NOHIBBERTNO wrote:Nephilim wrote:
what's this bragging you two are speaking of?
Really? There are so many threads dedicated to bragging! Even in callouts where people look down on you because you have fewer points than them. It happpens. I mean i dont have that many points, but thats mainly due to lack of games. Im sure if I spend time on here and work at it one day I will reach rank of captain and then I will see if I have to be as arrogant and downgrading as some people on the forums seem to be.....
#1: i definitely agree, JR is a braggart. and he creates lots of threads to make himself feel better. but so what? this is one guy; you're saying he's ruining CC for you? i won't go as far as comic boy and call you a hater, but i do think you sound like a little like a whiner. do you have a pet peeve with braggarts? if so, it probably indicates something about yourself.
#2: robin's "best singles scores" thread? here's the thing mate. many, many people consider singles games as the best and truest test of skill. in this view, team games are easier. so these folks would like to have a record of what the scoreboard would look like w/ no team games. i personally play a lot of team games, so this view is in some sense disparaging to me and other players like me. but that's ok. it doesn't make me feel bad.
and from another perspective: if you think this method of keeping score is arrogant, then logically you must assume that any scorekeeping, or determination of winners and losers, is also arrogant. if you would like to follow your reasoning to its ultimate conclusion, then i invite you to leave CC, b/c it is a gaming site w/ a winner and one or more losers in every game. however, if winning and competition equal arrogance in your mind, and make you feel bad, then leaving CC will not solve your problem.
#3: in the callout thread in question and many other scenarios, high score players set a minimum score for games. i cannot speak for anyone but myself, but i think many folks would agree w/ the following reason for doing so. it's not b/c of arrogance. it's b/c a series of clan or individual challenge matches, or even a regular bunch of games among certain groups, should not force the players involved to risk an inordinate amount of their points. thus, minimum limits are created so that if a loss occurs (and we all know luck and not merely skill is involved here), it does not hurt the losing players too badly. if you can't handle this and it seems arrogant, let me suggest something: deal with it. if you want to play w/ the big boys, dedicate a month to increasing your score so you can get up there. if you can't get there, you don't deserve to play. if you think it's stupid, useless, and unfair that things work this way, then you may have a fundamental misunderstanding of the concept of competition.
one more thing: if you think it's stupid that people care so much about points, and that we should all just be playing for fun, i offer these thoughts. first off, a lot of us think winning is fun. period. but more importantly, when one sets minimum point limits for their games, one is attempting to insure that no idiotic gameplay will occur. this is done to increase the level of fun in the game, b/c idiotic moves ruin many games. and in fact, those that ruin games w/ bad moves are often people below certain relative point levels. stick around long enough, and you'll learn that is how things work. so again, if you want to get a reputation that you can play, so you can get some games w/ the best players, you gotta put in the work and pay your dues. cheers, good luck, and suck it up cupcake!