide the flame wars from new posters.

* Specifics: Users who have less than 100 posts won't be able to see or enter the flame wars forum

* Why it is needed: Too many times I see new posters enter flame wars and they either get completely owned or seriously offended. This makes them less confident as posters and ultimately leads them to leaving the forums, and perhaps even leaving CC altogether. By not being able to enter the flame wars, they will feel more accepted into the forums and it will encourage them to continue posting.



Thoughts?
Pleasant Chaps still suck cock.

Yakuza power.
User avatar
Major misterman10
 
Posts: 9412
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 1:48 pm
Location: Out on the Pitch.

Postby treefiddy on Mon Aug 06, 2007 10:22 pm

Some people thrive on flaming others. While it may be a deterrent for some, it could be a draw for others. The comment for the forum already says it's not for the easily offended.

My suggestion would be to change the name to "Swear Wars". There normally isn't any good flaming going on; just people swearing as much as possible.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class treefiddy
 
Posts: 407
Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 11:37 am

Postby Coleman on Tue Aug 07, 2007 7:22 am

Feeling guilty Misterman? :P

On topic. I don't think this is a bad idea, but I have no idea if this current forum program can do that automatically or not. If not I don't think any mod wants to take the time to handle it manually.
Warning: You may be reading a really old topic.
User avatar
Sergeant Coleman
 
Posts: 5402
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 10:36 pm
Location: Midwest

Postby misterman10 on Tue Aug 07, 2007 11:10 am

Coleman wrote:Feeling guilty Misterman? :P

On topic. I don't think this is a bad idea, but I have no idea if this current forum program can do that automatically or not. If not I don't think any mod wants to take the time to handle it manually.

I don't even go to flame wars that often anymore, but with the recent events with Honibaz and others I think my idea would be good

Honibaz
Pleasant Chaps still suck cock.

Yakuza power.
User avatar
Major misterman10
 
Posts: 9412
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 1:48 pm
Location: Out on the Pitch.

Postby AndyDufresne on Tue Aug 07, 2007 11:12 am

I'm no expert with phpBB forums, but I think restricting access like that is either nearly impossible or impossible. :)

Perhaps the next update from phpBB will have something similar. Go check out their forums and ask around!


--Andy
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class AndyDufresne
 
Posts: 24935
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo

Postby Kaplowitz on Tue Aug 07, 2007 11:44 am

AndyDufresne wrote:I'm no expert with phpBB forums, but I think restricting access like that is either nearly impossible or impossible. :)

Perhaps the next update from phpBB will have something similar. Go check out their forums and ask around!


--Andy


i think that its very simple


if i am correct:

just make a forum rank (for example "frequent poster") with a requirement of 100 posts. (Everyone with 100 posts or more will automatically be given the rank. i think it says it right under the avatar. This is only a rank for the forums.) Then make it so that the Flame Wars is only visible to people with that rank.

A while back, i created a forum for me and a few friends....unfortunatly it was spammed by 1000's of advertisements. We got about 100 new members a day with one message each, an advertisement.....it was horribe!

back to the subject: i think that its a good idea. Maybe say somewhere in the forum that the Flame Wars exists so that the newcommers will not be confused (or in some cases it will give them something to look forward to).

(i like to write in parenthesis)

misterman10 wrote:I don't even go to flame wars that often anymore, but with the recent events with Honibaz and others I think my idea would be good


my only two posts in the flame wars are about Honibaz.
Last edited by Kaplowitz on Tue Aug 07, 2007 11:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
Private 1st Class Kaplowitz
 
Posts: 3088
Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 5:11 pm

Postby Keebs2674 on Tue Aug 07, 2007 11:53 am

Don't you mean "Restrict Flame Wars to Non-New Posters"?
Captain Keebs2674
 
Posts: 107
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 8:48 am

Postby wcaclimbing on Tue Aug 07, 2007 12:02 pm

AndyDufresne wrote:I'm no expert with phpBB forums, but I think restricting access like that is either nearly impossible or impossible. :)

Perhaps the next update from phpBB will have something similar. Go check out their forums and ask around!


--Andy


That is VERY easy to do. Just do what Kaplowitz said.

Everyone would have a title under their name, which might get annoying, though.

I vote NO. let the n00bs get owned in Flame Wars.
Image
User avatar
Private 1st Class wcaclimbing
 
Posts: 5598
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 10:09 pm
Location: In your quantum box....Maybe.

Postby AndyDufresne on Tue Aug 07, 2007 12:06 pm

We'd like to keep the forum 'rankless' though. That is why it is currently off. We'd have to turn it on...something we'd rather not do. Thus the impossibility.


--Andy
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class AndyDufresne
 
Posts: 24935
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo

Postby Coleman on Tue Aug 07, 2007 12:15 pm

AndyDufresne wrote:We'd like to keep the forum 'rankless' though. That is why it is currently off. We'd have to turn it on...something we'd rather not do. Thus the impossibility.


--Andy


I wish things I didn't want were impossible.
Warning: You may be reading a really old topic.
User avatar
Sergeant Coleman
 
Posts: 5402
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 10:36 pm
Location: Midwest

Postby gimil on Tue Aug 07, 2007 12:16 pm

AndyDufresne wrote:We'd like to keep the forum 'rankless' though. That is why it is currently off. We'd have to turn it on...something we'd rather not do. Thus the impossibility.


--Andy


technically possible. Your choosing to make it difficult :wink:

why don't you want the ranks on?
What do you know about map making, bitch?

natty_dread wrote:I was wrong


Top Score:2403
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class gimil
 
Posts: 8599
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:42 pm
Location: United Kingdom (Scotland)

Postby Phobia on Tue Aug 07, 2007 12:20 pm

gimil wrote:
AndyDufresne wrote:We'd like to keep the forum 'rankless' though. That is why it is currently off. We'd have to turn it on...something we'd rather not do. Thus the impossibility.


--Andy


technically possible. Your choosing to make it difficult :wink:

why don't you want the ranks on?


Because it would encourage even more people to spam their way to higher post counts, and higher ranks.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Phobia
 
Posts: 1497
Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 2:11 pm
Location: Sheffield, England

Postby gimil on Tue Aug 07, 2007 12:44 pm

Phobia wrote:
gimil wrote:
AndyDufresne wrote:We'd like to keep the forum 'rankless' though. That is why it is currently off. We'd have to turn it on...something we'd rather not do. Thus the impossibility.


--Andy


technically possible. Your choosing to make it difficult :wink:

why don't you want the ranks on?


Because it would encourage even more people to spam their way to higher post counts, and higher ranks.


:?

have 2 rank

Forum newbie 0-99 posts
Forum member 100+
What do you know about map making, bitch?

natty_dread wrote:I was wrong


Top Score:2403
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class gimil
 
Posts: 8599
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:42 pm
Location: United Kingdom (Scotland)

Postby misterman10 on Tue Aug 07, 2007 12:54 pm

AndyDufresne wrote:We'd like to keep the forum 'rankless' though. That is why it is currently off. We'd have to turn it on...something we'd rather not do. Thus the impossibility.


--Andy


Well, couldn't you just make it a hidden forum, like clan forums. Once you reach the required number of posts, you become a member of the "posting clan" or whatever you want to call it, and you can then enter the flame wars. I don't think ranks would be a problem, like others stated, if there are only two ranks.
Pleasant Chaps still suck cock.

Yakuza power.
User avatar
Major misterman10
 
Posts: 9412
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 1:48 pm
Location: Out on the Pitch.

Postby treefiddy on Tue Aug 07, 2007 2:29 pm

Kaplowitz wrote:i think that its very simple


if i am correct:

just make a forum rank (for example "frequent poster") with a requirement of 100 posts. (Everyone with 100 posts or more will automatically be given the rank. i think it says it right under the avatar. This is only a rank for the forums.) Then make it so that the Flame Wars is only visible to people with that rank.

A while back, i created a forum for me and a few friends....unfortunatly it was spammed by 1000's of advertisements. We got about 100 new members a day with one message each, an advertisement.....it was horribe!

back to the subject: i think that its a good idea. Maybe say somewhere in the forum that the Flame Wars exists so that the newcommers will not be confused (or in some cases it will give them something to look forward to).

(i like to write in parenthesis)

misterman10 wrote:I don't even go to flame wars that often anymore, but with the recent events with Honibaz and others I think my idea would be good


my only two posts in the flame wars are about Honibaz.


I really don't think it's that simple. I have admin access to another board that uses the same software (might be a version behind), and while I can add ranks based on how many posts someone has, I cannot assign permissions for that rank.

I've checked permissions for individual, forum, and group. None allow me to dictate ranked users access to a private forum.

The only thing that I know of that could be automatic is to hide the forum to unregistered guests.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class treefiddy
 
Posts: 407
Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 11:37 am

Postby AndyDufresne on Tue Aug 07, 2007 3:36 pm

I think the simplest thing is to keep it the way it is. ;)


--Andy
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class AndyDufresne
 
Posts: 24935
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo

Postby The Kurgan on Tue Aug 07, 2007 8:25 pm

I agree with misterman. Too many new posters with less than 100 posts.

Great. Now I've got to get 65 more posts really soon...
User avatar
Corporal The Kurgan
 
Posts: 59
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 6:57 pm
Location: The Planet Zeist

Postby Dancing Mustard on Wed Aug 08, 2007 7:53 am

As a regular Flame Wars poster I have to say that I think there's a whole lot of merit in restricting the Flame Wars section of the forums in some way or other.
A lot of very new posters do go there, and a great number of them are immediately verbally savaged (many never post again after the experience). This is a bad experience for them, and it can only serve to make them feel less than satisfied with their CC forum experience.
On the other hand, a lot of Flame Wars regulars have spilled a lot of ink complaining about how Flame Wars is being overrun by spamming 'n00bs'. Restricting the Flame Wars forum would make them happier (so they say).

In other words:
1. New users would probably be happier if they were kept ignorant of Flame Wars until they found their feet in the community
2. Flame Wars regulars allege that they would be happier if new users weren't constantly making "I hate teh dices", and "RandomDude deadbeated, waaa!" threads.

While I appreciate Andy's sentiment that it is 'simpler' to keep things as they are, and while I see great merit in keeping the forums rank-free; I can't help but point out that there would be benefits to two seperate groups of forum users if some way of restricting/hiding the flame forums could be implemented, even if it does have to wait until the Php update.

Yes, keeping the status quo is easy; and I appreciate that Lack is very busy man. But you've got to admit that restricting Flame Wars would be beneficial two at least two seperate groups of users.

Even if it isn't going to be done (either until the update, or maybe ever), can we at least agree that doing it would be a good thing?
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!

Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
User avatar
Corporal Dancing Mustard
 
Posts: 5442
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 3:31 pm
Location: Pushing Buttons

Postby misterman10 on Wed Aug 08, 2007 10:23 am

To end all discussion, this is why my idea would be so helpful:

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=25191
Pleasant Chaps still suck cock.

Yakuza power.
User avatar
Major misterman10
 
Posts: 9412
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 1:48 pm
Location: Out on the Pitch.

Postby treefiddy on Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:41 pm

Restricting new users from the Flame Forum does not prevent older members from flaming in the other forums, which is what he is complaining about.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class treefiddy
 
Posts: 407
Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 11:37 am

Postby wicked on Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:55 pm

So many holes in this idea and reasons not to, don't have time to list them all. Not a good idea IMO.
User avatar
Major wicked
 
Posts: 15787
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:23 pm

Postby MR. Nate on Wed Aug 08, 2007 1:00 pm

treefiddy wrote:The only thing that I know of that could be automatic is to hide the forum to unregistered guests.


Actually, I joined because I was fascinated by a post. A buddy had sent me a link to the site, but I had been putting off actually joining. When I saw the forums, there was a topic on Christianity, and I was hooked. Been arguing there ever since.
AAFitz wrote:There will always be cheaters, abusive players, terrible players, and worse. But we have every right to crush them.
MeDeFe wrote:This is a forum on the internet, what do you expect?

End the Flame Wars.
User avatar
Corporal MR. Nate
 
Posts: 951
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 10:59 am
Location: Locked in the warehouse.

Postby misterman10 on Wed Aug 08, 2007 2:18 pm

wicked wrote:So many holes in this idea and reasons not to, don't have time to list them all. Not a good idea IMO.


Come on, at least tell the truth as to why you don't like it. We all know you just cant stop flaming the noobs in flame wars
Pleasant Chaps still suck cock.

Yakuza power.
User avatar
Major misterman10
 
Posts: 9412
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 1:48 pm
Location: Out on the Pitch.

Postby morph on Wed Aug 08, 2007 11:47 pm

I think it is a good idea, i see so many posts in flame wars were lil noobs jump in and only have 12 posts and complain about dice or somethin like that, they get beaten worse then a red headed step child (to borrow that phrase) and then they complain... if you restrict it, then they can get a foot hold in the community and maybe learn the ropes, not to mention if they stick around long enough they will gain friends who might post a lot in flame wars which can help if they start to get flammed not to mention it will stop stupid posts in flame forums that are just there to draw noobs in cuz it says their names..

im not sayin right now that it should be done, but in the long run it might be worth it if the programs for the site could allow it...
I am slowly going insane, thanks to Jay, Brandon (the douch tool) and sammy gags for his pic of bubba....
User avatar
Cadet morph
 
Posts: 1106
Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 5:54 pm
Location: Behind you, no stop turnin in circles your makin me dizzy

Postby Ronaldinho on Sat Aug 11, 2007 10:39 am

treefiddy wrote:My suggestion would be to change the name to "Swear Wars". There normally isn't any good flaming going on; just people swearing as much as possible.




Change it Ronaldinho's house. Simple.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant Ronaldinho
 
Posts: 3069
Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 5:35 pm
Location: Dorset, England.


Return to Archived Suggestions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users